Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder][infra] openstack-tox-py27 job is not executed when spec files are added or modified in nova-specs

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 11/16/2017 12:15 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> On 11/16/2017 9:58 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> >>> On 2017-11-16 15:17:58 +0900 (+0900), Takashi Natsume wrote: >>> In nova-specs project, there is an

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Nikhil Komawar for glance core

Big +2 Glad you are back :) Abhishek On 17-Nov-2017 4:59 AM, "Brian Rosmaita" wrote: > I'm sure I don't need to introduce Nikhil Komawar (nikhil in IRC), who > was Glance PTL for the Kilo, Liberty, and Newton releases and who was > a long time Glance core until he

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder][infra] openstack-tox-py27 job is not executed when spec files are added or modified in nova-specs

> > > > I think this is the approach we will likely want: > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/520823/ > > > > I don't have time to look into it right now, but we probably shouldn't run > openstack-tox-py27 against these repos in the first place, especially after > this change. It is just

[openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Nikhil Komawar for glance core

I'm sure I don't need to introduce Nikhil Komawar (nikhil in IRC), who was Glance PTL for the Kilo, Liberty, and Newton releases and who was a long time Glance core until he stepped down at the end of June this year. Nikhil has informed me that he now has time to do Glance code reviews again, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder][infra] openstack-tox-py27 job is not executed when spec files are added or modified in nova-specs

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 04:42:11PM -0600, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:41:56PM -0600, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:58:38PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > >> > > > >>So we'll probably need to change the definition of the nova-specs py27 > > > >>job to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder][infra] openstack-tox-py27 job is not executed when spec files are added or modified in nova-specs

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:41:56PM -0600, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:58:38PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > >> > > >>So we'll probably need to change the definition of the nova-specs py27 > > >>job to run these linter type tests in the pep8 run. > > >> > > > [snip] > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Blueprint proposals for 'file' publisher: Compression and CSV file format

On 2017-11-16 03:29 PM, Waines, Greg wrote: > Ok ... if you don’t mind, i might create a blueprint anyways ... for > traceability and documentation purposes. > > We/WindRiver tracks both blueprints and code submissions that we have > worked on, as an indication of our upstream contributions.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Blueprint proposals for 'file' publisher: Compression and CSV file format

Ok ... if you don’t mind, i might create a blueprint anyways ... for traceability and documentation purposes. We/WindRiver tracks both blueprints and code submissions that we have worked on, as an indication of our upstream contributions. Greg. From: gordon chung Reply-To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Blueprint proposals for 'file' publisher: Compression and CSV file format

On 2017-11-16 02:48 PM, Waines, Greg wrote: > Cool ... i will go ahead and submit a blueprint for these. just an fyi, we don't use blueprints in Telemetry projects. just submit the code :) if there's many alternatives to the solution or if it's a something controversial, we usually discuss

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Blueprint proposals for 'file' publisher: Compression and CSV file format

Cool ... i will go ahead and submit a blueprint for these. Wrt the compression blueprint, locally we subclassed the base python rotating file handler class in order to optionally compress the file as part of the “shouldRollover” stage. Greg. From: gordon chung Reply-To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder][infra] openstack-tox-py27 job is not executed when spec files are added or modified in nova-specs

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:58:38PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> > >>So we'll probably need to change the definition of the nova-specs py27 > >>job to run these linter type tests in the pep8 run. > >> > > > >By the way, it looks like neutron-specs and cinder-specs are going to have > >the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][all] Removal of packages from bindep-fallback

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 04:59:01PM +1100, Ian Wienand wrote: > Hello, > > Some time ago we started the process of moving towards projects being > more explicit about thier binary dependencies using bindep [1] > > To facilitate the transition, we created a "fallback" set of > dependencies [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][neutron][infra][all] Tag of openstack/neutron-fwaas-dashboard failed

> > > > Looking at the openstackdocstheme document [1], PDF generation > > expects 'release' variable > > but AFAIK we only generate HTML version of release notes and I think > > we can drop 'release' > > and 'version' variables from conf.py. > > > > [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][neutron][infra][all] Tag of openstack/neutron-fwaas-dashboard failed

