Re: [openstack-dev] Asking for ask.openstack.org

On 04/05/2018 10:23 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 04/04/18 17:26, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Here's the thing: email alerts. They're broken. This is the type of thing we can fix if we know about it ... I will contact you off-list because the last email to what I presume is you went to an address that

Re: [openstack-dev] Asking for ask.openstack.org

On 04/05/2018 08:30 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > We likely need to reduce the number of days we retain database > backups / http logs or look to attach a volume to increase storage. We've long had problems with this host and I've looked at it before [1]. It often drops out. It seems there's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Vitrage] New proposal for analysis.

Hello Ifat, Thanks for the good comments. It was very helpful. As you said, I tested for std.ssh, and I was able to get much better results. I am confident that this is what I want. We can use std.ssh to provide convenience to users with a much more efficient way to configure

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Problems setting up my own OpenStack Infrastructure

* Puppet doesn't create the //var/log/nodepool///images /log directory Note that since [1] the builder log output changed; previously it went through python logging into the directory you mention, now it is written into log files directly in /var/log/nodepool/builds (by default) * The

Re: [openstack-dev] Asking for ask.openstack.org

The email alert definitely should be the first one to get fixed :) On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:23 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 04/04/18 17:26, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > >> Hi everyone! >> >> We have a very robust and vibrant community at ask.openstack.org < >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Asking for ask.openstack.org

On 04/04/18 17:26, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Hi everyone! We have a very robust and vibrant community at ask.openstack.org .  There are literally dozens of posts a day. However, many of them don't receive knowledgeable answers.  I'm really worried about this becoming

Re: [Openstack-operators] Asking for ask.openstack.org

Hi Jimmy, I tend to jump on things but only those that go to my Inbox and don't otherwise get filtered. I'll see if I'm sub'd to ask.o.o and if so, I'll put that into my Inbox instead of it going into one of my myriad google filtered folders. OTOH, if it is truly just a web site I need to

Re: [openstack-dev] Asking for ask.openstack.org

On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 04:26:12PM -0500, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > Hi everyone! > > We have a very robust and vibrant community at ask.openstack.org > . There are literally dozens of posts a day. > However, many of them don't receive knowledgeable answers. I'm really

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc][openstack-helm][tripleo]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

On 4 April 2018 at 14:45, Brandon Jozsa wrote: > I’ve been a part of the OpenStack-Helm project from the very beginning, and > there was a lot of early brainstorming on how we could collaborate and > contribute directly to Kolla-Kubernetes. In fact, this was the original >

[Openstack-operators] Asking for ask.openstack.org

Hi everyone! We have a very robust and vibrant community at ask.openstack.org . There are literally dozens of posts a day. However, many of them don't receive knowledgeable answers. I'm really worried about this becoming a vacuum where potential community

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] Upcoming changes in ARA Zuul job reports

Hi, You might have noticed that the performance (and reliability) of the new reports aren't up to par. If you see failures in loading content, a refresh will usually fix the issue. We have different fixes to improve the performance and the reliability of the reports and we hope to be able to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-track-chairs] Asking for ask.openstack.org

Oh that's great! I'll try to attend that talk and, in the meantime, gather other relevant tags. Thanks for the info :) Kendall Nelson April 4, 2018 at 5:09 PM Hey Jimmy, So the First Contact SIG has started looking at questions posted on ask.o.o with the tags

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-track-chairs] Asking for ask.openstack.org

Hey Jimmy, So the First Contact SIG has started looking at questions posted on ask.o.o with the tags of 'contributor' or 'contribution' on a weekly basis and discussing it in our weekly meeting as a standing item. If there are other relevant tags that you think we should be looking at I would be

[openstack-dev] [All] TC Election Season

Hello! Election details: https://governance.openstack.org/election/ Please read the stipulations and timelines for candidates and electorate contained in this governance documentation. There will be further announcements posted to the mailing list as action is required from the electorate or

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Deciding on EC fragment config

Thanks John, I was leaning towards '2 is not quite enough' for parity, but wanted to get a 2nd opinion. The level of detail and discussion in your answer is very helpful, much appreciated! Mark On 05/04/18 08:25, John Dickinson wrote: The answer always starts with "it depends...". Depends

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc][openstack-helm][tripleo]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

I’ve been a part of the OpenStack-Helm project from the very beginning, and there was a lot of early brainstorming on how we could collaborate and contribute directly to Kolla-Kubernetes. In fact, this was the original intent when we met with Kolla back in Barcelona. We didn’t like the idea of

