[OpenStack-Infra] Retire pabelanger as infra-root

Hello all, The time has come for me to step down my infra-root duties. Sadly, my day to day job is no longer directly related to openstack-infra, and finding it difficult to be involved in 'infra-root' capacity to help the project. Thanks to everything on the infra team, everybody is awesome

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Touching base; Airship CI cluster

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 02:12:11PM -0800, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020, at 1:45 AM, Roman Gorshunov wrote: > > Hello Clark, > > > > Thank you for your reply. Meeting time is OK for me. I have forwarded > > invitation to Pete Birley and Matt McEuen, they would hopefully join > > us. >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [zuul-jobs] configure-mirrors: deprecate mirroring configuration for easy_install

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:02:13PM +1100, Ian Wienand wrote: > Hello, > > Today I force-merged [5] to avoid widespread gate breakage. Because > the change is in zuul-jobs, we have a policy of annoucing > deprecations. I've written the following but not sent it to > zuul-announce (per policy)

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Low Key Monday Evening Get Together

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:31:05PM -0400, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > Hello Infra! > > > > Monday evening is looking like a good night to have a low key informal > > team gathering. The only official event on the calendar is the > >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding index and views/dashboards for Kata to ELK stack

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 06:53:16PM +, Whaley, Graham wrote: > (back to an old thread... this has rippled near the top of my pile again) > > > -Original Message- > > From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 6:03 PM > > To: Whaley, Graham ;

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] using molecule to test ansible playbooks and roles

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:29:43AM +, Sorin Sbarnea wrote: > I recently came across molecule a > project originated at Cisco which recently become an officially Ansible > project, at the same time as ansible-lint. Both projects were transferred > from

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 04:27:00PM -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 10/15/2018 05:49 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 18:51 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > On 2018-10-10 13:35:00 -0500 (-0500), Greg Hill wrote: > > > [...] > > > > We plan to still have a CI gatekeeper,

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding index and views/dashboards for Kata to ELK stack

On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 01:14:21PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018, at 3:16 AM, Whaley, Graham wrote: > > Hi Infra team. > > > > First, a brief overview for folks who have not been in this loop. > > Kata Containers has a CI that runs some metrics, and spits out JSON > > results.

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Continued discussion of Winterscale naming

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 02:26:09PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, at 11:06 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018, at 11:33 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > The Infra team has been brainstorming and collecting feedback in > > >

[openstack-dev] non-candidacy for TC

Greetings, After a year on the TC, I've decided not to run for another term. I'd like to thank the other TC members for helping bring me up to speed over the last year and community for originally voting. There is always work to do, and I'd like to use this email to encourage everybody to

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Retiring some repos?

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 07:03:29AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > I digged into the remaining and will investigate whether we can retire them: > > openstack-infra/zuul-packaging > > Paul, should we abandon this one as well? > Yes > openstack-infra/featuretracker (together with

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Continued discussion of Winterscale naming

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 06:33:06PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > The Infra team has been brainstorming and collecting feedback in > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/infra-services-naming as to what > actual name/domain the Winterscale effort will use. If you've not > been following along, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican][ara][helm][tempest] Removal of fedora-27 nodes

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 09:56:44AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 08:01:46PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > We've had fedora-28 nodes online for some time in openstack-infra, I'd like > > to > > finish the migration pr

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican][ara][helm][tempest] Removal of fedora-27 nodes

On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 08:01:46PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > We've had fedora-28 nodes online for some time in openstack-infra, I'd like to > finish the migration process and remove fedora-27 images. > > Please take a moment to review and approve the f

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][kolla-ansible][tripleo] ansible roles: where they live and what do they do

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:00:13PM -0600, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:33 PM Alex Schultz wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Doug Hellmann > > wrote: > > > Excerpts from Alex Schultz's message of 2018-08-09 14:31:34 -0600: > > >> Ahoy folks, > > >> > > >> I think

[openstack-dev] [barbican][ara][helm][tempest] Removal of fedora-27 nodes

Greetings, We've had fedora-28 nodes online for some time in openstack-infra, I'd like to finish the migration process and remove fedora-27 images. Please take a moment to review and approve the following patches[1]. We'll be using the fedora-latest nodeset now, which make is a little easier for

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [zuul] Change publication interface to be directories on node, not executor

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:42:12PM -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey everybody! > > I'd like to make a proposal for changing how we do logs/artifacts/docs > collection based on the last few weeks/months of writing things- and of > having to explain to people how to structure build and publish jobs

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Reworking zuul base jobs

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:22:13AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > A few weeks ago, I sent an email to the zuul-discuss[1] ML talking about the > idea of splitting a base job in project-config into trusted / untrusted parts. > Since then we've actually imple

[OpenStack-Infra] Reworking zuul base jobs

Greetings, A few weeks ago, I sent an email to the zuul-discuss[1] ML talking about the idea of splitting a base job in project-config into trusted / untrusted parts. Since then we've actually implemented the idea in rdoproject.org zuul and seems to be working very well. Basically, I'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] Disk space requirement - any way to lower it a little?

