Igor,
> For VIP allocation we should use POST request. It's ok to use PUT for
setting (changing) IP address.
My proposal is about setting IP addresses for VIPs only (auto and manual).
No any other allocations.
Do you propose to use POST for first-time IP allocation and PUT for IP
re-allocation?
Hello TelcoWG,
Due to personal reasons I have to resign my TelcoWG core team membership.
I will remove myself from the core reviewer group.
Thanks for all the support!
Regards
Marc
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
On 02/11/15 23:56, Thales wrote:
I'm trying to get DevStack to work, but am getting errors. Is this a good list
to ask questions for this? I can't seem to get answers anywhere I look. I
tried the openstack list, but it kind of moves slow.
Thanks for any help.
Regards, John
In case it
Hi,
Trying to get more attention to this ...
We had our driver removed by commit:
https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/f0ab819732d77a8a6dd1a91422ac183ac4894419
due to no CI.
Pls let me know if there is something wrong so we can fix it asap so we can
have the driver back in M.
The CI is
On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 20:17 +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We finally have ready for review all specifications required to support
> High Availability Active/Active configurations in Cinder's Volume nodes.
>
> There is a Blueprint to track this effort [1] and the specs are as follow:
>
Absolutely an oversight as far as I can tell - probably similar problems in
the admin --all-tenants view of various other cinder resources. Patch
welcome once we get micro-versions landed, in the meantime it would be
great if you could file a bug, and ideally check any other views (snaps,
backups,
Hi,
let me try to rephrase this a bit and Bogdan will correct me if I'm wrong
or missing something.
We have a set of top-scope manifests (called Fuel puppet tasks) that we use
for OpenStack deployment. We execute those tasks with "puppet apply". Each
task supposed to bring target system into
Reviving the thread.
On the design summit session dedicated to agent and plugin extensions [1]
the following was stated for l2 agent extensions (I appreciate if someone
checks me on the following though):
- current l2 agent extensions mechanism lacks insight into agent details
like
hi Magnum hackers:
Currently there is a pip line on project-config to do magnum functional
testing [1]
on summit, we've discussed that we need to split it per COE[2], we can
do this by adding new pip line to testing./
/ /- '{pipeline}-functional-dsvm-magnum{coe}{job-suffix}':/
coe could be
Hi
Have you posted a review to re-add the driver? I can't see one, though I
might be missing it.
If you have a review posted, please add a link here, but you are in good
shape to make the M release.
If you don't yet have a review posted, please prepare and submit one using
the normal gerrit
Greetings
At the Mitaka summit, we discussed whether having a mid-cycle summit
was worth it for Mitaka. The outcome is that we should skip it this
time. Some reasons below:
1. We've a well defined, narrow, list of priorities that need to be
worked on.
2. Based on the above, there won't be
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Michal Rostecki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes.
>
> I'd like to add that these 3 things (pid=host, net=host, -v) are supported
> by Marathon, so probably it's much less problematic for us than Kubernetes
> at this
Hi all,
Live migration was confirmed as a Nova priority for the Mitaka cycle and a
sub-team section can be found on the priorities tracking page [1].
Most team members expressed they would like a regular IRC meeting for tracking
work and raising blocking issues. Looking at the contributors
Hi Duncan,
here is the review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241174
Thanks,
Eduard
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Greetings,
As usual, here's my summary from the summit. This time, it's limited
mostly to Glance as I wasn't able to spread myself on other rooms as I
normally do. Before I get into the details, I'd like to recommend
folks to do the same and write their own summaries (especially PTLs).
It's nice
Zhi Chang wrote:
Hi, all
Now, I should make some database model definitions if I want to upgrade db. And a database migration
script will generated when I run "neutron-db-manage revision -m "description of revision"
--autogenerate". The database will upgraded
Here's a Devstack review for zookeeper in support of this initiative:
https://review.openstack.org/241040
Thanks,
Dims
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Thanks robert,
>
> I've started to tweak https://review.openstack.org/#/c/209661/ with regard
>
Le 03/11/2015 12:53, Markus Zoeller a écrit :
Hey Nova folks, this is your bug lord speaking. You may have noticed
that we have around 3 bugs open ... just kidding, it's above 1000 and
keeps growing. During the summit, we concluded that the "fix all the
crap" action item was a bit too
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply.
What do you mean a review? Should i resubmit the driver code to the cinder
repo? Do i need also the driver certification tests?
