+1000 Excellent
I am really excited about having a heavily tested proper client-side
layer. This
is very needed, given that amount of javascript in Horizon is rising.
The hacked
together libraries in JQuery, that are there now are very hard to orient
in and will
be hard to maintain in the
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Pedro Roque Marques
pedro.r.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
Radomir,
An extra issue that i don't believe you've covered so far is about comment
ownership. I've just read an email on the list that follows a pattern that
i've heard many complaints about:
-1
Nicolas Barcet wrote:
[...]
To enable this, we are proposing that the commit text of a patch may
include a
sponsored-by: sponsorname
line which could be used by various tools to report on these commits.
[...]
This proposal raises several questions.
(1) Is it a good idea to allow
+1 also.
I spent less than half the time on my first fix (so far) understanding the
problem, reproducing it, coding it and learning about the code review
system.
Much more than half the time was spent on reverse engineering existing
tests to be able to add new ones (which had to use features not
To be clear, that was a +1 for Mark's suggestion:
In cases like that, I'd be of a mind to go +2 Awesome! Thanks for
catching this! It would be great to have a unit test for this, but it's
clear the current code is broken so I'm fine with merging the fix
without a test. You could say it's now
Hi Ajay,
Ajay Phogat letsgot...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, all!
I am a student of Computer Science and have learnt some basics of OpenStack
for implementing one of my projects in college. While learning about
OpenStack, I came to know about the metering project, ceilometer.
I would love to
On 11/10/2013 11:53 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
A random off-the-top-of-my-head use case would be to subscribe to
events from creating or changing objects in a particular Swift
account or container. This would allow much more efficient listings
in Horizon for active containers (and may
On 11/12/2013 12:09 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Sounds reasonable, but just one caveat ...
Notifications can either be disabled in the service config (e.g. by setting
the notifier_strategy to noop in the glance config) or mis-configured (e.g.
by not overriding control_exchange name in the cinder
Hi Angus,
that is an interesting idea. Since you mentioned the software config
proposal in the beginning as a related item, I guess you are trying to
solve some software config related issues with Mistral. So a few questions,
looking at this purely from a software config perspect:
Are you
Welcome Joris!
I would enjoy helping you get started contributing to OpenStack. Are you
on IRC yet? Talking on IRC is our most efficient means of communication.
On the Freenode network I suggest joining #openstack, #openstack-dev,
#openstack-101, #openstack-meeting, #openstack-meeting-alt as
Hi everyone,
We'll be skipping the project/release status meeting today (usually
happening at 21:00 UTC). Most PTLs are just back from the Design Summit
week and catching up, and some are still in vacation, so there is little
point in having one today. For this week they should work on filing,
I don't know what's all involved in putting out a release for
sqlalchemy-migrate but if there is a way that I can help, please let me
know. I'll try to catch dripton in IRC today.
As for CI with DB2, it's in the blueprint as a work item, I just don't
know enough about the infra side of
On 02/11/13 05:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Christopher Armstrong's message of 2013-11-01 11:34:56 -0700:
Vijendar and I are trying to figure out if we need to set the resource_id
of a resource to None when it's being deleted.
This is done in a few resources, but not everywhere. To me
On 12 нояб. 2013 г., at 19:04, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
If yes, is there a way for passing data around - e.g. output produced by
one software config step is input for another software config step?
Thomas, yes, we’re planning to have a data flow mechanism similar to
On 11 November 2013 12:04, Alexander Kuznetsov akuznet...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi all,
While studying Hadoop performance in a virtual environment, I found an
interesting problem with Nova scheduling. In OpenStack cluster, we have
overcommit policy, allowing to put on one compute more vms than
Hi,
I am attempting to extract the consensus we reached in all the design
summit sessions here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IcehouseNovaSummit
Help to verify that I have not miss-represented things would be very
gratefully received.
