FYI
Original Message
Subject: [openstack-community] Updates in the OpenStack blog policy
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:01:14 -0700
From: Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org
To: Community User Groups, OpenStack commun...@lists.openstack.org
Dear all,
starting today
On Mon 05 Aug 2013 05:59:15 PM PDT, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
However, I think it still needs some tweaking... With digest mode
enabled I'm get 10+ digests per day, often with just a few messages in
them. Whereas with the -dev and -operators lists I get one per day.
There's no way to fiddle with
Hi Frans
a lot of useful material for presentations with images, charts, up to
date numbers and more is available in the marketing portal
http://www.openstack.org/marketing
Check there to see if you find what you're looking for.
/stef
On 08/16/2013 08:47 PM, Frans Thamura wrote:
Hi All
I
We are holding an online meeting for all the people that use Ask OpenStack.
On Thursday Sept. 5 from 6PM to 7PM Pacific Time on IRC freenode.net
#openstack-community
The main intention is to share best practices and in the long term
improve the objective of Ask OpenStack:
to provide the
Register Now For The Summit in Hong Kong
http://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-summit-hong-kong-2013Register
?? ?? ???,
http://openstacksummitnovember2013.eventbrite.com/
OpenStack Heat and Ceilometer got their dashboard panel
On 09/08/2013 06:24 PM, Peter Feiner wrote:
I'm giving a webinar on OpenStack performance tuning on Wednesday
September 11 at 1PM EST. The webinar will focus on configuration
considerations geared toward efficiency and concurrency. If you're
interested, please register now!
Register Now For The Summit in Hong Kong
http://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-summit-hong-kong-2013/?source=o12
? ??? ???,
https://www.eventbrite.com/event/6786581849/o12
The last batch of invites to the Summit for
Hello all,
this is a reminder to fill in the User Survey: the deadline to complete
the survey is September 30.
If you’re using OpenStack, take 15 minutes to complete the User Survey
by Sept 30. Your feedback can impact the roadmap
http://www.openstack.org/user-survey
If you know somebody that
Hi GHANSHYAM,
the main source of information for reporting is your members profile:
http://www.openstack.org/community/members/profile/6461
there you have listed no affiliation therefore your contributions will
be counted only as personal contributions in
http://activity.openstack.org. If you
October 4th, 2013
Register Now For The Summit in Hong Kong
http://www.openstack.org/summit/hk?source=o12
?? ?? ???,
http://www.openstack.org/summit/hkc?source=o12
September 2013 PTL elections – Final results
Register Now For The Summit in Hong Kong
http://www.openstack.org/summit/hk?source=o12
?? ?? ???,
http://www.openstack.org/summit/hkc?source=o12
CoreOS, a good operating system for your OpenStack controllers
Hi Ilkka
thanks for letting us know. I have added the event to the list on
www.openstack.org/community/events
It would be good, if you have materials in English, to share those
after the event. Reports like
On 11/14/2013 09:56 AM, Boris Renski wrote:
If per bylaws any integrated project can called itself OpenStack Blah
then we return to the question of current difference between integrated
and core. It seems like there is no alignment. Jonathan's opinion
contradicts Thierry's.
I don't see this
Our first OpenStack Ambassadors
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2013/11/announcing-our-first-openstack-ambassadors/
Following on from our earlier
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2013/08/ambassador-program/ discussions
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2013/08/ambassador-program-specifics/
Spinning up OpenStack “DefCore” Committee by spotting elephants
http://robhirschfeld.com/2013/11/22/defcore/
This week, Joshua McKenty
http://insights.wired.com/profile/JoshuaMcKenty, Rob Hirschfeld
http://robhirschfeld.com/ and a handful of interested individuals
(board member
November 29th, 2013
Friday Dec 20th – Doc Bug Day
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/020105.html
This month, docs reaches 500 bugs, making it the 2nd-largest project by
bug count in all of OpenStack. Yes, it beats Cinder, Horizon, Swift,
Keystone and
Hi Thomas,
On 12/03/2013 01:41 PM, Thomas McLaughlin wrote:
I believe with the vmwareapi.VMwareESXDriver: a driver that lets
nova-compute communicate directly to an ESX host we can accomplish One
and Two but I want to be sure someone else has achieved this first.