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > Hello, > > While trying to get a new validation¹ in the undercloud preflight > checks, I hit an (not so) unexpected issue with the CI: > it doesn't provide flavors with the minimal requirements, at least > regarding the disk

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [TIP] tox release 3.1.1

On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 01:44:00PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Eric Fried's message of 2018-07-09 11:16:11 -0500: > > Doug- > > > > How long til we can start relying on the new behavior in the gate? I > > gots me some basepython to purge... > > > > -efried > > Great

[OpenStack-Infra] zuulv3 feedback for 3pci

Greetings, Over the last few weeks I've been helping the RDO project migrate away from zuulv2 (jenkins) to zuulv3. Today all jobs have been migrated with the help of the zuul-migrate script. We'll start deleting jenkins bits in the next few days. I wanted to get down some things I've noticed in

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] dropping selinux support

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:56:22PM -0400, Mohammed Naser wrote: > Hi everyone: > > This email is to ask if there is anyone out there opposed to removing > SELinux bits from OpenStack ansible, it's blocking some of the gates > and the maintainers for them are no longer working on the project >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo gate is blocked - please read

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 12:47:10PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-06-15 23:15:01 -0700 (-0700), Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] > > ## Dockerhub proxy issue > > Infra using wrong image layer object storage proxy for Dockerhub: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575787/ > > Huge thanks to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][python3][tc][infra] Python 3.6

On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 04:48:00PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 05/06/18 16:38, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2018-06-05 15:55:49 -0400: > > > We've talked a bit about migrating to Python 3, but (unless I missed it) > > > not a lot about which version of Python

[openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit server replacement finished

Hello from Infra. Gerrit maintenance has concluded successfully and running happily on Ubuntu Xenial. We were able to save and restore the queues from zuul, but as always be sure to check your patches as a recheck maybe be required. If you have any questions or comments, please reach out to us

[openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit server replacement scheduled for May 2nd 2018

Hello from Infra. Today is the day for scheduled maintenance of gerrit, we'll be allocating 2 hours for the outage but don't expect it to take that long. During this time you will not be able to access gerrit. If you have any questions, or would like to follow along, please join us in

Re: [openstack-dev] Thank you TryStack!!

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:37:21AM +, Jens Harbott wrote: > 2018-03-26 22:51 GMT+00:00 Jimmy Mcarthur : > > Hi everyone, > > > > We recently made the tough decision, in conjunction with the dedicated > > volunteers that run TryStack, to end the service as of March 29, 2018.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] final stages of python 3 transition

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:27:31AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 04:54:46PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > It's time to talk about the next steps in our migration from python > > 2 to python 3. > > > > [...] > > > > 2. Change (or duplicate) all functional test jobs to

[openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit server replacement scheduled for May 2nd 2018

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:49:12AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: Hello from Infra. This is our weekly reminder of the upcoming gerrit replacement. We'll continue to send these announcements out up until the day of the migration. We are now 1 weeks away from replacement date. If you have any

[openstack-dev] [bifrost][bandit][magnum][ironic][kolla][pyeclib][mistral] Please merge bindep changes

Greetings, Could you please review the following bindep.txt[1] changes to your projects and approve them, it would be helpful to the openstack-infra team. We are looking to remove some legacy jenkins scripts from openstack-infra/project-config and your projects are still using them. The

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Stop supporting bindep-fallback.txt moving forward

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:34:09PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-04-20 12:31:24 -0400 (-0400), Paul Belanger wrote: > [...] > > That is fine, if we want to do the mass migration to bionic first, > > then start looking at which projects are still using > > bin

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] PTG September 10-14 in Denver

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:42:48AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've been asked if the Infra team plans to attend the next PTG in Denver. My > current position is that it would be good to attend as a team as I think it > will give us a good opportunity to work on modernizing

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Stop supporting bindep-fallback.txt moving forward