Thanks,
Eduard
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
Hi Sumit,
As you mentioned I used the AWS template format and now able to create a
service chain successfully. But I dont see any firewall and lb created in
my network. Am I missing anything here?
Regards,
Naresh.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:42 PM, NareshA kumar
wrote:
Hi, all
Now, I should make some database model definitions if I want to upgrade db.
And a database migration script will generated when I run "neutron-db-manage
revision -m "description of revision" --autogenerate". The database will
upgraded when run "neutron-db-manage upgrade head".
You can create new migration using "neutron-db-manage revision -m 'desc'
--expand/--contract" depends in what changes do you want to do in migration
expand - add something, contract - delete or modify.
More information -
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/devref/alembic_migrations.html
Thanks for your reply.
There is an error when I run migration cmd:
stack@devstack:~/neutron/neutron/db/migration$ neutron-db-manage revision -m
'desc' --contract
usage: neutron-db-manage [-h] [--config-dir DIR] [--config-file PATH]
[--core_plugin CORE_PLUGIN]
Your installed neutron is not current. When developing new db migrations you
should be working with the master branch. Fast forward your repo and re-run
devstack to get the latest neutron-db-manage.
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015, Zhi Chang wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
Hey Nova folks, this is your bug lord speaking. You may have noticed
that we have around 3 bugs open ... just kidding, it's above 1000 and
keeps growing. During the summit, we concluded that the "fix all the
crap" action item was a bit too unspecific, so let's try another thing.
Beginning by end
Le 02/11/2015 19:40, Brant Knudson a écrit :
(...) by typing something like:
$ bandit-conf-generator --disable try_except_pass --out bandit.yaml
oslo.messaging ~/openstack/bandit/bandit/config/bandit.yaml
(...) we should have a config file for bandit-conf-generator...
but then why not
Hi
Yes, you should resubmit the code to cinder. There is no need to do the
certification tests, they are replaced by the CI.
On 3 November 2015 at 12:10, Eduard Matei
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
> What do you mean a review? Should i resubmit the
He's very good reviewer with a deep knowledge of keystone and puppet.
Thank you Richard for your help.
+1
Emilien Macchi writes:
> At the Summit we discussed about scaling-up our team.
> We decided to investigate the creation of sub-groups specific to our
> modules
Do you have the lasted code of Neutron? Change [1] that allows this was
merged on the 22d of October.
[1] -
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/9d069c48aed3a087c5c51366c8e70b29f339e794
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Zhi Chang wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
Hi Sumit,
Thanks for your quick help. I think I am almost done. I am able to
successfully create sfc chain spec with aws template. I have also created
group members and able to ping between them. But I dont see any firewall or
loadbalancer namespaces created.
Am I missing something here? Thanks in
Hi all,
A spec [1] that proposes adding a new server_ids query string parameter
to the existing GET /servers/detail URI resource has highlighted an
interesting issue.
The point of the spec is to add an ability to filter the results for the
GET /servers/detail API call to a specified set of
On 11/02/2015 08:02 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Here's an initial agenda for our weekly meeting, tomorrow at 1500 UTC
> in #openstack-meeting-4:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20151103
>
> Feel free to add any ite
On 11/03/2015 10:50 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I don't like very long command lines, it's hard to document them or
comment them. I prefer configuration files. But bandit.yaml, the
"template", is already a configuration file!?
Yes, the config file provided by bandit is some kind of "enable
Hello everyone,
I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the
diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of
contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in
reviews lately. Thus, I think we could benefit greatly by adding him
On 11/02/2015 07:32 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
If we can add this command directly in our tox.ini and entirely avoid
having the bandit.yaml would that be even better?
Why not, but it'd have some drawbacks as well:
- should the conf generator be broken for some reason, the gate may end
up
Hi Cyril,
This is a really cool idea. It should be fairly easy to implement and
can only help make Bandit more usable. To be honest enhancing the way
we're using the 'bandit.yaml' file has been on our list for a while.
A tool like this seems like it would be a nice intermediate solution
until
On 11/02/2015 07:40 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
We could use something like this in keystone since we've got a few
repositories. There should be a way to document why the test was skipped
since otherwise we'll have to figure it out every time we update the
file. Putting a comment on the command
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
on fwaas design session in Tokyo it was pointed out that for new fwaas
API we may want to use service groups [1] that were approved but never
merged. As far as I can tell, service groups are designed to catch
several criteria to describe a
This plan makes a lot of sense to me.
With the staggering number of sub-projects in neutron it is impossible for
the stable team to cope with the load. Delegation and decentralisation is a
must and both sub-project maintainers and the stable team will benefit from
it.
