[openstack-dev] [Blazar] new instance reservation overview

Hi Blazar folks, I drafted overview of new instance reservation [1]. It contains motivation and basic idea of the reservation, short-term goal and long-term goal. It's just a draft and entry points for the discussion. We would also discuss some reservations things based on the etherpad

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:40:30PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > I don't attend many TC meetings, it's usually on accident, but yeah, when I > do I always note the flurry of cross-talk chatter that just drowns > everything out. I feel like there are usually at least 3 parallel > conversations

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:16:57AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think > you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing > proposed changes and pushing your own) ? Starting today, I've moved from a position

Re: [Openstack] Neutron in Newton: host_id and device_owner?

Thanks - I was thinking that the second option (fake IP and update on port update) may work - that validates it somewhat. And about the deferred allocation - where would I find more info on that? [image: --] Gregory Golberg [image: http://]about.me/gregorygolberg

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Howdy, To answer the original question, if elected, I should be able to commit at least a few hours per day to the TC (if not more). I can also be quite elastic in this being able to spend more time some weeks than others as the role dictates. My timezone is UTC+10 which makes the meetings at

Re: [Openstack] Neutron in Newton: host_id and device_owner?

IIRC it will not. If you're building an ipam driver that needs to take into account host_id you will need to leverage the deferred allocation stuff done as part of the routed networks work. Or you could allocate a dummy IP and then update to a different one on the next port update that assigns the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

> When there are topics with a lot of people clamoring to talk, Thierry usually > lets people speak in order of "raising > their hand". This reduces cross-talk and lets everyone get their turn to > state what's on their mind. +1, impressive for the "raising their hand" in TC weekly IRC

Re: [Openstack] How to get all detail RPC message and detail context in neutron docs?

I would strongly recommend that you don't build anything based on these messages. The contents change from release to release since this is an internal API between the agents and the server. On Apr 6, 2017 00:48, "Sam" wrote: > Thank you, use debug option will also help us

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] How to get all detail RPC message and detail context in neutron docs?

I would strongly recommend that you don't build anything based on these messages. The contents change from release to release since this is an internal API between the agents and the server. On Apr 6, 2017 00:48, "Sam" wrote: > Thank you, use debug option will also help us

Re: [Openstack] Neutron in Newton: host_id and device_owner?

Ah, thanks - but when you say nova may not have set them yet is it at all possible that it would get set prior to an IPAM request? [image: --] Gregory Golberg [image: http://]about.me/gregorygolberg On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Benton

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?

I think 'a' is probably the way to go since we can mainly rely on existing horizon guides for creating new dashboard repos. On Apr 10, 2017 08:11, "Akihiro Motoki" wrote: > Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), > > As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for

Re: [Openstack] Neutron in Newton: host_id and device_owner?

Nova may not have set them yet. The port is updated with the host ID and the device ID separately from the port creation in later Nova versions IIRC. On Apr 10, 2017 10:03, "Gregory Golberg" wrote: > Sorry, that should read host AND instance ID (as the device_id was >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 04:19:00PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > There was no stable team meeting today but according to the release schedule > page [1], Mitaka EOL happens after today. So what's the plan? Same old song > and dance as always? Yup. I'm generating the list of EOL'able repos

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

On 10/04/17 05:19 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > There was no stable team meeting today but according to the release > schedule page [1], Mitaka EOL happens after today. So what's the plan? > Same old song and dance as always? > i abandoned all the stable/mitaka items in Telemetry projects.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

Yes, please cancel. I don't even see at this point a need for a separate program for the effort. It was applicable before when we dealt with stable gates on daily basis, but it's no longer the case. Ihar On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:19 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > There was no

Re: [Openstack-operators] about the R release name

This cracked me up! "Mountain Dew learned the hard way when 4 Chan took control of a vote to name a new flavor, and the joke was on Taylor Swift and VH1 when the Internet chose a school for the deaf

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriede...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 4:41 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority > > On 4/10/2017 2:55 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > I don't attend many TC meetings, it's usually on accident, but yeah, when I > do I always note the flurry of cross-talk chatter that just drowns everything > out. I feel like there are usually at least 3 parallel

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Matt Riedemann wrote: This might also tie back in with what cdent was mentioning, and if the flurry of conversation during a TC meeting throws people off, maybe the minutes should be digested after the meeting in the mailing list. I know the meeting is logged, but it can

[openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

There was no stable team meeting today but according to the release schedule page [1], Mitaka EOL happens after today. So what's the plan? Same old song and dance as always? Also, while I'm here, should the stable team meeting be cancelled? There hasn't been a meeting in a month [2]. Should

Re: [Openstack-operators] about the R release name

+2 On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 04/10/2017 02:10 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: > >> The naming is based on community input and there's good reason to believe >> that in this round of voting both of these values will get a low score. >> >> But, we

Re: [Openstack-operators] about the R release name

On 04/10/2017 02:10 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: The naming is based on community input and there's good reason to believe that in this round of voting both of these values will get a low score. But, we could have a repeat of the Boaty McBoatface debacle  I would totally vote for OpenStack Boaty

Re: [Openstack] LinuxBridge Agent Error

On 04/10/2017 04:15 PM, Georgios Dimitrakakis wrote: Installing the "conntrack-tools" package from the "centos-openstack-ocata" repository seems to have fixed the problem. My question is if this should have happened automatically during installation and if yes why it didn't happen? From your

Re: [openstack-dev] Ocata - Ubuntu 16.04 - OVN does not work with DPDK

On 8 April 2017 at 00:37, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > Guys, > > I manage to deploy Ocata on Ubuntu 16.04 with OVN for the first time > ever, today! > > It looks very, very good... OVN L3 Router is working, OVN DHCP working... > bridge mappings "br-ex" on each compute

Re: [Openstack] EC2-API in Ocata - Help wanted

Hello Alexandre, thank you very much for your time. I have a rough guide of what I did in order to have it working in case you need it to update the docs so please let me know if I can be of any assistance. By the way could you please check the following thread and let me know if you have

[Openstack] nova, cinder instances fail to install, Openstack Fuel 10

Hi guys, I'm installing openstack via Fuel 10, actually I tried 11 and I see the same error: For example nova instance not able to connect to internet after netconfig pupper script. I can ping mgmg 192.168.0.3 VIP Nslookup doesn't work Ping of 8.8.8.8 doesn't work. During deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On 4/10/2017 2:55 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: The TC meetings are held in IRC and that may somewhat mitigate the issue for non-native English speakers, but I've had problems myself keeping up at times with the flurry of comments. In any case, I think it would be good to include language in the pile

Re: [Openstack] EC2API Very Slow

Hello again, after some time... The "nova list" command is very fast indeed and the only problem I observer is through the EC2 API. I have found out the following bug and I believe is related to it, what do you people think? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ec2-api/+bug/1619259 Best regards,

Re: [Openstack-operators] FW: [quotas] Unified Limits Conceptual Spec RFC

Sending out a heads up that the initial spec [0] merged. [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/440815/ On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > > For those that are interested in nested quotas, there is proposal on how > to address this forming in openstack-dev (and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] FW: [quotas] Unified Limits Conceptual Spec RFC

Sending out a heads up that the initial spec [0] merged. [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/440815/ On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > > For those that are interested in nested quotas, there is proposal on how > to address this forming in openstack-dev (and

Re: [Openstack] LinuxBridge Agent Error

Installing the "conntrack-tools" package from the "centos-openstack-ocata" repository seems to have fixed the problem. My question is if this should have happened automatically during installation and if yes why it didn't happen? Best, G. On Fri, 07 Apr 2017 19:26:02 +0300, Georgios

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On 04/10/2017 01:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 4/10/2017 1:18 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Thierry Carrez wrote: So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing proposed changes and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > How will the TC grow a diverse membership if it's not even held, at least > every other week, in a timezone where the other half of the world can > attend? This is something we do need to sort out. The experiences I

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 4/10/2017 11:14 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/10/2017 10:37 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/10/2017 09:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 4/10/2017 1:51 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: How long are we expected to be carrying this deprecated bridge code? If you need these CLIs/API bindings in the client, then don't upgrade to 8.0.0, or run different versions

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Agreed but not only for the TC. I also heard privately from some contributors that meetings times prevent them from fully engage with a project. This is something where we as the TC can lead by example. German On 4/10/17, 3:06 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote: Matt,

Re: [Openstack-operators] about the R release name

Legit point. +1 Vote Rambler. No one's owned a rambler in like 50 years. =P On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Saverio Proto wrote: > Hello Ops, > > I got the mail about the Poll for OpenStack R Release Naming > > I am shocked that there are proposed names like Raspberry

