Hey guys! Any ideas about how to load balance or split the VXLAN network traffic?
On 10 April 2015 at 01:39, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Remo, Erik, > > Thanks for this fast reply! :-) > > Remo, I want to seg the communication between my Instances (i.e., > intra-vm communication), for example, I want to "scp from-instance-a > to-instance-b" through "net-a" and simultaneously, "scp from instance-b > to-instance-a" through "net-b", so, there will be no bottleneck. On this > example, both Instances have two subnets attached but, I would like to use > two VXLAN tunnels, one for "net-a" and another for "net-b"... And I'm not > sure if this is even possible to achieve... Is it? > > Evolving this scenario, I'll build something like this: > > * Instance-A -> net-a -> "Instance-Bridge" -> net-b -> "Instance-Gateway" > -> Internet > > Here, the "Instance-bridge" will be connected at both "net-a" and > "net-b", and will act as bridge. The gateway IP of "Instance-a" is > allocated at "Instance-Gateway". > > So, I'll need to, somehow, attach "net-a", to a VXLAN tunnel associated > with "segment 1", and "net-b", to a VXLAN tunnel associated with "segment > 2". > > Erik, in fact, no, I don't need more bandwidth, I just need to make sure > that the network traffic going in and out from "Instance-bridge / > Instance-Gateway" will face no bottleneck. I'm thinking about the > possibility to build a LACP BOND channel, using 4 ethernets, for just one > VXLAN subnet. This way, I believe it will more dynamic and easy to > build/manage... What do you think? Ah, and yes, I'm intending to segment > the traffic in a specific way, as my above example. > > Thanks again! > > Best, > Thiago > > On 9 April 2015 at 23:32, Erik McCormick <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> > wrote: > >> If your goal is to simply have more available bandwidth, I would think >> you could bond the 4 interfaces into one and enable jumbo frames. Are you >> intending to segment the traffic for some other purpose? >> On Apr 9, 2015 7:20 PM, "Martinx - ジェームズ" <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey guys! >>> >>> I'm looking to build an OpenStack environment, where I have 4 physical >>> interfaces that will be dedicated to the VXLAN tunnels but, how can I do >>> that? >>> >>> For example, I planning to create 4 "net / subnets" and each one of it >>> will be associated with 1 VXLAN tunnel (of 4?)... >>> >>> My need is that some traffic will come from one segment, pass through a >>> Instance and goes out through another segment. So, in fact, I need to >>> balance the network traffic, throughout more than one segment, to avoid >>> bottlenecks. >>> >>> >>> Which approach better fits into my needs? >>> >>> A- 1 VXLAN tunnel for each ethernet segment (4 tunnels) (is this even >>> possible?)? or >>> >>> B- 1 VXLAN on top of a BOND channel (here, the BOND channel will be >>> built using 4 ethernet segments)? >>> >>> >>> I appreciate any tip! :-) >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >>> >>> Cheers! >>> Thiago >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >>> Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org >>> Unsubscribe : >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack >>> >>> >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
