On 10/30/2013 12:08 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
Hi all,
Recently, I did something crazy and got into the top 10 reviewers for
OpenStack in a 30/60 day window. Admittedly, this was for documentation
- which is quite a bit different than code - but the experience did
give me a small window of
On 30 October 2013 12:08, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
Hi all,
Recently, I did something crazy and got into the top 10 reviewers for
OpenStack in a 30/60 day window. Admittedly, this was for documentation -
which is quite a bit different than code - but the experience did give me a
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:08:03AM +1100, Tom Fifield wrote:
Hi all,
Recently, I did something crazy and got into the top 10 reviewers
for OpenStack in a 30/60 day window. Admittedly, this was for
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:08:03AM +1100, Tom Fifield wrote:
[...]
I think it's time to bend that focus slightly, and promote the role
of the +1 reviewers. Every review that a non-core reviewer does
helps reduce the burden of core reviewers just that little bit.
++
I consider to change the above to praise the -1 reviewers and ask for
more ;). The constructive critique given by good -1 review helps with
iteration over a patch and getting it in shape - and sharing the load of
reviews.
___
Mailing list:
Hi all,
Recently, I did something crazy and got into the top 10 reviewers for
OpenStack in a 30/60 day window. Admittedly, this was for documentation
- which is quite a bit different than code - but the experience did
give me a small window of insight into the challenge faced by our
On 2013-10-30 10:08:03 +1100 (+1100), Tom Fifield wrote:
[...]
Do you see this too?
Very often, in fact--I was just marveling at it again this morning.
Thanks for breaching the subject!
How can we help encourage more +1 reviews?
I've been toying with the idea of asking change submitters to