John
___
You can consider having a separate host aggregate for Hadoop, and use a
combination of AggregateInstanceExtraSpecFilter (with a special flavor
mapped to this host aggregate) and AggregateCoreFilter (overriding
cpu_allocation_ratio for this host aggregate to be 1).
Regards,
Alex
From:
Thinking in that direction, the Trove team had a design session about
current status of agent in project.
Just take a look https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TroveGuestAgents
With best regards,
Ilya Sviridov
http://www.mirantis.ru/
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Igor Marnat
Thanks, Sean! I am on east coast, so Monday 20:00 UTC time and Thursday 21:00
UTC time work great for me. Hopefully we can find a timeslot working for
everybody!
Shixiong
On Nov 11, 2013, at 1:23 PM, Collins, Sean (Contractor)
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at
Ilya,
that's cool! Mind if Murano and Savanna teams join the same etherpad?
Regards,
Igor Marnat
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Ilya Sviridov isviri...@mirantis.comwrote:
Thinking in that direction, the Trove team had a design session about
current status of agent in project.
Just take
Hi neutron and lbaas folks!
We have a plenty of work to do for the Icehouse, so I suggest we start
having regular weekly meetings to track our progress.
Let's meet at #neutron-lbaas on Thursday, 14 at 15-00 UTC
The agenda for the meeting is the following:
1. Blueprint list to be proposed for the
Hello,
Solum meets Tuesdays at 1600 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt (formerly in #solum)
Note: Due to the Nov 3rd change in Daylight Savings Time, this now happens at
08:00 US/Pacific (starts in about 50 minutes from now)
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum
Regards,
Adrian
Hello,
Solum meets Tuesdays at 1600 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt (formerly in #solum)
Note: Due to the Nov 3rd change in Daylight Savings Time, this now happens at
08:00 US/Pacific (starts in about 45 minutes from now)
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum
Regards,
Adrian
FYI, by default Openstack overcommit CPU 1:16, meaning it can host 16 times
number of cores it possesses. As mentioned Alex, you can change it by enabling
AggregateCoreFilter in nova.conf:
scheduler_default_filters = list of your filters, adding AggregateCoreFilter
here
and modifying the
Hi all,
Currently, many modules from openstack.common package register
oslo.config options. And this is completely OK while these modules are
copied to target projects using update.py script.
But consider the situation, when we decide to split a new library from
oslo-incubator - oslo.spam - and
Igor, better to create another one to track the requirements for such agent
framework as far as this etherpad is
official result of design session.
With best regards,
Ilya Sviridov
http://www.mirantis.ru/
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Igor Marnat imar...@mirantis.com wrote:
Ilya,
that's
I agree that it would be better to hold it on a channel with a bot which
keeps logs.
I just found that most convenient slots are already taken on both
openstack-meeting and openstack-meeting-alt.
14-00 UTC is convenient for me so I'd like to hear other opinions.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Tue, Nov
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like to get some sort of consensus on this before I start working on it.
Now that people are back from Summit, what would you propose?
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original Message -
From: Solly Ross
On 12/11/13 14:59, Alex Heneveld wrote:
One minor suggestion is to consider using a special character (eg $)
rather than reserved keywords. As I understand it the keywords are only
interpreted when they exactly match the value of a key in a map, so it
is already unlikely to be problematic.
On 11/12/2013 8:09 AM, John Griffith wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like to get some sort of consensus on this before I start working on it.
Now that people are back from Summit, what would you propose?
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original
Hi,
In Telecom Cloud applications, the requirements for every application are
different. One application might need 10 CPUs, 10GB RAM and no disk. Another
application might need 1 CPU, 512MB RAM and 100GB Disk. This varied
requirements directly affects the flavors which need to be created for
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/11/13 05:30, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Christopher Armstrong's message of 2013-11-01 11:34:56
-0700:
Vijendar and I are trying to figure out if we need to set the resource_id
of a resource to None when it's
Thanks folks for the interesting suggestions on this topic! I’ll b updating
the BP this week with this and other info i am gathering.