[Openstack] UC Meeting 04/10/17 Cancelled

Hey everyone, Apologies for the late notice. We are cancelling the meeting today. We have moved to a weekly cadence with meetings being subject to new agenda items having to be proposed/added by the Friday before the meeting. In other words, for UC meeting scheduled for 04/17/17 agenda items will

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > How will the TC grow a diverse membership if it's not even held, at least > every other week, in a timezone where the other half of the world can attend? +1 --

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Matt, I second this request. At least one person i talked to, pointed this as a primary reason for not standing for the TC election. Thanks, Dims On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/10/2017 1:18 PM, Chris Dent wrote: >> >> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017,

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] critical fix for ceph job

* Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/7/2017 9:43 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Ghanshyam Mann > > wrote: > > > > Thanks. I am not sure these kind of driver specific behavior on

[Openstack-operators] about the R release name

Hello Ops, I got the mail about the Poll for OpenStack R Release Naming I am shocked that there are proposed names like Raspberry or Root ! Think about troubleshooting and searching on google: Openstack Raspberry "string of log file" The Raspberry or Root words are anti-google words that will

[Openstack-operators] UC Meeting 04/10/17 Cancelled

Hey everyone, Apologies for the late notice. We are cancelling the meeting today. We have moved to a weekly cadence with meetings being subject to new agenda items having to be proposed/added by the Friday before the meeting. In other words, for UC meeting scheduled for 04/17/17 agenda items will

[openstack-dev] UC Meeting 04/10/17 Cancelled

Hey everyone, Apologies for the late notice. We are cancelling the meeting today. We have moved to a weekly cadence with meetings being subject to new agenda items having to be proposed/added by the Friday before the meeting. In other words, for UC meeting scheduled for 04/17/17 agenda items will

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On 4/10/2017 1:18 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Thierry Carrez wrote: So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing proposed changes and pushing your own) ? I've been regularly

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > How long are we expected to be carrying this deprecated bridge code? If you > need these CLIs/API bindings in the client, then don't upgrade to 8.0.0, or > run different versions of novaclient in venvs or containers if

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are pleased to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. rolling

[Openstack] [Heat] Customize server names in AutoScalingGroup

Hi, I want to customize the names of the OS::Nova::Server resources that are part of a OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup resource. Ideally, I want to use something like:     - If I do not specify the name, then the name will default to this pattern:     -- I could, in theory, get close to what I want

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Apr 10, 2017, at 4:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think > you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing > proposed changes and pushing your own) ? Well, as you know I have been

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Hi, I am well aware that being on the TC is a serious time commitment and that there is more to do than a given day has hours. So I read your question more about prioritizing and how I would do that. A fair part of how I prioritize depends on input from others. That’s why I said listening to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Thierry Carrez wrote: So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing proposed changes and pushing your own) ? I've been regularly reviewing changes in the governance repo and

Re: [Openstack] [openstack-dev] Common client version to communicatewith various OpenStack releases

I got it completely. Thanks a lot Troyer for great support. Will go ahead use latest client to communicate with K, L, M, N and O releases. Will update you the status soon… -- Thanks & Regards, Bharat Kumar K From: Dean Troyer Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 10:04 PM To: Bharat Kumar Kobagana Cc:

[openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Meeting Reminder

Hello! Just wanted to remind everyone of our meeting today at 20:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 Please feel free to add items to the agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-upstream-institute-meetings Also, please take a look at the slides so we can focus on improvements rather than

Re: [Openstack] Neutron in Newton: host_id and device_owner?

Sorry, that should read host AND instance ID (as the device_id was instance_uuid). [image: --] Gregory Golberg [image: http://]about.me/gregorygolberg On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Gregory Golberg wrote: > Hi all > >

[Openstack] Neutron in Newton: host_id and device_owner?

