On 10 January 2014 01:46, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I think we are all agreed that the current state of Gate Resets isn't good.
...
Specifically I'd like to get commitments from as many PTLs as possible that
they'll both directly participate in the day, as well as encourage the rest
of
On 9 January 2014 07:05, Samuel Merritt s...@swiftstack.com wrote:
On 1/7/14 2:53 PM, Michael Still wrote:
So applying migration 206 took slightly over a minute (67 seconds).
Our historical data (mean + 2 standard deviations) says that this
migration should take no more than 63 seconds. So
On 7 January 2014 08:50, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com wrote:
Pretty much what Vish said.
In re: History. I think this was the right way, these scheduler files didn't
just spring up from nowhere, maintaining the history is a good thing. Even
when this becomes a separate
On 8 January 2014 03:01, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Yaguang Tang yaguang.t...@canonical.com
...
For the V3 API clients should access neutron directly for quota information.
The V3 API will no longer proxy quota related information for neutron.
On 4 January 2014 08:31, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
I really don't understand the aversion to allowing contributors to
police on their own what files they do and don't commit in a review
to an OpenStack project. It all boils down to the following
balancing act:
I have *no*
On 6 January 2014 05:18, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
I think people are conflating two different global concepts
here...
There had been a discussion about synchronizing the .gitignore files
of all projects into one central list (a la openstack/requirements
synchronization):
On 01/09/14 19:12, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
This is definitely great news!
+2 to the things Sergey mentioned below.
Additionally, will you fill out the blueprint or wiki w/ details that
will help others write integration tests for your plugin?
We already implemented at least some part of the
On 5 January 2014 02:02, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
So we used to do that the apps against release libraries. And the result was
more and more full day gate breaks. We did 2 consecutive ones in 2 weeks.
Basically, once you get to be a certain level of coupled in OpenStack we can
no
Thanks Jay, this is a very useful summary! Some comments inline:
On 01/09/2014 06:22 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
I'm trying to hash out where data will live for Tuskar (both long term
and for its Icehouse deliverables). Based on the expectations for
Icehouse (a combination of the wireframes and
On 09/01/14 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:08 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi Jeremy
Don't you think it is burden for operators if we should choose correct
combination of config for
Jay Pipes wrote:
Personally, I think sooner is better. The severity of the disruption is
quite high, and action is needed ASAP.
Having the bug day organized shouldn't prevent people from working on
the most pressing issues and get the disruption under control ASAP...
I'm confident we'll be
Hello All Please help me,
I Export Template of Windows Server R2 2008 from XEN server as VHD file.
Create a template in cloudstack with this VHD file
I tried to launch an instance through this Template.
After downloading template it tried to installed for half an hour after
that, removes the
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/01/14 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
I also think projects should try to minimize configuration options at
their minimum so operators are completely lost. Opening the sample
nova.conf and seeing 696 options is not what I would call user friendly.
And also
On 09/01/14 13:28 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:23 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 08/01/14 17:13 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi folks
OpenStack process tend to have many config options, and many hosts.
It is a pain to manage this tons of config options.
To centralize this
Hi everyone!
This is the announcement of Murano Bug Triage Event that will be held at
#murano channel at 11:00 UTC on Monday.
Current bug state can be found in our launchpad
pagehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bugs
.
See you there!
Kate.
___
Answers inlined.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Daniele Venzano daniele.venz...@eurecom.fr
wrote:
On 01/09/14 19:12, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
This is definitely great news!
+2 to the things Sergey mentioned below.
Additionally, will you fill out the blueprint or wiki w/ details that
Hi everyone!
This is the announcement of Murano Bug Triage Event that will be held at
#murano channel at 11:00 UTC on Monday.
Current bug state can be found in our launchpad
pagehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bugs
.
See you there!
Kate.
