On 27 November 2014 at 12:11, Mohammad Hanif wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Recently, as part of the L2 gateway thread, there was some discussion on
> BGP/MPLS/Edge VPN and how to bridge any overlay networks to the neutron
> network. Just to update everyone in the community, Ian and I have
> separately s
+1 for a separate interface.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for putting it up Dmitry. I think the idea is fine too, I
> understand that people may want to use in-band discovery for drivers like
> iLO or DRAC and having those on a separated interface
Looks like there is a review in the queue -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111485/
-- dims
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> To anyone who reviews sqlalchemy-migrate changes, there are people
> talking to themselves on GitHub about long-overdue bug fixes because
> the Ge
I think it's necessary to start a working group for plugins and meet by
weekly until issues like these are flushed out of the design
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opens
To anyone who reviews sqlalchemy-migrate changes, there are people
talking to themselves on GitHub about long-overdue bug fixes because
the Gerrit review queue for it is sluggish and they apparently don't
realize the SQLAM reviewers don't look at Google Code issues[1] and
GitHub pull request commen
Hi guys,
It's not a big secret that working on "races" especially in OpenStack gates
is quite complicated task.
Current workflow:
1) Some tempest test run fails
2) Build rules for elastic-recheck & report bug
3) Recheck specific bug XXX
4) Collect stats
5) Attempt to fix BUG, believe that it fix
Cinder does not expose an API for this, and should not be doing so - such
an API is a security risk and of little benefit to most deployments in
doing so.
On 28 November 2014 at 18:57, Pradip Mukhopadhyay
wrote:
> Thanks Qiming & Pavlo. We had looked into the v2 of Cinder API listings:
> http://
