Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Clearing out old gerrit reviews

Same. On 3 August 2018 at 13:15, Renat Akhmerov wrote: > Dougal, the policy looks good for me. I gave it the second +2 but didn’t > approve yet so that others could also review (e.g. Adriano and Vitalii). > > Thanks > > Renat Akhmerov > @Nokia > On 3 Aug 2018, 16:46 +0700, Dougal Matthews ,

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Clearing out old gerrit reviews

Agreed. On 10 July 2018 at 05:42, Renat Akhmerov wrote: > Dougal, I’m totally OK with this idea. > > Thanks > > Renat Akhmerov > @Nokia > On 9 Jul 2018, 22:14 +0700, Dougal Matthews , wrote: > > Hey folks, > > I'd like to propose that we start abandoning old Gerrit reviews. > > This report

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Promoting Vitalii Solodilov to the Mistral core team

+1 On 19 June 2018 at 10:47, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > > On 19 June 2018 at 10:27, Renat Akhmerov wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I’d like to promote Vitalii Solodilov to the core team of Mistral. In my >> opinion, Vitalii is a very talented engineer who has been demonstrating it >> by providing very

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Proposing time slots for Mistral office hours

I'm good for helping with the Monday and Friday time slots Cheers, Adriano On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > > On 5 February 2018 at 07:48, Renat Akhmerov > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Not so long ago we decided to stop

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Adding Adriano Petrich to the core team

..@gmail.com>, wrote: > > welcome to the team, Adriano! > > > Cheers, > Lingxian Kong (Larry) > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Renat Akhmerov <renat.akhme...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I’d like to promote Adriano Petrich to the Mistr

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints moved out to Rocky

I have https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mistral/+spec/mistral-workflow-executions-yaql-function almost all implemented and I would like submit an FFE for it Cheers, Adriano On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:01:41PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] New hash for master promoted

Amazing! Thanks for the effort that took to get the promotion fixed! On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Jason E. Rist wrote: > On 11/03/2017 03:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami wrote: > > Hi, > > > > since the failures in Tuesday's tests were caused by infra problems, we > > believed a

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Mistral Custom Actions API Design

base class for all actions w/o talking > about various modifications of this class yet. > > So if you see a concrete idea about using zope interfaces please share. > I’m interested in that. > > Renat Akhmerov > @Nokia > > On 14 Mar 2017, at 22:14, Adriano Petrich <apet

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Mistral Custom Actions API Design

Sorry if I'm missing the point here, and for being late on the discussion. But what about zope interfaces? Would not that be clearer? On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > > On 14 March 2017 at 11:14, Renat Akhmerov >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Upstream backwards compatibility job for Newton oooq

Mathieu, That sounds exactly what we need. Do we run tempest or something on those to validate it? On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:34 PM, mathieu bultel <mbul...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Adriano > > On 01/17/2017 03:05 PM, Adriano Petrich wrote: > > So I want to make a backwa

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Upstream backwards compatibility job for Newton oooq

So I want to make a backwards compatibility job upstream so from last scrum I got the feeling that we should not be adding more stuff to the experimental jobs due to lack of resources (and large queues) Is that so? I was thinking about using nonha-multinode-oooq that seems to be working. Is that