___
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net]
Sent: 10 January 2014 08:54
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] where to expose network quota
On 8 January 2014 03:01, Christopher Yeoh
On 10/01/14 11:28 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/01/14 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
I also think projects should try to minimize configuration options at
their minimum so operators are completely lost. Opening the sample
nova.conf and seeing 696 options is not
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:34 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
On Thu, 2014-01-09
On 10 January 2014 07:40, Jiang, Yunhong yunhong.ji...@intel.com wrote:
Robert, sorry that I’m not fan of * your group * term. To me, *your
group” mixed two thing. It’s an extra property provided by configuration,
and also it’s a very-not-flexible mechanism to select devices (you can only
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
noo...@noorul.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/08/2014 11:40 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014 9:58 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com
In any case, we don't have to decide this now. If we simply allowed the
whitelist to add extra arbitrary properties to the PCI record (like a group
name) and return it to the central server, we could use that in scheduling
for the minute as a group name, we wouldn't implement the APIs for flavors
Greetings,
More discussions around the adoption of Pecan.
I'd like to know what is the feeling of other folks about migrating
existing APIs to Pecan as opposed to waiting for a new API version as
an excuse to migrate the API implementation to Pecan?
We discussed this in one of the sessions at
On 01/10/2014 04:13 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 5 January 2014 02:02, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
So we used to do that the apps against release libraries. And the result was
more and more full day gate breaks. We did 2 consecutive ones in 2 weeks.
Basically, once you get to be a
On 01/10/2014 05:06 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Jay Pipes wrote:
Personally, I think sooner is better. The severity of the disruption is
quite high, and action is needed ASAP.
Having the bug day organized shouldn't prevent people from working on
the most pressing issues and get the disruption
Hi team,
I've decided to move discussion about aggregation in mailing list.
Here is a description about my idea and I really need your comments.
*Idea:*
The goal is to improve performance when user gets statistics for meter. Now
we have fixed list of statistics (min, max and so on). During
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
Tried wiping out the (installed) python-greenlet rpm and re running, and
that was not installed afterwards, either. I am guessing that the package
install step is getting skipped somehow, after the first run.
That sounds
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/01/14 11:28 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Personally I think we should (and we can) say NO more often. As we get
stronger as a dev community it becomes easier, and I think we see more
opinionated choices in
I've not read the blueprint yet, but I think we'll need another name
for it. I'm sure lots of us are running this Sentry in prduction:
https://github.com/getsentry/sentry
Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/
Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/
OpenStack Developer
Georgy,
Pecan hook functions (http://pecan.readthedocs.org/en/latest/hooks.html) are
passed a `state` argument, which has a couple of attributes you can make use
of. Starting at the `before` hook, you have access to `state.controller`,
which is the @pecan.expose() decorated
Apologies for this top post, I just want to move this discussion towards action.
I am traveling next week so it is unlikely that I can make the meetings. Sorry.
Can we please agree on some concrete actions, and who will do the coding?
This also means raising new blueprints for each item of work.
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2014-01-09 12:21:05 -0700:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi folks
Thank you for your input.
The key difference from external configuration system (Chef, puppet
etc) is integration with
openstack services.
If an object A contains another object or object list (called
sub-object), any change happened in the sub-object can't be detected
by obj_what_changed() in object A.
Well, like the Instance object does, you can override obj_what_changed()
to expose that fact to the caller. However, I think
Hi folks,
Please keep in mind that our weekly meeting changed its timeslot from
Mondays to Fridays 1500 UTC.
#openstack-meeting should be available at this time, booking it.
-Sylvain
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi everybody,
there is first stab of Deployment Management section with future
direction (note that it was discussed as a scope for Icehouse).
I tried to add functionality in time and break it down to steps. This
will help us to focus on one functionality at a time and if we will be
in time
Howdy Stackers!
We are developing a new open source Network Functions Virtualization
driver for Neutron. I am writing to you now to ask for early advice
that could help us to smoothly bring this work upstream into OpenStack
Juno.
The background is that we are open source developers working to
Jarda,
I love how this is progressing. It will be very nice once it's implemented!
