Re: [Openstack] multiple public ip

2013-01-31 Thread Umar Draz
Hi Vish, Assign direct/static IP address to Instance something like bridge rather than nating is possible? Same like vSphare Best Regards, Umar On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.comwrote: On Jan 30, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Umar Draz unix...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Openstack] multiple public ip

2013-01-31 Thread Balamurugan V G
Perhaps you can use the multiple flat network model shown here: http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-network/admin/content/use_cases_multi_flat.html The TenantC VM1 gets two IPs, one from each net. But in this case each net is in a different subnet. May be you can create the nets for the

Re: [Openstack] Configuring instances during first boot

2013-01-31 Thread Benoit ML
Hello, Thank you for your answers, Effectively I did'nt see this point ... I must now think about it ... I hope that copy ganlance image to cinder bootable volume will answer to this probleme. That's because in our hand made cloud, we use cobbler/kickstart to deploy every VM ... so no resize

Re: [Openstack] List of Cinder compatible devices

2013-01-31 Thread Avishay Traeger
openstack-bounces+avishay=il.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote on 01/31/2013 12:37:07 AM: From: Tom Fifield fifie...@unimelb.edu.au To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net, Date: 01/31/2013 12:38 AM Subject: Re: [Openstack] List of Cinder compatible devices Sent by:

Re: [Openstack] List of Cinder compatible devices

2013-01-31 Thread Sébastien Han
Just added some stuff about RBD where E refers to Essex. -- Regards, Sébastien Han. On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Avishay Traeger avis...@il.ibm.com wrote: openstack-bounces+avishay=il.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote on 01/31/2013 12:37:07 AM: From: Tom Fifield fifie...@unimelb.edu.au

Re: [Openstack] List of Cinder compatible devices

2013-01-31 Thread Shake Chen
I think need add Vendor storage series. like not all the EMC storage would support Cinder. On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Sébastien Han han.sebast...@gmail.comwrote: Just added some stuff about RBD where E refers to Essex. -- Regards, Sébastien Han. On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:20

Re: [Openstack] List of Cinder compatible devices

2013-01-31 Thread Koert van der Veer
In that case, it is probably best to transpose the table, with series included, the number of products will yield too many columns to be workable. Also: Do blank spaces indicate not supported or unknown? koert On 01/31/2013 04:47 PM, Shake Chen wrote: I think need add Vendor storage series.

Re: [Openstack] List of Cinder compatible devices

2013-01-31 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Koert van der Veer ko...@cloudvps.comwrote: In that case, it is probably best to transpose the table, with series included, the number of products will yield too many columns to be workable. Also: Do blank spaces indicate not supported or unknown? koert

Re: [Openstack] multiple public ip

2013-01-31 Thread Caitlin Bestler
The doc cited explains how this works with Quantum, but not with Openstack. VM1 is shown as being accessible via two VNICs, that implies that their is a Hypervisor that is available by two NICs. How does Nova know that this is in fact one Hypervisor and not two? Similar question must be

[Openstack] Multiple public ips with Quantum

2013-01-31 Thread tra26
Hello, I am trying to implement a scenario where a group of instances have multiple public ips each on the same network. Reasons for this are legacy related, other tenants should operate like with regular floating ips. I've tried to create multiple vifs on an instance with the same network, but

Re: [Openstack] nova ceph integration

2013-01-31 Thread Sébastien Han
Try to have a look at the boot from volume feature. Basically the disk base of your instance is an RBD volume from Ceph. Something will be remain in /var/lib/nova/instances but it's only the kvm xml file. http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/rbd-openstack/?highlight=openstack Cheers! -- Regards,

Re: [Openstack] nova ceph integration

2013-01-31 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Sébastien Han han.sebast...@gmail.comwrote: Try to have a look at the boot from volume feature. Basically the disk base of your instance is an RBD volume from Ceph. Something will be remain in /var/lib/nova/instances but it's only the kvm xml file.

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] DevStack setup on XenServer

2013-01-31 Thread Antonio Tirri
Thank you Bob. I expanded the RAM of my Virtual Machine, but the execution of the script show me this error: ++ dirname /root/devstack/openstack-dev-devstack-f49c410/tools/xen/scripts/install-os-vpx.sh + thisdir=/root/devstack/openstack-dev-devstack-f49c410/tools/xen/scripts + '[' '' ']' + '['

Re: [Openstack] Horizon and open connections

2013-01-31 Thread Gabriel Hurley
Even though I don't experience this problem (and prefer nginx to apache), I can help diagnose: Connections ending up in CLOSE_WAIT means that the socket isn't being fully closed, which is controlled by the client lib (in this case python-keystoneclient) which uses httplib2 under the hood.

Re: [Openstack] nova ceph integration

2013-01-31 Thread Sébastien Han
+1 John Since CephFS is not production ready what you can do is map RBD device to all of your compute nodes and then mount them in /var/lib/nova/instances. The downside of this that you have way more IOPS since you only have one RBD per compute node for EVERY VMs that will end up into this

Re: [Openstack] Add NIC to running instance?

2013-01-31 Thread Édouard Thuleau
Hi Yaguang, Could you restore the review please ? Because I cannot push the rebased code on an abandoned review and only the review owner is authorized to do that. Regards, Édouard. On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Yaguang Tang yagu...@canonical.com wrote: Hi, I am glad you have make this

Re: [Openstack] Horizon and open connections

2013-01-31 Thread Rick Jones
On 01/31/2013 11:59 AM, Gabriel Hurley wrote: Even though I don't experience this problem (and prefer nginx to apache), I can help diagnose: Connections ending up in CLOSE_WAIT means that the socket isn't being fully closed, which is controlled by the client lib (in this case

Re: [Openstack] nova ceph integration

2013-01-31 Thread Razique Mahroua
Speaking of which guys,anything particular stability-wise regarding Ceph within OpenStack. It's officially not production-ready, yet it's often that solution that comes out when we are looking for data clustering.GlusterFS...yah or nay? Razique Mahroua-Nuage Corazique.mahr...@gmail.comTel: +33 9

Re: [Openstack] Centos : yum install openstack-quantum-openvswitch

2013-01-31 Thread Greg Chavez
Hey guys, I'm having the same problem on RHEL 6.3. Did a search on openvswitch at RHN and it came up with nothing. Where is it? Fedora's core repos? On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:15 PM, George Lekatsas glekats...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, following the installation instruction and yum install

Re: [Openstack] Centos : yum install openstack-quantum-openvswitch

2013-01-31 Thread Greg Chavez
Disco: https://github.com/homework/openvswitch/blob/master/INSTALL.RHEL. And then, in my case, I'm just adding it to a local mrepo configuration. That really sucks, though. C'mon EPEL. Seriously, this is one of the hardest application deployments I've ever done. It's actually worse than

Re: [Openstack] nova ceph integration

2013-01-31 Thread Josh Durgin
Ceph has been officially production ready for block (rbd) and object storage (radosgw) for a while. It's just the file system that isn't ready yet: http://ceph.com/docs/master/faq/#is-ceph-production-quality Josh On 01/31/2013 01:23 PM, Razique Mahroua wrote: Speaking of which guys, anything

[Openstack] netns help

2013-01-31 Thread Paras pradhan
Hi all, How does one delete netns? I followed the following link to create requited net,subnet, router in which dhcp is disabled https://raw.github.com/EmilienM/openstack-folsom-guide/master/scripts/quantum-networking.sh but I still see as : root@folsom-network:~# ip netns

[Openstack] [keystone] Why are we returing such a big payload in validate token?

2013-01-31 Thread Ali, Haneef
Hi, As of now v3 validateToken response has tokens, service catalog, users, project , roles and domains. (i.e) Except for groups we are returning everything. We also discussed about the possibility of 100s of endpoints. ValidateToken is supposed to be a high frequency call .This is

Re: [Openstack] [keystone] Why are we returing such a big payload in validate token?

2013-01-31 Thread Jay Pipes
+1000 On 01/31/2013 07:44 PM, Ali, Haneef wrote: Hi, As of now v3 validateToken response has “tokens, service catalog, users, project , roles and domains. (i.e) Except for groups we are returning everything. We also discussed about the possibility of 100s of endpoints.

Re: [Openstack] [keystone] Why are we returing such a big payload in validate token?

2013-01-31 Thread Adam Young
On 01/31/2013 07:44 PM, Ali, Haneef wrote: Hi, As of now v3 validateToken response has tokens, service catalog, users, project , roles and domains. (i.e) Except for groups we are returning everything. We also discussed about the possibility of 100s of endpoints. ValidateToken is

Re: [Openstack] [keystone] Why are we returing such a big payload in validate token?

2013-01-31 Thread Ali, Haneef
Isn't signed token an optional feature? If so validateToken is going to be a high frequency call. Also Service Catalog is a constant, the services can cache it. It doesn't need to be part of validateToken. Thanks Haneef From: openstack-bounces+haneef.ali=hp@lists.launchpad.net

Re: [Openstack] [keystone] Why are we returing such a big payload in validate token?

2013-01-31 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Jan 31, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Ali, Haneef haneef@hp.com wrote: Isn’t signed token an optional feature? If so validateToken is going to be a high frequency call. Also “Service Catalog” is a constant, the services can cache it. It doesn’t need to be part of validateToken. Service

Re: [Openstack] [keystone] Why are we returing such a big payload in validate token?