Also, since patches can
Hi Folks,
We would like to resume the Neutron DVR Subteam Meeting starting November 4th
2015.
If you are an active technical contributor in openstack and would like to
discuss any DVR related items feel free to join the meeting.
Here are the meeting details.
IRC channel:
Release liaisons,
At the summit we discussed some of the process changes we are putting
in place for the Mitaka cycle. This email thread is the official
notification of those changes for folks who weren't able to be in
the room for the discussion, and the reminder for those who were.
The biggest
Hi Ihar,
This sounds good. I actually had a draft e-mail that I've been saving
until I got back, that may be relevant. Some contributors met on Friday
to discuss the packet classification framework, mostly centered around
just building a reusable library that can be shared among multiple
Egor,
I don't have much experience with Aurora, but as far as I see, it
doesn't support mounting volumes from host yet:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1107
In my opinion we should try to investigate currently existing frameworks
which meets our main criteria before making
Thanks for all your efforts Sean.
I was actually thinking a separate IRC for this effort would be great and
will help all the interested people to come together and develop.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks
Vikram
On Nov 3, 2015 11:54 PM, "Sean M. Collins" wrote:
> I made a
+1
On 11/03/2015 09:25 AM, Gregory Haynes wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the
> diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of
> contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in
>
Excerpts from Gregory Haynes's message of 2015-11-03 07:25:27 -0800:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the
> diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of
> contributions for some time to the project, and has been a
On 11/03/2015 04:16 PM, Jeff Peeler wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Michal Rostecki wrote:
Hi,
+1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes.
I'd like to add that these 3 things (pid=host, net=host, -v) are supported
by Marathon, so probably it's much less
Excerpts from Cyril Roelandt's message of 2015-11-03 16:46:25 +0100:
> On 11/02/2015 07:32 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> > If we can add this command directly in our tox.ini and entirely avoid
> > having the bandit.yaml would that be even better?
>
> Why not, but it'd have some drawbacks as
Hi all,
We have a simple patch allowing to use OpenContrail's vrouter with
vhostuser vif types (currently only OVS has support for that). We would
like to contribute it.
However, We would like this change to land in the next maintenance release
of Kilo. Is it possible? What should be the process
As we discussed at the summit, we are going to be changing the way we
handle releases from stable branches, starting with stable/liberty this
cycle.
In the past the release team and stable maintenance team have
coordinated stable releases of all projects at specific times during the
life cycle of
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that
> maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe
> that in
On 15:26 Nov 03, Robert Collins wrote:
> Hi, at the summit we had a big session on distributed lock managers (DLMs).
>
> I'd just like to highlight the conclusions we came to in the session (
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-cross-project-dlm
> )
Also Cinder will be spearheading
Michal/Steve,
could you elaborate about choosing Marathon vs Aurora vs custom scheduler
(to implement very precise control around placement/failures/etc)?
‹
Egor
On 11/2/15, 22:44, "Michal Rostecki" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>+1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes.
>
>I'd like
What is the issue with logging? Can someone other than Yanis look into
this?
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> I'm seeing a lot of patches using the new $::os_service_default.
>
> Please stop trying to using it at this time. The feature is not stable
>
I made a very quick attempt to jot down my thoughts about how it could
be used. It's based off what I proposed in https://review.openstack.org/238812,
and is my attempt to take that review and use SQLAlchemy to make it
actually work.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Michal Rostecki wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 04:16 PM, Jeff Peeler wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Michal Rostecki
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> +1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes.
>>>
>>> I'd like to add
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 18:57 +0100, Michał Dubiel wrote:
> Hi all,
> We have a simple patch allowing to use OpenContrail's vrouter with
> vhostuser vif types (currently only OVS has support for that). We
> would like to contribute it.
> However, We would like this change to land in the next
+1 Doug
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and
> constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those
> written down before we start approving any changes.
>
> Doug
>
>
Hi all,
For auto-setting driver options on enrollment, I would vote for option 2
with default being fake driver + optional CMDB integration. This would ease
managing a homogeneous pool of BMs, but still (using fake driver or data
from CMDB) work reasonably well in heterogeneous case.
