On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote:
Jay,
Not far, IMHO. 100ms difference in startup time isn't something we should
spend much time optimizing. There's bigger fish to fry.
I
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
I cannot speak for all projects, but at least in Nova you
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
My main objection to the model you propose is its binary nature. You
bundle core reviewing duties with drivers duties into a single
group. That simplification means that drivers have
www.mellanox.com
Office:+972 74 712 9244
Mobile: +972 54 554 0233
Fax:+972 72 257 9400
*From:* Joe Gordon [mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 3:29 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Mellanox
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0]. Instead
of writing the same thing twice, you can look at the rendered html from
that patch [1]. Neutron tried to go from core
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:24 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0]. Instead of
writing the same thing twice, you can look at the rendered html
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you feel like a core deveper/reviewer (we initially called them core
developers) [1]:
In OpenStack a core developer is a developer who has
I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0]. Instead of
writing the same thing twice, you can look at the rendered html from that
patch [1]. Neutron tried to go from core to maintainer but after input from
the TC and others, they are keeping the term 'core' but are clarifying
/check/check-tempest-dsvm-full/f6c95de/logs/testr_results.html.gz
Also what tests are running and how do they actually check if sriov works?
I can provide more if needed.
Thanks,
Nurit.
*From:* Joe Gordon [mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 11, 2015 7:50 PM
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 01:04:46PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-03-23 21:31:30 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 09:35:50PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-03-23 15:15:18 -0400
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
We have a cross-project spec up for review discussing a change in the
release process precipitated by the fact that we are now capping library
versions in stable branch test configurations. We’ve talked about it a
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-03-23 15:15:18 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote:
[...]
I don't want it suppressed. I want the use of API extensions and the
extension framework(s) to be completely dropped for all future
API-affecting work.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 03/21/2015 01:21 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
Hi,
I've recently been playing around a bit with API microversions and I
noticed something that may be problematic.
The way microversions are handled, there is a
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 08:33:26AM +0100, Thomas Herve wrote:
Interesting bug. I think I agree with you that there isn't a good
solution
currently for instances that have a mix of shared and not-shared
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:09:33PM -0700, Rafi Khardalian wrote:
I am concerned about how block migration functions when Cinder volumes
are
attached to an instance being migrated. We noticed some unexpected
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Sean,
2015-03-16 23:15 GMT+09:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net:
Our current top level shipped example paste.ini for Nova includes the
following set of endpoint definitions:
[composite:osapi_compute]
use =
On a related note, I am trying to come up with different ways to reproduce
the quota bugs (as tracked in https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1284424)
and so far I have found one way, but I bet there are many more. So far I
have only reproduced https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1296414, which
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Nurit Vilosny nur...@mellanox.com wrote:
Hi ,
I would like to ask for a CI permission to start commenting on Nova branch.
Mellanox is engaged in pci pass-through features for quite some time now.
We have an operating Neutron CI for ~2 years, and since
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
The last couple of days I was at the Operators Meetup acting as Nova
rep for the meeting. All the sessions were quite nicely recorded to
etherpads here - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-meetup
There was both a
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2015 07:48 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
Out of sync Quotas --
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-nova-feedback L63
The quotas code
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:31 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote:
Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com writes:
After watching the TC meeting, and double checking with the meeting notes
[0], it looks like the magnum vote was deferred to next week. But what
concerns me is the lack
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
The wheel has been removed from PyPI and anyone installing testtools
1.7.0 now will install from source which works fine.
On stable/icehouse devstack fails[*] with
pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (unittest2 0.5.1
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
The TC is in the middle of implementing a fairly significant change in
project governance. You can find an overview from Thierry on the
OpenStack blog [1].
Part of the change is to recognize more projects as being
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/03/15 12:29, Russell Bryant wrote:
I feel that we're at a very vulnerable part of this transition. We've
abolished the incubation process and integrated release. We've
established a fairly low bar for new
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015, at 05:27 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/03/15 12:29, Russell Bryant wrote:
I feel that we're at a very
First pass at trying to capture this thread into a README:
https://review.openstack.org/162334
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:18 PM, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:47, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
thanks for a clear write-up of the matter and food for thought.
