Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Puppet OpenStack PTL non-candidacy

2016-09-10 Thread Emilien Macchi
Thank you all for all the kind words! I appreciate them a lot :-) Just a note to avoid confusion, I'm not going anywhere, and I'll keep focus on Puppet modules + TripleO like before. Sorry but I'll still bother you when something breaks in OpenStack :-P Thanks again, On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 10:23

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] moving driver to open source

2016-09-10 Thread Avishay Traeger
On Sep 9, 2016 18:13, "Duncan Thomas" > So my issue is not with any of those things, it is that I believe anybody should be able to put together a distribution of openstack, that just works, which any supported backend, without needed to negotiate licensing deals with vendors, and without having to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] FFE request for RBD replication

2016-09-10 Thread Jay S. Bryant
+1 from me. It is making good progress and is low risk. -Jay On 09/09/2016 02:32 PM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: Hi, As some of you may know, Jon Bernard (jbernard on IRC) has been working on the RBD v2.1 replication implementation [1] for a while, and we would like to request a Feature Freeze Exc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] FFE request for RBD replication

2016-09-10 Thread John Griffith
Given the the patch is up and well on its way I don't know why this would be a problem. FWIW ya get my +1 On Sep 9, 2016 1:34 PM, "Gorka Eguileor" wrote: > Hi, > > As some of you may know, Jon Bernard (jbernard on IRC) has been working > on the RBD v2.1 replication implementation [1] for a whil

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] SFC flows issue

2016-09-10 Thread Ravi Sekhar Reddy Konda
Hi Mohan, |--| |--| |--| | SRC-VM | | SF-VM | | DST-VM | |--| |--| |--| 192.168.0.9 P1 | 192.168.0.4 P2 | | p3 192.168.0.12 p4 | 192.168.0.8 fa:16:3e:48:88:96 | fa:16:3e:bb:be:c2 | | fa:16:3e:9a:29:f1 | fa:16:3e:9f:25:c8

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] governance proposal worth a visit: Write down OpenStack principles

2016-09-10 Thread Amrith Kumar
> -Original Message- > From: Edward Leafe [mailto:e...@leafe.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 1:02 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] governance proposal worth a visit: > Write down OpenStack principles >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] governance proposal worth a visit: Write down OpenStack principles

2016-09-10 Thread Amrith Kumar
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Dent [mailto:cdent...@anticdent.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 7:19 AM > To: OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] governance proposal worth a visit: Write > down OpenStack principles > > > There's a governance p

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Puppet OpenStack PTL non-candidacy

2016-09-10 Thread Amrith Kumar
Emilien, Great work over the past 18 months, it was a pleasure to work with you. Thanks for all you've done! -amrith > -Original Message- > From: Emilien Macchi [mailto:emil...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2016 12:06 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: [

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

2016-09-10 Thread Sergey Vasilenko
+1 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Puppet OpenStack PTL non-candidacy

2016-09-10 Thread Yolanda Robla Mota
Thanks Emilien for all the work you've done on the modules, and thanks for always being there when support was needed. I think you've done an amazing work as PTL, and good luck on your next projects! - Original Message - From: "Emilien Macchi" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not