Hi:
Just to return to the earlier part of this thread with respect to ASR1k plugin
usage, here are a few additional pointers that may also be helpful:
Cisco OpenStack plugin documentation:
http://networking-cisco.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ (includes all Cisco plugins)
Launchpad page for bug/issu
On 2018-02-01 14:58:46 -0500 (-0500), Satish Patel wrote:
> Interesting survey but if i am not wrong Fuel is end of life and they
> stopped development right?
[...]
Sure, but that doesn't mean people aren't still running environments
deployed with it.
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description
Interesting survey but if i am not wrong Fuel is end of life and they
stopped development right?
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2018-02-01 19:15:51 +0400 (+0400), Fawaz Mohammed wrote:
>> TripleO (Supported on CentOS and RHEL) and Juju (Supported on
>> Ubuntu) [1] are
On 2018-02-01 19:21:03 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2018-02-01 19:15:51 +0400 (+0400), Fawaz Mohammed wrote:
> > TripleO (Supported on CentOS and RHEL) and Juju (Supported on
> > Ubuntu) [1] are the most used OpenStack deployment tools.
> [...]
>
> Most used in what sense? That statis
On 2018-02-01 19:15:51 +0400 (+0400), Fawaz Mohammed wrote:
> TripleO (Supported on CentOS and RHEL) and Juju (Supported on
> Ubuntu) [1] are the most used OpenStack deployment tools.
[...]
Most used in what sense? That statistic seems to contradict the
results of the official OpenStack User Surve
Thanks!
any specific version of TripleO i should use or openstack version for
production?
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Fawaz Mohammed
wrote:
> Yes, you can do that.
>
> On Feb 1, 2018 8:49 PM, "Satish Patel" wrote:
>>
>> Is it ok if i create undercloud on VMware because its easier to take
>
Yes, you can do that.
On Feb 1, 2018 8:49 PM, "Satish Patel" wrote:
> Is it ok if i create undercloud on VMware because its easier to take
> snapshot and clone etc.
>
> ~S
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Fawaz Mohammed
> wrote:
> > In case your undercloud is dead, there will no be any impa
Is it ok if i create undercloud on VMware because its easier to take
snapshot and clone etc.
~S
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Fawaz Mohammed
wrote:
> In case your undercloud is dead, there will no be any impact in your
> overcloud, but you will not be able to perform day 2 operations on your
In case your undercloud is dead, there will no be any impact in your
overcloud, but you will not be able to perform day 2 operations on your
tripleO environment, such as scale-out / scale-in the infrastructure,
update / upgrade your overcloud.
For that, it's recommended to backup the undercloud at
You have a point there! Got it,
One more question what will happened if deploy my cloud and second day
my undercloud (TripleO) node is dead? is it going to impact my
overcloud production? because all recipe cooked inside undercloud and
now its no more.
Do you think i need to keep backup of unde
On TripleO deployment, it's a challenge to use VMs for any overclode role
(controller, compute or storage). As undercloud uses BMC / IPMI to control
the power if bare metal during the deployment.
---
Regards,
Fawaz Mohammed
On Feb 1, 2018 8:07 PM, "Satish Patel" wrote:
Thanks for info i will ke
Thanks for info i will keep in mind, Can we use VM for controller
node? or 1 physical and 2 VM controller node, just a thought
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Fawaz Mohammed
wrote:
> For TripleO deployment, you'll need:
> A separate node or VM as UnderCloud.
> 3 control nodes for HA, 2 controll
For TripleO deployment, you'll need:
A separate node or VM as UnderCloud.
3 control nodes for HA, 2 controllers can't form HA by default, this is to
avoid split-brain scenarios.
For compute nodes, I recommend to have 2 x 10G ports, one for O&M and the
other one for tenants. And a separate 1G for BM
We are CentOS7 shop that is why i have started playing with TripleO on
my VMware environment to get familiar. what do you suggest for 20 node
cluster? we don't have any storage requirement all we need CPU and
Memory to run our application, currently all application running on
VMware and i want to m
Hi Satish,
TripleO (Supported on CentOS and RHEL) and Juju (Supported on Ubuntu) [1]
are the most used OpenStack deployment tools.
>From the deployment perspectives, you need to know your cloud setup and the
required plugins to decide which deployment you will choose. As each tool
has a pre-integ
Hi Fawaz,
Great so you think I'm doing right thing to use ASR1k for my L3 function?
I'm using DVR on my lab with 3 node cluster and it's kinda complicated to
troubleshoot sometime.
We are planning to build 20 node cluster for start and started playing with
tripleo to deploy and having lots o
http://www.jimmdenton.com/networking-cisco-asr-install/ can beet your
requirements. I have another plugin in production from different vendor for
the same purpose. and it works perfect.
Regarding your question about the license, usually, there is no license for
such plugins.
I've no production ex
*can meet your requirements
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Fawaz Mohammed wrote:
> http://www.jimmdenton.com/networking-cisco-asr-install/ can beet your
> requirements. I have another plugin in production from different vendor for
> the same purpose. and it works perfect.
>
> Regarding your que
What about this? http://www.jimmdenton.com/networking-cisco-asr-part-two/
ML2 does use ASR too,
Just curious what people mostly use in production? are they use DVR or
some kind of hardware for L3?
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Fawaz Mohammed
wrote:
> Hi Santish,
>
> In my knowlege, Cisco ha
Hi Santish,
In my knowlege, Cisco has ml2 driver for Nexus only.
So, if you have requirements for dynamic L3 provisioning / configuration,
it's better to go with SDN solution.
On Jan 31, 2018 11:39 PM, "Satish Patel" wrote:
> So no one using ASR 1001 for Openstack?
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at
So no one using ASR 1001 for Openstack?
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Satish Patel wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We are planning to deploy production style private cloud and gathering
> information about what we should use and why and i came across with
> couple of document related network node critica
Folks,
We are planning to deploy production style private cloud and gathering
information about what we should use and why and i came across with
couple of document related network node criticality and performance
issue and many folks suggesting following
1. DVR (it seem complicated after reading
22 matches
Mail list logo
