[openstack-dev] [Mistral] Notes on action YAML declaration and naming

We touched this on review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73205/, and fixed a bit, bringing it up here to further discuss at slightly higher level. Let's go over a tiny bit of YAML definition, clarifying terminology on the way. Current DSL snippet: actions: my-action parameters:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Need more sample HOT templates for users

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 08:24:09AM +0100, Thomas Spatzier wrote: Thanks, Thomas. The first link actually provides a nice inventory of all Resources and their properties, attributes, etc. I didn't look into this because I was thinking of the word 'developer' differently. This pointer is useful f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Notes on action YAML declaration and naming

On 14 Feb 2014, at 15:02, Dmitri Zimine wrote: > Current DSL snippet: > actions: >my-action > parameters: > foo: bar > response: # just agreed to change to 'results’ Just a note: “response” indentation here is not correct, it’s not a parameter called “response”

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Gate] qemu: linux kernel too old to load a ram disk

Hello, It looks since 12 hours the gate fails in 100% of case because an error with libvirt (logs/libvirtd.txt): qemu: linux kernel too old to load a ram disk Bug reported on openstack-ci: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1280142 Fingerprint: http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJz

Re: [openstack-dev] Gamification and on-boarding ...

+1 Mentoring and devoted mentors and not demotivating new folks (but instead "growing" and fostering them) is IMHO 10x more important than a badge program. Badges seem nice and all but I think it's not the "biggest win for the buck". Sent from my really tiny device... > On Feb 13, 2014, at 6:0

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova][VCDriver] VMWare VCDriver problems

Hi, We are currently looking into that. Thanks Gary From: Jay Lau mailto:jay.lau@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Thursday, February 13, 2014 11:14 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Should we limit the disk IO bandwidth in copy_image while creating new instance?

Instead of limitating the consumed bandwidth by proposiong a configuration flag (yet another one, and which default value to be set ?), I would propose to only decrease the niceness of the process itself, so that other processes would get first the I/O access. That's not perfect I assume, but that'

Re: [openstack-dev] "bad" default values in conf files

2014-02-13 23:19 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes : > On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:38 -0500, David Kranz wrote: > > I was recently bitten by a case where some defaults in keystone.conf > > were not appropriate for real deployment, and our puppet modules were > > not providing better values > > https://bugzilla.red

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Interest in discussing vendor plugins for L3 services?

I'm also interested in it. UTC8. -- cheers, Li Ma ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Should we limit the disk IO bandwidth in copy_image while creating new instance?

It could be a good idea but as Sylvain said how to configure this? Then, what about using scp instead of rsync for a local copy? - Original Message - From: "Wangpan" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 4:52:20 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Shoul

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] project name collision - renaming required

Hi folks, It was decided to remove some names from the initial voting, please, see them in meeting logs - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2014/savanna.2014-02-13-18.00.html Thanks. On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: > Please, note, that I'm planning today t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Gate] qemu: linux kernel too old to load a ram disk

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:58 PM, sahid wrote: > Hello, > > It looks since 12 hours the gate fails in 100% of case because > an error with libvirt (logs/libvirtd.txt): > qemu: linux kernel too old to load a ram disk > > > Bug reported on openstack-ci: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+

[openstack-dev] [savanna] renaming: initial voting

Hi folks, I've created a poll to select 10 candidates for new Savanna name. It's a first round of selecting new name for our lovely project. This poll will be ended in Monday, Feb 17. You should receive an email from "Sergey Lukjanov (CIVS poll supervisor) slukja...@mirantis.com" via cs.cornell.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

Hi On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:27:20AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: > So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc, > we're running into some friction. > > I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators > :) > > So far: > - some packages use

[openstack-dev] vhost-{pid} takes up cpu

Hi deal stackers, I am running a devstack with two nodes: one is controller (no nova-compute running) and other is compute. I am using neutron ml2 plugin and ovs agent with GRE tunnel. I started a VM and tried to run iperf testing: 1. start iperf as server role in the VM, which has a floating ip

Re: [openstack-dev] Interested in attracting new contributors?

