Re: [Openstack] Cells: *how* experimental?

2016-01-28 Thread Tim Bell
> -Original Message- > From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com] > Sent: 29 January 2016 00:10 > To: openstack > Subject: Re: [Openstack] Cells: *how* experimental? > > Excerpts from Ken D'Ambrosio's message of 2016-01-28 12:39:01 -0800: > > Hey, all. Trying to have geographically-disp

[Openstack] Fw: new message

2016-01-28 Thread alex
Hey! Open message a...@alexchaney.com ___ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.o

Re: [Openstack] Cells: *how* experimental?

2016-01-28 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Ken D'Ambrosio's message of 2016-01-28 12:39:01 -0800: > Hey, all. Trying to have geographically-dispersed legs to a ~60 node > liberty development cloud. Based on the traffic I see back and forth on > our icehouse cloud, it makes me think that having a cell hierarchy for > the n

Re: [Openstack] Cells: *how* experimental?

2016-01-28 Thread David Medberry
Cells v2 is in active development. If you can wait a bit longer and upgrade/reinstall with Mitaka and v2 you will be in a better place. Hopefully a nova core will weigh in to tell me I'm on or off track with that comment. Kris Lindgren also keeps a pretty good eye on this and I've cc'd him. On Thu

[Openstack] Cells: *how* experimental?

2016-01-28 Thread Ken D'Ambrosio
Hey, all. Trying to have geographically-dispersed legs to a ~60 node liberty development cloud. Based on the traffic I see back and forth on our icehouse cloud, it makes me think that having a cell hierarchy for the new cloud might cut down on the back-and-forth chatter -- which would be good