As for
On 03/11/15 15:25, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the
diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of
contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in
reviews lately. Thus, I
Hello,
I was looking for guidance as to how to enable notifications in heat and if
there is already a tool that can read those events? Looking through the code,
it gives somewhat conflicting information as to the extent to which
notifications are supported. e.g. [1] says its not supported, but
Hi stackers,
Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool
that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes,
Images, ..) in the next way:
>>> resource = api.resouce_do_some_stuff()
>>> while api.resource_get(resource["uuid"]) != expected_status
>>>
I'd be interested in being involved with this, and I know Paul Murray is
interested as well.
I went to make a doodle, but then realised the only non-terrible timeslot
for Australia / UK / US Central is 8pm UTC (7am Australia, 8pm London, 2pm
Central US). So what do people think of that time slot?
With the spec that Angus proposed, a read/write bind mount volume is not a
requirement as the configuration comes from the central data store (etcd
or zookeeper).
Just pid=host and net=host are hard requirements. Nova will not work
without net=host, atleast on RPM based distributions. Sam Yaple
Hi Javeria,
Try to use 'master' in 'role' field. Example:
- role: 'master'
stage: pre_deployment
type: shell
parameters:
cmd: echo all > /tmp/plugin.all
timeout: 42
Let me know if you need additional help.
Thanks,
Igor
P.S: Since Fuel 7.0 it's
Sorry I replied to this right away but used the wrong email address and it
bounced!
> I've appreciated all of richs v3 contributions to keystone. +1 from me.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot
wrote:
> He's very good reviewer with a deep knowledge of
Hello,
I'm now working on patch to neutron to add QoS in linuxbridge: https://
review.openstack.org/#/c/236210/
Patch is not finished yet but I have some "problem" with some tests. For
example Microsoft Hyper-V CI check are failing. When I checked logs of this
tests in
Matthew,
There's a failure in grenade - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232918/
There's a fix in progress - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240371/
Once that gets released in oslo.reports. We should be able to unclog
those updates
thanks,
Dims
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Matthew Thode
I'm looking at introducing the ability for tripleoclient to upload
docker images into a docker registry (planning for it to be installed
in the undercloud [1]). I wanted to make sure something like this
would be accepted or get suggestions on an alternate approach.
Ultimately may end up looking
Hey everyone,
I've been working on a fuel plugin and for some reason just cant figure out
how to run a task on the fuel master node through the tasks.yaml. Is there
even a role for it?
Something similar to what ansible does with localhost would work.
Thanks,
Javeria
Are these constraints locked in place for the entire release cycle? It
doesn't look like the stable/liberty version has been updated since
release and it'd be nice if newer versions of the packages were tested,
specifically babel in my case (as we have to have users mask the newer,
stable
As we discussed at the summit, the release management team is
modifying our change management tracking tools and processes this
cycle. This email is the official announcement of those changes,
with more detail than we provided at the summit.
In past cycles, we have used a combination of Launchpad
On 11/03/2015 01:57 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> There's a failure in grenade - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232918/
> There's a fix in progress - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240371/
>
> Once that gets released in oslo.reports. We should be able to unclog
> those updates
Excerpts from Jeff Peeler's message of 2015-11-03 11:54:24 -0800:
> I'm looking at introducing the ability for tripleoclient to upload
> docker images into a docker registry (planning for it to be installed
> in the undercloud [1]). I wanted to make sure something like this
> would be accepted or
lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and
constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those
written down before we start approving any changes.
Doug
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-11-03 14:57:01 -0500:
> Matthew,
>
> There's a
On 04/11/15 02:25, Gregory Haynes wrote:
> Current cores - Please respond with any approvals/objections by next Friday
> (November 13th).
+1 from me as well.
--
Steve
"...In the UNIX world, people tend to interpret `non-technical user'
as meaning someone
Hi Doug,
Thanks for posting this. I'm working on this for Zaqar now and there is
a question. As for the stable/liberty patch, where does the
"60fdcaba00e30d02" in [1] come from? Thanks.
[1]
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241322/1/releasenotes/notes/60fdcaba00e30d02-start-using-reno.yaml
On Nov 3, 2015 4:29 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-11-03 14:20:10 -0800:
> > Hi stackers,
> >
> > Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool
> > that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g.
Clint, Morgan,
I totally agree that the pub/sub model is better approach.
However, there are 2 great things about polling:
1) it's simpler to use than pub/sub (especially in shell)
2) it has really simple implementation & we can get this in OpenStack in
few days/weeks
What about just supporting
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> [...]
> Glance Artifacts REpository (Glare)
> ===
>
> Do you remember the Glance *EXPERIMENTAL* Glance V3 API? We had that
> famous discussion again, the one we had in Vancouver, Paris and
>
On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
What if we add new API method that will just resturn resource status by
UUID? Or even just extend get request with the new argument that returns
only status?