Hi all In Liberty, port object that got passed into IPAM driver contained binding:host_id entry (and neutron.ports DB table had a device_id field). Now it looks like the host_id is not being passed in and device_id field is empty in the ports table. What is the proper way now to look for host in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][manila] Ganesha deployment

I'm not really an expert on composable roles so I'll leave that to someone else, but see my thoughts inline on the networking aspect. On 04/10/2017 03:22 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote: 2) define a new VIP (for IP failover) and 2 networks for NfsStorage role: a) a frontend network between users

Re: [Openstack] [openstack-dev] Common client version to communicate with various OpenStack releases

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Bharat Kumar Kobagana wrote: > Which are the non-end-of-life releases, till Kilo? Everything older than Mitaka is already EOL, Mitaka happens soon. The releases page[0] shows 10 Apr 2017 (today!?) as the EOL date for Mitaka, but I don't think

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think > you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing > proposed changes and pushing your own) ? If there was ONE thing, one >

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Unknown provider resource-type-registry.service test error

Hi all, Thanks very much in advance for any help you are able to offer. I have been working on developing the QoS Policies panel for horizon and have the panel working, however I am struggling with the qos.service.spec.js file. In advance of going into my findings and issues so far, the

[Openstack-operators] [HA] HA Discussion at Boston Forum

Hi All, I proposed a session [1] to Boston Forum and it is now at incomplete state. This is good opportunity for all of us to get together and discuss our HA related issues. I need your help to reform this session. Please put comments on [1] or replay to this with your comments. [1]

[openstack-dev] [HA] HA Discussion at Boston Forum

Hi All, I proposed a session [1] to Boston Forum and it is now at incomplete state. This is good opportunity for all of us to get together and discuss our HA related issues. I need your help to reform this session. Please put comments on [1] or replay to this with your comments. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 04/10/2017 10:23 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: 2017-04-10 23:19 GMT+09:00 Dean Troyer : On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 04/10/2017 10:24 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 04/10/2017 11:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 4/10/2017 9:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] is it ok to create extra users with sudo permissions during devstack run

Clark, thanks for reply. On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017, at 08:31 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > > Hi infra team, > > > > on order to test a piece of functionality I am developing, during the > > devstack plugin run I need

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 04/10/2017 10:37 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/10/2017 09:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for network management

Re: [Openstack] Is there a way to download an offline openstack DOC's copy

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017, at 08:40 AM, don...@ahope.com.cn wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to get an offline copy of the openstack documents, but most of the > ducuments are online HTML, it is not convenient, how can i download all > the DOC's ? > > Thank you. Depending on your needs it might make the

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] is it ok to create extra users with sudo permissions during devstack run

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017, at 08:31 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > Hi infra team, > > on order to test a piece of functionality I am developing, during the > devstack plugin run I need to create an extra user with password-less > sudo > permissions. As I am not sure of intricacies of our infra

[Openstack] Is there a way to download an offline openstack DOC's copy

Hi all, I want to get an offline copy of the openstack documents, but most of the ducuments are online HTML, it is not convenient, how can i download all the DOC's ? Thank you. ___ Mailing list:

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Meeting April 11, 2017 @1500 UTC

Just a reminder, we have a meeting scheduled tomorrow April 11, 2017 @1500UTC[0]. Please add something to the agenda[1] if you have something you would like to talk about. Thanks, -Alex [0] https://docs.openstack.org/developer/puppet-openstack-guide/meetings.html [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 04/10/2017 09:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for network management and newer API versions for other compute

[openstack-dev] [infra] is it ok to create extra users with sudo permissions during devstack run

Hi infra team, on order to test a piece of functionality I am developing, during the devstack plugin run I need to create an extra user with password-less sudo permissions. As I am not sure of intricacies of our infra setup, I'd like to clarify if it is acceptable. TL;DR There is

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

Looks like " Swift cluster level metrics and analytics" is also scheduled twice. Thiago > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: > On 10/04/17 22:19, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Flavio Percoco >> wrote: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

On 4/10/2017 4:35 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please check yours. Please also find attached in PDF the proposed schedule for the Forum in Boston.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 04/10/2017 11:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/10/2017 9:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki >> wrote: >>> (question not directly related to this topic) >>> I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 23:19 GMT+09:00 Dean Troyer : > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: >> (question not directly related to this topic) >> I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for >> network management >> and newer API

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?

Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-04-11 00:09:10 +0900: > Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), > > As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for > neutron stadium projects? > There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying > to add dashboard

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 4/10/2017 9:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for network management and newer API versions for other compute

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 4/10/2017 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: Is there any deprecation policy in novaclient python binding? I was not aware of deprecation warnings. If novaclient follows nova deprecation, it sounds reasonable to me. Yes we deprecated the CLIs in this change in Newton:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] another i18n proposal for heat templates 'description' help strings

Hi Peng, I added some thoughts in-line, let me know what you think. On 10 April 2017 at 08:10, Peng Wu wrote: > Hi, > > In TripleO UI project users requested translation of the web UI. But > some web UI strings are displayed from heat template files in tripleo- >

[openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?

Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying to add dashboard support. I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

On 10/04/17 22:19, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 10/04/17 17:35 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Token expiration]

Thanks Dolph, I now have a pretty clear picture about it. Br, Tuan/Nokia On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > The token itself is still expired, regardless of where it's persisted, if > at all. Expired tokens are only considered valid when

[Openstack-operators] [telecom-nfv] Boston Summit Working Group Session

Hi All, Just FYI, we do have a session time at the summit: http://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/17636/openstack-operators-telecomnfv-working-group-session It's possible I missed being alerted to the fact that our request was accepted. I didn't notice it until the

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > (question not directly related to this topic) > I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for > network management > and newer API versions for other compute operation. This is probably true for

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 10/04/17 17:35 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We >> have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

I am okay to drop nova-network feature in Pike. More generally, can we horizon team say the following? A feature deprecated in a back-end project is automatically deprecated in Horizon and a feature in horizon will be dropped if a corresponding support is dropped in a back-end project and/or

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-03-29 5:06 GMT+09:00 Matt Riedemann : > On 3/28/2017 9:04 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to raise a topic when horizon nova-network support can be >> dropped. >> I added [tc] tag as it is related to >> "assert:follows-standard-deprecation" tag in

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

David Medberry wrote: > Are the three rooms roughly the same size? 102 and 103 are slightly larger than 104. Cheers, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[Openstack] iSCSI Cinder backends + session behaviour

Hello OpenStackers I just had a question for those here that may use iSCSI-based Cinder back-ends; In your implementations do you have the ability for hypervisors and controllers to only hold iSCSI sessions open to Cinder LUNs that they require, but not others? That is, a hypervisor

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

> -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 5:17 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority > > Hi everyone, > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

Are the three rooms roughly the same size? On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We > have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please > check

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][kolla] extended start and hostpath persistent dirs

Responses inline :) I started snipping parts out because the quotations are getting long. tl;dr use kolla images and bootsrap OR upstream images with direct commands: .. code-block:: yaml kolla_config: /var/lib/kolla/config_files/foo.json command: /usr/bin/foo We insist on using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Token expiration]

The token itself is still expired, regardless of where it's persisted, if at all. Expired tokens are only considered valid when presented as an X-Auth-Token to keystonemiddleware.auth_token along with a valid X-Service-Token, or when validating an X-Subject-Token against keystone directly using

[Openstack] VMs lost IP after running for few days on OpenStack Liberty.

Hi, Experts, Recently I found VMs on my OpenStack Liberty will get lost their private IP address after running normally for 1~2 days("#ip addr" will show no IP associated with eth0 for example), thus could not be ssh login anymore. But after console login to the instances from Horizon and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] allow_instance_snapshots config option is not used consistently

On 4/10/2017 5:20 AM, sfinu...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 10:24 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 10 April 2017 at 01:56, Matt Riedemann wrote: I found a fun little legacy nugget of compute API non- interoperability joy tonight. The "allow_instance_snapshots"

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Tags for volumes

You can deploy Searchlight (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Searchlight) and it can handle this and more complex metadata querying (it is backed by elastic search and supports all of the expressive power of elastic search queries). There's a limit to how much query functionality can go into a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On 10/04/17 11:16 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, New in this TC election round, we have a few days between nominations and actual voting to ask questions and get to know the candidates a bit better. I'd like to kick off this new "campaigning period" with a basic question on available

Re: [Openstack] [openstack-dev] Common client version to communicate with various OpenStack releases

Hello Troyer, Thank you very much for your quick response and great help. Which are the non-end-of-life releases, till Kilo? On Apr 10, 2017 6:28 AM, "Dean Troyer" wrote: On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Bharat Kumar Kobagana wrote: > Is it possible use

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

On 10/04/17 17:35 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please check yours. Please also find attached in PDF the proposed schedule for the Forum in

[Openstack] Reminder User Committee Meeting

Hey everyone, User Committee will meet today in #openstack-meeting @ 1900UTC. If you have any requests for agenda items you can reply to this email or message any of the UC members via email as well as IRC - #openstack-uc -- Kind regards, OpenStack UC

  1   2   >