Thanks Thiago,
Did you try to add Port Forwarding iptables' rules directly to the
OpenStack router ?
Best Regards,
Abbass
2013/12/19 Martinx - ジェームズ
> Cool! You're welcome!=)
>
> My topology is "Per-Tenant Router with Private Networks", it does looks
> like your first example but, a b
Cool! You're welcome!=)
My topology is "Per-Tenant Router with Private Networks", it does looks
like your first example but, a bit different, like this:
---
Yours:
Internet public-network OpenStack-Router
Private-OpenStack-Network NAT-Instance
Dear Thiago,
Thanks a lot for your answer.
One more thing, do your configuration look something like this :
Internet public-network OpenStack-Router
Private-OpenStack-Network NAT-Instance
|
Abbass,
The only way I figured out to do this, is by creating a "NAT Instance",
with a Floating IP attached to it and, the "magic" happens here:
Contents of my /etc/network/nat-rules.save
---
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.12 on Fri Oct 18 02:41:35 2013
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD AC
Could you please elaborate about your temporary solution ?
I couldn't get a VM to act as a router that will do the port forwarding for
other VMs in a private network. For some reason the VM cannot act as a
router.
Is it due to neutron networking ?
Best regards,
2013/12/19 Martinx - ジェームズ
> I'
I'm wondering about this too... I think that would be very nice to give the
FWaaS, the ability to manage the NAT table of tenant router.
This way, there is no need for a "NAT Instance" with a second Floating IP
attached to it plus creepy NAT rules there (far away from the tenant
router).
Also, th
Hello,
Why is it not possible to do port forwarding with neutron L3 ?
Any alternative to manually adding to iptables of each virtual router ?
Best regards,
___
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to : ope