On 2017-11-16 11:45, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > 2017-11-16 19:33 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger : >> On 2017-11-16 11:27, Akihiro Motoki wrote: >>> 2017-11-16 18:59 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger : On 2017-11-15 19:07, Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > Someone needs to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder][infra] openstack-tox-py27 job is not executed when spec files are added or modified in nova-specs

On 11/16/2017 12:17 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Yeah, in other words, the job definition skips the files that we care about in nova-specs: https://github.com/openstack-infra/openstack-zuul-jobs/blob/00168bf82cf4a13ac6339736667dd532eeeff4e9/zuul.d/jobs.yaml#L238 So we'll probably need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Blueprint proposals for 'file' publisher: Compression and CSV file format

On 2017-11-16 12:44 PM, Waines, Greg wrote: > > 1.Compression of files (within file rotation) to minimize disk usage and > minimize bandwidth in FTP-ing these files off server > > oi.e. as part of file rotation, the newly rotated file would be gzip’d > to compress the file > > othis would

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Migrating TripleO CI in-tree tomorrow - please README

TL;DR: don't approve or recheck any tripleo patch from now, until further notice on this thread. Some good progress has been made on migrating legacy tripleo CI jobs to be in-tree: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:tripleo/migrate-to-zuulv3 The next steps: - Let the current gate to finish

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder][infra] openstack-tox-py27 job is not executed when spec files are added or modified in nova-specs

On 11/16/2017 12:15 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 11/16/2017 9:58 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-11-16 15:17:58 +0900 (+0900), Takashi Natsume wrote: In nova-specs project, there is an 'openstack-tox-py27' job (in Zuul check or Zuul gate). The job checks whether spec files comply with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] openstack-tox-py27 job is not executed when spec files are added or modified in nova-specs

On 11/16/2017 9:58 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-11-16 15:17:58 +0900 (+0900), Takashi Natsume wrote: In nova-specs project, there is an 'openstack-tox-py27' job (in Zuul check or Zuul gate). The job checks whether spec files comply with the template or not, line length, etc. But there are

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Blueprint proposals for 'file' publisher: Compression and CSV file format

Hey there, I am looking for some feedback on 2x enhancement / blueprint proposals for the ‘file’ publisher in ceilometer. i.e. https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/publisher/file.py Are the Ceilometer owners open to looking at blueprints for the following ? 1.

[openstack-dev] [networking-bagpipe] [networking-bgpvpn] missing tarballs for queens milestone 1

Hi Corey and I have been working through the first Queens milestones for Ubuntu (and the UCA) - both networking-bagpipe and networking-bgpvpn don't have published tarballs on tarballs.openstack.org. Would it be possible to get those up? or we can cut our own from the git repo for this milestone

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on the TripleO on Kubernetes work

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Integration with TripleO Heat Templates > === > > This work is on-going and you should eventually see some patches popping-up > on > the reviews list. One of the goals, besides

[openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-sig/news

Greetings OpenStack community, No meeting this week, as people are still straggling back after the Sydney summit. There will also be no meeting next week, due to the US Thanksgiving holiday. So I guess we'll see you all again in December! # Newly Published Guidelines None this week. # API

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] openstack-tox-py27 job is not executed when spec files are added or modified in nova-specs

On 2017-11-16 15:17:58 +0900 (+0900), Takashi Natsume wrote: > In nova-specs project, there is an 'openstack-tox-py27' job (in > Zuul check or Zuul gate). The job checks whether spec files comply > with the template or not, line length, etc. But there are cases > that the job is not executed even

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-14, November 18-24

G'day mate, it's our regular release countdown email. Development Focus - We are now just a few weeks away from the second milestone. Work on new feature should be well underway. There was good turn out last week at the Summit. For those that were able to attend, please share

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Workflow Squad Meetings

Hey all, Starting next week we are going to have regular weekly meetings for the workflows squad. This will be at 3pm UTC every Wednesday. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-workflows-squad-status We will be using the above etherpad to store the meeting details, location etc and lake

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nominate akrivoka for tripleo-validations core

+1 On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Honza Pokorny wrote: > Hello people, > > I would like to nominate Ana Krivokapić (akrivoka) for the core team for > tripleo-validations. She has really stepped up her game on that project > in terms of helpful reviews, and great patches. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominate chem and matbu for tripleo-core !

