Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Barcelona Design Summit space needs

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 07:18:26PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:04:15AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> As a reminder, here's what we had for Austin: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] FFE request for Ceph RGW integration

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 03:25:30PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Here's my 2 cents: > > The patch in puppet-ceph has been here for long time now and it still > doesn't work (recent update of today, puppet-ceph is not idempotent > when deploying RGW service. It must be fixed in order to get >

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Deep merge map of lists?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:10:47PM +0200, Jiří Stránský wrote: > > On 30.8.2016 10:17, Steven Hardy wrote: > > > > > Yeah, that gets us closer, but we do need to handle more than one value > > (list entry) per key, e.g: > > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Feature freeze exception for OVN

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 07:53:07PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote: > Hi, > > The THT patch for OVN [1] has no more dependencies with the recent merging > of [2]. The changes in heat templates does not have any impact on the > existing templates as major of the changes are in new templates and will

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Ironic composable services

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:20:00AM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > Bare metal provisioning is a hot topic right now. These services are also > required for Dan's heat-driven undercloud work. The majority of changes has > landed already, but there a few changes waiting on puppet-ironic

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Deep merge map of lists?

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:03:27PM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:07:09AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > >> dict($.groupBy($.keys().toList()[0], $.values().toList()[0][0]))

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Requesting FFE for improved Swift deployments

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:32:09PM +0200, Christian Schwede wrote: > Hello, > > kindly asking for a FFE for a required setting to improve Swift-based > TripleO deployments: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358643/ This looks like it's associated with a bug, and if it's a bugfix then no FFE

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Manila CephFS Native backend integration

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS > > driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Deep merge map of lists?

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:07:09AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a need to merge a list of maps of lists: > > > > heat_template_version: 2016-10-14 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][release] Plans re newton-3 release and feature freeze exceptions

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:18:17PM +0300, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: >On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > There have been some discussions on $subject recently, so I wanted to > give > a st

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Deep merge map of lists?

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:07:09AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a need to merge a list of maps of lists: > > > > heat_template_version: 2016-10-14 >

[openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Deep merge map of lists?

Hi all, I have a need to merge a list of maps of lists: heat_template_version: 2016-10-14 outputs: debug: value: yaql: # dict(vms=>dict($.vms.select([$.name, $]))) expression: dict($.data.l.select([$.keys().toList()[0], $.values().toList()[0]])) data:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] FFE request for Manila integration

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:26:51AM -0400, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > The 3 patches we need to wrap up the Manila integration for TripleO still > haven't gotten enough review attention to merge: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354019 > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354014 >

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][release] Plans re newton-3 release and feature freeze exceptions

Hi all, There have been some discussions on $subject recently, so I wanted to give a status update. Next week we will tag our newton-3 release, and we're currently working to either land or defer the remaining features tracked here: https://launchpad.net/tripleo/+milestone/newton-3 We need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][tripleo][horizon][tripleo-ui] Parameter groups, tags and deprecation

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:19:12PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 25/08/16 14:02, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > So I'm following up on a discussion that started here: > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356240 > > > > Ba

[openstack-dev] [heat][tripleo][horizon][tripleo-ui] Parameter groups, tags and deprecation

Hi all, So I'm following up on a discussion that started here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356240 Basically I recently suggested[1] that relaxing the restriction where a parameter can only exist in exactly one parameter_group would be a way to help work around some pain-points we have in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] collaboration request with vendors

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:11:38PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > TripleO does support multiple vendors for different type of backends. > Here are some examples: > Neutron networking: Cisco, Nuage, Opencontrail, Midonet, Plumgrid, Biswitch > Cinder: Dell, Netapp, Ceph > > TripleO developers are

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Testing optional composable services in the CI

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:20:59AM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > However, the current gate system allows to run jobs based on files affected. > > So we can also run a scenario covering ironic on THT check/gate if > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Barcelona Design Summit space needs

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:04:15AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Team, > > Thierry sent an email to all PTLs about space needs for next Summit. Thanks for raising this while I was out Emilien - indeed we need to provide some feedback (before the end of August, ideally sooner) about our needs