[openstack-dev] Asking for ask.openstack.org

Hi everyone! We have a very robust and vibrant community at ask.openstack.org . There are literally dozens of posts a day. However, many of them don't receive knowledgeable answers. I'm really worried about this becoming a vacuum where potential community

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Deciding on EC fragment config

The answer always starts with "it depends...". Depends on your hardware, where it's physically located, the durability you need, the access patterns, etc There have been whole phd dissertations on the right way to calculate durability. Two parity segments isn't exactly equivalent to three

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] The createBackup API

+openstack-operators Operator feedback wanted: do you have users that pass rotation parameter '0' to the createBackup API in order to delete backups? Do you have users using the createBackup API in general? On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:44:40 +0800, Alex Xu wrote: There is spec proposal to fix a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] The createBackup API

+openstack-operators Operator feedback wanted: do you have users that pass rotation parameter '0' to the createBackup API in order to delete backups? Do you have users using the createBackup API in general? On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:44:40 +0800, Alex Xu wrote: There is spec proposal to fix a

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Problems setting up my own OpenStack Infrastructure

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Bernd Bausch wrote: > Lenny, > > thanks, these instructions are a bit more robust and easier to > understand than [2]. > > One details stands out for me: They make it clear that Ubuntu 14 is > required. A few Puppet modules, in particular Etherpad used as an >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > >> Kind of a support question but figured I'd ask here in case there are >> suggestions for workarounds for specific machines. >> >> Setting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > Kind of a support question but figured I'd ask here in case there are > suggestions for workarounds for specific machines. > > Setting up a new rack of mixed machines this week and hit this issue > with HP machines using the

[openstack-dev] [docs] Documentation meeting minutes for 2018-04-04

=== #openstack-doc: docteam === Meeting started by pkovar at 16:02:31 UTC. The full logs are available at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/docteam/2018/docteam.2018-04-04-16.02.log.html . Meeting summary --- * dropdown menus on

[openstack-dev] [openstack-helm][infra] Please consider using experimental pipeline for non-voting jobs

Greetings, I've recently proposed https://review.openstack.org/558870 to the openstack-helm project. This moves both centos / fedora jobs into the experimental pipeline. The reason for this, the multinode jobs in helm each use 5 nodes per distro. This this case, 10 shared between centos / fedora.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

How about * As an operator, I’d like to spin up the latest release to check if a problem is fixed before reporting a problem upstream We use this approach frequently with packstack. Ideally (as today with packstack), we’d do this inside a VM on a running OpenStack cloud… inception… ☺ Tim

Re: [Openstack] API endpoint naming in Keystone

Hi Andrew! AFAIK there's no difference between Liberty and Mitaka nova endpoints (we're using newton and $(tenant_id)s is still present in the nova endpoints and it's working properly). It seems to me that the difference you're showing was introduced in ocata, you can compare the official doc

Re: [openstack-dev] [bifrost][helm][OSA][barbican] Switching from fedora-26 to fedora-27

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:54:26AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:13PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > A quick search of git shows your projects are using fedora-26 nodes for > > testing. > > Please take a moment to look at gerrit[1] and help land

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] about re-image the volume

On 4/2/2018 6:59 AM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: I can only see one benefit from implementing this feature in Cinder versus doing it in Nova, and that is that we can preserve the volume's UUID, but I don't think this is even relevant for this use case, so why is it better to implement this in Cinder

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are glad to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) Weekly priorities

[Openstack-operators] [HELP REQUESTED] First deployment of OpenStack in existing enterprise network

Hello deployers from a rank newbie. My organization wants to try building an OpenStack deployment on premises partly to move our existing ad hoc container services into a more controllable and uniform system and partly to provide a test environment for working with a few other organizations on

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Could keystone to keystone federation be deployed on Centos?

On 04/04/2018 02:52 AM, 何健乐 wrote: Hi all， Could keystone to keystone  federation be deployed on Centos. I have notice all the document was deployment on Ubuntu. If could, is there some documents that is about deploying k2k on centos. Yes k2k should work on centos, there is nothing OS

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] a plan to stop syncing requirements into projects

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-03-28 18:53:03 -0400: > > Because we had some communication issues and did a few steps out > of order, when this patch lands projects that have approved > bot-proposed requirements updates may find that their requirements > and lower-constraints files

[openstack-dev] Openstack Deployment issue - Tripleo

Hi guys, We have a problem with deploying Tripleo that the network configuration is not propagated to ComputeSriov nodes. I've included my own network.yaml to be like that: resource_registry: OS::TripleO::ComputeSriov::Net::SoftwareConfig: ./computesriov.yaml

