Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2017-12-15 16:15:04 +0100:
> On 12/14/2017 12:44 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > We can take stock of the intermediate releases over the last year, and make
> > sure they all work together once a year. Chris Jones mentioned that we
> > should
> > give users
On 12/16/2017 5:51 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
Thinking a bit more, the above reminds of this[*] by DanPB a couple of
years ago, where Dan's 'Modest Proposal' was: "switch to a development
cycle that is exactly 2 months".
But one pontential question that comes to mind from that old thread is
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:02:13PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:17:26PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
> > What it means:
> >
> > - We'd only do one *coordinated* release of the OpenStack components
> > per year, and maintain one stable branch per year
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:11:24AM +0800, Zhenyu Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy
> wrote:
[...]
> > For a relatively mature (~7 years; and ~5 years if we count from the
> > time governance changed to OpenStack Foudation) project, one