Please let me know if you are interested in being involved in brainstorming on
this issue and I will set up an irc meeting to discuss it further
On Nov 11,
As an IPv6 engineer interesting in helping Neutron get where it could be,
I'd like to join in on this. I also like the Thursday 21:00 UTC slot.
-Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Excerpts from Thomas Spatzier's message of 2013-11-11 08:57:58 -0800:
Hi all,
I have just posted the following wiki page to reflect a refined proposal
for HOT software configuration based on discussions at the design summit
last week. Angus also put a sample up in an etherpad last week,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Caitlin Bestler
caitlin.best...@nexenta.com wrote:
On 11/12/2013 8:09 AM, John Griffith wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd like to get some sort of consensus on this before I start working on
it. Now that people
Hi Eugene,
LBaaS meeting on #openstack-meeting was previously schedule on
Thursdays 1400UTC. And indeed it is still listed on
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings as such, so I believe keeping
it in that timeslot should be fine.
- Stephen
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Eugene
On 11/11/13 at 05:27pm, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
Resend after the HK summit, hope someone can give me hint on it.
Thanks
--jyh
-Original Message-
From: Jiang, Yunhong [mailto:yunhong.ji...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 5:39 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject:
On 11/12/2013 02:33 PM, David Kranz wrote:
On 11/12/2013 01:36 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-11-12 10:01:06 -0800:
During the freeze phase of Havana we got a ton of new contributors
coming on board to Tempest, which was super cool. However it meant we
had
Hi folks,
We'll have a Glance team meeting this Thursday at 2000 UTC (don't forget
that UTC applies to both the time and the date!). In your timezone that is
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Glance+Meetingiso=20131114T20ah=1.
As usual the meeting room is
Hi
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 13:11 -0800, Shawn Hartsock wrote:
Maybe we should have some 60% rule... that is: If you change more than
half of a test... you should *probably* rewrite the test in Mock.
A rule needs a
On 13-11-11 01:31 AM, Lyle, David wrote:
I think there is certainly interest. I do think it will need to be highly
configurable to be useful. The problem, as Dolph points out, is that each
deployment has its own workflow.
Points of configuration:
-Does the local keystone deployment policy
On 2013-11-12 15:27, Shawn Hartsock wrote:
Good point.
I assume someone made a comparison similar to this:
* http://garybernhardt.github.io/python-mock-comparison/
... and evangelized a choice. I had assumed that Mock vs mox was not
merely based on Python3 support but had something to do with
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:07 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Is this a potential issue
On 11/11/13 at 05:27pm, Jiang,
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Hartsock [mailto:hartso...@vmware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:56 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [heat] Custom Flavor creation through
Heat
My concern with
Hi Folks!
Sorry to dig up a really old topic, but I¹d like to know the status of
ceilometer db migrations.
I¹d like to submit two branches to modify the Event and Trait tables. If I
were to do that now, I would need to write SQLAlchemy scripts to do the
database migration - (background:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 16:42 -0500, Chuck Short wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 13:11 -0800, Shawn Hartsock wrote:
On 12/11/13 10:32 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Spatzier's message of 2013-11-11 08:57:58 -0800:
Hi all,
I have just posted the following wiki page to reflect a refined proposal
for HOT software configuration based on discussions at the design summit
last week. Angus also put
Hi All,
A blueprint has been registered to add Nova vif driver support for Juniper
vrouter.
The Juniper OpenContrail Controller is a logically centralized but physically
distributed Software Defined Networking (SDN) controller that is responsible
for providing the management, control, and
Hello, guys!
I hope everybody has eventually got home after the summit and feeling ok :)
So it's time to proceed thinking about integration, unit and performance
testing in Ceilometer. First of all I'd like to appreciate your help in
composing etherpad
- Original Message -
From: Yunhong Jiang yunhong.ji...@intel.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 5:39:58 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Custom Flavor creation through Heat
On 12/11/13 15:13 -0800, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
Given the recent discussion of scheduled autoscaling at the summit session
on autoscaling, I looked into the state of scheduling-as-a-service in and
around OpenStack. I found two relevant wiki pages:
George,
Thanks for the comments, they make a lot of sense. There is a Glance
team meeting on Thursday where we would like to push a bit further on
this. Would you mind sending in a few more details? Perhaps a sample of
what your ideal layout would be? As an example, how would you prefer
not the video I was looking for, but he kind of makes the point about
planning...
http://youtu.be/2E0C9zLSINE?t=42m55s
# Shawn Hartsock
- Original Message -
From: Shawn Hartsock hartso...@vmware.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
On 11/12/2013 01:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
This proposal raises several questions.
(1) Is it a good idea to allow giving credit to patch sponsors
On one hand, this encourages customers of OpenStack service companies to
fund sending back bugfixes and features upstream.
Does it? I'm
Hi stackers,
From the design summit, Boris has a great idea to improve db performance but
needs more evaluation because of memcached.
For UBS, it seems we agree to go with the current solution and don't depend on
Boris's great idea.
Can someone help to review the ground work of UBS
Hi stackers,
From the design summit, Boris has a great idea to improve db performance but
needs more evaluation because of memcached.
For UBS, it seems we agree to go with the current solution and don't depend on
Boris's great idea.
Can someone help to review the ground work of UBS
I agree that parametric testing, with input generators is the way to go for the
API testing. Both positive and negative. I've looked at a number of
frameworks in the past and the one that until recently was the highest on my
list is Robot:
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/
I had
Hi,
On 13 November 2013 12:54, K S khyat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi I'm a newbie to horizon and I'm working on a trove related issue.
My use case is that on successful execution of the workflow in
trove, I need to redirect the workflow to a view. Additionally I want
to pass a couple of parameters
Hi all,
In Tempest, we have some testcases that disable/enable services or agents.
e.g.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55271/1/tempest/api/compute/admin/test_services.py
test_service_enable_disable
test_disable_service_with_disable_reason
Since Tempest run in parallel for now, I'm afraid of
On Nov 12, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Prasad Miriyala pmiriy...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi All,
A blueprint has been registered to add Nova vif driver support for Juniper
vrouter.
The Juniper OpenContrail Controller is a logically centralized but physically
distributed Software Defined Networking
I think we should remove these tests, even though tempest run in serial.
Because we can't assume the enable service action will be successful.
(But on the other hand, one test is failed, the tempest gate will be
failed. We need find it out and fix it. :-) )
On 2013?11?13? 10:23, Zhi Kun
Kyle,
These requirement should also be required for existing third plugins.
Will you allow new patches to existing plugins without this requirement?
I hope we don't end up creating multiple classes of citizens.
Regards
-Harshad
On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
Garry Chen - iPhone
On 2013年11月13日, at 上午5:44, Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com wrote:
On 13-11-11 01:31 AM, Lyle, David wrote:
I think there is certainly interest. I do think it will need to be highly
configurable to be useful. The problem, as Dolph points out, is that each
On Nov 12, 2013, at 10:02 PM, Harshad Nakil hna...@contrailsystems.com wrote:
Kyle,
These requirement should also be required for existing third plugins.
Will you allow new patches to existing plugins without this requirement?
I hope we don't end up creating multiple classes of citizens.
Hi everyone,
We’ve created several etherpads to start discussing all things related with
further Mistral development. Here they are:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TaskFlowAndMistral
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MistralQuestionsBeforeImplementation
Hi,
This is in relation with the patch at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55517/
which supports use of 'Expect: 100-Continue' header in swift client during a
PUT request. This will help attain an interim response before actual upload of
chunks, which will act
So I'm curious - is taskflow still a thing? Adrian was saying in HK
that Rackspace wasn't investing in it any more as another library -
Spiffy? - was functionally superior, and there is no need to reinvent
the wheel.
