Just got connected!!! Strange :|
Thanks :)
Best Regards,
Swapnil
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Swapnil Kulkarni <
swapnilkulkarni2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vijay, yes I'm on irc.freenode.net, the channel list is not showing
> #openstack-cinder, also
>
> /join openstack-cinder
>
> returns
>
> o
Vijay, yes I'm on irc.freenode.net, the channel list is not showing
#openstack-cinder, also
/join openstack-cinder
returns
openstack-cinder :No such channel
Best Regards,
Swapnil
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:58 PM, atul jha wrote:
> Swapnil,
>
> This has it all https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/
On 12/30/2013 08:31 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently, in the global-requirements.txt, we have:
>
> Django>=1.4,<1.6
> django-bootstrap-form
>
> However, django-bootstrap-form fail in both Django 1.4 and Django 1.6.
>
> What's the way forward? Would it be possible that someone makes
Swapnil,
This has it all https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/IRC
cheers!!
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On 01/02/2014 12:25 PM, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
> Have you tried joining this channel on irc.freenode.net?
>
>
> Regards,
> Vijay
>
>
> _
On 01/02/2014 12:25 PM, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote:
Have you tried joining this channel on irc.freenode.net?
Regards,
Vijay
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstac
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Greg,
This is really not a new discussion. Particularly, we’ve already discussed
EventScheduler thing before with heat folks
(http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/019150.html).
We agreed that EventScheduler doesn’t make a lot of sense alone after Mistral
came into
Brant,
That is fine for some cases but we provide non-ldap backends, and a
read/write backend. If we continue to provide a keystone specific idp
(likely we need to), these features are a must-have in the long run. Just
my view (and requests from real customers). It's all well and good to
recommen
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 7:33 PM, 黎林果 wrote:
> I have met this problem too.The units can't be run.
> The end info as:
>
> Ran 0 tests in 0.673s
>
> OK
> cp: cannot stat `.testrepository/-1': No such file or directory
>
> 2013/12/28 Jay Pipes :
>> On 12/27/2013 11:11 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>>>
>>>
I have met this problem too.The units can't be run.
The end info as:
Ran 0 tests in 0.673s
OK
cp: cannot stat `.testrepository/-1': No such file or directory
2013/12/28 Jay Pipes :
> On 12/27/2013 11:11 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>>
>> I'm really sorry about the horrid UI - we're in the middle of
hi Thomas:
thank you for your suggestion. I agree with you. cracklib is useful to
check
password. I only give a example to set password, not force use this rule.
I think password scheme should be more discussion.
I refer to linux password policy. The Linux password rule is
configurab
在2013年12月31 03时15分，"Brant Knudson"写道：
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:55 AM, li-zheming wrote:
hi all:
when create user, you can set user password. You can set password as a
simple word 'a'. the
password is too simple but not limit. if someone want to steal your password,
it is so easily(
Hello Stackers!
I have an idea:
In a IPv6-Only Tenant subnet, we can offer a solution to make its IPv6
network, reachable from the old Internet infrastructure (IPv4), how?
1- Floating IP (v4) based on NAT46.
That way, the attached Floating IP (when with NAT46), it will be a real
IPv4 address
On 01/01/2014 02:16 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
>> So you are really making 2 assumptions here that aren't valid:
* it was known to be a backwards compatibility problem - because it wasn't,
and no one provided feedback over the course of 4 days to indicate that it
was (there were some alternative im
On 01/01/2014 04:30 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
- Changes in default behaviour: Always likely to affect existing systems in
some way. Maybe we should have an additional type of review vote that comes
from people who are recognised as reperensting large production deployments ?
This is my bigges
Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2014-01-01 13:30:32 -0800:
>
> > - Changes in default behaviour: Always likely to affect existing systems
> > in some way. Maybe we should have an additional type of review vote that
> > comes from people who are recognised as reperensting large production
> - Changes in default behaviour: Always likely to affect existing systems in
> some way. Maybe we should have an additional type of review vote that comes
> from people who are recognised as reperensting large production deployments ?
This is my biggest worry... there are changes which ma
Hi Sean, and Happy New Year :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
> Sent: 30 December 2013 22:05
> To: Day, Phil; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional
> changes
Hi Jon,
The issue here is that the backport into Havana hasn't been merged yet:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56149/
I apologise for the delay, It has been in review for a long time.
If there are some stable maintainers that are able to take a look that would be
really appreciated.
Cheers,
Thanks for the detailed update. This is very informative and useful.
Thanks
On 12/31/13 11:58 PM, "Michael Still" wrote:
>Hi.
>
>So while turbo hipster is new, I've been reading every failure message
>it produces to make sure its not too badly wrong. There were four
>failures posted last night w
20 matches
Mail list logo
