the JS*int projects from OpenStack?
On 4/2/14 8:43 AM, Radomir Dopieralski openst...@sheep.art.pl wrote:
On 02/04/14 15:26, Kevin Conway wrote:
What licensing issues were brought up that prevent the use of JSLint or
JSHint? Both are MIT licensed.
Granted, JSLint has an additional clause
.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Kevin Conway
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
On 2/4/14 12:07 PM, victor stinner victor.stin...@enovance.com wrote:
The purpose of replacing eventlet with asyncio is to get a well defined
control flow, no more surprising task switching at random points.
I disagree with this. Eventlet and gevent yield the execution context
anytime an IO
Denis,
It seems that you are hitting on a couple of points here. 1) You aren't a
fan of the fact that calls to user/db are routed through an extensions
written for mysql. 2) This creates a conflict when a datastore does not
support those calls. I am confused about your solution.
Your suggestion
Will we be doing more complex things than every day at some time? ie,
does the user base see value in configuring backups every 12th day of
every other month? I think this is easy to write the schedule code, but i
fear that it will be hard to build a smarter scheduler that would only
allow X
What is the major motivation not to simply use a glance image named MySQL
5.5 or MongoDB 2.4?
Wouldn't that give service providers all the flexibility they need for
providing different types? For example, I could offer a simple MySQL
image that creates a MySQL instance. If all my users use the