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] release reminder

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:17:16AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > This is a quick release update: > > - We're currently R-6, "Final release for non-client libraries". > - Next week will be R-5, "Feature freeze" and "newton-3 milestone". > We'll proceed to a TripleO b3 release. If you need FFE,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fernet Key rotation

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:31:29AM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 09/08/16 21:21, Adam Young wrote: > > On 08/09/2016 06:00 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > > > > > > In either case a good mechanism might be to use a Heat Software > > > Deployment via the Heat API directly (i.e. not as part of a stack)

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making the nonha-multinode and undercloud jobs voting

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:14:24PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > I've proposed: > https://review.openstack.org/353019 > > which makes gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-nv and > gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-undercloud-nv become voting jobs. > > I think these jobs have proven to be stable enough

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Progress on overcloud upgrade / update jobs

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 09:46:20PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently working by iteration to get a new upstream job that test > upgrades and update. > Until now, I'm doing baby steps. I bootstrapped the work to upgrade > undercloud, see https>

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:56:32PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/05/2016 01:21 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > > > Last week I started some prototy

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] a new Undercloud install driven by Heat

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 12:27:40PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 08/04/2016 11:48 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > Last week I started some prototype work on what could be a new way to > > install the Undercloud. The driving force behind this was some of the > > recent "composable services" work

Re: [openstack-dev] Project mascots update

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:19:10AM -0700, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: >Thanks to all of you for contributing unique and inspiring ideas to choose >a team mascot. You can view a list of projects that have chosen their >mascots here: http://www.openstack.org/project-mascots, and more will

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Improving Swift deployments with TripleO

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:36:45PM +0200, Christian Schwede wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to improve the Swift deployments done by TripleO. There are a > few problems today when deployed with the current defaults: Thanks for digging into this, I'm aware this has been something of a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Modifying just a few values on overcloud redeploy

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:04:22AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > On 07/27/2016 06:04 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:23:21PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > > > I worked through how to do a complete clone of the templates to do a > > > deploy and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:08:08PM +0100, Dougal Matthews wrote: >On 27 July 2016 at 12:41, Honza Pokorny wrote: > > Hello folks, > > As the tripleo-ui project is quickly maturing, it might be time to start > versioning our code.  As of now, the version is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 08:41:32AM -0300, Honza Pokorny wrote: > Hello folks, > > As the tripleo-ui project is quickly maturing, it might be time to start > versioning our code. As of now, the version is set to 0.0.1 and that > hardly reflects the state of the project. > > What do you think? I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Modifying just a few values on overcloud redeploy

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:23:21PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: >I worked through how to do a complete clone of the templates to do a >deploy and change a couple values here: > >http://adam.younglogic.com/2016/06/custom-overcloud-deploys/ > >However, all I want to do is to set two

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] service validation during deployment steps

Hi Emilien, On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:59:33PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > I would love to hear some feedback about $topic, thanks. Sorry for the slow response, we did dicuss this on IRC, but providing that feedback and some other comments below: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Emilien

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] moving tripleo-ci/test-environments into THT

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:30:37PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Ben Nemec <openst...@nemebean.com> wrote: > > On 07/21/2016 11:31 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:32:23PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] moving tripleo-ci/test-environments into THT

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:32:23PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > We're currently using tripleo-ci to store our test-environments files > (ie: multinode.yaml, etc). > To make it compatible with our different versions of TripleO, we have 2 > options: > > * Duplicate templates and use

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo-common bugs, bug tracking and launchpad tags

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:28:10PM +0100, Julie Pichon wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday Dougal mentioned on IRC that he hadn't realised there was a > separate project for tripleo-common bugs on Launchpad [1] and that he'd > been using the TripleO main tracker [2] instead. > > Since the TripleO tracker

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Gabriele Cerami for tripleo-quickstart core

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:06:53AM -0400, John Trowbridge wrote: > Howdy, > > I would like to propose Gabriele (panda on IRC), for tripleo-quickstart > core. He has worked on some pretty major features for the project > (explicit teardown, devmode), and has a good understanding of the code base.

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Integration of non-puppet service configuration?

