Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] [vitrage] Propose adding Vitrage's actions to Mistral Actions

Hello Renat, I'll join the IRC channel :) Thanks, Jaewook. 2018-04-23 15:45 GMT+09:00 Renat Akhmerov : > On 23 Apr 2018, 13:38 +0700, Jaewook Oh , wrote: > > Hello Mistral and Vitrage team, > > I've been testing vitrage with mistral workflow, > but it seems that there are no Vitrage actions in

[openstack-dev] [Freezer] New feature to support taking backup by nova and cinder instance name

Hi Szaher, Sorry I asked for review the patch only for this new feature instead of explaining the background. Let me explain the background of this requirement. This mail is in reference for the https://bugs.launchpad.net/freezer/+bug/1603099 Currently Freezer has feature to take the backup of s

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] [vitrage] Propose adding Vitrage's actions to Mistral Actions

On 23 Apr 2018, 13:38 +0700, Jaewook Oh , wrote: > Hello Mistral and Vitrage team, > > I've been testing vitrage with mistral workflow, > but it seems that there are no Vitrage actions in Mistral yet. > > I think Vitrage actions should be added to Mistral. > We can use the actions in mistral workf

[openstack-dev] [mistral] [vitrage] Propose adding Vitrage's actions to Mistral Actions

Hello Mistral and Vitrage team, I've been testing vitrage with mistral workflow, but it seems that there are no Vitrage actions in Mistral yet. I think Vitrage actions should be added to Mistral. We can use the actions in mistral workflow to automate lots of repeated tasks as it was originally in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config driveformat

Yes, fully understand this ,thanks for sharing! Best Regards! Kevin (Chen) Ji 纪 晨 Engineer, zVM Development, CSTL Notes: Chen CH Ji/China/IBM@IBMCN Internet: jiche...@cn.ibm.com Phone: +86-10-82451493 Address: 3/F Ring Building, ZhongGuanCun Software Park, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, PRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] campaign question related to new projects

> > We are discussing adding at least one new project this cycle, and > the specific case of Adjutant has brought up questions about the > criteria we use for evaluating new projects when they apply to > become official. Although the current system does include some > well-defined requirements [1

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] kolla September ptg survey

Hello Jeffrey, Filled the form. Yes, it's always good time to gather and discuss about the next roadmap at PTG. As It was great at Dublin PTG for Kolla despite snow storm. Hope I would be able to travel. ---spsurya On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > Hi kollars > > The nex

[openstack-dev] [kolla] kolla September ptg survey

​​ Hi kollars The next PTG will be held at Denver Colorado on September 10-14, 2018[0]. We have to decide whether Kolla will participate. I personally think ptg is a great time for the team to gather together to resolve issues and make next roadmap. But it is not that easy for every to travel. So

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] campaign question related to new projects

Doug Hellmann wrote: > [This is meant to be one of (I hope) several conversation-provoking > questions directed at prospective TC members to help the community > understand their positions before considering how to vote in the > ongoing election.] > > We are discussing adding at least one new proj

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] campaign question related to new projects

Thanks, Doug, for raising this campaign question Here are my answers: ***How you would evaluate a project's application in general First I would work through the requirements ([1]) to evaluate projects. Since most of the requirements are specific enough. And here's more important part, to leav