I think the idea
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
So a review [1] was recently submitted to cinder to fix up all of the H302
violations, and turn on the automated check for them. This is certainly a
reasonable suggestion given the number of manual reviews that
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote:
Gary Kotton came across a doozy of a bug recently:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1419785
In short, when you start a Nova compute, it will query the driver for
instances and compare that against the expected host
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
During yesterday’s cross-project meeting [1], we discussed the Eventlet
Best Practices” spec [2] started by bnemec. The discussion of that spec
revolved around the question of whether our cross-project specs
forward is a openstack-specs spec to hash out these details.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Ian Cordasco [mailto:ian.corda...@rackspace.com]
Sent: 19 February 2015 17:49
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Joe
Gordon
Cc: openstack-operat
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 06:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23
forward is a openstack-specs spec to hash out these details.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Ian Cordasco [mailto:ian.corda...@rackspace.com]
Sent: 19 February 2015 17:49
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Joe
Gordon
Cc: openstack-operators
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 03:14 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
During yesterday’s cross-project meeting [1], we discussed the
Eventlet
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
[...]
I think a lot of the frustration with our current cadence comes out of
the big stop everything (development, planning etc.), and stabilize the
release process. Which in turn isn't really
We saw the same issue elsewhere, and Doug had great explanation on how it
broke semver
https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg46533.html
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:14:36PM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
Was:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/057578.html
There has been frustration with our current 6 month development
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Johannes Erdfelt johan...@erdfelt.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Agree on the pain of maintaining milestone plans though, which is why I
propose we get rid of most of it in Liberty. That will actually be
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:50:45AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/24/2015 07:48 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 02/24/2015 12:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Towards the end of merging the regression test for the nova
volume-attach bug - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157959/ there was a
discussion around what style the functional tests should take.
Especially as that had a mix of
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 02/24/2015 03:28 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
IMHO the CLI should have an option to returned raw JSON back instead of
pretty tabled results as well.
Um... isn't
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:18 PM, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:47, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I'm happy if there are other theories about how we do these things,
being the first functional test in the python-novaclient tree that
creates and destroys
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/20/2015 07:16 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/20/2015 12:26 AM, Adam Gandelman wrote:
Its more than just the naming. In the original
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/20/2015 07:16 PM
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 02:07 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 06:06 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/20/2015 12
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
1.
A few months back we started the process to remove the tempest CLI
tests from tempest [0]. Now that we have successfully pulled novaclient
CLI
tests out of tempest, we have the process sorted
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Couldn't find anything strong in the logs to back the reason for OOM.
At the time OOM happens, mysqld and java processes have the most RAM hence
OOM selects mysqld (4.7G) to be killed.
From a glusterfs
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 06:06 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/20/2015 12:26 AM, Adam Gandelman wrote:
Its more than just the naming. In the original proposal,
requirements.txt is the compiled list of all pinned
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Feb 18, 2015, at 10:00 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 03:17 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17
better, then great!
As for Doug's comment, yes we need to work something out to overwrite
requirements.gate, under your proposed naming, with global requirments
Adam
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Doug Hellmann d
And this just broke icehouse jobs. Which means devstack-gate is broken.
http://logs.openstack.org/53/157553/1/check/check-tempest-dsvm-full-icehouse/6c63b71//logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2015-02-19_22_21_21_419
not pushing the patch to fix this myself, we need more
people who are able to monitor and fix these types of issues.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
And this just broke icehouse jobs. Which means devstack-gate is broken.
http://logs.openstack.org/53/157553/1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 02/16/2015 08:50 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On 2/16/15, 16:08, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 02/16/2015 02:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 01:01 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
Hey everyone,
1.
A few months back we started the process to remove the tempest CLI
tests from tempest [0]. Now that we have successfully pulled
novaclient CLI
tests out of tempest, we have the process sorted out. We now
have a process
that should be easy to follow for each project,
be able to filter out unit
tests or vice versa without altering discovery.
On 14 Feb 2015 08:57, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
1.
A few months back we started the process to remove the tempest CLI
tests from tempest [0]. Now that we have successfully pulled
novaclient
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015, at 07:12 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
Hi,
As you know a few of us have been spending way too much time digging
stable/juno out of the ditch its currently in. And just when we thought
we
were
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Alexandre Levine alev...@cloudscaling.com
wrote:
Yaroslav,
The bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1410622
And the review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152112/
It's recently fixed.