If I understand your message
Hi Frans,
On 11/27/2013 05:23 AM, Frans Thamura wrote:
The idea, several.topic in one day, rather one serial series
there are a lot of events organized around the world about OpenStack but
only a few of them are organized by the OpenStack Foundation. What
usually happens is that a set of
Wrapping up the OpenStack Travel Support Program – Icehouse
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2013/12/wrapping-up-the-openstack-travel-support-program-icehouse/
The OpenStack Foundation brought 18 people to Hong Kong thanks to the
grants offered by the first edition of the Travel
On 12/10/2013 01:19 PM, Rerngvit Yanggratoke wrote:
We are pleased to inform you that we release “Stack mobile”, an Android
app for managing an Openstack cloud on the go, to the Google Play store
today
Congratulations for the release. Are you releasing the source code under
an open source
PTL Project Update Webinars Start Next Week
To allow for broader participation, we’ve scheduled post-Summit webinars
with the Project Team Leads (PTLs) to provide the latest project updates
rather than schedule these tracks during the Summit. We’ll be trying out
this new format starting
We have finalized dates and details for the webinars by the PTLs to give
an overview of the future roadmap for all OpenStack programs.
Join us Tuesday and Thursday at 7 a.m. Pacific/10 a.m. Eastern to
discuss Neutron, Keystone, Nova, and Swift. Then we’ll take a break for
the holidays and finish
On 12/16/2013 09:37 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
Do you have any examples of what kind of feedback you would like to pass
on to developers (I was unable to attend Tim's discussion of the user
survey)? Also just playing devils advocate here, but why not use our
bug system to provide feedback?
I can
moving the discussion to the General list. The original message
partially quoted below is on
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/community/2013-December/000674.html
On 12/15/2013 08:09 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
When considering any OpenStack project in production system, many
factors must be
What Is VMware Up To With OpenStack?
http://cloudarchitectmusings.com/2013/12/18/what-is-vmware-up-to-with-openstack/
As a former vSphere and now OpenStack Architect, Kenneth Hui
http://cloudarchitectmusings.com/ has been following with much
interest the courtship ritual that VMware
On 12/23/2013 02:36 PM, Sriram Subramanian wrote:
Few weeks ago, there was an email on a google spreadsheet tracking
different kind of OpenStack User Personas (IT Admin, University
researcher etc). Could someone point to that please?
I think you're referring to this one:
OpenStack “J” naming poll closed
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2013-December/004035.html
Polls closed, the OpenStack community decided: Juno will be the name of
the OpenStack development cycle starting in May 2014, after the Icehouse
cycle completes.
Third
OpenStack Documentation Wrap Up for 2013
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2014/01/openstack-documentation-wrap-up-for-2013/
It's that time of the new year to reflect and look for ways to keep
improving the OpenStack docs. Here's a list of major events from 2013 in
OpenStack doc-land.
There are quite some differences between wiki pages for the projects and
more often than not I and others end up having to hit the search button
to find out small details about a project, like who's the current PTL or
when the project has its meetings. Also, sometimes reporters land on a
page
On 01/07/2014 02:26 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Note that the current wiki landing pages are about programs (collection
of projects handled by the same development team), not projects. Would
you rather have one page per project ? For example, one for Nova and one
for Python-Novaclient ? Or just
How are we picking the OpenStack DefCore “must pass” tests?
http://robhirschfeld.com/2014/01/07/defcore-critieria/
/WARNING LABEL: THE FOLLOWING SELECTION CRITERIA ARE PRELIMINARY TO GET
FEEDBACK AND HELP VALIDATE THE PROCESS.
/As part of the DefCore work
Hello folks,
tomorrow we're continuing the series of project updates from OpenStack
PTLs with Data Processing (Savanna) and Database Service (Trove)
Thursday, January 16, 2013 9 a.m. Pacific/12 Noon Eastern
Project team leads: Sergey Lukjanov, Data Processing (Savanna) and
Michael Basnight,
Election Results for Individual and Gold Directors
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2014/01/election-results-for-individual-and-gold-directors/
Each January two of the Foundation member classes hold elections to
determine their Board representatives for 2014. The Gold Members held
On 01/17/2014 01:08 PM, Andriy Yurchuk wrote:
I'm wondering what is the process of choosing a codename for an
OpenStack project (I mean Nova, Glance etc.)? Is there a
public/internal voting held or is it a decision of a project lead?
