[Openstack] Issue with total_iops_sec VM Quota

2014-11-28 Thread Raghu K
Here is a problem I am facing with quota. I have set total iops VM quota to 99. ubuntu@ceph-perftest-1:~$ nova --os-username admin --os-password admin --os-tenant-id 38a100db8cab4c89a9602ef1eb38f893 --os-auth-url http://172.30.90.89:5000/v2.0/flavor-show m1.small +---

Re: [Openstack] Issue with total_iops_sec VM Quota

2014-11-28 Thread Raghu K
Another thing I wanted to mention was I have the latest icehouse code base with this fix (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118942/) On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Raghu K wrote: > Here is a problem I am facing with quota. I have set total iops VM quota > to 99. > > ubuntu@ceph-perftest-1:~$ no

Re: [Openstack] Issue with total_iops_sec VM Quota

2014-11-30 Thread Raghu K
I noticed QOS in general is not working. Btw, I am using latest icehouse devstack and testing this on a mapped rbd device. Please, advise. On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Raghu K wrote: > Here is a problem I am facing with quota. I have set total iops VM quota > to 99. > > ubuntu@ceph-perftes

Re: [Openstack] Issue with total_iops_sec VM Quota

2014-12-01 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
>I noticed QOS in general is not working. > Btw, I am using latest icehouse devstack and testing this on a mapped rbd > device. Please, advise. There lies the problem, throttling is not working for ceph devices in Icehouse. ( images_type=rbd ) This is fixed in Juno but was never back-ported. The

Re: [Openstack] Issue with total_iops_sec VM Quota

2014-12-01 Thread Raghu K
Robert - thank you so much for pointing me to this bug. I have put a comment asking if there is a timeframe to expect this fix in icehouse. On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Robert van Leeuwen < robert.vanleeu...@spilgames.com> wrote: > >I noticed QOS in general is not working. > > Btw, I am using

Re: [Openstack] Issue with total_iops_sec VM Quota

2014-12-01 Thread Raghu K
I did get the master branch with this fix but still dont see total disk IOPS QOS working when i used FIO tool. Not sure if it is still broke or if I am missing something. Is anybody else experiencing the same ? On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Raghu K wrote: > Robert - thank you so much for point