The iconography seems to be inconsistent. The ! triangle is used for error
conditions and warning conditions; and the x hexagon is also used for error
conditions.
For the Roles usage, will the user be able
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.comwrote:
Is there any way to have WSME pass through arbitrary attributes to the
created object? There is nothing that i can see in the documentation or
code that would seem to support this.
In keystone we have the situation
Hello everyone.
I would like to know if anyone here has knowledge on how easy it is to use
Horizon for something else then OpenStack things?
I'm the starter of the dlux project that aims to consume the OpenDaylight
SDN controller Northbound REST APIs instead of the integrated UI it has
now.
Thanks for the feedback :)
= Stack =
There is a single stack in Tuskar, the overcloud.
A small nit here: in the long term Tuskar will support multiple overclouds.
Yes, absolutely. I should have added For Icehouse like I did in other
places. Good catch.
There's few pieces of concepts
Sukhdev,
Thanks for your comment. Eugene summarized very well the reason I didin't
specify any testing dealing with the ml2 plugin. It
Cheers
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.comwrote:
Sukhdev,
API tests are really not for end-to-end testing; also,
As much as the Tuskar Chassis model is lacking compared to the Tuskar
Rack model, the opposite problem exists for each project's model of
Node. In Tuskar, the Node model is pretty bare and useless, whereas
Ironic's Node model is much richer.
Thanks for looking that deeply into it :)
So, it's
I have used the Horizon framework for an application other than the OpenStack
Dashboard and it worked really well. There is an effort to create a separation
between the Horizon framework and the OpenStack Dashboard and once that happens
it will be even easier. How hard or difficult it is will
Thank everyone who were on our Climate weekly meeting.
Meeting minutes:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2014/climate.2014-01-10-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2014/climate.2014-01-10-15.00.txt
Log:
+1 PCI Flavor.
From: Jiang, Yunhong [mailto:yunhong.ji...@intel.com]
Sent: January-10-14 1:56 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support
BTW, I like the PCI flavor :)
From: Jiang, Yunhong
On 01/10/2014 04:27 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
Thanks for the feedback :)
= Stack =
There is a single stack in Tuskar, the overcloud.
A small nit here: in the long term Tuskar will support multiple
overclouds.
Yes, absolutely. I should have added For Icehouse like I did in other
places. Good
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jay Dobies jason.dob...@redhat.com wrote:
There's few pieces of concepts which I think is missing from the list:
- overclouds: after Heat successfully created the stack, Tuskar needs to
keep track whether it applied the post configuration steps (Keystone
Thanks for recording this. A few questions:
- I'm guessing the capacity metrics will come from Ceilometer. Will
Ceilometer provide the averages for the role or is that calculated by
Tuskar?
- When on the change deployments screen, after making a change but not
yet applying it, how are the
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Imre Farkas ifar...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/10/2014 04:27 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
There's few pieces of concepts which I think is missing from the list:
- overclouds: after Heat successfully created the stack, Tuskar needs to
keep track whether it applied the
Sounds good to me. The list base objects don't have methods to make changes to
the list - so it would be a case of iterating looking at each object in the
list. That would be ok.
Do we need the contents of the lists to be modified without assigning a new
list? - that would need a little more
Sounds good to me. The list base objects don't have methods to make changes
to the list - so it would be a case of iterating looking at each object in
the list. That would be ok.
Hmm? You mean for NovaObjects that are lists? I hesitate to expose lists
as changed when one of the objects
One more related idea related to real packages in TripleO. While I still think
using packages is totally cool we may want to make an exception for
systemd/upstart scripts. We have some non-standard ordering in our TripleO init
scripts that is meaningful and blindly switching to a distro
Hi Luke,
Very pleased to see this initiative in the OpenStack/NFV space.
A dumb question - how do you see this related to the ongoing
[openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support
discussion on this list?
Do you see that work as one component within your proposed
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:34 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes
If anyone is giving any thought to networks that are available to multiple
tenants (controlled by a configurable list of tenants) but not visible to all
tenants I'd like to hear about it.