There is not a very formal process for those names. Usually
Icehouse-2 development milestone available
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-announce/2014-January/000187.html
The second milestone of the Icehouse development cycle, icehouse-2″ is
now available for Keystone, Glance, Nova, Horizon, Neutron, Cinder,
Ceilometer, Heat,
OpenStack 2014: Powered by Users
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2014/01/openstack-2014-powered-by-users/
If momentum is any indication, 2014 is poised to be a defining year for
OpenStack. All of our vital statistics, from community growth to code
commits and tracked deployments,
Hi Anastasis,
thank you for writing such detailed proposal. I would like to clarify
though that at the moment there are no plans for OpenStack to
participate to Google Summer of Code. Unless somebody steps up to lead
the participation to GSoC we'll have to find another way for you to
develop this
OpenStack 2013.2.2 released
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-announce/2014-February/000195.html
The OpenStack Stable Maintenance team is happy to announce the release
of the 2013.2.2 stable Havana release. A total of 98 bugs have been
fixed across all projects. These
if you haven't already, I would suggest you to send this also to
j...@openstack.org to advertise it on http://openstack.org/jobs
/stef
On 02/24/2014 02:05 AM, Yonghua Peng wrote:
Hello,
I am not sure if it's fine or not to send the jobs message here. I will
say sorry if it has disturbed
Hi Adam,
On 02/24/2014 10:42 AM, Adam Lawson wrote:
Where do presenters from past OpenStack Summits view the vote
numbers/counts for presentations that didn't make the cut? Are those
numbers available to the public or registered members on OpenStack.org
somewhere?
we don't make that
Why you should be reviewing more OpenStack code
https://dague.net/2014/02/28/why-you-should-be-reviewing-more-openstack-code/
Icehouse 3 is upon us, and as someone that is on a bunch of core review
teams, it means a steady drum beat of everyone asking how do they get
core reviewers
On Mon 24 Feb 2014 06:44:47 PM PST, Adam Lawson wrote:
Vote counts for Summit submissions (a way to gauge audience interest)
would really help me when concocting future ideas for future Summits.
That's where I'm going with this really...
I think that asking for a comment from the track chair
I'm happy to announce a great opportunity for new contributors to
OpenStack: a free training program to accelerate the speed at which new
OpenStack developers are successful at integrating their own roadmap
into that of the OpenStack project.
Details on the blog
Upcoming changes to Design Summit format
http://fnords.wordpress.com/2014/03/20/upcoming-changes-to-design-summit-format/
Since the very beginning of OpenStack we fulfilled our Open Design
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Open#Open_Design promise by organizing
a developer gathering
OpenStack Summit May 2014 Schedule Registration Deadlines
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2014/03/openstack-summit-may-2014-schedule-registration-deadlines/
The official Summit agenda is now live*
http://openstacksummitmay2014atlanta.sched.org/. *Adjustments, edits,
additions to
On Fri 16 May 2014 11:43:04 AM PDT, Adrien Cunin wrote:
I suggest you subscribe to the community mailing-list. People announce
local OpenStack events there, and call for papers for related events are
also relayed.
I think the marketing mailing list is more appropriate: the marketing
team
On 05/20/2014 02:11 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
I've posted to this list a couple times with some questions but I don't
see my own posts in my inbox. Is there a hold-back or review period
I should expect before my questions are posted to the list, or is this
simply configured not to send
Hello folks
one of the requests in Atlanta was to setup carefully listening ears for
developers and users alike so they can highlight roadblocks, vent
frustration and hopefully also give kudos to people, suggest solutions, etc.
I and Tom have added two 1 hour slots to the OpenStack Meetings
hello all
while we're getting ready to launch the OpenStack Groups portal I
noticed that we have multiple 'code of conducts' and we should probably
merge them into one to clarify things.
There are two classes of OpenStack CoCs, one inspired by Ubuntu's CoC
version 1 and another more
It is time again for our PTL post-Summit webinar series. Come listen to
the latest project updates from Icehouse to Juno. Each webinar includes
45 minutes of updates with 15 minutes of qa.
These webinars were established to reduce the number of conflicts during
the Summit and allow for broader
Hello folks
There are a lot more users of Ask OpenStack and I think we could use a
refresh of the wiki page resources for moderators[1].
On July 11th during Community Office Hours I'll be available to explain
how to better use Ask OpenStack, both for people who ask questions and
for responders.
Hi Adam
[removing the community list from the cc, crossposting is not good]
On 08/27/2014 11:11 AM, Adam Lawson wrote:
Something I've been hearing the last couple summits is folks who have
seen the light and want to get involved with the project is that they
don't know where to go, where to
mostly gathered comments from
people between San Francisco and Silicon Valley and I’d like to expand
the research. Fill in this brief survey
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/15vX9pGlvBVftq4YlD6vE0rOMKq9e3U25Qh_9gJ6Ky_4/viewform
or contact Stefano Maffulli directly via email (replying to this message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/29/2014 08:11 AM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
I am wondering what sort of tools we have at our disposal to help
combat this problem. Based on what I've seen recently, we could
reduce the nature of this problem by:
Flagging the post and
Hi Saloni
On 09/30/2014 09:12 AM, Saloni Baweja wrote:
I am an aspirant for OPW and did find projects like Wikimedia,
Evergreen interesting and have bit more inclination towards OpenStack.
But I have no idea about cloud storage, their working etc and am just
a beginner. It would be great if I
On 09/30/2014 08:03 AM, Kuo Hugo wrote:
Could you please post the log of related requests in Swift's log ???
please, don't cross-post and don't use the Development list for usage
questions. OpenStack-Dev is for the developers of OpenStack to discuss
development issues and roadmap.
It is
Hi Jean-Daniel,
it seems (from the little investigation I've done) that you've provided
two different email addresses for your profile on
http://openstack.org/profile/ (I see one at geekarea there) and on
gerrit (your ovh one). Use the same as primary email address and you
should be able to
On 12/02/2014 12:56 AM, Venu Murthy wrote:
Great Initiative Mark,
In the beginning of my openstack journey, being able to ssh/connect to
the VMs/Instances was the greatest challenge. After having spent several
months to debug such issues, I've posted one of the solutions here.
February 9th is the deadline to submit a talk for the May 2015 Vancouver
Summit
Would you like to speak at the May 2015 OpenStack Summit in Vancouver?
Then hurry up and submit a talk! February 9 is the final day that
speaking submissions will be accepted.
HOW TO VOTE: If you are an eligible voter[1], you should have received
an email with the subject “OpenStack Foundation – 2015 Individual
Director Election” from secret...@openstack.org. This email includes
your unique voting link. If you did not receive an email, please contact
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 09:27 -0600, John Griffith wrote:
You are exactly correct Thierry, being a track chair a few times in
the process has been something like:
* PIck a cut off based on votes
* Review remaining submissions as a panel
I followed a different process when I've been
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 15:00 +0200, Salvo Rapisarda wrote:
I have a problem with auth google n ask.openstack.org
When I try to login the page redirect to
https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6206245?p=openidrd=1
Hi Salvo
I apologize for the issue. We've had a couple of delays while
[REMINDER]
the service Ask OpenStack on https://ask.openstack.org will be down for
maintenance on Monday, April 6 from 9am PDT for around 3-4 hours.
The downtime is needed to move the service on new infrastructure,
powered by OpenStack and puppet script. Once we move to the new server
we'll have
Hello folks
the service Ask OpenStack on https://ask.openstack.org will be down for
maintenance on Monday, April 6 from 9am PDT for around 3-4 hours.
