On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
Hi Joe,
I've often had a similar thought myself of whether a single 'osclient'
would be better. I see consistency across all clients as the bare minimum,
and a single client as an interesting option to explore. Thanks for
driving this Dean, I look
We should definitely push to consolidate common code for clients! We can use
either glanceclient or quantumclient as a prototype. As for the auth code
specifically, it can be replaced with something as simple as this:
https://github.com/openstack/python-glanceclient/blob/master/glanceclient
. As for the auth code
specifically, it can be replaced with something as simple as this:
https://github.com/openstack/python-glanceclient/blob/master/glanceclient/shell.py#L119
On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
Very cool guys!
We'll be reworking the Quantum client in a similar
can
use either glanceclient or quantumclient as a prototype. As for the auth
code specifically, it can be replaced with something as simple as this:
https://github.com/openstack/python-glanceclient/blob/master/glanceclient/shell.py#L119
On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
Very
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Brian Waldon
brian.wal...@rackspace.com wrote:
to be a drop-in replacement for the existing client that lives in Glance,
but a complete rewrite with a shiny new interface that maintains
feature-parity.
Coolness! I've added it to the command mapping in
-common)? It seems like much
of what is in
https://github.com/openstack/python-glanceclient/tree/master/glanceclient/commonwould
be useful across all projects. The same could likely be said for the
basic keystone code required by a client (e.g.,
https://github.com/openstack/python-novaclient/blob
is interested in playing with the new client, here it is:
https://github.com/openstack/python-glanceclient. You can either yell at me or
use Gerrit to fix anything I may have overlooked. Thanks!
Brian Waldon
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net
7 matches
Mail list logo