Hi all, Recently I've had a few discussions around $subject, and in particular there are folks involved in our community who would like to enable an optional alternative so puppet-ceph for configuring ceph services in a deployed overcloud. The alternative under discussion is ceph-ansible, and I

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Heat map replacement options

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:25:39AM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to figure out the cleanest way to do a replacement of values in > a mapping (json parameter) in a heat template, e.g: > > ServiceNetMap: > type: json > default: > Iro

Re: [openstack-dev] [DIB] [TripleO] Should we have a DIB meeting?

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 04:20:35PM -0700, Stephane Miller wrote: >There are a lot of interesting and complex changes going on with DIB at >the moment. This is a good thing, but it also means that we have more >complex decisions to make for the project. We've already taken one step to >

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Heat map replacement options

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:35:51PM +0300, Peter Razumovsky wrote: >Try this: >yaql: >  expression:let(root => $) -> >dict($root.data.service.items().select([$[0], $root.data.ip[$[1]]])) >  data: >    service: { get_param: ServiceNetMap } >    ip: { get_param: NetIpMap}

[openstack-dev] [heat][yaql] Heat map replacement options

Hi all, I'm trying to figure out the cleanest way to do a replacement of values in a mapping (json parameter) in a heat template, e.g: ServiceNetMap: type: json default: IronicApiNetwork: internal_api CephPublicNetwork: storage NetIpMap: type: json default:

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][release] TripleO Newton Release schedule and Feature Freeze

Hi all, So we discussed $subject in our weekly meeting, and I wanted to follow up with some proposals to clarify our plan wrt the final Newton release, feature freeze, and how the dates will line up given that we're now following[1] the cycle-trailing release model[2] for most TripleO

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] 3rd party CI

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 04:45:03PM -0400, Wesley Hayutin wrote: >Greetings, >Just wanted to let folks know we're bringing up two 3rd party gates for >TripleO CI atm. >1. The first gate will be for upgrading from mitaka -> newton/master >2. The second gate will be for running

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Making TripleO CI easier to consume outside of TripleO CI

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 03:39:41PM -0400, John Trowbridge wrote: > Howdy folks, > > In the TripleO meeting two weeks ago, it came up that tripleo-quickstart > is being used as a CI tool in RDO. This came about organically, because > we needed to use RDO CI to self-gate quickstart (it relies on

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][os-net-config] add support for NFV virtual switch

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 04:38:49PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 07/07/2016 05:45 PM, Xin Wu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is Xin from Big Switch. I'm proposing to make os_net_config support > > DPDK switch for NFV workloads. > > Current os_net_config supports ovs_bridge, linux_bridge,

Re: [openstack-dev] Mascot/logo for your project

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 08:00:29AM -0700, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: >The Foundation would like to help promote OpenStack projects in the big >tent with branding and marketing services. The idea is to create a family >of logos for OpenStack projects that are unique, yet immediately >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:22:33PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 07/04/2016 01:42 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > I wanted to revisit this thread, as I see some of these interfaces > > are now posted for review, and I have a couple of ques

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO CI mentoring

Hi all, At last weeks meeting, we discussed the idea of some sort of rotation where folks would volunteer their time to both help fix CI when it breaks, and also pass on some of the accrued knowledge within the team to newer folks wishing to learn. I'm hoping this will achive a few things: -

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

Hi Dmitry, I wanted to revisit this thread, as I see some of these interfaces are now posted for review, and I have a couple of questions around the naming (specifically for the "provide" action): On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:31:36PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > The last step before the

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][heat] Global stack-list for Magnum service user

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 11:43:47AM +0200, Johannes Grassler wrote: > Hello, > > Magnum has a periodic task that checks the state of the Heat stacks it creates > for its bays. It does this across all users/tenants that have Magnum bays. > Currently it uses a global stack-list operation to query

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] glance backend: replace swift by file in CI

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:59:45PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 06/28/2016 01:37 PM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > > TL;DR > > > > Makes absolutely sense to run file backend on single node undercloud at CI. > > > > Few more comments inline. > > > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO deep dive hour?

