That's because spec was proposed to the juno/ folder. Look at
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/neutron-specs/master/doc/source/index.rst,
if spec is in juno/ folder, then contents shows it as approved one.
Once merged, it means approved, right? So it is going to be Ok after merge.
Thoug
Yes. It shows up in the approved section since it's just a build of the
patch as-is.
The link is titled gate-neutron-specs-docs in the message from Jenkins.
--
Kevin Benton
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Mandeep Dhami wrote:
> Just for clarification. Jenkins link in the description puts the
Aaron
One use case is that tenant would like to put all the servers in a single
broadcast domain (thus single IP/subnet domain). The servers can include
the 3 tier servers (web database and application server). Why would he do
that - Because it is simpler.
Then the tenant would like to put securi
Just for clarification. Jenkins link in the description puts the generated
HTML in the section "Juno approved specs" even tho' the blueprint is still
being reviewed. Am I looking at the right link?
Regards,
Mandeep
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Mike Scherbakov
wrote:
> Yes, thanks, that's e
Is there any use case for reattach?
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ray Chen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1167931) says, we
> have to do sth:
>
> 1) Just remove 'reattach' in file 'cinder/bin/cinder-manage'. I didn't
> find any reference to this call.
Hi All,
As this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1167931) says, we have
to do sth:
1) Just remove 'reattach' in file 'cinder/bin/cinder-manage'. I didn't find
any reference to this call. it's om to remove it.
2) If we keep it, 'reattach' function in cinder-manage will be moved to
nov
Yes, thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for!
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Mike Scherbakov
> wrote:
> > Hi Kyle,
> > I built template and it looks awesome. We are considering to use same
> > approach for Fuel.
> >
> > My assumpti
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 01:17:37AM +, Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Thanks for doing this,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 11:59 AM
> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject:
Hi
I using jclouds lib integrated with Openstack Swift+ keystone combination.
Things are working fine except stability test. After 20-30 hours of test
jclouds/SWIFT start degrading in TPS and keep going down over the time.
1) I am running the (PUT-GET-DEL) cycle in 10 parallel threads.
2) I am get
(2014/04/17 4:22), Jaume Devesa wrote:
I thought that OpenStack just support one release backwards, if we have
to support three versions, this is not useful.
In fact, I could not make sense this meaning. OpenStack has two
"security-supported" series and one project under development.
https:/
您好：
由于一些情况，我想退出该邮件列表。谢谢！
xueyan
2014.4.21___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 2014年04月17日 05:25, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
Hi, Christopher,
I have some question to the API changes related to
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80707/4/nova/api/openstack/compute/plugins/v3/hypervisors.py
, which adds a property to the hypervisor information.
Hi, Yunhong, Chris may b
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for doing this,
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 11:59 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [QA] qa-specs Repo and QA Program Juno Blueprint
> Review Process
>
Hi David,
Thanks for pointing it up.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 4:16 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] Compatibility of extra values returned in
> json dicts and head
>>1. In what ways does the current quota system not work for you? (Operations)
This is Chen from Yahoo openstack engineering team, I can explain our user case
for “per-flavor-quota”.
We operates a large openstack baremetal cluster where flavors are defined based
on standard hardware config (a c
>>1. In what ways does the current quota system not work for you? (Operations)
This is Chen from Yahoo openstack engineering team, I can explain our user case
for “per-flavor-quota”.
We operates a large openstack baremetal cluster where flavors are defined based
on standard hardware config (a c
I suggest you starting from heat project, the orchestration component. One
benifit is you can gain an overall understanding on how each component
works together from API level without struggling in implementation
details. Another reason is heat is a little younger comparing with nova.
There are mu
On 04/18/2014 11:21 AM, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
Howdy, folks!
Could someone explain to me the SSL usage scenario where it makes
sense to re-encrypt traffic traffic destined for members of a back-end
pool? SSL termination on the load balancer makes sense to me, but I'm
having trouble understa
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Mike Scherbakov
wrote:
> Hi Kyle,
> I built template and it looks awesome. We are considering to use same
> approach for Fuel.
>
> My assumption is that spec will be on review for a negotiation time, which
> is going to be quite a while. In my opinion, it is not al
On 4/20/2014 2:43 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
There seems to be a perfect storm of Neutron-related bugs that are
blocking anything from passing the check queue in stable/havana. Is
anyone from the Neutron team looking at these?
Here's what I seem to be hitting consistently:
https://bugs.launch
Hi all,
Can I please ask for some reviews on the following:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87226/ - Install checkmk_agent
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87223/ - Install icinga cgi interface
I already have a souple of +1s and jenkins is happy, all I need is +2 and +A! :)
Thanks,
Matt
There seems to be a perfect storm of Neutron-related bugs that are
blocking anything from passing the check queue in stable/havana. Is
anyone from the Neutron team looking at these?
Here's what I seem to be hitting consistently:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1251448
^ marked as won
On Apr 18, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Stephen Balukoff
mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net>>
wrote:
Hi y'all!
Carlos: When I say 'client cert' I'm talking about the certificate / key
combination the load balancer will be using to initiate the SSL connection to
the back-end server. The implication here is t
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 08:35 +, Huangtianhua wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> Currently, the EC2 API of OpenStack only has tags support (metadata)
> for instances. And there has already a blueprint about to add support
> for volumes and volume snapshots using “metadata”.
>
> There are a lot of resources
Hello everyone,
Before going any further with my implementation I would like to ask the
community about the LVM thin support in Nova (not Cinder).
The current implementation of the LVM backend does not support thin LVs.
Does anyone believe it is a good idea to add support for this in Nova ? (I
pla
Hi all:
Currently, the EC2 API of OpenStack only has tags support (metadata) for
instances. And there has already a blueprint about to add support for volumes
and volume snapshots using "metadata".
There are a lot of resources such as
image/subnet/securityGroup/networkInterface(port) are suppo
26 matches
Mail list logo