The downtime is needed to move the service on new infrastructure,
powered by OpenStack and puppet script. Once we move to the new server
we'll
On Thu 07 Aug 2014 12:12:26 PM PDT, Brandon Logan wrote:
It's just my own preference. Others like webex/hangouts because it can
be easier to talk about topics than in IRC, but with this many people
and the latency delays, it can become quite cumbersome. Plus, it makes
it easier for meeting
On 08/07/2014 01:41 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
My point was simply that we don't have direct control over the
contributors' activities
This is not correct and I've seen it repeated too often to let it go
uncorrected: we (the OpenStack project as a whole) have a lot of control
over contributors to
On 08/08/2014 02:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
I agree with Eoghan here. The main goal of an agile/lean system is to
maximize a development team productivity. The main goal of Open source
project management is not to maximize productivity. It’s to maximize
contributions. I wrote about that a
On 08/13/2014 07:33 AM, Ian Wells wrote:
I have no great answer to this, but is there a way - perhaps via team
sponsorship from cores to ensure that the general direction is right,
and cloned repositories for purpose-specific changes, as one example -
that we can get an audience of people to
On 08/12/2014 06:46 PM, Wuhongning wrote:
I couldn't have been at the IRC meeting for the time difference, are
there any conclusion for this topic, or is it still open?
I, the PTL, some core reviewers and many in the GBP team are actively
working on a proposal to send to the list for quick
Thanks for the summary Trevor.
On 08/18/2014 01:25 PM, Trevor Vardeman wrote:
1) Discuss future of Octavia in light of Neutron-incubator project proposal.
a) There are many problems with Neutron-Incubator as currently described
Let's be specific, enumerate the problems and address them,
On 08/19/2014 08:39 AM, Eichberger, German wrote:
Just to be clear: We all think the incubator is a great idea and if
some things are ironed out will be a good way to onboard new projects
to Neutron. What bothers me is the timing. Without warning we were
put in an incubator in the span of like
On 08/19/2014 07:37 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
All of these projects should be able to live in the Program, in the
openstack/ code namespace, for as long as the project is actively
developed, and let the contributor communities in these competing
projects *naturally* work to do any of the following:
Hi Szepe,
On Wed 20 Aug 2014 11:33:47 AM PDT, Szépe Viktor wrote:
Thank you for your answer.
That workflow seems a huge job for me.
I leave this patch up to you.
thanks for sending this fix. You've stumbled upon one of the known
issues of OpenStack's way to deal with small patches like
On 08/21/2014 10:14 AM, Doug Wiegley wrote:
We made the voice/IRC decision in the very format that favors voice. So
in the interest of putting the discussion to bed, voice your opinions here
in a non-voice way:
I was about to voice (ha!) my opinion there but I stopped because I
don't think we
On 08/21/2014 08:00 AM, thomas.pessi...@orange.com wrote:
Sorry if I am not on the right mailing list. I would like to get some
information.
No problem, this is the correct mailing list as this message is about
discussing the future of an openstack component.
I would like to know if I am a
I think we can't throw Ceilometer and Triple-O in the same discussion:
they're two separate issues IMHO, with different root causes and
therefore different solutions.
On 08/21/2014 06:27 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
The point I've been making is
that by the TC continuing to bless only the Ceilometer
On 08/25/2014 02:36 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
So to see if we can get something useful from this thread.
not on this mailing list. Move it somewhere else: this thread is off
topic here.
/stef
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On Mon 25 Aug 2014 03:38:18 PM CDT, Zane Bitter wrote:
I'd say we've done fairly well, but I would attribute that at least in
part to the fact that we've treated the PTL as effectively the
temporary release management contact more than the guy who will
resolve disputes for us. In other words,
On 08/22/2014 08:19 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
I think Anne makes some excellent points about the pattern being
proposed being unlikely to be commonly implemented across all the
programs (or, at best, very difficult). Let's not try to formalize
another best practice that works many times and
On 08/21/2014 03:12 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
I wonder where discussion around the proposal is running. Is it public?
Yes, it's public, and this thread is part of it. Look at the dates of
the wiki: this is a recent proposal (first appearance Aug 11), came out
to address the GBP issue, quickly
On 08/28/2014 03:04 PM, Susanne Balle wrote:
Just for us to learn about the incubator status, here are some of the
info on incubation:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/Incubation
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects
These are not the correct documents
On Fri 29 Aug 2014 12:47:00 PM PDT, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote:
Third-party-request
This list is the new place to request the creation or modification of
your third party account. Note that old requests sent to the
openstack-infra mailing list don't need to be resubmitted, they are
already in
On Fri 29 Aug 2014 03:03:34 PM PDT, James E. Blair wrote:
It's the best way we have right now, until we have time to make it more
self-service. We received one third-party CI request in 2 years, then
we received 88 more in 6 months. Our current process is built around
the old conditions. I
On 08/29/2014 11:17 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
After moving to use ZNC, I find IRC works much better for me now, but
I am still learning really.
