Norris! As in ... Chuck Norris lives in Texas.
Just saying. ; )
On Nov 9, 2015 5:31 AM, "Monty Taylor" wrote:
> Hey everybody!
>
> It's release naming time, and this time we get to do two at once!
>
> If you'd like to propose a name, there are two wiki pages:
>
> For the N release, where the geo
ed in the press release as
having participated thus far. I didn't know the opportunity even existed so
I am wondering is the COA effort invite-only or did I just miss the email?
//adam
*Adam Lawson*
AQORN, Inc.
427 North Tatnall Street
Ste. 58461
Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2230
Toll-free: (84
As long as you manage to keep your networks separate(d) using VLANs or
something, NIC use is kind of irrelevant as far as requirements go.
*Adam Lawson*
AQORN, Inc.
427 North Tatnall Street
Ste. 58461
Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2230
Toll-free: (844) 4-AQORN-NOW ext. 101
International: +1 302
Edited subject line - forgot to add neutron. ; )
*Adam Lawson*
AQORN, Inc.
427 North Tatnall Street
Ste. 58461
Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2230
Toll-free: (844) 4-AQORN-NOW ext. 101
International: +1 302-387-4660
Direct: +1 916-246-2072
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Adam Lawson wrote
Is there an Open/Contrail document or other online resource I can read that
explains the difference between the internal "introspect" ports and
external GUI ports?
//adam
*Adam Lawson*
AQORN, Inc.
427 North Tatnall Street
Ste. 58461
Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2230
Toll-free: (844) 4
Hey everyone, is it true the only backend DB's supported by Ceilometer
(+Aodh et al) is PostgreSQL, MySQL, HBase and MongoDB?
Specifically, I don't see Cassandra listed but there was a spec back in
2013 tto inclue it as a plugin option.
//adam
*Adam Lawson*
AQORN, Inc.
427 North Tatn
Of all of the projects unde the big tent on their respective flight paths,
is there a central repo where their integration status is
listed/maintained? I.e. incubated/integrated/core etc)? I can't find it but
I know it exists...
//adam
*Adam Lawson*
AQORN, Inc.
427 North Tatnall Stree
Wednesday, April 06, 2016 4:39 PM
> *To:* CHOW Anthony
> *Cc:* Adam Lawson; openstack
> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack] all projects status?
>
>
>
> The Project Navigator http://www.openstack.org/software/project-navigator/
> should address that, but it seems a little bit outdated
Hey everyone!
Does Neutron support mpls/bgp presently? I'm looking for use cases/methods
where it's done outside Calico or Contrail.
Anyone have a link to a doc or steps where it's been done successfully?
//adam
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack
This is a scheduler thing. Kvm/Linux has it's own scheduler built in for
any process that needs to share CPU cycles aside from the filter scheduler
used by OpenStack. My understanding is that any optimizations assigned to
resource consumption will not be handled by OpenStack but with manual
tweaks.
With 4 physical cpu cores, you'll have 8 with HT so you likely don't need
anything managing overcommitting. But you also have memory contention in
your design. OpenStack facilitates resource limits to prevent the
contention from happening but does not get into managing vm priorities. The
assumption
group via OpenStack) or firewall on
the VM itself.
Another question, are incoming connections timing out, is the security
group allowing connections from everyone or a subset? i ask because I
haven't seen the easy questions asked up front.
//adam
*Adam Lawson*
Principal Architect
Office: +1-
Another FYI, OpenStack services don't have to be running to access a
virtual machine. Period. Amy other condition that prevents this is a
serious design flaw.
//adam
On Apr 13, 2017 5:31 AM, wrote:
> Fyi, the idea of controllers are a bit of a misnomer. You should have
> redundant services; they
Fyi, the idea of controllers are a bit of a misnomer. You should have
redundant services; they don't necessarily need to be on the same box.
Since your asking as a new user. Have fun!
//adam
On Apr 12, 2017 5:27 PM, "Konstantin Raskoshnyi" wrote:
> Yes, machines are still running, but since neu
I don't mean to be inflammatory. First off.
That said, I was emailed a link to review the drafted TC vision. When going
through it I did not see a vision but rather a 'yay for our to-date
accomplishments' statement. What are the actual plans for the future as
envisioned by the TC?
Be careful, a compute node showing as down may not actually be down at all
but the agent not being able to report back or frm the conductor not being
able to update the db. I was about to ask if the VM's were offline or not.
Glad you got it figured out!
//adam
On Dec 29, 2017 1:04 PM, "Jim Okken"
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
