Re: [openstack-dev] [DevStack] fails in lxc running ubuntu trusty amd64

2014-06-19 Thread Jérôme Gallard
Hi Mike, We worked with Devstack and LXC and got the same issue ( https://blueprints.launchpad.net/devstack/+spec/lxc-computes ). The issue seems to be linked with namespace: https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org/msg00839.html

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Multi-node aspects of the infra

2014-04-04 Thread Jérôme Gallard
Hi James, Thanks for your feedback! When https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84473 will be merged, could we try to propose a patch and/or create a BP for that? Thanks, Jérôme 2014-04-03 18:37 GMT+02:00 James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org: Jérôme Gallard gallard.jer...@gmail.com writes: Hi

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Multi-node aspects of the infra

2014-04-03 Thread Jérôme Gallard
Hi James, Thanks for your answer! As Mathieu said, we are currently working on the multi-node part of the project and try to understand how the multi-node feature of nodepool could be used by the other components of the infra. Does something like the following lines make sense? + when a job

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Availability Zones and Host aggregates..

2014-03-27 Thread Jérôme Gallard
Hi Toan, Is what you say related to : https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/schedule-set-availability-zones? 2014-03-27 10:37 GMT+01:00 Khanh-Toan Tran khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.com: - Original Message - From: Sangeeta Singh sin...@yahoo-inc.com To: OpenStack Development

[OpenStack-Infra] Multi-node aspects of the infra

2014-03-07 Thread Jérôme Gallard
Hi all, We would like to contribute to the multi-node aspects of the infra. To do that, we want to build our own infra (setup all the zuul / jenkins / nodepool services), and try to see in which way nodepool could be improved to manage several sets of VMs. After a chat with Clark on

Re: [openstack-dev] Combination of ComputeCapabilitiesFilter and AggregateInstanceExtraSpecsFilter

2013-07-11 Thread Jérôme Gallard
Thanks a lot for your answers and for solving the issue. Regards, Jérôme On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/05/2013 08:14 PM, Qiu Yu wrote: Russell, Should ComputeCapabilitiesFilter also be restricted to use scoped format only? Currently it

[openstack-dev] Combination of ComputeCapabilitiesFilter and AggregateInstanceExtraSpecsFilter

2013-07-05 Thread Jérôme Gallard
Hi all, I'm trying to combine ComputeCapabilitiesFilter and AggregateInstanceExtraSpecsFilter. However I probably missed something, because it does not work :-) Both filters are activated with the following order: ComputeCapabilitiesFilter, AggregateInstanceExtraSpecsFilter. I created a flavor

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] volume affinity filter for nova scheduler

2013-07-03 Thread Jérôme Gallard
Hi all, Russell, I agree with all of your remarks, and especially with the fact that placement details have to be avoided to be exposed to users. However I see a possible use case for the filter. For instance, if we consider the BP Support for multiple active scheduler drivers (