On 09/15/2015 02:06 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 13:46:16 -0700:
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-09-14 13:25:43 -0700:
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 12:51:24 -0700:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of
On 09/14/2015 04:58 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
Apologies for forking the thread, but there was way too much in Doug's
email (and Flavio's response) and I only want to make a few points about
tasks. Please read Doug's original email and Flavio's reply at some
point, preferably before you read
On 09/05/2015 06:19 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 04:20:23PM EDT, Kevin Benton wrote:
Right, it depends on your perspective of who 'owns' the API. Is it
cloud-init or EC2?
At this point I would argue that cloud-init is in control because it would
be a large undertaking to
mordred@camelot:~$ neutron net-create test-net-mt
Policy doesn't allow create_network to be performed.
Thank you neutron. Excellent job.
Here's what that looks like at the REST layer:
DEBUG: keystoneclient.session RESP: [403] date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015
13:55:47 GMT connection: close content-type:
On 09/04/2015 10:55 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
On Sep 4, 2015, at 07:04, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com>
wrote:
mordred@camelot:~$ neutron net-create test-net-mt Policy doesn't
allow create_network to be performed.
Thank you neutron. Excellent job.
Here's what that look
On 09/04/2015 01:42 PM, John Griffith wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Mathieu Gagné <mga...@internap.com> wrote:
On 2015-09-04 12:50 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 09/04/2015 10:55 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
Obviously the translation of errors
would be more difficult if the en
On 08/28/2015 08:32 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
Ceilometer with ... something:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in
On 08/28/2015 08:32 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
Ceilometer with ... something:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in
On 08/28/2015 07:36 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
If you just want to shoot the breeze please respond here. If you
have specific comments on the spec please response there.
I have been thinking about doing it for Ironic as well so I'm looking
for options. IMHO after using WSME I would
On 08/21/2015 03:33 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/21/2015 02:34 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
So - the tl;dr is that I don't think that we should accept inputs like
the following:
x - 192
x/y - 10/8
x.x/y - 192.168/16
x.x.x/y - 192.168.0/24
which are equivalent to::
x.0.0.0/y -
On 08/01/2015 03:40 AM, Mike Perez wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
...random thought here, skip as needed... in all honesty orchestration
solutions like mesos
(http://mesos.apache.org/assets/img/documentation/architecture3.jpg),
map-reduce
On 07/24/2015 12:47 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from James Galvin's message of 2015-07-24 09:08:36 -0700:
Hi All
I am having some trouble with down sizing an instance,
I can resize the instance from say small flavour to medium flavour but when
trying to resize the instance back from
On 07/14/2015 11:08 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On 7/13/15, 16:19, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
Ian Cordasco wrote:
On 7/13/15, 15:09, Dave Walkerem...@daviey.com wrote:
On 13 Jul 2015 8:52 pm, Ian Cordascoian.corda...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On 7/13/15, 03:38, Thierry
Hi everybody!
Ok. There is nothing more actually useful I can say that isn't in the
subject line. As I mentioned previously, the preliminary results from
our name election are here:
http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_4983776e190c8dbc
As you are all probably aware by now, as a
On 07/10/2015 07:19 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 10 July 2015 at 01:59, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote:
Or a database per python major version (or at least gracefully handle the
incompatibility).
So that would partition the data, and the whole point of test
*repository* is
to anything.
Cheers
Tristan
*From:* Jaesuk Ahn [mailto:bluejay@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, 8 July 2015 2:41 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List; Openstack Users; Monty Taylor;
Community User Groups, OpenStack
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-community] [openstack-dev] OpenStack
Hi everyone!
In light of issues raised concerning the initially selected name for the
M release (Meiji), that name will not be used.
It turns out fully open community and fully inclusive collaboration is a
hard thing to get right. On the one hand, we do not want to exclude
anyone's input or
Hi everybody!
Ok. There is nothing more actually useful I can say that isn't in the
subject line. As I mentioned previously, the preliminary results from
our name election are here:
http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_4983776e190c8dbc
As a follow on step, the OpenStack Foundation
Hi everybody!
Ok. There is nothing more actually useful I can say that isn't in the
subject line. As I mentioned previously, the preliminary results from
our name election are here:
http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_4983776e190c8dbc
As a follow on step, the OpenStack Foundation
On 06/29/2015 08:44 AM, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Hello all,
DIB has come a long way and we seem to have a fairly stable interface
for the elements and the image creation scripts. As such, I think it's
about time we commit to a major version release. Hopefully this can give
our users the
On 06/26/2015 04:26 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
The Python 3.4 gate (py34) of cinder, glance and nova just became
voting. You now have to write Python code compatible with Python 2.7 and
3.4.