Hi all, I think we should separate between mentoring efforts and documentation. For the first one, is true that there are always tons of tasks to do but sometimes a beginner won't find them because they are not familiar with the workflow neither with the community. People that is not involved wit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] User Signup

2014-02-10 17:03 GMT+01:00 Kieran Spear : > On 10 February 2014 08:27, Soren Hansen wrote: >> I agree that putting admin credentials on a public web server is a >> security risk, but I'm not sure why a set of restricted admin >> credentials that only allow you to create users and tenants is a >> b

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Notes on action YAML declaration and naming

Current DSL snippet: actions: my-action parameters: foo: bar response: # just agreed to change to 'results' select: '$.server_id' store_as: v1 'result' sounds better than 'response' and, I think, more fit to action description. And I suggest

[openstack-dev] Skipping next Project/Release meeting and 1:1s

Hi PTLs, I need to attend an unexpected family event on Tuesday, so I won't be able to do our regular 1:1s, nor will I be able to chair the Project/Release meeting on Feb 18th at 21:00 UTC. Since the date coincides with FeatureProposalFreeze for a number of projects, I suspect most of you won't r

Re: [openstack-dev] vhost-{pid} takes up cpu

You can run the command "taskset -pc {pid}" for both kvm guest process and its vhost-{pid}. If they are not identical, you can change the affinity to achieve NUMA/cache sharing. Not sure it will solve the problem. -- cheers, Li Ma On 2/14/2014 7:42 PM, Yongsheng Gong wrote: > Hi deal stackers

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

Hi Robert, > So far: > - some packages use different usernames > - some put things in different places (and all of them use different > places to the bare metal ephemeral device layout which requires > /mnt/). > - possibly more in future. Somehow I miss between your suggestions of option #A an

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova][VCDriver] VMWare VCDriver problems

Cool, thanks Gary. Do you have some bugs or bp filed in launchpad to trace those issues? 2014-02-14 17:11 GMT+08:00 Gary Kotton : > Hi, > We are currently looking into that. > Thanks > Gary > > From: Jay Lau > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] Interested in attracting new contributors?

On 14 February 2014 07:06, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz < victo...@vmartinezdelacruz.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I think we should separate between mentoring efforts and documentation. > > For the first one, is true that there are always tons of tasks to do but > sometimes a beginner won't find them

[openstack-dev] [Nova] bp proposal: filter based on the load averages of the host

Greetings, I would like to add a new filter based on the load averages. This filter will use the command uptime and will provides an option to choice a period between 1, 5, and 15 minutes and an option to choice the max load average (a float between 0 and 1). Why: During a scheduling it could

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] bp proposal: filter based on the load averages of the host

This will probably not work for the vmware driver since it does not return a standard uptime string. Here's an example of what you would get: $ nova hypervisor-uptime 1 +-++ | Property| Value

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:27:20AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc, we're running into some friction. I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators :) So far: - some packages use different usernam

[openstack-dev] [Climate] Meeting minutes

Thanks everyone who took part in our weekly meeting. It is real pleasure to work with you, folks! Meeting minutes are here: Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2014/climate.2014-02-14-15.04.html Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2014/climate.201

[openstack-dev] [Openstack][Horizon] switchable switched classes in forms.py

Hi, I can see that the forms.py file can have parameters/inputs that are of class type "switchable switched", i.e. this field 'B' will appear on the form if it's 'switched' based on a choice from a previous field 'A'. Then depending on the choice made for 'B', field 'C' will appear on the form.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Interest in discussing vendor plugins for L3 services?

