That's' the most confusing part.
I don't even have a log for service nova-novncproxy.
Thanks.
-chen
-Original Message-
From: Kashyap Chamarthy [mailto:kcham...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 12:16 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re:
+2
I recently had a patch abandoned that had every right to be pulled off the
list. It had fallen off my radar and was no longer relevant.
As long as there is a way to restore the patch where appropriate, we
should do it.
Jay
I have to agree with John. We have many more submitters than we
Hi,
I am just relaying pain-points that we encountered in neutron. As I have
said below it makes the development process a lot quicker for people
working on external drivers. I personally believe that it fragments the
community and feel that the external drivers loose the community
contributions
Am 27.02.2015 um 01:04 schrieb Sage Weil:
[sorry for ceph-devel double-post, forgot to include
openstack-dev]
Hi everyone,
The online Ceph Developer Summit is next week[1] and among other
things we'll be talking about how to support CephFS in Manila. At
a high level, there are basically
Hello, OpenStack dev members,
Is there any problem on Hyper-V Nova CI Infrastructure?
I don't know why i failed my petch set.
My first patch set was succeeded , and then i changed the commit message,
then failed on Hyper-V test.
Could you tell me the reason?
Here is my test result links.
On 28/02/15 09:02, John Griffith wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org
mailto:stef...@openstack.org wrote:
I'm not expressing myself cleary enough. I don't advocate for the
removal of anything because I like pretty charts. I'm changing the
Deleting a volume created from a snapshot is permitted. Performing
operations on a volume created from snapshot should have the same behavior
as volumes created from volumes, images, or empty (no source). In all of
these cases, the volume should be deleted, regardless of where it came
from.
Hello,
I got an error when try to ./stack.sh as:
/2015-03-02 05:58:20.692 | net.ipv4.ip_local_reserved_ports = 35357,35358
2015-03-02 05:58:20.959 | New python executable in tmp-venv-NoMO/bin/python
2015-03-02 05:58:22.056 | Installing setuptools, pip...done.
2015-03-02 05:58:22.581 | ERROR: 'pip
From: yuntong [mailto:yuntong...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 7:35 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [devstack] pip wheel' requires the 'wheel' package
Hello,
I got an error when try to ./stack.sh as:
2015-03-02 05:58:20.692 |
Good lucky :)
-邮件原件-
发件人: Jeff Peeler [mailto:jpee...@redhat.com]
发送时间: 2015年2月28日 4:23
收件人: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
主题: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Stepping down from core
As discussed during the previous Heat meeting, I'm going to be stepping down
from core on the Heat project.
Thank you for the great contribution. Good luck in your new endeavors :)
Regards,
Sergey.
On 27 February 2015 at 23:23, Jeff Peeler jpee...@redhat.com wrote:
As discussed during the previous Heat meeting, I'm going to be stepping
down from core on the Heat project. My day to day focus is
Hi,
i was trying to understand below patch:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44881/24
What volume's current host means in this patch?
I want to understand it with some examples.
Regards
Nikesh
__
OpenStack Development
Please do feel free to write a patch - you can probably do the best job,
given that the questions are still fresh in your mind.
On 1 March 2015 at 21:37, Nikesh Kumar Mahalka nikeshmaha...@vedams.com
wrote:
Thanks,
I think if these informations are added in openstack documents having
topic
I have to agree with John. We have many more submitters than we have core
folks, and our current scaling limits tend to be around core and reviews,
not around submissions, so making life slightly more difficult for
submitters in order to make it substantially easier for core is a
reasonable trade.
I thought that case should be caught well before it gets to the driver. Can
you retry with the LVM driver please?
On 27 February 2015 at 10:48, Eduard Matei eduard.ma...@cloudfounders.com
wrote:
Hi,
We've been testing our cinder driver extensively and found a strange
behavior in the UI:
-
Migrate - move between backends of the same volume type
Retype - move between types. Will migrate the volume for you if necessary
On 1 March 2015 at 09:40, Avishay Traeger avis...@stratoscale.com wrote:
Nikesh,
The case you are trying is supposed to fail. You have a volume of type
Excerpts from Gary Kotton's message of 2015-03-01 02:32:37 -0800:
Hi,
I am just relaying pain-points that we encountered in neutron. As I have
said below it makes the development process a lot quicker for people
working on external drivers. I personally believe that it fragments the
community
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Nikesh Kumar Mahalka
nikeshmaha...@vedams.com wrote:
Hi,
i was trying to understand below patch:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44881/24
What volume's current host means in this patch?
I want to understand it with some examples.
Regards
Nikesh
18 matches
Mail list logo
