Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-11 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 12/10/2013 06:24 PM, Kotwani, Mukul wrote: 2.6.18, not sure about the IO schedulers. The default scheduler could be different. Is the expected performance between the schedulers supposed to be that dramatically different? I expect redhat didn't backport CFS to 2.6.18 -- that's the process

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread John Smith
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote: Hey John, Ubuntu is 13.04 and Redhat is 5.8. So its 2x vs 3x kernel ? ___ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to :

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread Kotwani, Mukul
Hey John, Ubuntu is 13.04 and Redhat is 5.8. Mukul -Original Message- From: John Smith [mailto:lbalba...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 3:49 PM To: Kotwani, Mukul Cc: Pete Zaitcev; OpenStack Mailing List Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL Hi, What verslons

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread John Smith
:44 PM To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: OpenStack Mailing List Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL Thanks Pete! We were using Grizzly, which is over a release old, with Folsom Keystone for RHEL. So not recent at all. Is there something that would be missing in RHEL5.x which would cause

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread Chuck Thier
My first guess is that the Redhat kernel in 5.8 may not have as many xfs improvements and may require that the inode size set to 1024 instead of the default. That would be the first thing I would try. -- Chuck On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:57 PM, John Smith lbalba...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread Rick Jones
: Thursday, December 05, 2013 6:44 PM To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: OpenStack Mailing List Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL Thanks Pete! We were using Grizzly, which is over a release old, with Folsom Keystone for RHEL. So not recent at all. Is there something that would be missing in RHEL5.x which

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-10 Thread Kotwani, Mukul
To: Kotwani, Mukul; Pete Zaitcev Cc: OpenStack Mailing List Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL On 12/10/2013 04:12 PM, Rick Jones wrote: On 12/10/2013 03:23 PM, Kotwani, Mukul wrote: A new piece of data.. We used the disable_fallocate configurable on Ubuntu, and the numbers do reduce

[Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-05 Thread Kotwani, Mukul
Folks, Has anyone used and/or deployed RHEL (5.8) with Swift? We are running some experiments with Swift installed on both platforms, same hardware, and we are seeing some pretty different performance profiles. Ubuntu is doing much better than RHEL. Has anyone else seen the performance

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-05 Thread John Smith
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote: Has anyone used and/or deployed RHEL (5.8) with Swift? We are running some experiments with Swift installed on both platforms, same hardware, and we are seeing some pretty different performance profiles. Ubuntu is

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift on RHEL

2013-12-05 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 21:19:49 + Kotwani, Mukul mukul.g.kotw...@hp.com wrote: Has anyone used and/or deployed RHEL (5.8) with Swift? I was also looking for a Supported platforms for Swift, and I could not find it. I don't think an RDO for RHEL 5.x ever existed. First packages were built a