WOOHOO! Well done!
If the py34 check job fails on your patch, you may try to rebase it to
get
On 06/26/2015 07:24 AM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015, at 04:01 AM, Matthew Booth wrote:
I wrote this:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195983/1/tools/de-pbr.py,cm
Ideally we'd fix PBR, but this seems to be expected behaviour. Thoughts?
Use the PBR_VERSION env var [1], it exists
On 06/25/2015 10:22 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining
them, and want to air those concerns and see if others agree or can help
me see why I shouldn't worry.
On 06/25/2015 01:35 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Sean's point and Dmitri's are similar.
There are APIs for projects which do not have official team or program
names. And some teams may produce more than one forward-facing service.
Naming the API based in the team name doesn't make
On 06/24/2015 02:05 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/24/2015 01:51 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com
mailto:chd...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/24/2015 07:57 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On 06/23/2015 11:49 AM, Mike Perez wrote:
There was a bug raised [1] from some large deployments that the Cinder
client 1.2.0 and beyond is not working because of version discovery.
Unfortunately it's not taking into account of deployments that have a
proxy.
Cinder client asks Keystone to
On 06/23/2015 01:51 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
Hello everyone,
I took some time this morning to write out a document[0] that outlines
one possible ways for us to manage our upstream modules in a more
consistent fashion. I know we've had a few emails bouncing around
lately around this topic of
On 06/22/2015 02:49 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
We have quite a long list of patches to the openstack/requirements
repository, many of which are straightforward changes to increase the
minimums for libraries we develop within the community (meaning we are
holding up projects from using new
Hey all!
The M naming poll has concluded. I'd say and the winner is ... except
we still need to get the winning choice(s) vetted for legal entanglements.
Feel free to go and look at the results, they are publicly available -
but please DON'T start making t-shirts or having parties (ok, have as
Hey all!
The M naming poll has concluded. I'd say and the winner is ... except
we still need to get the winning choice(s) vetted for legal entanglements.
Feel free to go and look at the results, they are publicly available -
but please DON'T start making t-shirts or having parties (ok, have as
On 06/19/2015 11:40 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 06/19/2015 10:31 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Jun 19, 2015 3:56 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/19/2015 09:19 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote:
Some reasons of having complementary projects in Stackalytics:
*
On 06/19/2015 03:20 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to give a quick update on the new experimental job for testing
the Linux Bridge mechanism driver for Neutron.
I believe that there is only one patch that needs to be merged, in order to
get the job to a point where we could move
On 06/17/2015 03:24 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On 6/17/15, 13:53, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-06-17 14:47:48 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
+1 both to using -x and to removing the shebang.
Agreed. We don't want anyone directly invoking this file as an
executable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/17/2015 08:53 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
Hi Serg,
On 06/17/2015 05:35 AM, Serg Melikyan wrote:
Hi Emilien,
I would like to answer your question regarding
stackforge/puppet-murano repository asked in different thread:
Someone from
Hey everybody!
I've started the poll for the M release. By now, you should have gotten
an email with a link to the vote. If you did not and think that you
should have, please let me know (directly, not to the mailing list
please) and I can re-send and/or fix as necessary.
Please remember that
Hi!
When we cut a release, we do so on a branch. This means that the tag for
the release is not in the master branch of the repo, which means git can
produce unexpected output in some cases.
To solve this, we have the proposal bot propose a null-merge of the tag
back in to master. The patch in
On 06/04/2015 11:27 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
On 06/04/2015 05:03 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/04/2015 10:50 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
On 06/04/2015 04:40 PM, Ruby Loo wrote:
Hi,
In Kilo, we introduced microversions but it seems to be a
work-in-progress. There is an effort now to add
Hey everyone!
It's time to pick a name for the M release.
If you have a name you'd like us to vote on, please add it here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Naming/M_Proposals
The nominations will be open until 2015-06-07 23:59:59 UTC.
If you don't remember the rules, they're here:
Hey everyone!
It's time to pick a name for the M release.
If you have a name you'd like us to vote on, please add it here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Naming/M_Proposals
The nominations will be open until 2015-06-07 23:59:59 UTC.
If you don't remember the rules, they're here:
On 05/28/2015 11:25 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 05/26/2015 03:13 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:00:32AM +0200, Géza Gémes wrote:
Hi,
When someone calls nova volume-attach or the block-device-mapping
parameter
at boot, it is possible to specify a device name for the
On 05/28/2015 12:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr;
At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with
the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them.