I am interested. UTC - 8. On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Nick Ma wrote: > I'm also interested in it. UTC8. > > -- > > cheers, > Li Ma > > > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mai

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Notes on action YAML declaration and naming

“output” looks nice! Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. On 14 Feb 2014, at 20:26, Nikolay Makhotkin wrote: > Current DSL snippet: > actions: >my-action > parameters: > foo: bar > response: # just agreed to change to 'results' > select: '$.server_id'

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [cinder][neutron][nova][3rd party testing] Gerrit Jenkins plugin will not fulfill requirements of 3rd party testing

On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 08:54 +0900, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote a blog post about how to setup Zuul manually. > http://ritchey98.blogspot.jp/2014/02/openstack-third-party-testing-how-to.html > > It covers how to migrate from Gerrit Trigger plugin to Zuul and > some tips including a way

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Tempest code sprint - 2nd week of January, Montreal, QC, Canada

Time for a summary: Neutron Tempest Code Sprint Summary Where: Montreal, QC, Canada When: January 15, 16, 17 2014 Location: Salle du Parc at 3625 Parc avenue, a room in a residence of McGill University. Time: 9am - 5pm (8am - 6pm for some) Purpose: to focus on the stability of Neutron to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Notes on action YAML declaration and naming

I like output, too. But it should go with 'input' In summary, there are two alternatives. Note that I moved task-parameters under parameters. Ok with this? actions: my-action input: foo: bar task-parameters: flavor_id: image_

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

On 14 February 2014 17:57, Jay Dobies wrote: > I am propably repeating much of what James already said already. But I >> think an >> operator that makes the decision to do a package base Triplo installation >> does >> so e.g. because he is familiar with the tools and conventions of the >> specifi

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchicical Multitenancy Discussion

Hi Vinod! I think you can simplify the roles in the hierarchical model by only passing the roles for the authenticated project and above. All roles are then inherited down. This means it isn’t necessary to pass a scope along with each role. The scope is just passed once with the token and the p

Re: [openstack-dev] Devstack installation failed with CINDER installation

Jeremy, Thanks for the clarification. I found an alternative workaround that works for me and restricts the use of the openstack pypi mirror to only be used when running tox: 1. Add PyPi mirror to tox.ini's [tox] entry: +indexserver = +default = http://pypi.openstack.org/openstack e.g.

[openstack-dev] Glance v1 and v2

Hello: does anyone happen to know, or have a detailed write-up, on the differences between so-called "Glance v1" and "Glance v2"? In particular do we still need Glance Registry in Havana, or do we not? The best answer so far was to run the registry anyway, "just in case", which does not feel enti

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-02-13 13:27:20 -0800: > So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc, > we're running into some friction. > > I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators > :) > > So far: > - some packages us

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum

> -Original Message- > From: Clayton Coleman [mailto:ccole...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:34 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum > > > > - Original Mes

[openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

There is a Blueprint targeted for Icehouse-3 that is aiming to implement the AWS VPC api. I don't think that this blueprint is providing the necessary constructs to really implement a VPC, and it is not taking into account the domains, or proposed multi tenant hierarchy. In addition, I could no

[openstack-dev] [All] Fixed recent gate issues

As many of you surely noticed, we had some significant significant gate issues in the last day. It's fixed now, and I've got the details below. The root cause of the issue was a lack of proper testing in python- swiftclient. We've made some improvements here in the last few hours, but improving th

[openstack-dev] python-swiftclient releases

I'm pleased to announce a couple of big releases for python-swiftclient: versions 1.9.0 and 2.0.2. You can find them both on PyPI: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-swiftclient/2.0.2 https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-swiftclient/1.9.0 So why the two releases? The 2.0.2 release is the result o

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Fixed recent gate issues

On 02/14/2014 02:15 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > As many of you surely noticed, we had some significant significant > gate issues in the last day. It's fixed now, and I've got the > details below. > > The root cause of the issue was a lack of proper testing in > python- swiftclient. We've made som

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

Hi JC, I have proposed BP to address VPC using domain hierarchy and hierarchical administrative boundary. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-administrative-boundary Thanks, Arvind -Original Message- From: Martin, JC [mailto:jch.mar...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday,