There! this sentence has two very important points worth highlighting:
1- when people say IRC they mean IRC + a hack to overcome its limitation
2-
Hi Jyoti
This is the wrong email list: we use openstack-dev only to discuss
future development of OpenStack project. Use the General mailing list
or the one for Operators (check http://lists.openstack.org).
Alternatively search for answers (and if you don't find any, ask
questions) on
The DefCore project is moving forward and needs more and more eyes on
it. The next meetings are on Sept 9 and 10, with the same agenda to
facilitate global access.
I'm sharing the details below. All members of OpenStack ecosystem should
follow this process closely as it is going to define what an
On 09/05/2014 07:07 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
Actually, I don't think this analysis is accurate. Some people are
simply interested in small aspects of a project. It's the scratch your
own itch part of open source. The thing which makes itch scratchers
not lone wolfs is the desire to go the
On 09/09/2014 06:55 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
CLAs are a well known and documented barrier to casual contributions
I'm not convinced about this statement, at all. And since I think it's
secondary to what we're discussing, I'll leave it as is and go on.
I've done both ... I do prefer the patch
On 09/05/2014 12:36 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
How can the average deployer know whether a stackforge is
a. An early prototype which has completed (such as some of the
early LBaaS packages)
b. A project which has lost its initial steam and further
investment is not foreseen
c.
On 09/10/2014 02:27 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Well, both proposals can be done : we can create subteams and the
Subteam-Approval Gerrit label right know before Kilo, and we could split
the virt repos by later once the interfaces and prereqs are done.
That's what I mean in fact: create sub team
On 09/10/2014 12:56 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
I reject soundly and fundamentally the idea that Open Source projects
NEED a commercial ecosystem to provide solid quality software.
That's not what I said. I said that assuring the quality of code on a
public repository is not necessarily something
On 09/15/2014 03:56 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
A few of us have decided to pull together a regular (cadence to be
determined) video series taking on deep dives inside of OpenStack,
looking at code, explaining why things work that way, and fielding
questions from anyone interested.
For lack of a
Thank you Daniel, great job.
On 09/17/2014 09:03 AM, Daniel Izquierdo wrote:
* Further work
=
- Add Juno release information
It's coming :)
- Allow to have projects navigation per release
This is interesting
- Add Askbot data per release
This is really not needed, don't spend
On Fri 19 Sep 2014 09:25:10 AM PDT, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
Here we'll just have to agree to disagree. I think core reviewers
hiding behind an automated process so that they don't have to
confront contributors about stalled/inadequate changes is inherently
less friendly. Clearly you feel that
On 09/24/2014 10:05 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Whatever it ends up being, it needs to have some teeth to it. Otherwise,
we're going to end up in the exact same place we're in now, where each
project does something slightly different.
+1
I think getting started and produce some material to discuss
On 12/06/2013 02:19 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
We are growing. At the moment we are 4 core members and others are
coming in. But honestly, contributors are not coming to specific
projects - they go to reach UX community in a sense - OK this is awesome
effort, how can I help? What can I work on?
Hello folks
I wrote a blog post today after noticing again that reporters take the
data published on Activity Board and Stackalytics as true, without
asking questions to the protagonists. The problem is that at the moment
none of the systems we have can guarantee that the data is presenting at
On 12/12/2013 07:49 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote:
Stackalytics team is happy to announce the release of version 0.4.
[...]
Good job Ilya, congratulations on the release. I may not be able to join
the meeting (too early for me) so I leave here some feedback for you.
I like the new punchcards in the
On 12/18/2013 07:01 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
Options 2 and 3 sound identical to me, when realistically applied.
Option 3 just makes the common sense aspect mandatory.
Indeed, Option 3 gets my vote. One aspect I'd like to mention regarding
diversity of contributors in any open source project is
A few minutes ago we sent the first batch of invites to people who
contributed to any of the official OpenStack programs[1] from 00:00 UTC
on April 4, 2014 (Grizzly release day) until present.
We'll send more invites *after each milestone* from now on and until
feature freeze (March 6th,
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
