On 15/02/15 06:31 +, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG meeting
[1] concerning functional API in Glance [2]. We made some progress, but
need to close this off so the spec can be implemented in Kilo.
I believe this is where we left off:
1.
Hi Ruijing,
Thanks for the comments.
Re (1) - driver can implement replication
in any means the driver see fit. It can be exported and be available to
the scheduler/drive via the capabilities or driver
extra-spec prefixes.
Re (3) - Not sure I see how this relates
to storage side replication, do
On 2015-02-15 07:00:53 + (+), Gary Kotton wrote:
Yes, I think that they go out in batches. It would be best to check with
Stefano if you have any issues.
Also a reminder, you need to be the owner of a change in Gerrit
which merged on or after October 16, 2014 (or have an unexpired
entry
On 02/15/2015 01:31 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG meeting
[1] concerning functional API in Glance [2]. We made some progress, but
need to close this off so the spec can be implemented in Kilo.
I believe this is where we left off:
1.
[Sorry for the resend, I had to subscribe to openstack-dev first,
maybe worth removing the subscribe requirement for outsiders]
[Copying ovs-dev]
On 02/13/15 at 01:47pm, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
Sorry, I forgot about
5) If we put all our OVS/OF bridge logic in just one bridge (instead of
I’ve spent most of the past week deeply reviewing the asyncio system,
including that I’ve constructed a comprehensive test suite designed to
discover exactly what kinds of latencies and/or throughput advantages or
disadvantages we may see each from: threaded database code, gevent-based
code using
Hi-
This is the not the ML for these notifications. Use 3rd Party announce ML for
the same.
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
From: Fawad Khaliq [mailto:fa...@plumgrid.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 12:07 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
On Sun, 2015-02-15 at 14:34 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
Also a reminder, you need to be the owner of a change in Gerrit
which merged on or after October 16, 2014 (or have an unexpired
entry in the extra-atcs file within the governance repo) to be in
the list of people who automatically get
On 02/16/2015 12:24 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
So, let me just say that while I do not have a timeline on the removal
of auth fragments, since it is deprecated assume that this should no
longer be used if there is an alternative (which there is). I am willing
to continue with the discussion on
Hi, Ronen
3) I mean storage based replication. In normal, volume replication support FC
or iSCSI. We need to setup FC or iSCSI before we do volume replication.
Case 1)
Host --FC--Storage A ---iSCSI Storage B FC- Host
Case 2)
Host --FC--Storage A ---FC
On February 15, 2015 at 3:54:24 PM, Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org) wrote:
On 02/16/2015 12:24 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
So, let me just say that while I do not have a timeline on the removal
of auth fragments, since it is deprecated assume that this should no
longer be used if there is an
On 19 June 2014 at 20:38, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:09:33PM -0700, Rafi Khardalian wrote:
I am concerned about how block migration functions when Cinder volumes are
attached to an instance being migrated. We noticed some unexpected
behavior
What is the status of the conntrack integration with respect to
availability in distributions? The lack of state tracking has blocked the
ability for us to get rid of namespaces for the L3 agent (because of SNAT)
and the filtering bridge between the VM and OVS (stateful firewall for
security
On Fri Feb 13 2015 at 10:35:49 PM Miguel Ángel Ajo majop...@redhat.com
wrote:
We have an ongoing effort in neutron to move to rootwrap-daemon.
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron+branch:master+topic:bp/rootwrap-daemon-mode,n,z
Thanks for replying. I
Thanks Robert. I share most of your views on this. The project will
certainly miss your reviews. I'll go ahead and remove you from the
permissions and stats.
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-02-15 13:40:02 -0800:
Hi, I've really not been pulling my weight as a core reviewer in
On 02/15/2015 01:13 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
On 2/15/15, 10:10 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/15/2015 01:31 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG
meeting [1] concerning functional API in Glance [2]. We made
some progress,
On 2/15/15, 10:10 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/15/2015 01:31 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
This is a follow-up to the discussion at the 12 February API-WG meeting
[1] concerning functional API in Glance [2]. We made some progress,
but
need to close this off so the spec can be
Hi All,
I would like to request a FFE for the following blueprints:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/driver-private-data
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/pure-iscsi-chap-support
The first being a dependency for the second.
The new database table for driver data
On 02/15/2015 02:56 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-02-14 16:48:01 -0800:
Hi,
I've seen messages in the logs telling that we should move to the
identity_uri.
I don't really like the identity_uri which contains all of the
information in a single
On February 15, 2015 at 3:16:04 PM, Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org) wrote:
On 02/15/2015 02:56 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-02-14 16:48:01 -0800:
Hi,
I've seen messages in the logs telling that we should move to the
identity_uri.
I don't
Thanks for the reply, and you're right - I was interested in was allowing
people outside of the cloud to use Manila, that is great to hear that is a
supported use case. I still have some learning to do around per-tenant
share servers and per-tenant networks but in general I think it will work
Hi, I've really not been pulling my weight as a core reviewer in
TripleO since late last year when personal issues really threw me for
a while. While those are behind me now, and I had a good break over
the christmas and new year period, I'm sufficiently out of touch with
the current (fantastic)
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 01:39:21PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
Just ran across this from bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1398999. Is there some way to
signal to libvirt that some block devices shouldn't be migrated by it
but instead are known to be networked etc? Or put another way,
2 - 4 pm Tuesday (which means 6 - 8 am China Wed) should work for me. Let's
see if Bryan is ok with the time slot. And yes you don't need an account :)
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote:
I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p
Ruijing,
hi,
Are you discussing the network/fabric
between Storage A and Storage B?
If so, assumption in Cinder is that
this is done in advance by the storage administrator.
The design discussions for replication
resulted in that the driver is fully responsible for replication and it
is up to
Hi Ronen,
Xingyang mentioned there's another etherpad on rep and CG, which etherpad
should we mainly follow ?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Ronen Kat ronen...@il.ibm.com wrote:
Ruijing, hi,
Are you discussing the network/fabric between Storage A and Storage B?
If so, assumption in Cinder
Has there been any work to use conntrack synchronization similar to L3 HA
in DVR so failover is fast on the SNAT node?
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
On Feb 10, 2015 2:36 AM, Wilence Yao wilence@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After OpenStack
I just realized Monday is a holiday. What about 8a, 10a, 2-4p Tuesday?
I'm happy to try out gotomeeting. Looks like I don't need an account, right?
Tim
P. S. Pardon the brevity. Sent from my mobile.
On Feb 13, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Zhipeng Huang
zhipengh...@gmail.commailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com
fwiw, the latest patch set has logic built in that determines the purpose
of the key repository. If you want your deployment to sign tokens you can
point Keystone to a key repository for that purpose. Likewise, tokens will
only be encrypted if you tell Keystone to use a key repository for
Hi,
MS is back up and running.
Thanks
Gary
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Good question, I have:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-replication-redoc
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-replication-cg
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/volume-replication-fix-planning
Jay seems to be the champion for moving
replication forward, I will let Jay point the way.
--
On 02/14/2015 08:25 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
2015-02-14 1:41 GMT+08:00 Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com
mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com:
On 02/12/2015 04:10 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 02/12/2015 03:44 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Any action done by the operator is always more
32 matches
Mail list logo
