from flufl.enum import IntEnum
class A(IntEnum):
... a = 3
...
A.a
EnumValue: A.a [value=3]
Alex
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/2013 09:55 AM, Adam Young wrote:
On 12/10/2013 05:24 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/12/13 19:45 -0800, Alex
Would it make sense to use the `enum34` package, which is a backport of teh
enum package from py3k?
Alex
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
While Python 3 has enumerated types, Python 2 does not, and the standard
package to provide id, Flufl.enum, is not yet
Nope, you're totally right, corolocal.local is a class, whose instances are
the actual coroutine local storage.
Alex
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Roman Podoliaka rpodoly...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hey all,
I think I found a serious bug in our usage of eventlet thread local
storage. Please
It's worth noting that right now, just a few blocks from the office
DreamForce is going on, so it's going to be crowded, I strongly recommend
avoiding driving if you can.
Alex
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.comwrote:
No, it does not have any parking. I
There's several issues involved in doing automated regression checking for
benchmarks:
- You need a platform which is stable. Right now all our CI runs on
virtualized instances, and I don't think there's any particular guarantee
it'll be the same underlying hardware, further virtualized systems
It seems to me the much easier solution is to just always install
coverage.py into a virtualenv, then we don't have to worry at all about
operating-system politics.
Alex
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Hi there,
It appears that in Debian,
Falcon was included as a result of Marconi moving from stackforge to being
incubated. sphinxcontrib-programoutput doesn't appear to have been added at
all, it's still under review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46325/
Alex
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Morgan Fainberg m...@metacloud.com
without
major modifications, maybe u know of such a documentation that explains
this. I'd be interested in reading that at least (maybe others would like
to also).
:-)
-Josh
--
*From:* Alex Gaynor [alex.gay...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 10, 2013 8:18 AM
)
Thanks,
Roman
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
Many of you have probably seen me send review requests in the last few
weeks
about adding PyPy support to various OpenStack projects. A few people were
confused by these, so I wanted to fill
I wonder if there's any sort of automation we can apply to this, for
example having known rechecks have signatures and if a failure matches
the signature it auto applies the recheck.
Alex
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:18 AM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote:
This message has gone
John Griffith's message of 2013-08-27 09:42:37 -0700:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wonder if there's any sort of automation we can apply to this, for
example having known rechecks have signatures and if a failure
matches
the signature
Thanks everyone, I look forward to continuing to help out!
Alex
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
Without any objections, I've added Alex Gaynor to the requirements-core
team.
Welcome, Alex!
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Jeremy Stanley
are going to use a cffi lib as part of
Barbican (key management) anyway, so I'd like to see wider acceptance.
Jarret
+1
cffi rocks
Vish
From: Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:12 PM
To: openst
I'd strongly agree with that, a project must always be gated by any tests
for it, even if they don't gate for other projects. I'd also argue that any
time there's a non-gating test (for any project) it needs a formal
explanation of why it's not gating yet, what the plan to get it to gating
is, and
who suggested Swift as the best place to get started
with OpenStack + PyPy). For those who don't know I'm one of the core
developers of PyPy :)
Alex
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2013-08-13 16:58, Alex Gaynor wrote:
One of the issues that came
Hi all,
(This references this changeset: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38415/)
One of the goals I've been working at has been getting swift running on
PyPy (and from there, the rest of OpenStack). The last blocking issue in
swift is that it currently uses netifaces, which is a C-extension
I'd favor weakening or removing this requirement. Besides google I've never
seen any other python project which enforced this standard, and I think
it's a very weak heuristic for readability.
Alex
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
I wanted to get a
I think moving towards mock is a better long term strategy:
a) I don't you're correct that it's the most familiar for most python
developers. By PyPi installs (A TERRIBLE METRIC, but it's all we have).
Mock has 24k in the last week, mox has 3.5k
b) mock is a part of the standard library starting
As a heads up I filed bugs with each of these projects (with the exception
of netifaces, which doesn't appear to have a tracker). The dnspython
maintainer has already uploaded the package to PyPi and disabled scraping!
Alex
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
netifaces is also used in swift for the whataremyips function. (Personaly
I'd love to replace that as it doesn't work on PyPy, but that's a rather
different conversation :))
Alex
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote:
I reckon the netifaces package is
20 matches
Mail list logo