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Marios Andreou wrote: [...] > I'll ping alex when he's online later to check that chem and matbu are added > to the right launchpad and gerrit groups. Note: we accept anyone willing to do self triage in Launchpad group, not only cores. If you

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on the TripleO on Kubernetes work

Hi Team, I wanted to take a chance to send some updates about the work that we have been doing on the Kubernetes side of things and how things are progressing. As you read this update, please bear in mind that we are still at the early stages of this work and there are many things under

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Tagging Parameters

Hi, A new attribute "tags" has been added to the template parameters in heat [1]. By adding this, we can categorize the parameters based on features, which can be used for validations. Currently, I am working on a patch [2] which will add the "role_specific" tag to the parameters, which are

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nominate chem and matbu for tripleo-core !

Yeah!!! Welcome both! On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Marios Andreou wrote: > Thanks to everyone who voted and with only positive feedback (successfully > spread across two threads ** ) it looks like we can now welcome Sofer and > Mathieu to the tripleo core team. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][neutron][infra] Tag of openstack/neutron-fwaas-dashboard failed

On 2017-11-16 11:45, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > 2017-11-16 19:33 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger : >> On 2017-11-16 11:27, Akihiro Motoki wrote: >>> 2017-11-16 18:59 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger : On 2017-11-15 19:07, Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > Someone needs to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][neutron][infra] Tag of openstack/neutron-fwaas-dashboard failed

On 2017-11-16 11:33, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-11-16 11:27, Akihiro Motoki wrote: >> 2017-11-16 18:59 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger : >>> On 2017-11-15 19:07, Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] Someone needs to figure that out. Unfortunately, I don't have the bandwidth right

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][neutron][infra] Tag of openstack/neutron-fwaas-dashboard failed

2017-11-16 19:33 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger : > On 2017-11-16 11:27, Akihiro Motoki wrote: >> 2017-11-16 18:59 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger : >>> On 2017-11-15 19:07, Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] Someone needs to figure that out. Unfortunately, I don't have the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][neutron][infra] Tag of openstack/neutron-fwaas-dashboard failed

On 2017-11-16 11:27, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > 2017-11-16 18:59 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger : >> On 2017-11-15 19:07, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> [...] >>> Someone needs to figure that out. Unfortunately, I don't have the >>> bandwidth right now. Maybe you, or someone else from one of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nominate chem and matbu for tripleo-core !

Thanks to everyone who voted and with only positive feedback (successfully spread across two threads ** ) it looks like we can now welcome Sofer and Mathieu to the tripleo core team. I'll ping alex when he's online later to check that chem and matbu are added to the right launchpad and gerrit

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominate chem and matbu for tripleo-core !

Thanks to everyone who voted and with only positive feedback (successfully spread across two threads ** ) it looks like we can now welcome Sofer and Mathieu to the tripleo core team. I'll ping alex when he's online later to check that chem and matbu are added to the right launchpad and gerrit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][neutron][infra] Tag of openstack/neutron-fwaas-dashboard failed

2017-11-16 18:59 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger : > On 2017-11-15 19:07, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-11-16 01:32:00 +0900: >>> 2017-11-15 1:06 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger : On 2017-11-14 17:03, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][neutron][infra] Tag of openstack/neutron-fwaas-dashboard failed

On 2017-11-15 19:07, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-11-16 01:32:00 +0900: >> 2017-11-15 1:06 GMT+09:00 Andreas Jaeger : >>> On 2017-11-14 17:03, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2017-11-14 09:31:48 +0100:

[openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Composable role OVS-DPDK compute node with single NIC

Hi, I managed to deploy a compute node with ovs-dpdk using two NICs. The first for the provisioning network and control plane, the other NIC is used tenant network over ovs-dpdk. I then tried to use only a single nic for provisioning and ovs-dpdk. I used the nic configuration below for the