Note, AFAIK this has not been backported to stable/juno or
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
The previous policy is that we do a release when requested or when a
critical bug fix merges. I don't see any critical fixes awaiting
release, but I am not opposed to a release.
The reason I didn't do this yesterday is
Hi,
As you know a few of us have been spending way too much time digging
stable/juno out of the ditch its currently in. And just when we thought we
were in the clear a new library was released without a requirements cap in
stable global-requirements and broke stable/juno grenade. Everytime this
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/20/2015 10:54 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
From: Kevin L. Mitchell [kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:54 PM
When we look at consistency, we look at everything else in OpenStack.
From the
On Feb 9, 2015 10:04 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
There are at least two blocking bugs:
1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/grenade/+bug/1419913
Sounds like jogo is working a javelin fix for this. I'm not aware of a
patch to review though.
We need to stop trying to install
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
Tracking etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/wedged-stable-gate-feb-2015
BTW there is a tracking etherpad updated by
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Stable_branch_champions
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:02 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Matt Riedemann
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:02 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 2/9/2015 12:23 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Feb 9, 2015 10:04 AM
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com
wrote:
On 2/9/15, 3:02 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Adrian Otto wrote:
[...]
We have multiple options for solving this challenge. Here are a few:
1) Cherry pick scheduler code from Nova, which
-client.
It will be backward compatible change.
Maintaining backwards compatibility is very important. Making return_req_id
optional sounds like a good solution going forward.
Could you please give your suggestion on this approach.
Thanks,
Abhishek
*From:* Joe Gordon
Before releasing a new python-novaclient we should make sure novaclient is
capped on stable branches so we don't break the world yet again.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
We haven't done a release of python-novaclient in awhile (2.20.0 was
So stable/juno grenade is still broken, meaning projects that stable/juno
branches that gate on grenade are blocked,
http://logs.openstack.org/02/153502/2/check/check-grenade-dsvm/f1f3e83/logs/grenade.sh.txt.gz#_2015-02-06_10_59_31_200
2015-02-06 10:59:31.200
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Malawade, Abhijeet
abhijeet.malaw...@nttdata.com wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted patch for cinder-client [1] to 'Return tuple containing
header and body from client' instead of just response.
Also cinder spec for the same is under review [2].
This change
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com
wrote:
Hey folks,
I wanted to get some feedback from the Nova folks on using Cinder's
Brick library. As some of you
may or may not know, Cinder has an internal module called Brick. It's used
for discovering and
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-01-27 02:46:03 -0800:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
I'm open to alternative suggestions on where the list of tags,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think the simple answer is yes. We (keystone) should emit
notifications. And yes other projects should listen.
The only thing really in discussion should be:
1: soft delete or hard delete? Does the service
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think the simple answer is yes. We (keystone) should emit
notifications. And yes other projects should listen.
The only thing really in discussion should be:
1: soft delete or hard delete? Does the service
This broke grenade on stable/juno, here is the fix.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152333/
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of:
TaskFlow 0.7.0: taskflow structured state management library.
For
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-01-29 19:31 GMT+01:00 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com:
That means clients need overlapping dependencies with the stable
branches.
I don't think this is a reasonable requirement, and am not sure what we
gain from
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
So, honestly, yes.
For a library to release safely it must:
* have stable-compat jobs running (this was the issue with barbican client)
* if it has a stable/juno branch it must be pinned in stable/juno (this
was the issue on
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Douglas Mendizabal
douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Jan 29, 2015, at 1:19 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015, at 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
So
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
The following review for Kilo deprecates the EC2 API in Nova -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150929/
There are a number of reasons for this. The EC2 API has been slowly
rotting in the Nova tree, never was highly tested,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/27/2015 02:41 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to nominate Melanie Witt for the python-novaclient-core
team.
(What is python-novaclient-core? Its a new group which will contain
all of nova-core
the domains
solution instead.
++ using per service virtual environments would help us avoid a whole class
of nasty issues. On the flip side doing this makes things harder for
distros to find a set of non-conflicting dependencies etc.
On the pip solver side, joe gordon was working on a thing to install
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Michael Gale gale.mich...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,
Does anyone know where I could find a feature wishlist? Ideally a list
of outstanding features or functionality that is wanted. But is currently
missing from OpenStack and not being worked on or has been
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:32 PM, ZhiQiang Fan aji.zq...@gmail.com wrote:
@Stefano Maffulli
Yes, the main point is the conflict of reserved all, and abandon some
(actually most).