2013-01-31 Thread Adam Young
On 01/31/2013 10:57 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: On Jan 31, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Ali, Haneef haneef@hp.com mailto:haneef@hp.com wrote: Isn’t signed token an optional feature? If so validateToken is going to be a high frequency call. Also “Service Catalog” is a constant, the

Re: [Openstack] multiple public ip

2013-01-31 Thread Balamurugan V G
The doc cited explains how this works with Quantum, but not with Openstack. -As of Folsom, you have the option of using Quantum for networking or Nova Network and I believe Nova network will eventually be deprecated. VM1 is shown as being accessible via two VNICs, that implies that their is a

[Openstack] openvswitch rpm on RHEL 6.3 frustration

2013-01-31 Thread Greg Chavez
On RHEL 6.3, with EPEL repos, we have openstack-quantum-openvswitch.noarch. It requires openvswitch.x86_64, which isn't provided by either RHEL channels or EPEL! So I tracked down the openvswitch source (not that hard) , and after a few hours of battling various compilation erros, ended up with

Re: [Openstack] openvswitch rpm on RHEL 6.3 frustration

2013-01-31 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Hi Greg, I can install openvswitch-1.7.3-1.x86_64.rpm on CentOS6.3 if specifying with kmod-openkmod-openvswitch-1.7.3-1.el6.x86_64.rpm: # rpm -ivh openvswitch-1.7.3-1.x86_64.rpm kmod-openvswitch-1.7.3-1.el6.x86_64.rpm Preparing...###

Re: [Openstack] openvswitch rpm on RHEL 6.3 frustration

2013-01-31 Thread Greg Chavez
Ken'ich, Arigato gozaimasu. Where did you get that rpm? On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jpwrote: Hi Greg, I can install openvswitch-1.7.3-1.x86_64.rpm on CentOS6.3 if specifying with kmod-openkmod-openvswitch-1.7.3-1.el6.x86_64.rpm: # rpm -ivh

Re: [Openstack] openvswitch rpm on RHEL 6.3 frustration

2013-01-31 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Hi Greg, On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 02:25:00 -0500 Greg Chavez greg.cha...@gmail.com wrote: Arigato gozaimasu. Where did you get that rpm? Dou itashimashite, I built the rpm files from source file by the following way: # wget http://openvswitch.org/releases/openvswitch-1.7.3.tar.gz # tar -zxvf

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_nova_trunk #579

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: precise_grizzly_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_nova_trunk/579/Project:precise_grizzly_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 31 Jan 2013 05:31:13 -0500Build duration:3 min 32 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: precise_grizzly_python-cinderclient_trunk #31

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
cause:Started by user Chuck ShortBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 1 out of the last 5 builds failed.80ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 2281 lines...]Finished at 20130131-0736Build needed 00:01:06, 1660k disc spaceINFO:root:Uploading package

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_nova_trunk #580

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: precise_grizzly_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_nova_trunk/580/Project:precise_grizzly_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:31:11 -0500Build duration:4 min 21 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_nova_trunk #581

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: precise_grizzly_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_nova_trunk/581/Project:precise_grizzly_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:01:13 -0500Build duration:3 min 40 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_grizzly_glance_trunk #99

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
at 20130131-1210Build needed 00:07:27, 20012k disc spaceERROR:root:Error occurred during package creation/build: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: raring_grizzly_glance_trunk #112

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: raring_grizzly_glance_trunk General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/raring_grizzly_glance_trunk/112/Project:raring_grizzly_glance_trunkDate of build:Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:01:09 -0500Build duration:14 minBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_grizzly_swift_trunk #100

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
at 20130131-1603Build needed 00:00:00

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_nova_trunk #582

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: precise_grizzly_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_nova_trunk/582/Project:precise_grizzly_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:04:14 -0500Build duration:3 min 44 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_nova_trunk #583

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: precise_grizzly_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_nova_trunk/583/Project:precise_grizzly_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:20:25 -0500Build duration:4 min 46 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: precise_grizzly_swift_trunk #101

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: precise_grizzly_swift_trunk General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_swift_trunk/101/Project:precise_grizzly_swift_trunkDate of build:Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:01:16 -0500Build duration:4 min 4 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: raring_grizzly_swift_trunk #98

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: raring_grizzly_swift_trunk General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/raring_grizzly_swift_trunk/98/Project:raring_grizzly_swift_trunkDate of build:Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:01:15 -0500Build duration:4 min 25 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: raring_grizzly_cinder_trunk #119

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
at 20130131-2037Build needed 00:02:59, 23324k

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_grizzly_cinder_trunk #120

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
at 20130131-2043Build needed 00:04:05

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_cinder_trunk #121

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
at 20130131

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: raring_grizzly_cinder_trunk #120

2013-01-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
at 20130131