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Noam Angel wrote: > Hi, > > First check you can ping the. > Then open a browser and login. > Make sure ipmi enabled. > Make sure user has permissions for admin or other role with reboot > capabilities. > Check again Hi, yeah. So like I mention

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:52 AM, Sanjay Upadhyay wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Dan Prince wrote: >> >> Kind of a support question but figured I'd ask here in case there are >> suggestions for workarounds for specific machines. >> >> Setting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

Hi, First check you can ping the. Then open a browser and login. Make sure ipmi enabled. Make sure user has permissions for admin or other role with reboot capabilities. Check again Get Outlook for Android From: Dan Prince

Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

No problem from s390x point of view. With Ubuntu we’re currently using* qemu: 2.10.1* libvirt: 3.6.0Thanks! ---Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 30. Mar 2018, at 16:26, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:The last version bump was in "Pike" release (commit: b980df0,11-Feb-2017), and we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Solar" release

No problem from s390x point of view. With Ubuntu we’re currently using* qemu: 2.10.1* libvirt: 3.6.0Thanks! ---Andreas Scheuring (andreas_s) On 30. Mar 2018, at 16:26, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:The last version bump was in "Pike" release (commit: b980df0,11-Feb-2017), and we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > Kind of a support question but figured I'd ask here in case there are > suggestions for workarounds for specific machines. > > Setting up a new rack of mixed machines this week and hit this issue > with HP machines using the

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Tripleo] ipmitool issues HP machines

Kind of a support question but figured I'd ask here in case there are suggestions for workarounds for specific machines. Setting up a new rack of mixed machines this week and hit this issue with HP machines using the ipmi power driver for Ironic. Curious if anyone else has seen this before? The

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Stein" release

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 04:09:29PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > [Meta comment: corrected the email subject: "Solar" --> "Stein"] Here's a change to get the discussion rolling: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/558171/ -- [RFC] Pick next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Stein" >

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC: Next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Stein" release

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 04:09:29PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > [Meta comment: corrected the email subject: "Solar" --> "Stein"] Here's a change to get the discussion rolling: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/558171/ -- [RFC] Pick next minimum libvirt / QEMU versions for "Stein" >

[openstack-dev] [docs] Documentation meeting today

Hi all, The docs meeting will continue today at 16:00 UTC in #openstack-doc, as scheduled. For more details, see the meeting page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting Cheers, pk __ OpenStack Development

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Deciding on EC fragment config

...hearing crickets - come on guys, I know you have some thoughts about this :-) ! On 29/03/18 13:08, Mark Kirkwood wrote: Hi, We are looking at implementing EC Policies with similar durability to 3x replication. Now naively this corresponds to m=2 (using notation from previous thread).

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db] innodb OPTIMIZE TABLE ?

On 03/04, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 04/03/2018 11:07 AM, Michael Bayer wrote: > > The MySQL / MariaDB variants we use nowadays default to > > innodb_file_per_table=ON and we also set this flag to ON in installer > > tools like TripleO. The reason we like file per table is so that > > we don't grow

Re: [Openstack] [HEAT] order in attributes list

Hi, AFAIU the get_attr function does not use the values you've passed to Heat in the resource definition, instead it fetches their actual values from Neutron (basically making a 'port show' API call), and Heat does nothing wrt to ordering afterwards. Btw AFAIR this is exactly why heat requires a

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weejky Team Meeting 2018.04.04

Hi Team, As usual team meeting starting UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg, initial agenda as follows: 1. Status report from subteam 2. Critical spec patch review Plz feel free to suggest more topics. -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Bug Triage on Friday

Hey all, During the office hour on Friday, and maybe some time after it, I am going to do some Mistral bug triage, planning and general tidying up on launchpad and gerrit. If you are able and want to join, please do! The slot is 8AM UTC - 9AM UTC. I'll be in #openstack-mistral I hope to try and

[Openstack-operators] [charms] openstack-base error with ntp charm

Hi all, I'm newbie with Openstack juju deployment, and I have a problem with ntp charm of openstack-base from openstack-charmers: openstack-base #54https://jujucharms.com/openstack-base/ ntp #24https://jujucharms.com/ntp/ The process stop when the install try to add a 5º unit of ntp , but really

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Could keystone to keystone federation be deployed on Centos?

Hi all， Could keystone to keystone federation be deployed on Centos. I have notice all the document was deployment on Ubuntu. If could, is there some documents that is about deploying k2k on centos.__ OpenStack Development