Thoughts?
not sure i understand the resource status by UUID, could you explain
that a
Here are the notes related to OpenStack Tacker project from Tokyo summit.
Tacker Developer Meetup
---
Rough notes are captured in the tacker design summit etherpad [1].
As discussed in the previous irc meeting [2] the team discussed
possible new irc meeting slots for the
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Michael Still wrote:
> I'd be interested in being involved with this, and I know Paul Murray is
> interested as well.
>
> I went to make a doodle, but then realised the only non-terrible timeslot
> for Australia / UK / US Central is 8pm UTC (7am
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-11-03 14:20:10 -0800:
> Hi stackers,
>
> Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool
> that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes,
> Images, ..) in the next way:
>
> >>> resource =
+1. I think we all had a great experience coming together, finding common
ground, and coming up with a solid plan to move forward that helps everyone
make progress. Thanks everyone for not skipping over a potentially unpleasant
conversation and getting together to talk it through. I think we
Hi All,
I see negative values being returned by resource tracker, which is
surprising, since enough capacity is available on Hypervisor (as seen
through df -ha output [0]). In my setup I have configured nova.conf to
created instance snapshot locally and I *don't have* disk-filter enabled.
Local
+1 to Georgy, we may need a framework on top of Mesos to enable Mesos
manage long running services and have the capability of scaling, ha etc and
Marathon is a good choice. Thanks.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov <
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Thank
Hi,
The change in https://review.openstack.org/237122 touches a feature from
ironic that has not been released in any tag yet.
At first, we from the team who has written the patch thought that, as it
has not been part of any release, we could do backwards incompatible
changes on that part
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> Hi stackers,
>
> Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool
> that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes,
> Images, ..) in the next way:
>
> >>> resource =
I'm reaching out to whoever owns the networking-powervm project [1]. I have
a review out [2] which updates the PyPI publishing jobs so we can push
releases for networking-powervm. However, in looking at PyPI, I don't see a
networking-powervm project, but instead a neutron-powervm project. Is there
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, michael mccune wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
>
>> What if we add new API method that will just resturn resource status by
>> UUID? Or even just extend get request with the new argument that returns
>> only status?
>>
>>
On 4 November 2015 at 09:28, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and
> constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those
> written down before we start approving any changes.
The tl;dr is that we'd make a
On 02/11/15 18:33, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Blame the core team :) I suspect you will end up retrying a lot of
patterns we tried and failed with Kubernetes. Kubernetes eventually was
found to be non-viable by the delivery of this 2 week project:
https://github.com/sdake/compute-upgrade
Hello,
The infrastructure team will be upgrading the Elasticsearch cluster used
by Logstash and elastic-recheck on Monday November 9th starting at about
1700UTC.
Because we are upgrading from 0.90.9 to 1.7.3 this will require a full
cluster restart. During the cluster restart you will not be
On 11/3/2015 11:57 AM, Michał Dubiel wrote:
Hi all,
We have a simple patch allowing to use OpenContrail's vrouter with
vhostuser vif types (currently only OVS has support for that). We would
like to contribute it.
However, We would like this change to land in the next maintenance
release of
On 11/02/2015 12:39 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 10:42 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 10/29/2015 08:27 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
>>> On 10/28/2015 12:14 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 10/27/2015 4:08 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> Learning how to debug the gate was identified as a
all,i would like to check if there is a Neutron driver or agent supporting
switching between SR-IOV ports on the same server.the wiki mentions 802.1Qbg
for switching in the server NIC (VEB), or by hairpinning the pkts in the
nexthop physical TOR (VEPA). i wanted to check if this is a supported
John,
The main point here is to reduce amount of data that we request from DB and
that is process by API services and sent via network
and make SQL requests simpler (remove joins from SELECT).
So like if you fetch 10 bytes instead of 1000 bytes you will process 100
times less and it will scale
Hi all,
Just FYI, the WIP patch-set is now available here:
https://review.openstack.org/241476
https://review.openstack.org/241477
https://review.openstack.org/241478
https://review.openstack.org/241479
https://review.openstack.org/241480
Thanks.
On 10/14/2015 10:05 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
Hi,
Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-11-03 17:32:43 -0800:
> Clint, Morgan,
>
> I totally agree that the pub/sub model is better approach.
>
> However, there are 2 great things about polling:
> 1) it's simpler to use than pub/sub (especially in shell)
I envision something like this:
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo