Re: [openstack-dev] Request for comments for a possible solution

Hi Vivek, Replies inline. Regards, Mike - Original Message - > Hi Mike, > > Few clarifications inline [Vivek] > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Kolesnik [mailto:mkole...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:58 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2Pop][HA Routers] Request for comments for a possible solution

Hi Mathieu, Comments inline Regards, Mike - Original Message - > Mike, > > I'm not even sure that your solution works without being able to bind > a router HA port to several hosts. > What's happening currently is that you : > > 1.create the router on two l3agent. > 2. those l3agent tr

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Fail to launch VM due to maximum number of ports exceeded

Hi Danny, what about the global ports count and quotas? On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Danny Choi (dannchoi) wrote: > Hi, > > The default quota for port is 50. > > +--++-+ > > localadmin@qa4:~/devstack$ neutron quota-show --tenant

[openstack-dev] [neutron][FWaaS] No weekly IRC meetings on Dec 24th and 31st

Hi, We will skip the meetings for the next two weeks since most team members are not available to meet. Please continue to keep the discussions going over the mailing and lists and the IRC channel. Check back on the wiki page for the next meeting and agenda [1]. Thanks, ~Sumit. [1] https://wiki.op

[openstack-dev] [cinder] ratio: created to attached

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does anyone have real world experience, even data, to speak to the question: in an OpenStack cloud, what is the likely ratio of (created) cinder volumes to attached cinder volumes? Thanks, Tom Barron -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGP

[openstack-dev] [qa] Fail to launch VM due to maximum number of ports exceeded

Hi, The default quota for port is 50. +--++-+ localadmin@qa4:~/devstack$ neutron quota-show --tenant-id 1b2e5efaeeeb46f2922849b483f09ec1 +-+---+ | Field | Value | +-+---

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][fwaas] neutron/agent/firewall.py

Correct, this is for the security groups implementation Miguel Ángel Ajo On Friday, 19 de December de 2014 at 23:50, Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw) wrote: > +1 Mathieu. Paul, this is not related to FWaaS. > > Thanks > > Sridar > > On 12/19/14, 2:23 PM, "Mathieu Gagné" http://web.com)> > wr

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] static files handling, bower/

This is a good proposal, though I'm unclear on how the static_settings.py file is populated by a developer (as opposed to a packager, which you described). Richard On Fri Dec 19 2014 at 12:59:37 AM Radomir Dopieralski < openst...@sheep.art.pl> wrote: > Hello, > > revisiting the package man

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Relocation of freshly deployed OpenStack by Fuel

-Need a little guidance with Mirantis version of OpenStack. We want move freshly deployed cloud, without running instances but with HA option to other physical location. The other location means different ranges of public network. And I really want move my installation without cloud redeployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [driver] DB operations

Got it Duncan. I will re-check if I can arrive at any solution without accessing the database. Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > No, I mean that if drivers are going to access database, then they should > do it vi

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [driver] DB operations

No, I mean that if drivers are going to access database, then they should do it via a defined interface that limits what they can do to a sane set of operations. I'd still prefer that they didn't need extra access beyond the model update, but I don't know if that is possible. Duncan Thomas On Dec