On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 21:36 -0400, Chuck Short wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there is an aversion to remove ietadm support
from folsom.
I have checked the iscsitarget sourceforge site and there
hasn't been a new version of iscsitarget in about 2 years. The kernel
module doesn't compile
Lloyd Dewolf wrote:
In my fantasies for the Grizzly release it would start something like:
A. Grizzly Summit
B. From the summit the Tech Committee PTL have community consensus
on the overarching goal for the release and the projects' goals.
Articulated online in user friendly manner.
Lloyd Dewolf wrote:
A. Grizzly Summit
B. From the summit the Tech Committee PTL have community consensus
on the overarching goal for the release and the projects' goals.
Articulated online in user friendly manner.
C. Webinar / OpenStack User Groups get a presentation on the release
Duncan McGreggor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org
wrote:
Speaking of that process, it's broken and needs to be fixed ASAP, since
we'll have the PTL elections soon. The current nomination process,
especially, is broken: it requires way too much
Hi
As for consumer cancellation notifications - I need to remember when
exactly they happen in an HA setup. Maybe you're right.
With the HA active/active configuration clients always consume from the Master
node so we can have a scenario where the queue is declared on a Slave node but
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
OpenStack Security Advisory: 2012-010
CVE: CVE-2012-3426
Date: July 27, 2012
Title: Various Keystone token expiration issues
Impact: Medium
Reporter: Derek Higgins
Products: Keystone
Affects: Essex, Folsom
Description:
Derek Higgins reported
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Lloyd Dewolf wrote:
In my fantasies for the Grizzly release it would start something like:
A. Grizzly Summit
B. From the summit the Tech Committee PTL have community consensus
on the overarching goal for the
On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Mark Collier wrote:
I do wonder if it would make sense to gather user feedback and goals before
the summit, like the day (or week) before, to help provide some priorities
(from their perspective) to consider going into the summit.
This does seem valuable,
I worry that if the users meet just a day before the conference, we cannot
consolidate the input. Having the time to work out that a large share of the
users are blocked on a specific problem is an important input to the
conference. A single user may have specific problems to be addressed but
I do wonder if it would make sense to gather user feedback and goals before
the summit, like the day (or week) before, to help provide some priorities
(from their perspective) to consider going into the summit.
This does seem valuable, although keep in mind that most users are a release
You can use a token to get a token. Look at the authenticate code in
keystone/service.py
Have the user initially get a non-tenant specific token. Pass that in the
x-auth header to POST /tokens/ along with a tenantid and you will get a new
one scoped to the tenant
Ah. This is perfect,
Hi guys, i saw the plugin to cleanup vms on xenserver, is this available
from kvm+libvirt ? Also, i saw on the code that the zombie state its
based on instance.updated_at , what actions over the server update this
field on the db ?
Regards
Lean
___
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@rackspace.comwrote:
We definitely want to have some means for nominees to provide details on
what they would bring to the Board, and can easily add a section or
statement to their current bios. We are just starting by contacting each
Hi,
I am trying to figure out the technology that openstack uses when multiple
VM's having the* same *base image (OS) are provisioned on a physical server.
Does it use as many copy as the number of VM's or does it use the same base
image and then copy on write.
I need to understand the complete
Hi,
I am trying to figure out the technology that openstack uses when multiple
VM's having the* same *base image (OS) are provisioned on a physical server.
Does it use as many copy as the number of VM's or does it use the same base
image and then copy on write.
I need to understand the complete
On 07/27/2012 11:18 AM, Ryan Lane wrote:
Users definitely need a better mechanism to give feedback early, and
to have their current production issues handled. The start of the
design summit is good, but it would also be nice to collect feedback
after the summit as well.
Do you think you can
On Jul 26, 2012, at 6:05 PM, Lloyd Dewolf wrote:
Who receives email sent to secret...@openstack.org? Sorry, I missed
who is the acting secretary. It might be nice to include the person's
name on the page:
http://www.openstack.org/community/openstack-foundation-board-2012-election-candidates/
Hi,
From: openstack-bounces+atul.jha=csscorp@lists.launchpad.net
[openstack-bounces+atul.jha=csscorp@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of Mark
Collier [mark.coll...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 10:48 PM
To: Lloyd Dewolf
Cc: OpenStack
Sorry if it's already been made clear somewhere, but I'm unsure for
what term these individuals are being elected? The bylaws say that the
election happens each year in the first two weeks of January, so is
this an election to fill the seats until the first ordinary election
in January?
--
Soren
On Jul 27, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
Sorry if it's already been made clear somewhere, but I'm unsure for
what term these individuals are being elected? The bylaws say that the
election happens each year in the first two weeks of January, so is
this an election to fill the seats
Highlights of the week
Join The OpenStack Foundation
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2012/07/join-the-openstack-foundation/
The OpenStack community has worked hard since the announcement of
intention to establish an OpenStack Foundation in October 2011. We've
come to the point
Nope, that's perfectly clear, I just failed to spot it. Thanks.
Best regards, Soren.
Sent from my phone. Please pardon my brevity.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :
Hi,
In our use case, there is a need to provide project-specific instance
type. Meaning that this instance type is only visible and available
for several projects. It's an idea kind of like private image concept
for Glance project.
Has this proposal been discussed before somewhere? Any comments?
Hi all -
I'd like to invite Ying Chun Guo (Daisy) to join our team, she has
worked both on doc bugs and on a process for translating
documentation.
Hi Daisy -
I hope you'll accept the invitation to join openstack-doc-core. Your
contributions have been extremely helpful.
Thanks,
Anne
--
Mailing
at 20120727
Title: quantal_folsom_nova_trunk
General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/quantal_folsom_nova_trunk/242/Project:quantal_folsom_nova_trunkDate of build:Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:31:54 -0400Build duration:12 minBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt
Title: precise_folsom_deploy
General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_deploy/134/Project:precise_folsom_deployDate of build:Sat, 28 Jul 2012 01:16:48 -0400Build duration:14 minBuild cause:Started by user adamBuilt on:masterHealth
27 matches
Mail list logo
