On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:39:49 PM David Kranz wrote:
> On 07/21/2014 04:13 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> > On 07/21/2014 02:03 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >> Thanks Matthew for the analysis.
> >>
> >> I think you missed something though.
> >>
> >> Right now the frustration is that unrelated intermittent bugs
There is going to be a mad rush to get many things into Neutron for Juno
here in the last few weeks. Neutron is overly saturated with code
reviews. So I'd like to list out some of the things LBaaS had planned
for Juno, what the status each of those are, and my thoughts on the
feasibility of actua
I want to write a cinder volume driver for my client and contribute for
Openstack Juno release. Till now i did not submit any blueprint for cinder
volume driver. Is there any deadline for submitting blueprint for cinder
volume driver? Is there any other deadline for submitting code and tests
after
Hey Miguel,
I just tried to reproduce what you got but couldn't. Have you pulled
down code recently? I believe new code hit on Friday that probably
fixed the issue you encountered.
Let me know.
Thanks,
Brandon
On Sun, 2014-07-27 at 19:24 -0500, Miguel Lavalle wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I spent a fe
Hey Miguel!
Thanks for doing this. I'll look into the pool issue ASAP and get back
to you.
Thanks,
Brandon
On Sun, 2014-07-27 at 19:24 -0500, Miguel Lavalle wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I spent a few hours deploying LBaaS V2 to my devstack instance and
> tested it with the Tempest api test developed a
Hi,
I have done OVSDB-Neutron integration with Openstack on Ubuntu with two
compute nodes, I have blogged the procedure to make integration successful
and blog details mentioned below.
http://openstackandsdn.wordpress.com/2014/07/26/opendaylight-ovsdb-neutron-integration-with-devstackopenstack-o
Dear all
Thanks for all the responses!
First, I threw the question actually wanting to hear other voices of
the similar requirements of dynamic parsing.
Glad to get all supports and also questions.
The scenario is that sometime we might define some groups in the config
file with cha
On 16 July 2014 03:45, Debojyoti Dutta wrote:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SchedulerUseCases
>
> [08:43:35] #action all update the use case etherpad
> athttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SchedulerUseCases
>
> Please update your use cases here ..
Added.
-Rob
--
Robert Collins
Disting
Thanks Kyle and everyone for supporting this! Will try the best to make the
code ready for Juno-3.
Xu Han
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Kyle Mestery
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:46 PM, CARVER, PAUL wrote:
>> Collins, Sean wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 23
On 28 July 2014 13:47, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> Logging discussion is at:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-summit-ops-monitoringlogging
Ah, awesome. So - reading through that, I don't see any captured
discussion of changing our defaults to match what folk are doing
(though there is discus
On 28/07/14 09:18, Robert Collins wrote:
On 28 July 2014 13:11, Tom Fifield wrote:
If a starting point is needed, the last discussion we had around
'reasonable' defaults is here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-summit-ops-reasonabledefaults
Thanks Tom!
I note that logging isn't in th
On 28 July 2014 13:11, Tom Fifield wrote:
> If a starting point is needed, the last discussion we had around
> 'reasonable' defaults is here:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-summit-ops-reasonabledefaults
Thanks Tom!
I note that logging isn't in there, so either its not an issue (in
wh
On 25/07/14 06:05, Robert Collins wrote:
On 25 July 2014 08:01, Sean Dague wrote:
I'd like us to think about whether they is anything we can do to make
life easier in these kind of hard debugging scenarios where the regular
logs are not sufficient.
Agreed. Honestly, though we do also need to
Hi,
I spent a few hours deploying LBaaS V2 to my devstack instance and tested
it with the Tempest api test developed a couple of week ago during the
Neutron code sprint. This is a list of the findings so far:
1) POST operations on loadbalancers, healthmonitors and listeners work fine
2) POST ope
add the major version: bp/thunderboostChange-Id: I174bff2a96ff82adb5894a84f33da91417df5b5f - - - We propose to add a new method named "Boot from VMThunder", for fast booting multiple homogeneous VMs. This method uses a third-party library (VMThunder) to support simultaneous booting of a large numbe
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
That's exactly the version which I've been looking at. The thing is,
when I run the unit test with that version, it just bombs on me because
mechanize isn't there.
How would you feel about it being optionally available and for the tests
for mechanize
I have in my q-svc log this line:
2014-07-27 19:46:02.243 DEBUG neutron.service [-]
service_providers.service_provider =
['VPN:fake_junos_vpnaas:neutron.services.vpn.service_drivers.fake_service_driver.FakeServiceDriver:default']
from (pid=2770) log_opt_values
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-package
On 07/27/2014 09:54 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
> I maintain wsgi-intercept, and I'm happy to remove mechanize if that's
> really necessary. I didn't want it in there but when someone asked for
> it to be back in there was insufficient objection so back in it went.
>
> https://github.com/cdent/pytho
On 07/26/2014 05:51 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 12:18 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 07/22/2014 11:58 AM, David Kranz wrote:
>>> On 07/22/2014 10:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
Honestly, I'm really not sure I see this as a different program, but is
really something that sho
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I don't think you get it. The question isn't to "fix Trove to be
ready for Py3.4", we're very far from that. The question is: how can I
maintain the python-wsgi-intercept package in Debian, when it now
depends on a very bad package in the newer version
Carlos,
The module skeleton, including API functions and their brief description, was
committed at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109849/
checkContainerExistance -should be used by LBaaS API, I will
merge it into TLS implementation change.
Hi Robert,
Please see inline
-Original Message-
From: Robert Li (baoli) [mailto:ba...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 12:44 AM
To: mest...@mestery.com; Irena Berezovsky
Cc: Akihiro Motoki; Sandhya Dasu (sadasu); OpenStack Development Mailing List
(not for usage questions)
Subject:
The same applies for the ‘XInUse’ exception – we have specific exception for
each entity that is ‘inUse’
Examples:
HealthMonitorInUse
PoolInUse
etc
I think that EnityInUse exception is good enough
Avishay
From: Avishay Balderman
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 10:20 AM
To: OpenStack Development Ma
On 07/27/2014 12:22 AM, Denis Makogon wrote:
> суббота, 26 июля 2014 г. пользователь Thomas Goirand написал:
> At this point, I gave-up with mechanize. But then, this makes me wonder:
> can we continue to use wsgi-intercept if it depends on such a bad Python
> module.
>
> If we are
24 matches
Mail list logo