If thats the case, should Mistral be built on Spiffy, and taskflow deprecated?
Yes it's still a thing and no it's not being deprecated, I heard other things
from other people at rackspace say the opposite, so maybe u misunderstood
adrian (if or if not rackspace is involved is there choice in the end).
So yes it's still being actively developed and yes it's gaining
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.comwrote:
I can put an upper bound on the version, that's fine with me. I'd rather
not avoid adding taskflow to wait until some new preemptive gating process
is in place. That doesn't exactly feel fair to the people creating
It seems to happen often that I go to review and approve something that
has a check icon in the R column and discover it actually also has a
-1 so I should not actually review it. Is it possible to change this
display to differentiate between clean +2 and this case? Has this not
bothered any
Hi David. Yes, i think this bothers lots of people, me included. I think
the only way to get around this is to setup your own custom queries. Sean
gives some examples on his blog:
http://dague.net/2013/09/27/gerrit-queries-to-avoid-openstack-review-overload/
We are working on moving to a newer
Hi, We are setting up our CI infrastructure environment, and we need a
account to communicate with community, could you arrange a user accoun,
thanks.
The detail info is as following:
1) The public_ssh_key.txt
2) Username for new account: root
3) Display name: ibm_cd_team
4)
Hi Eugene-
Thanks a lot for the reply.
It's a typo in my email. But then, I have the issue while adding floating IPs.
When I issue the below command,
root@havana:~# neutron floatingip-create net1
404 Not Found
The resource could not be found.
I get this error in neutron server logs
What is the output of `neutron ext-list` command?
Also, could you run neutron with -v option?
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Trinath Somanchi
trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Eugene-
Thanks a lot for the reply.
It’s a typo in my email. But then, I have the
On 11/11/2013 07:58 PM, Craig J wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently using the ldap backend for keystone, which means I have
thousands of users. When I go to add/remove users from a project in
horizon, all the users are displayed all at once. This causes the UI to
be very slow. Is there a
Hi Eugene-
Here is the output for the command neutron ext-list
root@havana:~# neutron ext-list
+---+--+
| alias | name |
+---+--+
| security-group| security-group
What plugin are you using?
Can you post neutron.conf to paste.openstack.org?
From the extension list it's clear that router extension is missing (it's
the extension that allows you to create floating ips)
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Trinath Somanchi
Hi
I was using ML2 Plugin as core-plugin and L3 plugin as service plugin.
Please find the neutron.cong @ http://paste.openstack.org/show/51936/
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
Trinath,
The only place I can point to is:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/ML2
But still I can be missing something. Probably it is worth raising a new
email thread regarding configuring ml2 plugin in neutron.
Thanks,
Oleg
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Trinath Somanchi
Could you please post a portion of neutron-server logs to
paste.openstack.org?
neutron.conf seems to be correct: l3 plugin is present, so router extension
should be supported.
In first several hundreds of lines should contain loading of router
extension and why it was or was not loaded.
Thanks,
Hi-
Please find the neutron server log @ Paste
http://paste.openstack.org/show/51954/
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 3:18 PM
To: Oleg Bondarev
Cc: Somanchi
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 05:07:16PM +, Andrew Plunk wrote:
The problem I am trying to solve here is not to secure an output, but to
provide the ability to only display an output to an end user one time.
I still think we need more info regarding the actual use-case, this sounds
like you're
Hi
I just finished installing my controller (Havana) and also installed a node
Everything was ok
but when I try to start an instance, It goes from spawning to error
and I didn't get error messages
I tried with Iso and qcow2 and get the same result
Any help is welcome
Regards
--
Stéphane
Hi all,
I use Openstack Havana (Storage + Identity)
I encountered some problems when i set permissions (ACLs) on Openstack
Swift containers.
My swift proxy-server.conf is here:
http://pastebin.com/0hpfebNp
My keystone.conf is here:
http://pastebin.com/VUGYbcM5
I have the token of
Hi All,
Could someone please explain the Cinder multi-backends feature (as of Havana)?
Specifically, I had the following questions:
1) Can I attach multiple physical storage backends (let's say one all SSD,
another all SATA for instance) to a single host?
2) How does migration
Answers in line.
From: Trivedi, Narendra [mailto:narendra.triv...@savvis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:24 AM
To: openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [Openstack] Cinde muti-backend feature
Hi All,
Could someone please explain the Cinder multi-backends feature (as of Havana)?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Trivedi, Narendra
narendra.triv...@savvis.com wrote:
Hi All,
Could someone please explain the Cinder multi-backends feature (as of
Havana)? Specifically, I had the following questions:
1) Can I attach multiple physical storage backends (let’s say
Hi John,
Thanks a lot for your response. I was looking at two specific use cases- 1)
Volume attached to an instance 2) Volume not attached to any instance. I am
assuming in both cases Cinder creates a new volume at the target and copies
data from the source volume to the target volume. In the
Thanks a lot for your response, Hrushikesh. It is really helpful :)
Regards,
Narendra
From: Gangur, Hrushikesh (R D HP Cloud) [mailto:hrushikesh.gan...@hp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:39 AM
To: Trivedi, Narendra; openstack@lists.openstack.org
Subject: RE: Cinde muti-backend feature
Hi Razique,
Thanks for providing me the description and steps. It was helpful. I later
discovered from our network administrator that few of our compute node have
their instance disk images mounted to a NFS server. I went through the NFS
server looking for the below UUIDs, found and fixed the
On 10/25/2013 11:19 AM, Brian Chong wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out if its possible to configure KeyStone tokens
to be one time use. My use case is that when a user requests that they
want to take a action on the platform (i.e.: boot a VM) they aren't
also using that same token to load a
Hello,
I have a multi-host grizzly RHEL6 install, using OVS. From the instance,
I can ping external ips, but DNS resolv doesn't work, it only works for
other instances on the VM network.
If I do subnet-update to add public DNS server ips to the vm network,
DNS resolv works for external hosts,
Hi Anne,
I finally found what I was looking for:
http://andymc-stack.co.uk/2013/07/apache2-mod_wsgi-openstack-pt-2-nova-api-os-compute-nova-api-ec2/
Regards,
Mark
From: Anne Gentle [mailto:a...@openstack.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 10:42 PM
To: Alain Roy; diane.fleming
Cc:
RH does have firewall rules you may want to see if DNS is going out. I know you
said that it goes outside but you can also check the order if in nsswitch.conf
etc..
Have a good day,
ciao
--
Remo Mattei
November 12, 2013 at 14:32:52, Xin Zhao (xz...@bnl.gov) ha scritto:
Hello,
I have
Thanks for reiterating that Zane. The problem I have is I want to display
generated passwords once, and only once in a ui. I want the ability to flag or
conditionally display outputs based on conditions.
Now you can argue that this belongs in heater, and I would not necessarily
disagree with
I’d like to update the havana install guide about the need to invoke
neutron-ovs-cleanup before rebooting nodes where there’s an openvswitch tap
device created (L3 agent, DHCP agent). See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1156861.
It seems like the RHEL packages install a
Excerpts from Andrew Plunk's message of 2013-11-12 17:24:25 -0800:
Thanks for reiterating that Zane. The problem I have is I want to display
generated passwords once, and only once in a ui. I want the ability to flag
or conditionally display outputs based on conditions.
A problem is
Alright.
The problem:
If a program generates a password, and displays it on a screen over and over
again, it is more susceptible to being compromised.
Possible solutions:
1).Provide a way to limit the availability of stack outputs returned from heat.
2).Provide
Hello Folks,
I am planning to have the first meetup of OpenStack User Group in U.A.E,
preferably in Dubai. If you are interested in attending the meetup then
please contact me off the list. Thanks.
Best regards,
Syed Armani
___
Mailing list:
100 matches
Mail list logo