Kevin, you're right. My use case is that the plugin enriches the vif
binding information. The value is generated along the ml2 agents
configuration files (the name of the interface to plug the port to).
There's no input coming from the user via API.
Irina, thanks for clarification. binding:vif_det
If fwaas code is at the router level, it would seem that null routing might
be one method of handling ddos, making fwaas a potentially suitable
program. Qos seems to address quality issues rather than focusing on
protection from unauthorized or malicious traffic whether that traffic
originates from
Hi, so we're nearly ready to deprecate the python-version-specific
requirements files. Once we have infra's requirements cross checking
jobs all copacetic again, we should be able to move forward.
There isn't a specific spec for this in pbr, and I wanted to get some
broad input into the manner of
On 26 June 2015 at 23:01, Matthew Booth wrote:
> I wrote this:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/195983/1/tools/de-pbr.py,cm
>
> Ideally we'd fix PBR, but this seems to be expected behaviour. Thoughts?
Hi Matt, thanks for raising this. We've had very mixed results trying
to figure out what iss
Hi everyone,
For folks who are working on Dell, Storpool and Infortrend drivers:
I have got a new patch for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/180873. There
is a change about how to implement the method update_migrated_volume for
each driver.
The code needs to return the final values for the key _
Since I found this classes site useful and thought others might also...
https://courses.engr.illinois.edu/cs525/sched.htm (it even appears
actively in use! since openstack is mentioned in some slides and papers!)
It has a bunch of papers which IMHO are relevant to openstack (and
various other
Gal:
I am also slow to jump between this and other work so I think I should be
the one apologizing. I think we are receptive to any of the approaches QoS,
FWaaS or Security Groups. I am not an expert on FWaaS but from a quick look it
seemed like the FWaaS granularity was at the router lev
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Nadya Shakhat wrote:
What is the workflow of adding a new topic? I suggest to add it to both [1]
and [2].
Very good question and great idea. I agree that both is the way to go,
but I would suggest that we keep the entry on the voting page[2] as just
a title and make the ad
Chris,
What is the workflow of adding a new topic? I suggest to add it to both [1]
and [2]. Also it may be useful to add more items for each topic like
description, open questions, leader. It may help to understand what should
be discussed and who is an initiator. What do you think?
[1] https://et
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
And... you should be good to go. Additional questions on moving forward,
or clarifications in the documentation, can be handled on this thread or
in the #openstack-qa channel.
I finally got started on this today but am having some issues,
likely because I
Hi everyone,
Here's an initial agenda for our weekly meeting next Tuesday at 1500 UTC
in #openstack-meeting-4:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20150630
Please add additional items you'd like to discuss.
--
Emilien Macchi
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
App catalog needs ubiquity. Needs to be sumple for op to install
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.
Thanks for arranging this Miguel. Looking forward to contribute in the best
way we can 😀
On 26-Jun-2015 3:33 pm, "Miguel Angel Ajo" wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Next week, from Tue (Jul 29th) to Thu (Jun 2nd), a few of us will be
> physically [1] attending the neutron QoS coding sprint in Ra'
On Sat, 27 Jun 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
* What code should be calling and hosting install_ceilometermiddleware?
Since it is lib/swift that is using it, there makes some sense?
Especially since it already has a relatively long block of
configuration instruction.
I've put up a devstack review
We need mutual exclusion for several operations. Whether that is done by
entity queues, locks, state based locking at the api later, or something
else, we need mutual exclusion.
Our current api does not lend itself to looser consistency, and I struggle
to come up with a sane api that does - nobody
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Andreas Scheuring <
scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi together,
> for a new ml2 plugin I would like to pass over some data from neutron to
> nova on port creation and update (exploiting port binding extension
> [1]). For my prototype I thought o
Hello All Magnum Developers, Users, and Fans:
Please take a few moments to complete our OpenStack / Magnum survey.
Your feedback is appreciated!:
http://goo.gl/forms/W6ggrLiYFv
Thank you,
-Perry Rivera
OpenStack / Magnum
__
17 matches
Mail list logo