Re: [Openstack-operators] [all] Naming the T release of OpenStack

Just do a vote as usual, train is a great candidate :) On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:44 PM Melvin Hillsman wrote: > I agree with Anita and wonder why Train did not meet the criteria? If > there is no way for Train to be an option outside of killing the voting, > than for the sake of integrity of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cyborg] Core Team Update

Big +1, xinran has been tremendously helpful in the development. On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 7:55 PM Li Liu wrote: > Hi Cyborg Team, > > I want to nominate Xinran Wang as a new core reviewer for Cyborg project. > Xiran has been working hard and kept contributing to the project[1][2]. > Keep Claim and

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]zero tolerance policy on padding activities

Hi all, I want to emphasize the zero tolerance policy in cyborg project regarding padding activities. If you look at the gerrit record [0] you would probably got the idea: out of the 15 abandoned patches, only the ones from jiapei and shaohe were actually meant to do real fixing. We have

Re: [openstack-dev] [penstack-dev]Discussion about the future of OpenStack in China

watcher is known by some, but I don't think Masakari is On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 5:47 AM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/24/2018 12:12 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > There were a couple points that I did manage to decipher, though. One > > thing that both articles seemed to say was that OpenStack doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [all][tc] We're combining the lists! (was: Bringing the community together...)

+1 and thanks for the effort to make this happen On Fri, Sep 21, 2018, 9:22 AM Lance Bragstad wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 7:19 PM Sean McGinnis > wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 03:46:43PM -0600, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> > Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-09-20

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] Capturing Feedback/Input

big +1, really look forward to the storyboard setup On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 6:31 AM Melvin Hillsman wrote: > Hey everyone, > > During the TC meeting at the PTG we discussed the ideal way to capture > user-centric feedback; particular from our various groups like SIGs, WGs, > etc. > > Options

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Capturing Feedback/Input

big +1, really look forward to the storyboard setup On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 6:31 AM Melvin Hillsman wrote: > Hey everyone, > > During the TC meeting at the PTG we discussed the ideal way to capture > user-centric feedback; particular from our various groups like SIGs, WGs, > etc. > > Options

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

Thanks Anita, will definitely do as you kindly suggested :) On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 12:04 PM Anita Kuno wrote: > On 2018-09-18 08:40 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > [...] > >> I can understand that IRC cannot be used in China which is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

Thanks Anita, will definitely do as you kindly suggested :) On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 12:04 PM Anita Kuno wrote: > On 2018-09-18 08:40 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2018-09-18 11:26:57 +0900 (+0900), Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > [...] > >> I can understand that IRC cannot be used in China which is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

A quick sidenote for anyone is using riot.im but not super familiar with it like I did ... Its global search could not cache all the openstack channels, therefore you have to manually join them via their own cmd lines as I recently discover the methods .. 1. add @appservice-irc:matrix.org for

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Meeting tomorrow

cc'ed sig list. Kind reminder for the meeting about 2 and half hours away, we will do a review of the denver ptg summary [0] and then go over the forum sessions which we want to propose [1] This is an EU/APAC friendly meeting so please do join us if you are in the region :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Meeting tomorrow

cc'ed sig list. Kind reminder for the meeting about 2 and half hours away, we will do a review of the denver ptg summary [0] and then go over the forum sessions which we want to propose [1] This is an EU/APAC friendly meeting so please do join us if you are in the region :)

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:06 AM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > This seems to completely miss the reasons I personally reject such > platforms. I don't use proprietary tools or services for interacting > with our community, I avoid relying on products from companies which > attempt to track or share my

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

Thanks Anne :) On another side note, there has not been a (maybe I missed) good "no" vote message I was looking for. A good quality "no" message could something like this in my opinion (and this is just one of many possibilities): "Thanks for invitation but no I would not like to use social

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

Would like to see some updates on the foundation's official wechat group up :) On the other note, I would like to point out that this email is merely asking who would be interested. The question about "dividing teams" and such is addressed in https://review.openstack.org/602697 . On Tue, Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

Great to see the momentum going ! :) Another problem is that many people doesn't follow upstream so they are oblivious about the new features and cool things had been done in every cycle, and then all these types of half ass openstack trashing blog post got shared in wechat moments dissing how

Re: [Openstack-operators] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

Just a quick update, the execution part of the proposal has been added in patch-2 , so if you have the similar concern shared in Matt's open letter , please help review and comment. On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, 5:51 PM Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi, > > Based upon the discussion we had at the T

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

Just a quick update, the execution part of the proposal has been added in patch-2 , so if you have the similar concern shared in Matt's open letter , please help review and comment. On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, 5:51 PM Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi, > > Based upon the discussion we had at the T

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

that there should be ambassadors to help facilitate the discussion, and the end goal is always to go to upstream instead of the convo ending in local or downstream. On Sat, Sep 15, 2018, 9:52 AM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/14/2018 1:52 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > This is a joint question from mnas

[Openstack-operators] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

Hi, Based upon the discussion we had at the TC session in the afternoon, I'm starting to draft a patch to add long term goal mechanism into governance. It is by no means a complete solution at the moment (still have not thought through the execution method yet to make sure the outcome), but feel

[openstack-dev] [tc][uc]Community Wide Long Term Goals

Hi, Based upon the discussion we had at the TC session in the afternoon, I'm starting to draft a patch to add long term goal mechanism into governance. It is by no means a complete solution at the moment (still have not thought through the execution method yet to make sure the outcome), but feel

[openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

This is a joint question from mnaser and me :) For the candidates who are running for tc seats, please reply to this email to indicate if you are open to use certain social media app in certain region (like Wechat in China, Line in Japan, etc.), in order to reach out to the OpenStack developers

[Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

Hi all, Follow up the diversity discussion we had in the tc session this morning [0], I've proposed a resolution on facilitating technical community in large to engage in global reachout for OpenStack more efficiently. Your feedbacks are welcomed. Whether this should be a new resolution or not

[openstack-dev] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

Hi all, Follow up the diversity discussion we had in the tc session this morning [0], I've proposed a resolution on facilitating technical community in large to engage in global reachout for OpenStack more efficiently. Your feedbacks are welcomed. Whether this should be a new resolution or not

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] [openstack-dev] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:15 AM Fox, Kevin M wrote: > How about stated this way, > Its the tc's responsibility to get it done. Either by delegating the > activity, or by doing it themselves. But either way, it needs to get done. > Its a ball that has been dropped too much in OpenStacks history.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:15 AM Fox, Kevin M wrote: > How about stated this way, > Its the tc's responsibility to get it done. Either by delegating the > activity, or by doing it themselves. But either way, it needs to get done. > Its a ball that has been dropped too much in OpenStacks history.

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-09-12 09:47:27 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote: > [...] > > So I encourage all elected TC members to work directly with the > > various SIGs to figure out their top issue and then work on > > managing those deliverables across

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-09-12 09:47:27 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote: > [...] > > So I encourage all elected TC members to work directly with the > > various SIGs to figure out their top issue and then work on > > managing those deliverables across

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

Well Public Cloud WG has prepared the ammo as you know and to discuss with TC on Friday :) A hundred percent with you on this matter. On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 9:47 AM Matt Riedemann wrote: > Rather than take a tangent on Kristi's candidacy thread [1], I'll bring > this up separately. > > Kristi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

Well Public Cloud WG has prepared the ammo as you know and to discuss with TC on Friday :) A hundred percent with you on this matter. On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 9:47 AM Matt Riedemann wrote: > Rather than take a tangent on Kristi's candidacy thread [1], I'll bring > this up separately. > > Kristi

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Day 2 Arrangement Reminder

Hi Team, Today the Cyborg session will concentrate on two items that were not covered yesterday: neutron-cyborg interaction and general device mgmt. Since I will be mostly at the Public Cloud WG session, Sundar will help to lead the discussion, and our Stein PTL Li Liu will host the online ZOOM

Re: [openstack-dev] [election] [tc] TC candidacy

:17 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/7/2018 8:54 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > One is related to the cyborg project where the team is working to build > > the open heterogenous resource mgmt platform. I would like to extend > > this mission over to kubernetes, which currently l

Re: [openstack-dev] [election] [tc] TC candidacy

PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > I found that most of my statement for my last ran is still valid today > > [0][1]. I want to build strong cross-community collaboration, best > > practices for project level governance and more innovations for > OpenStack. > > As I asked Rico, are

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg]PTG session prep

Hi Folks, For those of you are interested in the openstack public cloud, please take a look at the etherpad for our agenda[0] , you are more than welcomed to suggest/add new topics ! [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg-stein-ptg -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Denver PTG arrangements

Hi Team, As we discussed at yesterday's team meeting, please find our schedule for PTG at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cyborg-ptg-stein , team dinner information also available :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd

[openstack-dev] [election] [tc] TC candidacy

Hi all, I ran for TC in the last cycle and I guess you can find out more information on the candidacy patch [0], so I won't copy and paste that long article here again :) I found that most of my statement for my last ran is still valid today [0][1]. I want to build strong cross-community

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Team Weekly Meeting 2018.08.08

Hi Team, We are rushing towards the end of Rocky cycle and let's use the meeting to sync up with any important features still on the fly. starting UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg, as usual -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,.

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg] Asia-EU friendly meeting today

Hi team, A kind reminder for the UTC 7:00 meeting today, please do remember to register yourself to irc due to new channel policy. ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg] Asia-EU friendly meeting today

Hi team, A kind reminder for the UTC 7:00 meeting today, please do remember to register yourself to irc due to new channel policy. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Stepping down (but stick around)

Hi Team, For those of you who has been around since the "Nomad" time, you know how a terrific journey we have come along together. A pure idea, through community discussion and development, morphed into a project who is rapidly growing and gaining industry attentions. It is my privilege to serve

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg]New Meeting Time Starting This Week

Hi Folks, As indicated in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/584389/, PCWG is moving towards a tick-tock meeting arrangements to better accommodate participants along the globe. For even weeks starting this Wed, we will have a new meeting time on UTC0700. For odd weeks we will remain for the

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg]New Meeting Time Starting This Week

Hi Folks, As indicated in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/584389/, PCWG is moving towards a tick-tock meeting arrangements to better accommodate participants along the globe. For even weeks starting this Wed, we will have a new meeting time on UTC0700. For odd weeks we will remain for the

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Nominate Zhenghao Wang as new core reviewer

Hi Team, If you have been closely part of the rocky crazy development process, then you know Zhenghao :) Zhenghao is an open source engineer from Lenovo and has been very active in Cyborg project in Rocky cycle. He has helped finished os-acc lib setup, worked with coco to demonstrate the first

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting 2018.07.11

Hi Team, Weekly meeting as usual starting UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg, since holiday is over, let's focus on getting Rocky features done :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office:

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting 2018.07.04

Hi Team, We will have our weekly meeting as usual at #openstack-cyborg starting UTC1400. The main focus is to align the development status. -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office:

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting 2018.06.20

Hi Team, Weekly meeting as usual starting UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg Initial agenda: 1. Rocky task assignment confirmation 2. os-acc discussion -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Team Weekly Meeting 2018.06.13

Hi Team, Kind reminder for the team meeting today about 30 mins later at #openstack-cyborg . -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][cyborg][release] Pre-release of openstack/cyborg failed

thx guys , patch has been submitted at https://review.openstack.org/574927 On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 8:09 AM Clark Boylan wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, at 4:59 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > On 06/12/2018 06:01 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > > Hi Doug, > > > > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][cyborg][release] Pre-release of openstack/cyborg failed

Hi Doug, Thanks for raising this, we will check it out On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:32 AM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from zuul's message of 2018-06-12 21:57:02 +: > > Build failed. > > > > - release-openstack-python >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cyborg] [nova] Cyborg quotas

Hi Blair, Sorry for the late reply, could you elaborate more on the proxy driver idea ? On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: > (Please excuse the top-posting) > > The other possibility is that the Cyborg managed devices are plumbed in > via IP in guest network space. Then

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting 2018.06.06

Hi Team, let's resume the team meeting, at today's meeting we need to make decisions on all Rocky critical specs in order to meet MS2 deadline. -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] A culture change (nitpicking)

For me nitpicking during review is really not a good experience, however i do think we should tolerate at least one round of nitpicking. On another aspect, the nitpicking review culture also in some way encourage, and provide legitimacy in some way, to the padding activities. People are feeling

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Organizational diversity tag

I agree with Zane's proposal here, it is a good rule to have 2 core reviewer from different companies to provide +2 for a patch. However it should not be very strict given that project in early stage usually have to rely on devs from one or two companies. But it should be recommended that project

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]No Meeting This Week

Hi team, Given that people still recover from the summit and memorial day holiday, let's cancel the team weekly meeting this week as well. At the mean time feel free to communicate over irc or email :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]no meeting today

Enjoy the water view folks :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2

Re: [openstack-dev] [cyborg] [nova] Cyborg quotas

@Chris yes we are actively exploring this option :) On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 05/19/2018 05:58 PM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: > >> G'day Jay, >> >> On 20 May 2018 at 08:37, Jay Pipes wrote: >> >>> If it's not the VM

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting 2018.05.16

Hi team, As usual we will have our weekly meeting starting UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg, initial agenda as follows: 1. summit prep 2. sub team report 3. critical rocky spec review 4. open patches -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Nominating Sundar as new core reviewer (reminder)

Hi team, Since the meetbot not function properly after our long running review party, I would like send out this email for archiving purpose about Sundar's nomination to our core review team which was discussed Wed last week. As already stated during the team meeting last week, Sundar has been a

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]spec review day (May 9th)

Hi team, Let's make use of the team meeting on Wed to kickstart a whole day of concentration of review of the critical Rocky specs [0] and try to get them done as much as possible. We start with the meeting and folks in US and Europe could carry on til the end of the day when Asian devs could

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]No Team Meeting this Wed

Hi team, Since I'm traveling to KubeCon this week, let's cancel the weekly meeting today . You are still more than welcome to raise questions or just chat on our irc channel :) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] [Elections] Rocky TC Election Results

Congratulations to the newly elected TC members ! On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Amy wrote: > Congrats to all who were elected! > > Amy (spotz) > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 30, 2018, at 7:02 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > > Hello Everyone :) > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun][k8s] AWS Fargate and OpenStack Zun

Thanks Hongbin this is absolutely awesome. On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi folks, > > FYI. I wrote a blog post about a comparison between AWS Fargate and > OpenStack Zun. It mainly covers the following: > > * The basic concepts of OpenStack Zun and

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting 2018.04.25

Hi Team, Team meeting starting UTC1400 as usual at #openstack-cyborg, initial agenda as follows: 1. KubeCon preparation for resource mgmt wg discussion 2. subteam meeting arrangement for more agile meeting time/logistic 3. Rocky critical spec update 4. open patches/bug review -- Zhipeng

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] campaign question: How can we make contributing to OpenStack easier?

I think many projects are now beginning to develop the sub-team structure (e.g Nova, Ironic and Cyborg) and that might be part of the answer here. Having a sub-team structure and also have volunteer as sub team leads could also help people that are not good at code review to contribute

[Openstack-operators] [publiccloud-wg]KubeCon EU Public Cloud Meetup ?

Hi, I'm wondering for people who will attend KubeCon EU is there any interest for a public cloud meetup ? We could discuss many items listed in the ptg summary I just sent out via the meetup :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg]KubeCon EU Public Cloud Meetup ?

Hi, I'm wondering for people who will attend KubeCon EU is there any interest for a public cloud meetup ? We could discuss many items listed in the ptg summary I just sent out via the meetup :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies

[Openstack-operators] Public Cloud WG PTG Summary

Hi team, Sorry for this long overdue summary. During the Dublin PTG as a WG we held two successful discussion sessions on Mon and Tues, and below are the conclusions for this year's planning as far as I could recall. Please feel free to provide further feedback :) - Passport Program v2

[openstack-dev] Public Cloud WG PTG Summary

Hi team, Sorry for this long overdue summary. During the Dublin PTG as a WG we held two successful discussion sessions on Mon and Tues, and below are the conclusions for this year's planning as far as I could recall. Please feel free to provide further feedback :) - Passport Program v2

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Topics for the Board+TC+UC meeting in Vancouver

big +1 to Graham's suggestion On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:36 PM, Graham Hayes wrote: > On 18/04/18 11:38, Chris Dent wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > > >> So... Is there any specific topic you think we should cover in that > >> meeting ? > > > > The topics:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] campaign question related to new projects

I think it actually relies upon the new team to actively reaching out to the existing team. The new team cannot be lazy and wait for something happen for them, they have to keep reaching out and believe me the core developers from the existing official project will lend a hand in the end :) For

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] campaign question: How "active" should the TC be?

I don't have specific ideas now, but it would be great to have TC publish something like a new direction outlook per cycle or per year, to summarize that these x,y,z new areas are what the OpenStack Technical Committee considers worth exploring for new directions and we will sponsor projects that

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] campaign question: How can we make contributing to OpenStack easier?

Culture wise, being too IRC-centric is definitely not helping, from my own experience getting new Cyborg developer joining our weekly meeting from China. Well we could always argue it is part of a open source/hacker culture and preferable to commercial solutions that have the constant risk of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] campaign question: How should we handle projects with overlapping feature sets?

I think this depends on the nature of the project. For deployment tools, as we also have witnessed in OPNFV, it tends to have multiple solutions. So it is normal to have multiple such projects although they are solving the same problem generally speaking. For projects that has a clear definition

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] campaign question: How "active" should the TC be?

In general I would prefer TC take an active role regarding exploring new use cases and technology directions leverage the existing OpenStack infrastructure. I would against TC being too active on project level governance. For example we have been discussing about edge computing recently and we

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote]Retire kolla-kubernetes project

+1 On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 5:56 PM, Pete Birley wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018, 1:24 AM Eduardo Gonzalez > wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> 2018-04-19 8:21

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] campaign question related to new projects

As the one who just lead a new project into governance last year, I think I could take a first stab at it. For me the current requirements in general works fine, as I emphasized in my recent blog [0], the four opens are extremely important. Open Design is one of the most important out the four I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cyborg][release][Release-job-failures] Pre-release of openstack/cyborg failed

Thanks Doug we will take a look into it On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 12:02 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from zuul's message of 2018-04-20 13:59:14 +: > > Build failed. > > > > - release-openstack-python http://logs.openstack.org/fa/ >

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting 2018.04.18

Hi Team, Weekly meeting as usual starting UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg, initial agenda as follows: 1. MS1 preparation 2. bug report on storyboard 3. Rocky critical spec review 4. open patches discussion -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei

[openstack-dev] [election][tc]TC candidacy

Hi all, I'm announcing my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee. I started following OpenStack community since Portland Summit in 2013, and has been an integral part of it from then on. I'm currently serving as the PTL for the Cyborg project [0] which provides general management

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting April 11, 2018

Hi Team, Our weekly meeting starting from UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg as usual. The initial agenda is as follows: 1. Confirmation of new core reviewer promotion, 2. Critical Rocky Spec update and discussion 3. open patch discussion Please feel free to suggest new topics any time :) --

[openstack-dev] [cyborg] Promote Li Liu as new core reviewer

Hi Team, This is an email for my nomination of adding Li Liu to the core reviewer team. Li Liu has been instrumental in the resource provider data model implementation for Cyborg during Queens release, as well as metadata standardization and programming design for Rocky. His overall stats [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] Asking for ask.openstack.org

The email alert definitely should be the first one to get fixed :) On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:23 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 04/04/18 17:26, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > >> Hi everyone! >> >> We have a very robust and vibrant community at ask.openstack.org < >>

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weejky Team Meeting 2018.04.04

Hi Team, As usual team meeting starting UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg, initial agenda as follows: 1. Status report from subteam 2. Critical spec patch review Plz feel free to suggest more topics. -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei

Re: [openstack-dev] [k8s] OpenStack and Containers White Paper

Hi Chris, If it is possible to add Cyborg under "Projects that can stand alone in integrations with Kubernetes and other cloud technology" section, I would like to help on that content. On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:30 AM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I can help with

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] All Hail our Newest Release Name - OpenStack Stein

In hindsight, it would be much fun the R release named Ramm :P On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 3:10 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > Hi everybody! > > As the subject reads, the "S" release of OpenStack is officially "Stein". > As > been with previous elections this wasn't the first

Re: [openstack-dev] All Hail our Newest Release Name - OpenStack Stein

In hindsight, it would be much fun the R release named Ramm :P On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 3:10 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > Hi everybody! > > As the subject reads, the "S" release of OpenStack is officially "Stein". > As > been with previous elections this wasn't the first

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Team Weekly Meeting 2018.03.28

Hi Team, Weekly meeting as usual starting UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg, initial agenda as follows: * Cyborg GPU support discussion * Clock driver introduction by ZTE team * Rocky dev discussion: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/cyborg -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cyborg] Separate spec for compute node flows?

Hi Sundar, Zhuli will work on os-acc spec, and Li Liu will work on the glance and metadata one, as we assigned during ptg. But you are very welcomed to reach out to them and work together if you have the bandwidth :) On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Nadathur, Sundar

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Team Weekly Meeting 2018.03.21

Hi Team, Meeting today starting UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg, initial agenda as follows: 1. Sub-team lead progress update 2. rocky spec/patch review: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/cyborg -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cyborg] Tracking multiple functions

in the PTG. I > will try to address these aspects as well. > > Thanks & Regards, > Sundar > > > On 3/8/2018 4:53 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > > @jay I'm also against a weigher in nova/placement. This should be an > optional step depends on vendor implementation, not

Re: [openstack-dev] [cyborg]Summary of Mar 14 Meeting

not confined to FPGAs but should cover all devices, just as > the current Cyborg-Nova spec > <https://github.com/openstack/cyborg/blob/master/doc/specs/queens/approved/cyborg-nova-interaction.rst> > . > > Thanks, > > Sundar > > On 3/15/2018 9:00 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: >

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Summary of Mar 14 Meeting

Hi Team, Here are the meeting summary for our post-ptg kickoff meeting. 0. Meeting recordings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AZn0SUC_hw , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wE2GkSibDo , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E40JOm311WI 1. PoC from Shaohe and Dolpher (

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [First Contact][SIG] [PTG] Summary of Discussions

Hi folks, Sorry was not be able to make it to the First Contact SIG discussions in Dublin. The only suggestion I have is to have as many project as possible to have a dedicated FC SIG wiki page for localize onboarding support. For example like what we do in Cyborg:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting 2018.03.14 Agenda (No Time Change For US)

) On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes that would be one of the issue we need to discuss after the PoC demo :) > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Nadathur, Sundar < > sundar.nadat...@intel.com> wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting 2018.03.14 Agenda (No Time Change For US)

e discussed during the Cyborg/Nova discussion in the PTG? > > > > This is line 56 in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cyborg-ptg-rocky-nova- > cyborg-interaction . > > > > Regards, > > Sundar > > > > *From:* Zhipeng Huang [mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com] > *S

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Weekly Team Meeting 2018.03.14 Agenda (No Time Change For US)

Hi Team, We will resume the team meeting this week. The meeting starting time is still ET 10:00am/PT 7:00am, whereas in China it is moved one hour early to 10:00pm. For Europe please refer to UTC1400 as the baseline. This week we will have a special 2 hour meeting. In the first one hour we will

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Dublin Rocky PTG Summary

Hi Team, Thanks to our topic leads' efforts, below is the aggregated summary from our dublin ptg session discussion. Please check it out and feel free to feedback any concerns you might have. Queens Cycle Review Etherpad:https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cyborg-queens-retrospective 1. Adopt MS

Re: [openstack-dev] [cyborg]No Meeting This Week

, at 9:51 PM, Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As most of us are rekubrating from PTG and snowenpstack last week, let's > cancel the team meeting this week. At the mean time I have solicitate the > meeting summary from topic leads, and will send out a su

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cyborg] Tracking multiple functions

@jay I'm also against a weigher in nova/placement. This should be an optional step depends on vendor implementation, not a default one. @Alex I think we should explore the idea of preferred trait. @Mathew: Like Sean said, Cyborg wants to support both reprogrammable FPGA and pre-programed ones.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cyborg][glance][nova]cyborg FPGA management flow disscusion.

gt; > > BR > Shaohe Feng > > _ > *From:* Feng, Shaohe > *Sent:* 2018年2月12日 15:06 > *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; openstack-operators@lists. > openstack.org > *Cc:* Du, Dolpher <dolpher...@intel.com>; Zhipeng Huang < > zhipengh...@

  1   2   3   4   >