I had a brief follow-up conversation with Doug and Thierry, but I'd
like this
On 05/27/2015 06:35 PM, Keith Bray wrote:
Joe, regarding apps-catalog for any app deployable on OpenStack
(regardless of deployment technology), my two cents is that is a good
idea. I also believe, however, that the app-catalog needs to evolve
first with features that make it super simple to
On 05/11/2015 02:05 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services)
andrea.r...@hp.com wrote:
Agreed. Violating the HTTP spec is something that should be avoided.
Actually it is not violating the HTTP spec, from RFC:
A payload within a DELETE
On 05/08/2015 03:45 AM, Nikhil Manchanda wrote:
Comments and answers inline.
Li Tianqing writes:
[...]
1) why we put the trove vm into user's tenant, not the trove's
tenant? User can login on that vm, and that vm must connect to
rabbitmq. It is quite insecure.
what's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/04/2015 08:47 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On 05/04/2015 10:37 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 05/04/2015 07:52 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote:
On 2015-05-04 9:15 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 05/04/2015 06:03 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote:
On 2015-05-04
On 05/04/2015 03:53 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi, I'd like to talk about how often we can and should release pbr,
and what criteria we should use for 1.0.
tl;dr: release weekly [outside of organisation-wide-freezes], do a 1.0
immediately.
pbr, like all our libraries affects everything
On 05/04/2015 04:15 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 5 May 2015 at 08:12, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 05/04/2015 03:53 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
I'm fine with that in principle - I tend to release personal libraries
pretty much as soon as something interesting hits them. I have
On 05/01/2015 09:16 PM, Jamie Lennox wrote:
Hi all,
At around the time Barbican was applying for incubation there was a
discussion about supported WSGI frameworks. From memory the decision
at the time was that Pecan was to be the only supported framework and
that for incubation Barbican
On 04/29/2015 02:19 AM, Steve Kowalik wrote:
On 29/04/15 04:41, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 04/28/2015 02:02 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015, at 11:13 PM, Steve Kowalik wrote:
[snip]
* Decide if we host full upstream sources, or if we point at a remote
site with tarballs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/30/2015 08:06 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
On Apr 30, 2015, at 9:52 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 04/30/2015 12:40 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
Swift is a scalable and durable storage engine for storing
unstructured data. It's
On 04/26/2015 08:08 PM, Spencer Krum wrote:
Hi All,
The primary maintainer of puppetboard is stepping aside:
https://github.com/puppet-community/puppetboard/issues/132. We use
puppetboard to display facts from machines and reports of puppet runs. We
can expect to continue to have this need
On 04/26/2015 02:21 PM, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2015-04-23 23:27:00 +:
Hi folks,
I have spent the last couple of days trying to bring some sanity to the
image building process for Magnum.
I have found a tool which the Atomic upstream
On 04/25/2015 09:49 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-25 12:12:15 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
I'd like to make that a little more official:
- put it in our docs
- stop testing python setup.py install.
[...]
And emit a clear error message? (Even if that just means
On 04/24/2015 08:12 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
In our pbr integration tests we ensure that 'python setup.py install'
works, as well as ensuring that 'pip install' works. But see
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015525.html
- for the last 18 months in pbr we've
April 2015 at 15:27, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 04/25/2015 09:49 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-25 12:12:15 +1200 (+1200), Robert Collins wrote:
[...]
I'd like to make that a little more official:
- put it in our docs
- stop testing python setup.py install
On 04/25/2015 11:46 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 04/25/2015 11:33 AM, Dave Walker wrote:
I'm not going to pretend it is graceful... but is there a situation
where _ isn't correct?
Ooh. This is a worthy avenue to explore ...
Ok. After some chatting with fungi in IRC - I've got this:
https
On 04/24/2015 06:28 PM, David Medberry wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote:
What can and should the TC at large, and you specifically, do to ensure
quality improves for the developers, end-users and operators of
OpenStack as a full system, both as a
On 04/18/2015 10:44 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Replying inline.
