[openstack-dev] [neutron] no CI or upgrades meetings this week

And no CI meetings in next two weeks after the summit because of no planned attendance from main participants. Ihar __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [keystone] session etherpads

Hey all, We have a couple sessions to start off the week and I wanted to send out the links to the etherpads [0] [1] [2]. Let me know if you have any questions. Otherwise feel free to catch up or pre-populate the etherpads with content if you have any. Thanks! [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-midonet] networking-midonet core reviewer proposal

as i haven't heard any objections, i went ahead and added them to the list. [1] [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/607,members On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Ryu Ishimoto wrote: > > +1 ! > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:41 AM Takashi Yamamoto

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovn] metadata agent implementation

It would be interesting for this to be built in a way where other endpoints could be added to the list that have extra headers added to them. For example, we could end up with something quite similar to EC2 IAMS if we could add headers on the way through for requests to OpenStack endpoints. Do

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Should the Technical Committee meetings be dropped?

On 07/05/17 11:59 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-05-07 09:49:41 -0400: On 05/05/17 08:45 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: >On 05/04/2017 01:10 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > >> Some of the current TC activities depend on the meeting to some extent: >> >> * We

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Should the Technical Committee meetings be dropped?

Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2017-05-07 09:49:41 -0400: > On 05/05/17 08:45 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > >On 05/04/2017 01:10 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > > >> Some of the current TC activities depend on the meeting to some extent: > >> > >> * We use the meeting to give the final ack

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest April 29 - May 5

HTML version: https://www.openstack.org/blog/2017/05/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-20170507/ POST /api-wg/news = * Newly Published Guidelines * Create a set of API interoperability guidelines [1] * Guidelines Current Under Review * Microversions: add

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Should the Technical Committee meetings be dropped?

On 05/05/17 08:45 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 05/04/2017 01:10 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: Some of the current TC activities depend on the meeting to some extent: * We use the meeting to give the final ack on some the formal-vote reviews. * Some folks (tc members and not) use the meeting agenda

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Should the Technical Committee meetings be dropped?

On 05/05/17 11:22 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] But part of my concern to getting rid of the meeting is that I do find it valuable. The arguments against having it are some of the same I've heard for our in-person events. It's hard for some to travel to the PTG.

[openstack-dev] [releases] Stable branch conflicting information

So I noticed today that the release information [0] for Newton appears to have the wrong date for when Newton transitions to the Legacy Phase. According to this conversation [1], I think (thought?) we established that rolling over to each support phase would stay on a 6 month cycle, despite Ocata