According to the order the last will take effect IIUC Monty Taylor's
explaination.
I'm thinking that we should
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
We can side step the dependency graphing and ordering issue by looking at
the list of curently installed packages via pip freeze and not installing
dependencies (pip install --no-deps)
After looking into this further
We can side step the dependency graphing and ordering issue by looking at
the list of curently installed packages via pip freeze and not installing
dependencies (pip install --no-deps)
After looking into this further here are the known issues:
* Partial capping won't work [0], so we need to pin
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:13 PM, John Warren jswar...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
Can someone tell me or point me to documentation about what the required
yum and pip packages are to be able to run tox for glance, keystone,
neutron, cinder and nova on Centos 6.5 with Python 2.6? I looked at
Eventlet released 0.16.1 on 2015-01-14 [0], which removed a deprecated API
that nova stable/* still used. This caused nova-compute in stable/juno and
stable/icehouse to crash thus breaking grenade on master. In 24 hours this
bug caused 671 grenade jobs to fail[1]!
After some quick debugging of
On Jan 14, 2015 10:09 PM, Dr. Jens Rosenboom j.rosenb...@x-ion.de wrote:
Am 14/01/15 um 05:17 schrieb Adam Gandelman:
So eventlet 0.16.x has started hitting slaves and breaking stable
branches
(its not like we weren't warned :\ )
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1410626
Should
Hi all,
I am happy to announce the release of hacking 0.10. Below is a list of
whats new. Unlike most dependencies hacking changes are not automatically
pushed out by the OpenStack Proposal Bot. In order to migrate to the new
release each project will need a patch like this:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/06/2015 12:44 AM, Saju M wrote:
Hi,
I seen a blueprint which implement Amazon VPC APIs and Status is Abandoned
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40071/
The amazon VPC effort has moved to
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Andrew Beekhof abeek...@redhat.com wrote:
On 9 Dec 2014, at 1:20 am, Roman Dobosz roman.dob...@intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:44:57 +0100
Roman Dobosz roman.dob...@intel.com wrote:
I've just started to work on the topic of detection if host is
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Sam Morrison sorri...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m working on upgrading our nova to Juno.
First I upgrade the control infrastructure, conductor,api,scheduler etc.
and migrate the DB
I also set the following on the control hosts
[upgrade_levels]
compute=icehouse
I
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Kekane, Abhishek
abhishek.kek...@nttdata.com wrote:
Hi All,
AFAIK, for shelve api the parameter shelved_offload_time need to be
configured on compute node.
Can we configure this parameter on controller node as well.
Not 100% sure what you are asking
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Eli Qiao ta...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
hi all:
I have a patch [1], just did slight changes on api, do I need to write a
spec(kinds of wasting time to get approved)?
since api-microversion[2] is almost done, can we just feel free to add
changes as
On Dec 23, 2014 12:26 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
It would be great if we can get approval for the Hierachical Quota
handling in Nova too (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129420/).
Nova's spec deadline has passed, but I think this is a good candidate for
an exception. We will
/050755.html
I believe that Intel is building a CI system to test SR-IOV as well.
Thanks for the clarification.
Thanks,
Robert
On 12/18/14, 9:13 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Robert Li (baoli) ba...@cisco.com
wrote:
Hi,
During
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
Rather than waste your time making excuses let me state where we are and
where I would like to get to, also sharing my thoughts about how you can
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Robert Li (baoli) ba...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi,
During the Kilo summit, the folks in the pci passthrough and SR-IOV
groups discussed what we’d like to achieve in this cycle, and the result
was documented in this Etherpad:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
Some thoughts inline. I'll go ahead and push a change to remove the
things everyone seems to agree on.
On 12/09/2014 09:05 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/09/2014 09:11 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 9, 2014, at 6:39
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Radoslav Gerganov rgerga...@vmware.com
wrote:
On 12/15/2014 12:54 PM, Neil Jerram wrote:
My Nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) does not appear
on this dashboard, even though I believe it's in good standing and - I
hope - close to approval.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Radoslav Gerganov rgerga...@vmware.com
wrote:
On 12/15/2014 12:54 PM, Neil Jerram wrote:
My Nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130732/) does not appear
on this dashboard
101 - 200 of 797 matches
Mail list logo