-Original Message- From: Monty Taylor
[mailto:mord...@inaugust.com] Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 7:53 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
[Nova][Neutron] Linuxbridge as the default
On 04/17/2015 06:48 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote:
I know the DevStack issue seems to be solved, but I had to
respond.inline
From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov] Sent: Friday, April
17, 2015 12:28 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions) Subject: Re:
On 04/16/2015 07:41 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
We have a couple of Openstack projects that uses WSME for their REST
APIs[1], but WSME project looks abandoned. The review stats are not good,
for the last 40 days the project didn't have a single review from a core
reviewer[2], the
On 04/14/2015 08:21 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
It's time to be honest about the level of support that comes with those
other backends, deprecate the plugability, and move on to more
interesting problems. We do have plenty of them to solve. :) Perhaps in
On 04/14/2015 01:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
the flood gates for even more python3 problems to be found and fixed.
Recently a proposal was made to make
On 04/12/2015 08:01 PM, James Polley wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 04/12/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Right now we do something that upstream pip considers wrong: we make
our requirements.txt be our install_requires.
Upstream
On 04/12/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Right now we do something that upstream pip considers wrong: we make
our requirements.txt be our install_requires.
Upstream there are two separate concepts.
install_requirements, which are meant to document what *must* be
installed to import
an official installation guide; no need to
expose newbies including myself to the complexity of v2.
Bernd
-Original Message-
From: Monty Taylor [mailto:mord...@inaugust.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 6:22 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions);
openstack-d
Sorry for top posting - I wasn't subscribed to the doc list before
clarkb told me about this thread. Warning ... rage coming ... if you
don't want to read rage on a Saturday, I recommend skipping this email.
a) There may be a doc bug here, but I'm not 100% convinced it's a doc
bug - I'll try to
As a follow up to my previous email about thinking about ceasing to use
storyboard, I have done some work towards investigating using phabricator.
phabricator came out of Facebook, but has been spun out completely and
is now managed as an Open Source project. There is a company that has
formed
On 04/03/2015 11:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/03/2015 11:00 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
As a follow up to my previous email about thinking about ceasing to use
storyboard, I have done some work towards investigating using phabricator.
phabricator came out of Facebook, but has been spun out
On 04/03/2015 12:06 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-04-03 11:54:00 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
[...]
2) is there an event stream of changes (either real time or rss) that
can be consumed by said tools? Having the change stream would be really
helpful.
Which relates to a feature
On 04/03/2015 08:55 AM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
I was wondering..
Is the OpenStack CI/CD Infra using Heat in any way? Do the commits
trigger a new build of DevStack/OpenStack that is based on a Heat
Template or just the provisioning of a regular instance and then
deployment of code on
On 04/03/2015 08:55 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
I am looking forward to the Liberty cycle and seeing the special
casing we do for SQLite in our migrations (and elsewhere). My
inclination is that we should (similar to the deprecation of
eventlet) deprecate support for SQLite in Keystone. In
On 04/03/2015 11:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
As a follow up to my previous email about thinking about ceasing to use
storyboard, I have done some work towards investigating using phabricator.
[...]
For the record, I'll repost some of the analysis I did for mordred
On 04/02/2015 06:22 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote:
Hi stackers,
Recently, I started working on speeding up Rally cli.
What I understand immediately is that I don't understand why it takes
700-800ms
to just run rally
On 04/01/2015 05:41 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0]. Instead
of writing the same thing twice, you can look at the rendered html from
that patch [1]. Neutron tried to go from core to maintainer but after
input from the
On 03/27/2015 07:21 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/26/2015 06:46 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 27 March 2015 at 09:14, Ryan Brown rybr...@redhat.com
wrote:
Ooof, that's huge. If we can configure it to be less
aggressive I love the *idea* of having everything formatted
semantically, but that's
On 03/25/2015 05:50 PM, Maru Newby wrote:
I am excited by the release of YAPF [1], a gofmt-like too for python.
I think it has the potential to simplify style enforcement, and as
much as I appreciate our current hacking checks, I’d be much happier
not requiring developers to manually conform
On 03/24/2015 06:05 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Mark McClain's message of 2015-03-24 10:25:31 -0400:
Echoing both Thierry and John. I support Mike’s decision to enforce the
requirement. Maintaining
On 03/23/2015 04:15 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Jimmy Mcarthur wrote:
Hi all - The OpenStack Foundation has already worked up at least a
portion of this solution by allowing one or more users with an
OpenStackID to be set as a CCLA Admin for their
Hi everybody,
First, some background:
A year and a half ago, Infra started down the road of of writing a
replacement for the pieces of Launchpad that OpenStack continues to use.
There were several reasons, but notable amongst them are:
- Desire to use the forthcoming openstackid OpenID/Oauth as
On 03/21/2015 01:21 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
Hi,
I've recently been playing around a bit with API microversions and I
noticed something that may be problematic.