I'm especially thinking of scenarios where specific networks exist outside of
OpenStack and have specific
Hi folks, I put together a tracking blueprint for us to refer to in our team
meetings:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/marconi/+spec/graduation
Also, here is an outline of what I want to a accomplish for Icehouse:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Marconi/roadmaps/icehouse
Feedback is
That worked. I incorporated the
FORCE_PREREQ=1
change and all good.
On 01/10/2014 04:54 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/01/14 23:27 -0500, Adam Young wrote:
On 01/09/2014 04:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 01/09/2014 04:12 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Adam
Hi Yunhong,
I appreciate your comments. Please see inline…
--Robert
On 1/10/14 1:40 AM, Jiang, Yunhong
yunhong.ji...@intel.commailto:yunhong.ji...@intel.com wrote:
Robert, sorry that I’m not fan of * your group * term. To me, *your group”
mixed two thing. It’s an extra property provided by
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Sergey Skripnick sskripn...@mirantis.comwrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Eric Windisch ewindi...@docker.com
wrote:
About spur: spur is looks ok, but it a bit complicated inside (it uses
separate threads for non-blocking stdin/stderr reading
Hi Yongli,
Please also see my response to Yunhong. Here, I just want to add a comment
about your local versus global argument. I took a brief look at your patches,
and the PCI-flavor is added into the whitelist. The compute node needs to know
these pci-flavors in order to report PCI stats
I appreciate that we want to fix the ssh client. I'm not certain that
writing our own is the best answer.
I was supposed to fix oslo.processutils.ssh with this class, but it may
be fixed without it, not big deal.
In his comments on your pull request, the paramiko author recommended
Hi,
Thanks for the wireframes and the walkthrough. Very useful. I've a few
comments.
- I'd like to echo the comments from the recording about Role I think
the term probably isn't specific enough but I don't have a great
suggestion. However, this is probably suited better to the other
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sergey Skripnick
sskripn...@mirantis.comwrote:
I appreciate that we want to fix the ssh client. I'm not certain that
writing our own is the best answer.
I was supposed to fix oslo.processutils.ssh with this class, but it may
be fixed without it, not big
Hi Mike,
On 10 January 2014 17:35, Michael Bright mjbrigh...@gmail.com wrote:
Very pleased to see this initiative in the OpenStack/NFV space.
Glad to hear it!
A dumb question - how do you see this related to the ongoing
[openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sergey Skripnick
sskripn...@mirantis.com wrote:
I appreciate that we want to fix the ssh client. I'm not certain that
writing our own is the best answer.
I was supposed to fix oslo.processutils.ssh with this class, but it may
be fixed
Ian, thanks for your reply. Please check my response prefix with 'yjiang5'.
--jyh
From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 4:08 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through
Brian, the issue of 'class name' is because currently the libvirt does not
provide such information, otherwise we are glad to add that :(
But this is a good point and we have considered already. One solution is to
retrieve it through some code like read the configuration space directly. But
Hi
I've been thinking of ideas on how to fulfill this user self registration
requirement for our startup's private beta.
So far, i'm of the opinion that storage of customer data (contacts,
physical address, billing info, etc) by commercial entities can be handled
by Keystone via extension(s), (
On 10 January 2014 15:30, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
We seemed happy with the current system (roughly) around GPU passthrough:
nova flavor-key three_GPU_attached_30GB set
pci_passthrough:alias= large_GPU:1,small_GPU:2
nova boot --image some_image --flavor three_GPU_attached_30GB
On 10/01/14 04:30, Sean Dague wrote:
Minor correction, we're going to do this on Jan 27th, to be after the
i2 push, as I don't think there is time organize this prior.
