Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > 26 июня 2015 г. 2:47 пользователь "GHANSHYAM MANN" > написал: >> >> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Devananda van der Veen >> wrote: >> > Almost all of our discussions so far on this topic have left something >> > out, >> > which Monty

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > 26 июня 2015 г. 2:48 пользователь "GHANSHYAM MANN" > написал: >> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi >> wrote: >> > Sorry for late response here, >> > >> > 2015-06-20 9:14 GMT+09:00 Devananda van der Veen >> > : >> >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] Locks for create from volume/snapshot

Do we really need any of these locks? I'm sure we could come up with some way to remove them, rather than make them distributed. On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > John Griffith wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Joshua Harlow >

[openstack-dev] neutron

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] Locks for create from volume/snapshot

John Griffith wrote: On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Joshua Harlow mailto:harlo...@outlook.com>> wrote: Duncan Thomas wrote: We are working on some sort of distributed replacement for the locks in cinder, since file locks are limiting our ability to do HA. I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] Newb looking to contribute

On 06/27/2015 03:33 PM, Jeff Learman wrote: Big help! Thanks to Dims, Steve, and Jay. Jay, starting with unit tests does seem like a great way to get going for the reasons you mentioned, plus limiting damage (though I realize messed up tests could be a hassle too, if a foul-up gates patch commi

Re: [openstack-dev] Newb looking to contribute

Big help! Thanks to Dims, Steve, and Jay. Jay, starting with unit tests does seem like a great way to get going for the reasons you mentioned, plus limiting damage (though I realize messed up tests could be a hassle too, if a foul-up gates patch commits.) I think I'll take some time getting acqu

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] Locks for create from volume/snapshot

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Duncan Thomas wrote: > >> We are working on some sort of distributed replacement for the locks in >> cinder, since file locks are limiting our ability to do HA. I'm afraid >> you're unlikely to get any traction until that work is done. >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] Newb looking to contribute

On 06/27/2015 11:06 AM, Jeff Learman wrote: I'm an OpenStack newbie, but a seasoned programmer with decades of experience in data communications (especially IP stack lower layers) and embedded systems. I'm fluent in Python, C, C++, and Java. I'm looking for some pro-bono work to do, and am open

Re: [openstack-dev] Newb looking to contribute

We're always happy to have more help! I suggest playing around and contributing to the python-*clients, as they are a great way to see how different projects are used. Aside from that, strong code reviews are always appreciated (more so than patches sometimes). FWIW, you could manage with a windo

Re: [openstack-dev] Newb looking to contribute

Jeff, Here's a good starting point for helping with Nova: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-low-hanging-fruit I got my start with a tiny python library named oslo.config, we'd welcome help with any of the ongoing or new work in oslo: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo the channels are #ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] Locks for create from volume/snapshot

Duncan Thomas wrote: We are working on some sort of distributed replacement for the locks in cinder, since file locks are limiting our ability to do HA. I'm afraid you're unlikely to get any traction until that work is done. I also have a concern that some backend do not handle load well, and so

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

+1 On 6/27/15, 1:25 PM, "neil.jer...@metaswitch.com" wrote: >+1 also > > Original Message >From: Fox, Kevin M >Sent: Friday, 26 June 2015 21:15 >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Reply To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] Locks for create from volume/snapshot

Something that I would prefer is to get the following merged: https://github.com/python-zk/kazoo/pull/306 Then we can have tooz (http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tooz/) have a implementation of that (using the above PR #306 for the kazoo/zookeeper impl) and providing impls of it for the var

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zeromq] Next step

Spec [1] is updated and ready for review. Thanks everyone for taking part in the discussion. Regards, Oleksii [1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/187338 6/22/15 13:14, Sean Dague пишет: On 06/19/2015 08:18 PM, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: Do we have a good understanding of what is expected

[openstack-dev] Newb looking to contribute

I'm an OpenStack newbie, but a seasoned programmer with decades of experience in data communications (especially IP stack lower layers) and embedded systems. I'm fluent in Python, C, C++, and Java. I'm looking for some pro-bono work to do, and am open to any suggestions, advice, or pleas for help

[openstack-dev] [devstack] [swift] [ceilometer] installing ceilometermiddleware

(This is tangentially, because of config handling, related to the other thread on ceilometermiddleware: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/067642.html ) tl;dr: Where and how should ceilometermiddleware be handled in devstack? I'm in the process of creating a devstack p

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

+1 also   Original Message   From: Fox, Kevin M Sent: Friday, 26 June 2015 21:15 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Reply To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs +1 ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Heat] Tuskar v. Heat responsibilities

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 03:05:31PM -0400, James Slagle wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:05:08PM -0400, Jay Dobies wrote: > >> On top of that, only certain templates can be used to fulfill certain > >> resource types. For instance, you can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

https://bugs.launchpad.net/stackalytics/+bug/1469368 submitted. Tim > -Original Message- > From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] > Sent: 26 June 2015 23:16 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lig

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][all] the max length of an id

I suppose it is redundant to point out the following, but hey, you know without a bit of dogma each and every day on a mailing list how could we call ourselves a real open source project? Apologies to people for whom this is review. An identifier which is derived from its context and contains me

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Approval dates for non-priority specs

Thank you @Alex, it's helpful for me :) 2015-06-27 13:51 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu : > Hi, Rui, Abhishek, > > There is email can answer your question: > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/068079.html > > Thanks > Alex > > 2015-06-27 11:33 GMT+08:00 Rui Chen : > >> I have same qu

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][oslo] Locks for create from volume/snapshot

We are working on some sort of distributed replacement for the locks in cinder, since file locks are limiting our ability to do HA. I'm afraid you're unlikely to get any traction until that work is done. I also have a concern that some backend do not handle load well, and so benefit from the curre