Re: [openstack-dev] "bad" default values in conf files

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:38 AM, David Kranz wrote: > > Defaults in conf files seem to be one of the following: > > - Generic, appropriate for most situations > - Appropriate for devstack > - Appropriate for small, distro-based deployment > - Approprate for large deployment > In my experiences

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Martin, JC wrote: > > There is a Blueprint targeted for Icehouse-3 that is aiming to implement the > AWS VPC api. I don't think that this blueprint is providing the necessary > constructs to really implement a VPC, and it is not taking into account the > domain

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

Arvind, Thanks for point me to the blueprint. I'll add it to the related blueprints. I think this could be part of the solution, but in addition to defining administrative boundaries, we need to change the way object sharing works. Today, there is only two levels : project private or public. Yo

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

- Original Message - > From: "Robert Collins" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" , > openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:27:20 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO > > So progressing with the 'and f

Re: [openstack-dev] "bad" default values in conf files

Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-02-13 07:19:18 -0800: > * Identify settings that need to scale with the size of the underlying > VM or host capabilities, and provide patches to the configuration file > comments that clearly indicate a recommended scaling factor. Remember > that folks writ

Re: [openstack-dev] Gamification and on-boarding ...

On 02/13/2014 08:53 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > The delays on reviews for relatively trivial fixes I think is > something that is probably more demotivating to new folks than the > lack of badges. So some ability to keep on top of that I think > would be really great. Sure, I agree. I still think bad

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

Joe, I will let others comment, but since I think this BP was proposed much before the multi-tenant hierarchy BP, I would like to at least have the discussion. I would suggest a pause until we agree that this is ok to move this forward independently of the multi tenant hierarchy proposal. JC

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] promoting devtest_seed and devtest_undercloud to voting, + experimental queue for nova/neutron etc.

Thanks to a massive push this week, both the seed *and* undercloud jobs are now passing on tripleo-gate nodes, but they are not yet voting. I'd kind of like to get them voting on tripleo jobs (check only). We don't have 2 clouds yet, so if the tripleo ci-cloud suffers a failure, we'd have -1's eve

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] promoting devtest_seed and devtest_undercloud to voting, + experimental queue for nova/neutron etc.

On 02/14/2014 03:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > Thanks to a massive push this week, both the seed *and* undercloud > jobs are now passing on tripleo-gate nodes, but they are not yet > voting. > > I'd kind of like to get them voting on tripleo jobs (check only). We > don't have 2 clouds yet, so if

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Notes on action YAML declaration and naming

Dmitri, in our concerns under word 'input' we assume a block contains the info about how the input data will be taken for corresponding task from initial context. So, it will be a kind of expression (e.g. YAQL). Renat, am I right? On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Dmitri Zimine wrote: > I like

Re: [openstack-dev] Devstack installation failed with CINDER installation

On 2014-02-13 20:44, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-02-13 10:56:28 -0600 (-0600), Ben Nemec wrote: [...] configure pip to use the pypi.openstack.org mirror. [...] While this is sometimes a useful hack for working around intermittent PyPI CDN growing pains on your personal development workstatio

Re: [openstack-dev] "bad" default values in conf files

On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 11:30 -0800, Greg C wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:38 AM, David Kranz > wrote: > > Defaults in conf files seem to be one of the following: > > - Generic, appropriate for most situations > - Appropriate for devstack > -

Re: [openstack-dev] Gamification and on-boarding ...

On 2014-02-14 13:48, Russell Bryant wrote: On 02/13/2014 08:53 AM, Sean Dague wrote: The delays on reviews for relatively trivial fixes I think is something that is probably more demotivating to new folks than the lack of badges. So some ability to keep on top of that I think would be really gre

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [TripleO] Goal setting // progress towards integration

On 02/13/2014 04:24 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Dan Smith > wrote: > > > I would also like to see CI (either third party or in the gate) for > > the nova driver before merging it. There's a chicken and egg problem >

[openstack-dev] call for help with nova bug management

Hi Folks - I’ve offered to help Russell out with managing nova’s bug queue. The charter of this is as follows Triage the 125 new bugs Ensure that the critical bugs are assigned properly and are making progress Once this part is done we will shift our focus to things like Bugs in incomplete stat

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 00:05 +, Adrian Otto wrote: > If they want something more comprehensive, including a full set of open > source best practices by default, such as entrance and exit gating, hosted > code review and collaboration, It would be really nice to have a full > Zuul+Nodepool+Jen

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 14:18 +0100, Julien Vey wrote: > I agree gating is a great feature but it is not useful for every > project and as Adrian said, not understood by everyone. > I think many Solum users, and PaaS users in general, are > single-project/single-build/simple git worklow and do not ca

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] bp proposal: filter based on the load averages of the host

On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 15:29 +, sahid wrote: > Greetings, > > I would like to add a new filter based on the load averages. > > This filter will use the command uptime and will provides an option to choice > a > period between 1, 5, and 15 minutes and an option to choice the max load > average

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] User Signup

On 02/01/2014 12:24 PM, Saju M wrote: Hi folks, Could you please spend 5 minutes on the blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/user-registration and add your suggestions in the white board. Thanks, ___ OpenStack-dev mailing lis

Re: [openstack-dev] "bad" default values in conf files

>> were not appropriate for real deployment, and our puppet modules were >> not providing better values >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064061. I'd agree that raising the caching timeout is a not a good "production default" choice. I'd also argue that the underlying issue is fixed

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [TripleO] promoting devtest_seed and devtest_undercloud to voting, + experimental queue for nova/neutron etc.

Sean Dague writes: > On 02/14/2014 03:43 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >> Thanks to a massive push this week, both the seed *and* undercloud >> jobs are now passing on tripleo-gate nodes, but they are not yet >> voting. >> >> I'd kind of like to get them voting on tripleo jobs (check only). We >> do

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Notes on action YAML declaration and naming

Ok, I see. Do we have a spec that describes this? Lets spell it out and describe the whole picture of input, output, parameters, and result. DZ> On Feb 14, 2014, at 1:01 PM, Nikolay Makhotkin wrote: > Dmitri, in our concerns under word 'input' we assume a block contains the > info about

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Should we limit the disk IO bandwidth in copy_image while creating new instance?

On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 10:22 +0100, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > Instead of limitating the consumed bandwidth by proposiong a > configuration flag (yet another one, and which default value to be > set ?), I would propose to only decrease the niceness of the process > itself, so that other processes would

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

Hi JC, We agree with your proposed model of a VPC resource object. Proposal you are making makes sense to us and we would like to collaborate further on this. After reading your blueprint two things come to mind. 1. VPC vision for Openstack? (Your blueprint is proposing this vision) 2. Providin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum

I think a lot of projects don't bother to gate, because its far to much work to set up a workable system. I can think of several projects I've worked on that would benefit from it but haven't because of time/cost of setting it up. If I could just say "solum create project foo" and get it, I'm s

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][neutron][nova][3rd party testing] Gerrit Jenkins plugin will not fulfill requirements of 3rd party testing

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 12:34 -0800, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > > Jay, > > > > Just an FYI. We have modified the Gerrit plugin it accept/match regex > > to generate notifications of for "receck no bug/bug ###". It turned > > out to be very simple fix

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

Rudra, I do not agree that the current proposal provides the semantic of a VPC. If the goal is to only provide a facade through the EC2 API, it may address this, but unless you implement the basic features of a VPC, what good is it doing ? I do believe that the work can be done incrementally if

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Need a new DSL for Murano

Hi folks, Murano matures, and we are getting more and more feedback from our early adopters. The overall reception is very positive, but at the same time there are some complaints as well. By now the most significant complaint is is hard to write workflows for application deployment and maintenanc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Need a new DSL for Murano

An honest question, U are mentioning what appears to be the basis for a full programming language (variables, calling other workflows - similar to functions) but then u mention this is being stuffed into yaml. Why? It appears like u might as well spend the effort and define a grammar and simp