Specifically I'd like to get commitments from as many PTLs as possible
that they'll both directly participate in the day, as
Another question:
- A Role (sounds like we're moving away from that so I'll call it
Resource Category) can have multiple Node Profiles defined (assuming I'm
interpretting the + and the tabs in the Create a Role wireframe
correctly). But I don't see anywhere where a profile is selected when
Hey Yunhong,
The thing about 'group' and 'flavor' and 'whitelist' is that they once
meant distinct things (and I think we've been trying to reduce them back
from three things to two or one):
- group: equivalent devices at a host level - use any one, no-one will
care, because they're either
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Sergey Skripnick
sskripn...@mirantis.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sergey Skripnick
sskripn...@mirantis.com wrote:
I appreciate that we want to fix the ssh client. I'm not certain that
writing our own is the best answer.
I was
I've also used the core Horizon bits for dashboards other than the OpenStack
dashboard. I can't speak for any current bugs you may run into, but
by-and-large the ability to create arbitrary dashboards, tables, workflows,
etc. to interact with RESTful APIs works perfectly without the OpenStack
On 01/09/2014 06:14 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com
mailto:mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Brant Knudson b...@acm.org mailto:b...@acm.org wrote on
01/09/2014 10:07:27 AM:
When I was starting out, I ran devstack (
+100 also :)
2014/1/10 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:34 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 23:56
Hi Flavio, Clint
I agree with you guys.
sorry, may be, I wasn't clear. My opinion is to remove every
configuration in the node,
and every configuration should be done by API from central resource
manager. (nova-api or neturon server etc).
This is how to add new hosts, in cloudstack, vcenter, and
Thanks everyone who have joined Savanna meeting.
Here are the logs from the meeting:
Minutes:
savanna.2014-01-09-18.10.htmlhttp://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2014/savanna.2014-01-09-18.10.html
Log:
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 17:06 +, CARVER, PAUL wrote:
If anyone is giving any thought to networks that are available to
multiple tenants (controlled by a configurable list of tenants) but
not visible to all tenants I’d like to hear about it.
I’m especially thinking of scenarios where
I recently saw a case [1] where a misspelled assertion method
(asoptt_called_once_with vs assert_called_once_with) did not result in a test
failure because the object it was called on was created by mock.patch() without
any of the spec/spec_set/autospec parameters being set. Might it make
+1 but fixing this looks like take not small time
2014/1/10 Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com:
I recently saw a case [1] where a misspelled assertion method
(asoptt_called_once_with vs assert_called_once_with) did not result in a test
failure because the object it was called on was created by
Ian, thanks for your reply. Please check comments prefix with [yjiang5].
Thanks
--jyh
From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 12:17 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI
Hey Luke,
If you look at the passthrough proposals, the overview is that part of the
passthrough work is to ensure there's an PCI function available to allocate
to the VM, and part is to pass that function on to the Neutron plugin via
conventional means. There's nothing that actually mandates
Hi, Paul/Dan
For the extra_resource (refer to Dan's comments in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60258/ for more information), I created a
patch set
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:extra_resources,n,z
and want to get some
I have to use [yjiang5_1] prefix now :)
--jyh
From: Ian Wells [mailto:ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 3:55 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support
On 11 January 2014
Rebooting this thread now that I've reorg'd the Wiki page.
The proposed REST API spec for searching system and custom metadata in Swift,
across accounts, containers, and objects, is now posted at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MetadataSearchAPI
I've also made the first modification to the
On 2014-01-10 21:57:33 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote:
I have *no* aversion to allowing contributors to police things on
their own.
[...]
I know you don't. It was stated in the message I was replying to (in
context you trimmed) that ...the community should not accept or
promote any policy
On 11 January 2014 15:39, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2014-01-10 22:00:40 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote:
[...synchronized .gitignore across all projects...]
Out of curiousity, why wouldn't it work?
The example I gave earlier in the thread... one project wants
Hey all,
I have a question regarding the development of the tuskar-ui navigation.
So, to give some background: we are currently working off the wireframes that
Jaromir Coufal has developed:
http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/2013-12-03_tripleo-ui_02-resources.pdf
In these
90 matches
Mail list logo