The way microversions are handled, there is a monotonically increasing
MAX_API_VERSION value in
On 03/17/2015 09:07 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 03/16/2015 08:32 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 17 March 2015 at 13:22, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-03-17 12:54:00 +1300:
I've raised this in reviews 157135 and 153966, but I think
On 03/16/2015 08:32 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 17 March 2015 at 13:22, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-03-17 12:54:00 +1300:
I've raised this in reviews 157135 and 153966, but I think it deserves
a thread of its own.
I think
On 03/05/2015 12:02 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
The python-glanceclient release management team is pleased to announce:
python-glanceclient version 0.16.1 has been released on Thursday, Mar 5th
around 04:56 UTC.
For more information, please find the details at:
On 03/05/2015 05:26 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
And the results:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-W6R6K2T7/
It would appear that 'infra cloud' is far enough ahead of the others,
including a wide margin in front of discuss further that I think we
can declare it the winner of this very
On 02/26/2015 05:41 PM, Zaro wrote:
Thanks Jim. This makes a lot of sense and will hopefully make things
simpler and more robust.
Just a few questions:
I am not Jim - but I'm going to answer anyway ...
1. It looks like zuul can request a specific set of nodes for a job. Do
you envision
On 02/17/2015 07:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:16:46PM +0100, Christian Berendt wrote:
On 02/17/2015 12:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
In section 4.(c) the LICENSE text says
(c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
that
On 02/10/2015 10:28 AM, Alexander Tivelkov wrote:
Hi folks,
One of the key features that we are adding to Glance with the
introduction of Artifacts is the ability to have multiple versions of
the same object in the repository: this gives us the possibility to
query for the latest version of
On 02/10/2015 05:26 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
James,
Awesome! Amazing! You guys rock!=)
Thanks Boris! Just trying to keep up with all of the awesome developers
we have out there!
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:26 AM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote:
Hi,
We have added support for
On 02/04/2015 12:48 PM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
I agree. StoryBoard's storyboard-webclient project has a lot of existing
code already that's pretty well documented, but without knowing what
documentation system we were going to settle on we never put any rule
enforcement in place. If someone
On 02/04/2015 06:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:58:03AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
The first one is performance -- each call would spawn a Python
interpreter which would then call the system command. This was fine when
there were just a few calls here and there,
On 01/30/2015 12:20 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure:
contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability
on infra projects in Gerrit) and root members (people with
administrative access). Read all about it
On 01/28/2015 06:33 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
I can envision turning this driver into a total monster, adding
C-speedups where needed but without getting in the way of async
patching, adding new APIs for explicit async, and everything
On 01/29/2015 11:06 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
As a quick preface, today there is the assumption you can upgrade and
downgrade your SQL Schema. For the most part we do our best to test all of
this in our unit tests (do upgrades and downgrades land us in the same
schema). What isn’t clearly
with
decisions, however well meaning, that take place outside of the public
context.
So please accept my apology for my language - and please engage with me
in the discussion around how to make sure people don't inadvertently
begin to feel disenfranchised.
Thanks,
Monty
On 01/27/2015 04:50 PM, Monty
On 01/27/2015 10:35 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Lauren Sell lau...@openstack.org writes:
Hey Monty,
I’d like to weigh in here, because I think there have been some
misunderstandings around Lemming-gate. I’m glad you raised your
concerns; it’s a good test of release naming for us all to
On 01/28/2015 01:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
You'll notice that I did say in my suggestion that ANYONE should be able
to propose a name - I believe that would include non-dev people. Since
the people in question are marketing people, I would imagine that if any
of them
I do not like how we are selecting names for our releases right now.
The current process is autocratic and opaque and not fun - which is the
exact opposite of what a community selected name should be.
I propose:
* As soon as development starts on release X, we open the voting for the
name of
On 01/27/2015 06:05 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
On Jan 27, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I do not like how we are selecting names for our releases right now.
The current process is autocratic and opaque and not fun - which is the
exact opposite of what a community
On 01/17/2015 03:27 AM, ZhiQiang Fan wrote:
Hi, developers
I have observed that some source code files in our projects have been
announced as Copyright xxx, All rights reserved, and then followed by a
Apache License
Is this right? any conflict?
And if one company claims that it
On 01/14/2015 07:28 AM, Csaba Henk wrote:
Hi,
I hope I'm addressing the right list -- if not, please point
me where it's appropriate.
We (Manila developers) plan to start a new side-project that would
be hosted on Stackforge. It's tentatively named Manila Image Project,
although it would
501 - 600 of 900 matches
Mail list logo
