On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Shuu Mutou wrote:
> > AFAIK, the API WG adopted Swagger (OpenAPI) as common tool for API
> > docs.
> > Anne, has not the adoption been changed? Otherwise, do we need to
> > maintain much RST files also?
> >
> >
> >
> > It does
yeah the resource group %index% i am aware of.
i was hoping there was an index tracker for the heat stack as well.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Brent Troge wrote:
>
> > Is there an internal variable that I can poll
The entire core team voted +1.
I have added Vikas to Kuryr core team, Congrats and keep up the good work
Thanks
Gal.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote:
> +1
> Vikas has been working on various aspects of Kuryr with dedication for
> some time. So yes
On Aug 20, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Brent Troge wrote:
> Is there an internal variable that I can poll to expose the current
> index/interation of a heat stack ?
%index%
But only for ResourceGroups. AutoScalingGroups don't have one :(.
Example:
name: { list_join: ['-', [ { get_param:
Is there an internal variable that I can poll to expose the current
index/interation of a heat stack ?
I know resource group has an internal variable to track the current group
index/iteration, but wondering if heat has something simlar.
___
Mailing
I managed to get half of it working. There's an emulation layer
between EC2 and Keystone, and an emulation layer between S3 and Swift.
The first half is working for me now.
The 'trick' was realizing that the Helion distribution deploys the
various OpenStack services in a Python virtual
Our "TripleO" undercloud only requires a subset of the available
services that we run int the Overcloud. So ironic, heat, mistral,
zaqar, keystone, nova, swift, glance, neutron. These would mostly
satisfy our needs.
What I find interesting here is that there isn't much mention of
jenkins,
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 23:42 +, arkady_kanev...@dell.com wrote:
> What is the goal of undercloud?
> Primarily to deploy and manage/upgrade/update overcloud.
> It is not targeted for multitenancy and the only “application”
> running on it is overcloud.
> While it may have a couple of VMs running
Thanks all for the support. I will do my best.
Regards
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016, 9:28 PM Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Eduardo,
>
> Their was a unanimous response in votes with no veto on this core reviewer
> nomination. As a result, voting is closed early.
>
> Welcome to the