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:13:17AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, at 9:01 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2018-04-19 19:15:18 -0400 (-0400), Paul Belanger wrote: > > [...] > > > today ubuntu-bionic does seem to pass properly with > > > bindep-f

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] ubuntu-bionic and legacy nodesets

ython to 3.6 and likely be too late in the cycle to do it. I guess something we can hash out with infra / requirements / tc / EALLTHEPROJECTS. -Paul > > On 20 April 2018 at 00:37, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > With ubuntu-bionic r

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Stop supporting bindep-fallback.txt moving forward

On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:07:25AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2018-04-20 01:15, Paul Belanger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I'd like to propose we hard freeze changes to bindep-fallback.txt[1] and > > push > > projects to start using a local bindep.t

[openstack-dev] [all][infra] ubuntu-bionic and legacy nodesets

Greetings, With ubuntu-bionic release around the corner we'll be starting discussions about migrating jobs from ubuntu-xenial to ubuntu-bionic. On topic I'd like to raise, is round job migrations from legacy to native zuulv3. Specifically, I'd like to propose we do not add legacy-ubuntu-bionic

[OpenStack-Infra] Stop supporting bindep-fallback.txt moving forward

Greetings, I'd like to propose we hard freeze changes to bindep-fallback.txt[1] and push projects to start using a local bindep.txt file. This would mean, moving forward with ubuntu-bionic, if a project was still depending on bindep-fallback.txt, their jobs may raise a syntax error. In fact,

[openstack-dev] [infra] Removal of debian-jessie, replaced by debian-stable (stretch)

Greetings, I'd like to propose now that we have debian-stable (stretch) nodesets online for nodepool, that we start the process to remove debian-jessie. As I can see, there really is only 2 projects using debian-jessie: * ARA * ansible-hardening I've already proposed patches to update

[openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit server replacement scheduled for May 2nd 2018

Hello from Infra. This is our weekly reminder of the upcoming gerrit replacement. We'll continue to send these announcements out up until the day of the migration. We are now 2 weeks away from replacement date. If you have any questions, please contact us in #openstack-infra. --- It's that

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 09:00:15AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:11:23PM +, Frank Jansen wrote: > > Hi Ian, > > > > do you have any insight into the availability of a physical environment for > > the ARM64 cloud? > > > &

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:11:23PM +, Frank Jansen wrote: > Hi Ian, > > do you have any insight into the availability of a physical environment for > the ARM64 cloud? > > I’m curious, as there may be a need for downstream testing, which I would > assume will want to make use of our

[openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit server replacement scheduled for May 2nd 2018

Hello from Infra. This is our weekly reminder of the upcoming gerrit replacement. We'll continue to send these announcements out up until the day of the migration. If you have any questions, please contact us in #openstack-infra. --- It's that time again... on Wednesday, May 02, 2018 20:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 12:56:31AM -0700, Arun SAG wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Yah, I agree your approach is the better, i just wanted to toggle what was > > supported by default. However,

Re: [openstack-dev] [bifrost][helm][OSA][barbican] Switching from fedora-26 to fedora-27

On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 11:27:34AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:54:26AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:13PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > A quick search of git shows you

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:27:13PM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 8:06 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > > > On 18-03-31 15:00:27, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > > According to a notice[1] posted to the pypa-announce and > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Asking for ask.openstack.org

On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 04:26:12PM -0500, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > Hi everyone! > > We have a very robust and vibrant community at ask.openstack.org > . There are literally dozens of posts a day. > However, many of them don't receive knowledgeable answers. I'm really

[openstack-dev] [openstack-helm][infra] Please consider using experimental pipeline for non-voting jobs

Greetings, I've recently proposed https://review.openstack.org/558870 to the openstack-helm project. This moves both centos / fedora jobs into the experimental pipeline. The reason for this, the multinode jobs in helm each use 5 nodes per distro. This this case, 10 shared between centos / fedora.

Re: [openstack-dev] [bifrost][helm][OSA][barbican] Switching from fedora-26 to fedora-27

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:54:26AM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:13PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > A quick search of git shows your projects are using fedora-26 nodes for > > testing. > > Please take a moment t

[openstack-dev] Gerrit server replacement scheduled for May 2nd 2018

Hello from Infra. It's that time again... on Wednesday, May 02, 2018 20:00 UTC, the OpenStack Project Infrastructure team is upgrading the server which runs review.openstack.org to Ubuntu Xenial, and that means a new virtual machine instance with new IP addresses assigned by our service provider.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] Upcoming changes in ARA Zuul job reports

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 06:14:06PM -0400, David Moreau Simard wrote: > Hi, > > By default, all jobs currently benefit from the generation of a static > ARA report located in the "ara" directory at the root of the log > directory. > Due to scalability concerns, these reports were only generated

[Openstack] All Hail our Newest Release Name - OpenStack Stein

Hi everybody! As the subject reads, the "S" release of OpenStack is officially "Stein". As been with previous elections this wasn't the first choice, that was "Solar". Solar was judged to have legal risk, so as per our name selection process, we moved to the next name on the list. Thanks to

[Openstack-operators] All Hail our Newest Release Name - OpenStack Stein

Hi everybody! As the subject reads, the "S" release of OpenStack is officially "Stein". As been with previous elections this wasn't the first choice, that was "Solar". Solar was judged to have legal risk, so as per our name selection process, we moved to the next name on the list. Thanks to

[openstack-dev] All Hail our Newest Release Name - OpenStack Stein

Hi everybody! As the subject reads, the "S" release of OpenStack is officially "Stein". As been with previous elections this wasn't the first choice, that was "Solar". Solar was judged to have legal risk, so as per our name selection process, we moved to the next name on the list. Thanks to

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Recap of the Cross Community Infra/CI/CD event before ONS

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:11:39AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Thought I would give a recap of the Cross Community CI event that Fatih, > Melvin, and Robyn hosted prior to the ONS conference this last weekend. As a > small disclaimer there was a lot to ingest over a short

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [OpenStackAnsible] Tag repos as newton-eol

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 08:56:09AM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi folks, > Can we ask someone from infra to do this, or add me to bootstrappers > to do it myself? > Give that we did this last time, I don't see why we can't add you to boostrappers again. Will confirm. -Paul > On Thu, Mar

[Openstack] OpenStack "S" Release Naming Preliminary Results

Hello all! We decided to run a public poll this time around, we'll likely discuss the process during a TC meeting, but we'd love the hear your feedback. The raw results are below - however ... **PLEASE REMEMBER** that these now have to go through legal vetting. So it is too soon to say

[Openstack-operators] OpenStack "S" Release Naming Preliminary Results

Hello all! We decided to run a public poll this time around, we'll likely discuss the process during a TC meeting, but we'd love the hear your feedback. The raw results are below - however ... **PLEASE REMEMBER** that these now have to go through legal vetting. So it is too soon to say

[openstack-dev] OpenStack "S" Release Naming Preliminary Results

Hello all! We decided to run a public poll this time around, we'll likely discuss the process during a TC meeting, but we'd love the hear your feedback. The raw results are below - however ... **PLEASE REMEMBER** that these now have to go through legal vetting. So it is too soon to say

Re: [Openstack] Poll: S Release Naming

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 07:58:59PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings all, > > It is time again to cast your vote for the naming of the S Release. This time > is little different as we've decided to use a public polling option over per > user private URLs for voting. This m

Re: [Openstack-operators] Poll: S Release Naming

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 07:58:59PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings all, > > It is time again to cast your vote for the naming of the S Release. This time > is little different as we've decided to use a public polling option over per > user private URLs for voting. This m

Re: [openstack-dev] Poll: S Release Naming

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 07:58:59PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings all, > > It is time again to cast your vote for the naming of the S Release. This time > is little different as we've decided to use a public polling option over per > user private URLs for voting. This m

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][neutron] tools/tox_install changes - breakage with constraints

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:25:49PM +, Chris Dent wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > > > (1) it makes difficult to run tests in local environment > > We have only released version of neutron/horizon on PyPI. It means > > PyPI version (i.e. queens) is installed when we run

Re: [openstack-dev] [bifrost][helm][OSA][barbican] Switching from fedora-26 to fedora-27

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 04:44:07PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 03:20:40PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 03:53:59AM +, na...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote: > > > Hello Paul, > > > > > > I am Nam from Barbican te

Re: [openstack-dev] [bifrost][helm][OSA][barbican] Switching from fedora-26 to fedora-27

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 03:20:40PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 03:53:59AM +, na...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote: > > Hello Paul, > > > > I am Nam from Barbican team. I would like to notify a problem when using > > fedora-27. > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [bifrost][helm][OSA][barbican] Switching from fedora-26 to fedora-27

owse/MDEV-13508 > Looking at https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/mariadb seems 10.2.13 has already been updated. Let me recheck the patch and see if it will use the newer version. > Thanks, > Nam > > > -Original Message- > > From: Paul Belanger [mailto:pabelan...@redhat.com]

[Openstack] Poll: S Release Naming

Greetings all, It is time again to cast your vote for the naming of the S Release. This time is little different as we've decided to use a public polling option over per user private URLs for voting. This means, everybody should proceed to use the following URL to cast their vote:

[Openstack-operators] Poll: S Release Naming

Greetings all, It is time again to cast your vote for the naming of the S Release. This time is little different as we've decided to use a public polling option over per user private URLs for voting. This means, everybody should proceed to use the following URL to cast their vote:

[openstack-dev] Poll: S Release Naming

Greetings all, It is time again to cast your vote for the naming of the S Release. This time is little different as we've decided to use a public polling option over per user private URLs for voting. This means, everybody should proceed to use the following URL to cast their vote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [bifrost][helm][OSA][barbican] Switching from fedora-26 to fedora-27

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:13PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > A quick search of git shows your projects are using fedora-26 nodes for > testing. > Please take a moment to look at gerrit[1] and help land patches. We'd like to > remove fedora-26 node

[openstack-dev] [bifrost][helm][OSA][barbican] Switching from fedora-26 to fedora-27

Greetings, A quick search of git shows your projects are using fedora-26 nodes for testing. Please take a moment to look at gerrit[1] and help land patches. We'd like to remove fedora-26 nodes in the next week and to avoid broken jobs you'll need to approve these patches. If you jobs are

Re: [Openstack] [openstack-dev] Release Naming for S - time to suggest a name!

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 08:19:59PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > Hey everybody, > > Once again, it is time for us to pick a name for our "S" release. > > Since the associated Summit will be in Berlin, the Geographic > Location has been chosen as "Berlin"

Re: [openstack-dev] Release Naming for S - time to suggest a name!

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 08:19:59PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > Hey everybody, > > Once again, it is time for us to pick a name for our "S" release. > > Since the associated Summit will be in Berlin, the Geographic > Location has been chosen as "Berlin"

[openstack-dev] [infra][3rd party ci] Removal of jenkins user from DIB images

Greetings, As we move forward with using zuulv3 more and more and less and less of jenkins, we are continuing the clean up of our images. Specifically, if your 3rd party CI is still using jenkins please take note of the following changes[1]. By default our openstack-infra images will no longer

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Team dinner at Dublin PTG

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 06:57:29PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 03:17:58PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > It is that time again when we all get out from behind our computers and > > attempt > > to be social for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rdo cloud tenant reach 100 stacks

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:20:34PM +0100, Arx Cruz wrote: > Just an update, we cleaned up the stacks with more than 10 hours, jobs > should be working properly now. > > Kind regards, > Arx Cruz > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Arx Cruz wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We

[Openstack] Release Naming for S - time to suggest a name!

Hey everybody, Once again, it is time for us to pick a name for our "S" release. Since the associated Summit will be in Berlin, the Geographic Location has been chosen as "Berlin" (State). Nominations are now open. Please add suitable names to

[openstack-dev] Release Naming for S - time to suggest a name!

Hey everybody, Once again, it is time for us to pick a name for our "S" release. Since the associated Summit will be in Berlin, the Geographic Location has been chosen as "Berlin" (State). Nominations are now open. Please add suitable names to

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Team dinner at Dublin PTG

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 03:17:58PM -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > It is that time again when we all get out from behind our computers and > attempt > to be social for the evening. Talking about great subjects like sportsball and > favorite beers. > > As

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [nodepool] Restricting images to specific nodepool builders

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:28:27AM -0500, David Shrewsbury wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:25 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > How should we go about restricting certain image builds to specific > > nodepool builder instances? My immediate issue is with

[OpenStack-Infra] Team dinner at Dublin PTG

Greetings, It is that time again when we all get out from behind our computers and attempt to be social for the evening. Talking about great subjects like sportsball and favorite beers. As usually, please indicate which datetime works better for you by adding your name and vote to ethercalc[1].

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [all] project pipeline definition should stay in project-config or project side ?

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:05:34PM +0900, gmann wrote: > Hi Infra Team, > > I have 1 quick question on zuulv3 jobs and their migration part. From > zuulv3 doc [1], it is clear about migrating the job definition and use > those among cross repo pipeline etc. > > But I did not find clear

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI'ing ceph-ansible against TripleO scenarios

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 04:22:56PM -0800, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Is there any plans to run TripleO CI jobs in ceph-ansible? > I know the project is on github but thanks to zuulv3 we can now easily > configure ceph-ansible to run Ci jobs in OpenStack Infra. > > It would be really great to

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Broken repo on devstack-plugin-container for Fedora

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Daniel Mellado wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Since today, when I try to install devstack-plugin-container plugin over > fedora. It complains in here [1] about not being able to sync the cache > for the repo with the following error [2]. > > This is affecting

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Talks for the Vancouver CFP ?

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:12:55PM -0500, David Moreau Simard wrote: > Hi, > > Did we want to brainstorm around topics and talks suggestions from an > openstack-infra perspective for Vancouver [1] ? > > The deadline is February 8th and the tracks are the following: > - CI / CD > - Container

Re: [openstack-dev] Many timeouts in zuul gates for TripleO

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:23:45AM -0600, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 01/18/2018 09:45 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Or Idgar wrote: > > > Hi, > > > we're encountering many timeouts for zuul gates in TripleO. > > > For example, see > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][neutron][octavia][horizon][networking-l2gw] Renaming tox_venvlist in Zuul v3 run-tempest

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 05:13:28PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > The Zuul v3 tox jobs use "tox_envlist" to name the tox environment to > use, the tempest run-tempest role used "tox_venvlist" with an extra "v" > in it. This lead to some confusion and a wrong fix, so let's be > consistent across

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptl][goals][storyboard] tracking the rocky goals with storyboard

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 01:11:40PM -0800, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Since we are discussing goals for the Rocky cycle, I would like to > > propose a change to the way we track progress on the goals. > > > > We've

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Adding ARM64 cloud to infra

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:17:33AM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Wu dniu 12.01.2018 o 01:09, Ian Wienand pisze: > > On 01/10/2018 08:41 PM, Gema Gomez wrote: > >> 1. Control-plane project that will host a nodepool builder with 8 vCPUs, > >> 8 GB RAM, 1TB storage on a Cinder volume for the

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] ze04 & #532575

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 07:58:11AM -0500, David Shrewsbury wrote: > This is probably mostly my fault since I did not WIP or -2 my change in > 532575 to keep it > from getting merged without some infra coordination. > > Because of that change, it is also required that we change the user >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Hostnames

On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 10:21:12AM -0800, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Sat, Jan 6, 2018, at 10:03 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It seems that every time we boot a new server, it either randomly has a > > hostname of foo, or foo.openstack.org. And maybe that changes between > > the first

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul roadmap

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 05:01:41PM +0100, Matthieu Huin wrote: > Hello, > > If the getting-started documentation effort is also aimed at end > users, I'd be happy to help Leif with this: we've written a quick > start guide for Software Factory explaining how to set up pipelines > and jobs with

Re: [openstack-dev] Keystone Team Update - Week of 4 December 2017

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:58:05PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-12-08 18:48:56 +0100 (+0100), Colleen Murphy wrote: > [...] > > The major hindrance to keystone using Storyboard is its lack of > > support for private bugs, which is a requirement given that > > keystone is a VMT-managed

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Gate Issues

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 08:38:24PM +1100, Ian Wienand wrote: > Hello, > > Just to save people reverse-engineering IRC logs... > > At ~04:00UTC frickler called out that things had been sitting in the > gate for ~17 hours. > > Upon investigation, one of the stuck jobs was a >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 49

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:28:53PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-12-07 17:08:55 + (+), Graham Hayes wrote: > [...] > > It is worth remembering that this is a completely separate project to > > OpenStack, with its own governance. They are free not to use our tooling > > (and

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Nodepool drivers

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 09:34:50AM +, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: > Hi, > > Top posting here to raise another complication. > James mentioned an API problem regarding the NodeRequestHandler > interface. Indeed the run_handler method should actually be part of the > generic code so that the

[OpenStack-Infra] Virtual Sprint Queens

Greetings, I have created an etherpad[1] with some thoughts about doing a virtual sprint to upgrade our control plane to Ubuntu Xenial. Please take a moment to read and indicate when you could assist. While creating / deleting / upgrading control plane servers does require infra-root

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] Removal of packages from bindep-fallback

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 07:55:07PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-11-16 06:59, Ian Wienand wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Some time ago we started the process of moving towards projects being > > more explicit about thier binary dependencies using bindep [1] > > > > To facilitate the

Re: [openstack-dev] Removing internet access from unit test gates

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 04:41:13PM +, Mooney, Sean K wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 3:05 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul roadmap

On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:47:20PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > At the PTG we brainstormed a road map for Zuul once we completed the > infra cutover. I think we're in a position now that we can get back to > thinking about this, so I've (slightly) cleaned it up and organized it > here.

  1   2   3   4   5   >