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:00:11PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > We've got some new contributors around TripleO recently, and I'd like > to offer up a "TripleO deep dive hour". > > The idea is to spend 1 hour a week in a high bandwidth environment > (Google Hangouts / Bluejeans / ???) to deep dive

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposed TripleO core changes

Hi all, I've been in discussion with Martin André and Tomas Sedovic, who are involved with the creation of the new tripleo-validations repo[1] We've agreed that rather than create another gerrit group, they can be added to tripleo-core and agree to restrict +A to this repo for the time being

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][TripleO] Adding interfaces to environment files?

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:53:12PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 07/06/16 15:57, Jay Dobies wrote: > > > > > > 1. Now that we support passing un-merged environment files to heat, > > > it'd be > > > good to support an optional description key for environments, > > > > I've never understood why

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][TripleO] Adding interfaces to environment files?

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:57:31PM -0400, Jay Dobies wrote: > > All, > > > > We've got some requirements around adding some interfaces to the heat > > environment file format, for example: > > > > 1. Now that we support passing un-merged environment files to heat, it'd be > > good to support an

[openstack-dev] [heat][TripleO] Adding interfaces to environment files?

All, We've got some requirements around adding some interfaces to the heat environment file format, for example: 1. Now that we support passing un-merged environment files to heat, it'd be good to support an optional description key for environments, such that we could add an API (in addition to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:00:35AM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: > On 24.05.2016 09:34, Duncan Thomas wrote: > > Cinder bugs list was far more manageable once this had been done. > > > > It is worth sharing the tool for this? I realise it's fairly trivial to > > write one, but some standardisation

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

Hi Dmitry, Thanks for the detailed write-up, some comments below: On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:31:36PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > what do you propose? > > > I would like the new TripleO mistral workflows to start following the ironic > state machine closer. Imagine the

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] enabled convergence background

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:26:46AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:46 AM, xiangxinyong wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > I noticed that heat enabled convergence. > > I hope that's not the case :). We haven't made the switch yet. We > continue to do testing,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Aodh upgrades - Request backport exception for stable/liberty

Hi Pradeep, Firstly, as discussed on IRC, I echo all of bnemec's concerns, this is not well aligned with our stable branch policy[1], or the stable-maint direction towards "critical bugfixes only"[2], so if possible I'd rather we figured out a general way to solve this problem that doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Jinja2 for Heat template

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:08:02AM +0300, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: >Hi, > >not sure why 3 will bring chaos when implemented properly. I agree - heat is designed with composition in mind, and e.g in TripleO we're making heavy use of it for optional configurations and it works pretty

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit - session recap/summary

Hi all, Some folks have requested a summary of our summit sessions, as has been provided for some other projects. I'll probably go into more detail on some of these topics either via subsequent more focussed threads an/or some blog posts but what follows is an overview of our summit sessions[1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit Summary?

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:35:47PM -0600, Jason Rist wrote: > Hey Everyone - Forgive me if this has already been sent out - I looked > through all of my emails and didn't see something yet. Can someone > provide a summary of TripleO from the summit, for instance some of the > output from the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] composable roles team

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 03:27:29PM -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > One of the most urgent tasks we need to achieve in TripleO during > Newton cycle is the composable roles support. > So we decided to build a team that would focus on it during the next weeks. Note that there is some

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Change 247669: Ceph Puppet: implement per-pool parameters:

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:00:02AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > > Hi TripleO Team, > > > > If you could take care of ${subject}, it would be nice. > > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247669 > > > > Well, the

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Summit session etherpads

All, In preparation for our sessions next week, I created some etherpads and linked them all here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Newton/Etherpads#TripleO Note that each one has the initial session description cut/pasted, and I've nominated some initial drivers for each session -

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Launchpad cleanups for Newton

Hi all, So I've been attempting to beat our launchpad project into shape today, and have made a few changes with a view to making the tool more useful for tracking things during the Newton cycle: 1. New "TripleO Drivers" team I created https://launchpad.net/~tripleo-drivers which is a

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposed changes to TripleO project tags

All, We discussed some changes to our release cycle in the weekly meeting yesterday, namely to align with the intended direction of the puppet community to adopt the new cycle-trailing tag[1]. We have also discussed and agreed[2] to adopt the standard stable branch policy[3] for those repos

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] No IRC meeting next week

As so many of us will be in Austin next week, the weekly IRC meeting will be cancelled. The next meeting will be Tuesday 3rd May at 14.00 UTC: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TripleO Thanks, Steve __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][heat][all] Summit session clashes

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 04:24:46PM +1200, Steve Baker wrote: >All of the TripleO design summit sessions are on Thursday afternoon in >slots which clash with Heat sessions. Heat is a core component of TripleO >and as a contributor to both projects I was rather hoping to attend as >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backport exception request // discussion: setting the default root device

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:28:44AM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi OOO'ers! > > I'd like to get your permission to backport > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288417/ to stable/{liberty,mitaka} or seek > alternative suggestions on how to make life easier for folks upgrading for > Kilo. > > The

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Ability to reproduce failures

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:08:28PM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 16:18 +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > > > Note we're not using devtest at all anymore, the developer script > > many > > folks use is tripleo.sh: > > So, I followed the flow

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Can we create some subteams?

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:01:39PM +1200, Steve Baker wrote: >On 12/04/16 11:48, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2016-04-12 11:43:06 +1200 (+1200), Steve Baker wrote: > > Can I suggest a sub-team for > os-collect-config/os-refresh-config/os-apply-config? I ask since > these tools also make

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Can we create some subteams?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:33:53AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 04/11/2016 04:54 AM, John Trowbridge wrote: > > Hola OOOers, > > > > It came up in the meeting last week that we could benefit from a CI > > subteam with its own meeting, since CI is taking up a lot of the main > > meeting time. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Propose Lars Kellogg-Stedman for tripleo-quickstart core

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 06:06:03AM -0400, John Trowbridge wrote: > Hello again, > > This is semi-related to the subteam thread, but deserves its own. > > I would like to give Lars +2 on tripleo-quickstart. He has contributed > almost as much as I have to the project in terms of > LOC, and in

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Can we create some subteams?

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 05:54:11AM -0400, John Trowbridge wrote: > Hola OOOers, > > It came up in the meeting last week that we could benefit from a CI > subteam with its own meeting, since CI is taking up a lot of the main > meeting time. > > I like this idea, and think we should do something

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit sessions

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:25:48PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > All, > > As discussed briefly today in our weekly meeting, I've started this > etherpad: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-tripleo-sessions > > We have two fishbowl sessions and 3 working s

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][CI] Ability to reproduce failures

Hi Gabriele, On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:03:33PM -0400, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to find an entry point to join the effort in TripleO CI. > I studied the infrastructure and the scripts, but there's still something I'm > missing. > The last step of studying the complex

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Austin summit sessions

All, As discussed briefly today in our weekly meeting, I've started this etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-tripleo-sessions We have two fishbowl sessions and 3 working sessions, plus a half-day contributor meetup. Please can everyone dump ideas of what topics you'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FreeIPA integration

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:07:06PM +0300, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: >On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 05:28:57PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > > I finally have enough understanding of what is

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [Heat] Re-evaluate conditions specification

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:39:02PM +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: >Why is imperative programming always brought up when discussing >conditionals in the templates? We are not wanting anything imperative. The >heat engine still picks the final ordering of things. We just want to give >it

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FreeIPA integration

On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 05:28:57PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > I finally have enough understanding of what is going on with Tripleo to > reasonably discuss how to implement solutions for some of the main security > needs of a deployment. > > > FreeIPA is an identity management solution that can

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [Heat] Re-evaluate conditions specification

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:15:30PM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > > On 31/03/16 18:10, Zane Bitter wrote: > >> > >> > >> I'm in favour of some sort of variable-based implementation for a few > >> reasons. One is that (5) seems

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] PLUMgrid Neutron Integration for stable/mitaka

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:24:26AM +0500, Qasim Sarfraz wrote: >Hi TripleO Folks, >As Mitaka branch was cut few days ago, I would like a request for backport >for PLUMgrid Neutron integration patch [1]. The patch has been in progress >for a while and adds support for enabling

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Policy Managment and distribution.

