To clarify a bit, we obviously divide lots of things by tenant (quotas,
network listing, etc). The difference is that we have nothing right now
that has to be unique within a tenant. Are there objects that are uniquely
scoped to a tenant in Nova/Glance/etc?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Jay
On 03/20/2015 02:57 PM, Assaf Muller wrote:
Hello everyone,
The use_namespaces option in the L3 and DHCP Neutron agents controls if you
can create multiple routers and DHCP networks managed by a single L3/DHCP
agent,
or if the agent manages only a single resource.
Are the setups out
Ditto for Huawei.
While we are not *reliably* reporting, we are reporting and the necessary steps
have already been taken (and more importantly, approved) to get this reliably
working ASAP.
We respectfully request the same consideration for our cinder drivers.
--Rocky (as proxy for Liu
Hello everybody,
MagnetoDB team is happy to announce Kilo-3 release [1]
Thank you to everyone who made this possible.
[1] https://launchpad.net/magnetodb/kilo/kilo-3
--
With best regards
Ilya Sviridov
__
OpenStack
Tempest tests fail when not using namespaces, so I'm not sure how well we're
even testing that codepath anymore.
doug
On Mar 20, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Brian Haley brian.ha...@hp.com wrote:
On 03/20/2015 02:57 PM, Assaf Muller wrote:
Hello everyone,
The use_namespaces option in the L3 and
Mike,
I request the same consideration being given to the Oracle driver team:
The tag for Kilo in Cinder has already happened, so it's too late to revert.
We
may be able to revisit this in Kilo RC, but I want to see your CI reporting
reliably now to then to Cinder reviews.
We are going to
What if we just call it 'address_index' and make it an integer representing
the offset from the network start address?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
How is 0.0.0.1 a host address?
- Original Message -
Tempest tests fail when not using namespaces, so I'm not sure how well we're
even testing that codepath anymore.
Hrmph, I meant to mention that the code path is basically untested but forgot
to do that when I sent the email.
doug
On Mar 20, 2015, at 3:19
On 21:53 Fri 20 Mar , Rochelle Grober wrote:
Ditto for Huawei.
While we are not *reliably* reporting, we are reporting and the necessary
steps have already been taken (and more importantly, approved) to get this
reliably working ASAP.
We respectfully request the same consideration
I did hear of one use case.[1] :-)
In all seriousness, it seems like our abstraction over executing processes
must be leaking quite a bit if we can't handle a no-namespace deployment.
It seems like running a command without ip netns in front of it shouldn't
be that much harder. Or am I
It's good to have trackers for cleaning up the implementation of these
features. I hope we might be able soon to provide more details concerning
what cleaning up activities should happen here.
Core vs extension is often incorrectly misunderstood for essential vs
optional. I believe this
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
