On 01/24/2012 12:35 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
So some of the issues after doing a comparison might be the following:
For RHEL6 + EPEL a lot of the packages are there (yippe!).
Yes there has been lots of work in this area. See here for details:
On 01/17/2012 08:20 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
My goals were/are/(may continue to be, haha) the following:
1. Add in enough abstraction so that you can look at how each component is
installed/uninstalled/started/stopped by looking at a single file (maybe 2
files)
2. Have the ability to
Ok, I was using 6.1.
Is there any reason that it isn't available for 6.1 and 6.2 (technically?)
It would be nice to not have to distinguish (6.1 vs 6.2) in the new devstack v2.
My guess is the list I created then was using the 6.1 repo, which may not have
those pkgs (darn it).
On 01/24/2012 06:39 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Ok, I was using 6.1.
Is there any reason that it isn’t available for 6.1 and 6.2 (technically?)
Well it's not been tested on 6.1 currently.
One issue with 6.1 is the version of libvirt is too old I think.
cheers,
Pádraig.
Ok dokie,
Let me see what I can do to get a 6.2 system. Thx.
On 1/24/12 1:53 PM, Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com wrote:
On 01/24/2012 06:39 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Ok, I was using 6.1.
Is there any reason that it isn't available for 6.1 and 6.2 (technically?)
Well it's not been tested on
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Note rhel6 isn’t fully there yet. But in progress ;)
Anyone working on fedora version of it? Any known major issues
preventing it? I quickly added fedora labels next to RHEL6 in the
code, and added db.py stuff. By
Hmmm, what was the error for rabbitmq?
U should get a trace hopefully (with some stderr/stdout).
Darn commands that are supposed to be distro independent I guess really aren't.
Hmmph.
PWD_CMD = ['rabbitmqctl', 'change_password', 'guest']
-Josh
On 1/23/12 5:50 AM, ikke i...@iki.fi wrote:
No major issues preventing fedora.
In fact we might have to get packages from fedora (dependencies) and get those
into rhel (if possible).
Or create something like grid dynamics has (a dependency repo) and use that
for development purposes for rhel *like* systems (possibly hosted by yahoo??)
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
No major issues preventing fedora.
In fact we might have to get packages from fedora (dependencies) and get
those into rhel (if possible).
Or create something like grid dynamics has (a dependency repo) and use that
Working on getting that list committed ;) Hopefully today or tomorrow.
On 1/23/12 10:46 AM, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
No major issues preventing fedora.
In fact we might have to get packages from fedora
So some of the issues after doing a comparison might be the following:
For RHEL6 + EPEL a lot of the packages are there (yippe!).
https://github.com/yahoo/Openstack-Devstack2/tree/master/conf/pkgs
Some issues which the EPEL people's might be able to resolve:
db.json
Seems ok.
general.json
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?)
Sweet, we are working on getting functionality for rhel and ubuntu up and going
and then hopefully some docs (and code comments) can be added in so other
people can know exactly what is going on (without the typical go read the
code
@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Joshua Harlow
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 9:21 PM
To: Mark McLoughlin
Cc: Andy Smith; openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?)
Sweet, we are working on getting functionality for rhel and ubuntu up and going
and then hopefully some
Note rhel6 isn't fully there yet. But in progress ;)
On 1/20/12 7:33 PM, Sean Roberts sean...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Sweet. Will do next week.
~sean
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:25 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?) For those that want
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Harlow wrote:
My goals were/are/(may continue to be, haha) the following:
...
3. Have the ability to have pkg/pip installation (and definition
separate from the main code, already starting to be done), in more
than 1 distro.
* This allows
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Please check it out @ https://github.com/yahoo/Openstack-Devstack2
To stave off confusion it might be a good idea to rename this from 2
to alt or similar, or even as forks tend to in the WordPress world
ultimate or
In this case, I must take a step forward and start planing Debian support asap.
Ghe Rivero
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Serious kudos to you guys on this part. IMHO, having a devstack that
supports multiple distros is a massive win for OpenStack
Sweet, we are working on getting functionality for rhel and ubuntu up and going
and then hopefully some docs (and code comments) can be added in so other
people can know exactly what is going on (without the typical go read the
code response). But the idea is the following:
Have a set of json
Sure, this was just a name I picked. It can be renamed to anything, works for
me. I just needed a name for a github project (and it seemed to make sense at
the time, haha).
-Josh
On 1/18/12 9:10 AM, Lloyd Dewolf lloydost...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Joshua Harlow
devstack-pi (play on version numbers and python)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Sure, this was just a name I picked. It can be renamed to anything, works
for me. I just needed a name for a github project (and it seemed to make
sense at the time,
I +3.14159265 that!
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Jesse Andrews anotherje...@gmail.com wrote:
devstack-pi (play on version numbers and python)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Sure, this was just a name I picked. It can be renamed to
Brilliant!
From: openstack-bounces+garyk=radware@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+garyk=radware@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Joshua Harlow
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 9:21 PM
To: Mark McLoughlin
Cc: Andy Smith; openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new
Looks cool :)
I've been trying to plant the seed of switching devstack to python (heavily
utilizing fabric and cuisine) in my team's head for a while now.
We are heavily dependent on devstack for our development and testing
workflows so it would be a pretty big decision for us to switch tools,
Thx,
Yes we haven't been 100% doing the style stuff yet (which is ok I think for
now).
My idea for not using an underlying fabric was just to keep it as simple as
possible (but not to simple). Not always an easy choice :-)
On 1/17/12 10:56 AM, Andy Smith andys...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks cool
I think a goal would be to have easy fabric integration.
Right now our fabric scripts for devstack look like:
@task
@parallel
def stop():
Kill devstack and all VMs running
run(killall -9 screen || true)
run(screen -wipe || true)
# note we can probably remove this once devstack
My goals were/are/(may continue to be, haha) the following:
1. Add in enough abstraction so that you can look at how each component is
installed/uninstalled/started/stopped by looking at a single file (maybe 2
files)
2. Have the ability to start/stop in different manners (not always
@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Jesse Andrews
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 11:19 AM
To: Joshua Harlow
Cc: Andy Smith; Ken Thomas; openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?)
I think a goal would be to have easy fabric integration.
Right now our fabric scripts
, 2012 11:19 AM
To: Joshua Harlow
Cc: Andy Smith; Ken Thomas; openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new devstack (v2?)
I think a goal would be to have easy fabric integration.
Right now our fabric scripts for devstack look like:
@task
@parallel
def stop():
Kill devstack
: openstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Jesse Andrews
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 11:19 AM
To: Joshua Harlow
Cc: Andy Smith; Ken Thomas; openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Proposal for new
I think this can be done, sure.
Its basically abstracting away how actually execute commands (ie going throw
fabric instead of the shell...).
Which I think can be accomplished.
On 1/17/12 11:18 AM, Jesse Andrews anotherje...@gmail.com wrote:
I think a goal would be to have easy fabric
30 matches
Mail list logo