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:37:02PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Adam Young wrote: > > Keystone has a policy API, but no one uses it. It allows us to associate a > > policy file with an endpoint. Upload a json blob, it gets a uuid. Associate

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Stable Branch policy for Liberty/Mitaka (revisited)

Hi all, Some time ago we had a discussion re $subject [1] which I want to revisit, because the stable/mitaka branches have now been created. That thread, and various IRC discussions have led to (I believe) the following consensus: 1. stable/mitaka will align with the normal stable/maint

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] gnocchi backport exception for stable/mitaka

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > As Mitaka branch was cut yesterday, I would like to request a backport > exception to get gnocchi patches[1][2][3] into stable/mitaka. It > should low risk feature as we decided not to set ceilometer to use >

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] issue of ResourceGroup in Heat template

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:05:17PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 23/03/16 13:35, Steven Hardy wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:25:57PM +0300, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > >>Hello, > >>It looks similar on issue, which was discussed here [1] > >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] issue of ResourceGroup in Heat template

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:39:01AM -0400, Rabi Mishra wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:25:57PM +0300, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > > >Hello, > > >It looks similar on issue, which was discussed here [1] > > >I suppose, that the root cause is incorrect using get_attr for your > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Heat][Kolla][Magnum] The zen of Heat, containers, and the future of TripleO

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:42:17AM -0500, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > Hello, > > So Ryan, I think you can make use of heat all the way. Architecture of > kolla doesn't require you to use ansible at all (in fact, we separate > ansible code to a different repo). Truth is that ansible-kolla is >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Heat][Kolla][Magnum] The zen of Heat, containers, and the future of TripleO

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:01:03AM +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > +1 for TripleO taking a look at Kolla. > > Some random thoughts: > > I'm in the middle of deploying a new cloud and I couldn't use either TripleO > or Kolla for various reasons. A few reasons for each: > * TripeO - worries me for

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Heat][Kolla][Magnum] The zen of Heat, containers, and the future of TripleO

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:58:02PM -0400, Ryan Hallisey wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> So Ryan, I think you can make use of heat all the way. Architecture of > >>> kolla doesn't require you to use ansible at all (in fact, we separate > >>> ansible code to a different repo). Truth is that

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] issue of ResourceGroup in Heat template

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:25:57PM +0300, Sergey Kraynev wrote: >Hello, >It looks similar on issue, which was discussed here [1]  >I suppose, that the root cause is incorrect using get_attr for your case. >Probably you got "list"  instead of "string". >F.e. if I do something

[openstack-dev] [heat] Issue with validation and preview due to get_attr==None

Hi all, I'm looking for some help and additional input on this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1559807 Basically, we have multiple issues due to the fact that we consider get_attr to resolve to None at any point before a resource is actually instantiated. It's due to this:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Contributing to TripleO is challenging

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:19:47AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 09:41:42AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redha

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Contributing to TripleO is challenging

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 09:41:42AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Steven Hardy <sha...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:27:33PM +, arkady_kanev...@dell.com wrote: > >>Emilien, > >> > >>Ag

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Contributing to TripleO is challenging

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:27:33PM +, arkady_kanev...@dell.com wrote: >Emilien, > >Agree on the rant. But not clear on concrete proposal to fix it. > >Spend more time “fixing” CI and use Tempest as a gate is a bit wage. > >Unless we test known working version of each project

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] propose EmilienM for core

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 02:22:49PM -0400, Dan Prince wrote: > I'd like to propose that we add Emilien Macchi to the TripleO core > review team. Emilien has been getting more involved with TripleO during > this last release. In addition to help with various Puppet things he > also has experience in

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] propose trown for core

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 02:32:27PM -0400, Dan Prince wrote: > I'd like to propose that we add John Trowbridge to the TripleO core > review team. John has become one of the goto guys in helping to chase > down upstream trunk chasing issues. He has contributed a lot to helping > keep general CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Nomination Oleksii Chuprykov to Heat core reviewer

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:57:34PM +0300, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > Hi Heaters, > > The Mitaka release is close to finish, so it's good time for reviewing > results of work. > One of this results is analyze contribution results for the last release > cycle. > According to the data [1] we have one

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >