Thanks to all who replied, it's extremely helpful. I'll add a focus on
integration tests to the list of requirements
Mainn
- Original Message -
> Hey, you've already got a bunch of answers, but FWIW:
>
> a) I think it's fine to do a few big patches deleting stuff you don't
> want. You c
Hi Neutron team,
I'm working on building Third-party testing for Neutron Ryu plugin.
I intend to use Jenkins and gerrit-trigger plugin.
It is required that Third-party testing provides verify vote for
all changes to a plugin/driver's code, and all code submissions
by the jenkins user.
https://wik
Hi all,
During our last meeting, it was suggested that the Wed 9am PST meeting time is
not suitable for Asia and a few other interested parties were also unable to
attend.
I have set up a new doodle poll to gather times to reschedule the meeting.
Please indicate your availability here: http://d
Hi all,
We had a very good meeting last week around the git-pull blueprint. During the
discussion, Monty suggested using Zuul to manage the git repository access and
workflow.
While he is working on sending the group a diagram and description of what he
has in mind, I had a couple of other ques
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 22:13:18 -0600
Christopher Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Randall Burt
> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 5, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Christopher Armstrong <
> > chris.armstr...@rackspace.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Anderson Mesquita <
> > and
Hi,
We are scheduled to publish Nova, Keystone, Glance, Neutron, Cinder,
Horizon, Heat and Ceilometer 2013.2.1 stable Havana releases on Thursday Dec 12.
The list of issues fixed so far can be seen here:
https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/2013.2.1
https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Pendergrass, Eric
wrote:
> Hi, I’ve been out for nearly 3 weeks and noticed Compute meter names are
> now prefaced by "instance:"
>
>
>
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ceilometer/measurements.html
>
>
>
> Not sure when this happened but I was wondering if the
Hi!
Thanks - I've been wanting to kill this for a long time. Thanks for
starting the discussion...
On 12/08/2013 07:26 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
>
> We'd like to get the keystoneclient tests out of keystone. They're
> serving a useful purpose of catching problems with non-backwards
> compatible c
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, December 08, 2013 11:26:07 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
>
>>
>> We'd like to get the keystoneclient tests out of keystone. They're
>> serving a useful purpose of catching problems with non-backwards
>> compatible changes in keyston
On Sunday, December 08, 2013 11:26:07 AM, Brant Knudson wrote:
We'd like to get the keystoneclient tests out of keystone. They're
serving a useful purpose of catching problems with non-backwards
compatible changes in keystoneclient so we still want them run.
Problem is they're running at the w
On 9 December 2013 01:43, Maru Newby wrote:
>
>>> If AMQP service is set up not to lose notification, notifications will be
>>> piled up
>>> and stress AMQP service. I would say single node failure isn't catastrophic.
>>
>> So we should have AMQP set to discard notifications if there is noone
>
On 13-12-08 12:07 AM, Lyle, David wrote:
The set domain context functionality is for operators (admins) to refine the
context that they are working in/viewing. Admins can limit the scope of
identity visibility to one domain, rather than having to sort through the
exhaustive lists of projects,
We'd like to get the keystoneclient tests out of keystone. They're serving
a useful purpose of catching problems with non-backwards compatible changes
in keystoneclient so we still want them run. Problem is they're running at
the wrong time -- only on changes to keystone and not changes to
keystone
Hi All.
The wiki page for LBaaS SSL support was updated.
Please see and comment
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL#Vip_SSL_Association
Thank you!
Evg
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 9:14 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Hi
I was thinking about a different way for L7 modeling.
The key points are:
- The Rule has no action attribute
- A Policy is a collection of rules
- Association keep a reference to a Vip and to a Policy
- Association holds the action (what to do if the Policy "return" True)
- Association hold
Yes agree it not very cloud like. Thanks for pointing out the Manila
project, didn't know about it.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 12/06/2013 10:54 AM, Daniel Kuffner wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are using in our company for a prototype the docker hypervisor on
>> op
On Dec 7, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 7 December 2013 21:53, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>>
>> Case 3: Hardware failure. So an agent on the node is gone.
>>Another agent will run on another node.
>>
>> If AMQP service is set up not to lose notification, notifications will b
17 matches
Mail list logo