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

Hi JC, You have put it aptly. Goal of the blueprint is to present facade for AWS VPC API as the name suggest. As per your definition of VPC, shared network will have issues. However many of these concepts are not exposed to a AWS customers and the API work well. While we work incrementally towards

[openstack-dev] [nova][EC2] attach and detach volume response status

Hi Stackers; I use Nova EC2 interface to attach a volume, attach success, but volume status is detached in message response. # euca-attach-volume -i i-000d -d /dev/vdb vol-0001 ATTACHMENT vol-0001i-000d detached This make me confusion, I think the status sho

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

On 15 February 2014 07:46, Clint Byrum wrote: > * Reference implementations are always derided as not realistic. I think > we need to think of a different term. I prefer to just say that this > is the upstream implementation. We very much expect that a cloud can > and should operate with th

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs packages in TripleO

On 15 February 2014 08:42, Dan Prince wrote: > > Let me restate the options the way I see it: > > Option A is we do our job... by making it possible to install OpenStack using > various distributions using a set of distro agnostic tools (TripleO). So our job is to be the upstream installer. If

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum

On 15 February 2014 14:34, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > I think a lot of projects don't bother to gate, because its far to much work > to set up a workable system. > > I can think of several projects I've worked on that would benefit from it but > haven't because of time/cost of setting it up. > > If I

Re: [openstack-dev] request for testing new cloud foundation layer on bare metal

I'm sorry if this sounds rude, but I've been seeing your emails come in, and I've read your website, and I still have 0% clue about what PetiteCloud is. On 12 February 2014 21:56, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > PetiteCloud is a 100% Free Open Source and Open Knowledge bare metal capable > Cloud Foundati

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron py27 test 'FAIL: process-returncode'

You can pull the subunit log and use subunit-ls to see the tests that ran, and do a testr list-tests to get a set of all the tests: the one that bailed out must be one of the runs that doesn't report having been run [or possibly the very last one that ran in a worker - but lets assume not]. So subt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] User Signup

Den 15/02/2014 00.19 skrev "Adam Young" : >> Could you please spend 5 minutes on the blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/user-registration and add your suggestions in the white board. > Does it make sense for this to be in Keystone first, and then Horizon just consumes it? I w

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

Harshad, I'm not sure to understand what you mean by : > However many of these concepts are not exposed to a AWS customers and > the API work well. So for example in : http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/elastic-ip-addresses-eip.html#VPC_EIP_EC2_Differences When it says : "When

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][EC2] attach and detach volume response status

Hi, I checked the AttachVolume in AWS EC2: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/APIReference/ApiReference-query-AttachVolume.html The status returned is 'attaching': http://ec2.amazonaws.com/doc/2013-10-15/";> 59dbff89-35bd-4eac-99ed-be587EXAMPLE vol-1a2b3c4d i-1a2b3c4d /dev/sdh at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Interest in discussing vendor plugins for L3 services?

I'm interested in it. UTC8. At 2014-02-15 00:31:47,"punal patel" wrote: I am interested. UTC - 8. On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Nick Ma wrote: I'm also interested in it. UTC8. -- cheers, Li Ma ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@li

[openstack-dev] The BP for the persistent resource claim

Hi, Brian I created the BP for persistent resource claim at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/persistent-resource-claim , based on the discussion on IRC, can you please have a look on it to see any potential issue? Thanks --jyh __

Re: [openstack-dev] request for testing new cloud foundation layer on bare metal

We apologize for the unclearness of our wording both here and on our site (http://www.petitecloud.org). Over the next few weeks we will work on improving our descriptions of various aspects of what PetiteCloud is and what it is not. We will also add a set of tutorials showing what a cloud

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Interest in discussing vendor plugins for L3 services?

I'm interested in it. UTC8 On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:01 PM, shihanzhang wrote: > I'm interested in it. UTC8. > > > At 2014-02-15 00:31:47,"punal patel" wrote: > > I am interested. UTC - 8. > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Nick Ma wrote: > >> I'm also interested in it. UTC8. >> >> -- >