Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

On 07/20/2018 02:06 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:55 PM Ben Nemec > wrote: Okay, based on a private conversation this is coming off as way more troll-ish than I intended.  I don't understand where this work is going, but I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

On 07/20/2018 02:53 PM, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 07/19/2018 03:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Today I played a little bit with Standalone deployment [1] to deploy a single OpenStack cloud without the need of an undercloud and overcloud. The us

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 07/19/2018 03:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> Today I played a little bit with Standalone deployment [1] to deploy a >> single OpenStack cloud without the need of an undercloud and overcloud. >> The use-case I am testing is the followin

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 15:06 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:55 PM Ben Nemec > wrote: > > Okay, based on a private conversation this is coming off as way > > more > > troll-ish than I intended. I don't understand where this work is > > going, > > but I don't really

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:55 PM Ben Nemec wrote: > Okay, based on a private conversation this is coming off as way more > troll-ish than I intended. I don't understand where this work is going, > but I don't really need to so I'll step back from the discussion. > Apologies for any offense. > No

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

Okay, based on a private conversation this is coming off as way more troll-ish than I intended. I don't understand where this work is going, but I don't really need to so I'll step back from the discussion. Apologies for any offense. -Ben On 07/20/2018 12:20 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 07/20/

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

On 07/20/2018 01:18 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: On 7/20/18 2:13 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 07/19/2018 03:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Today I played a little bit with Standalone deployment [1] to deploy a single OpenStack cloud without the need of an undercloud and overcloud. The use-case I a

Re: [openstack-dev] [self-healing] [ptg] PTG track schedule published

Adam Spiers wrote: Apologies - I have had to change plans and leave on the Thursday evening (old friend is getting married on Saturday morning).  Is there any chance of swapping the self-healing slot with one of the others? It's tricky, as you asked to avoid conflicts with API SIG, Watcher, Mo

Re: [openstack-dev] [self-healing] [ptg] PTG track schedule published

Thierry Carrez wrote: Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, Last month we published the tentative schedule layout for the 5 days of PTG. There was no major complaint, so that was confirmed as the PTG event schedule and published on the PTG website: https://www.openstack.org/ptg#tab_schedule

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptg] PTG track schedule published

Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, Last month we published the tentative schedule layout for the 5 days of PTG. There was no major complaint, so that was confirmed as the PTG event schedule and published on the PTG website: https://www.openstack.org/ptg#tab_schedule The tab temporarily dis

[openstack-dev] [all] [ptg] PTG track schedule published

Hi everyone, Last month we published the tentative schedule layout for the 5 days of PTG. There was no major complaint, so that was confirmed as the PTG event schedule and published on the PTG website: https://www.openstack.org/ptg#tab_schedule You'll notice that: - The Ops meetup days were

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] New "validation" subcommand for "openstack undercloud"

On 7/16/18 6:32 PM, Dan Prince wrote: On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:27 AM Cédric Jeanneret wrote: Dear Stackers, In order to let operators properly validate their undercloud node, I propose to create a new subcommand in the "openstack undercloud" "tree": `openstack undercloud validate' This sho

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

Thank you very much to all for the recognition. I will use this power with responsibility, as Uncle Ben once said: https://giphy.com/gifs/MCZ39lz83o5lC/fullscreen Regards, Jose Luis On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:09 AM Carlos Camacho Gonza

[openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] placement update 18-29

HTML: https://anticdent.org/placement-update-18-29.html This is placement update 18-28, a weekly update of ongoing development related to the [OpenStack](https://www.openstack.org/) [placement service](https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/placement/). Thanks to Jay for providing one of th

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:43 AM Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:09 AM Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> Yeah I thought about this one too but I didn't have this challenge since >> I just wanted nova-compute & neutron-ovs-agent running on the edge. >> > > Actually I just faced it: > Er

Re: [openstack-dev] Disk space requirement - any way to lower it a little?

On 07/20/2018 09:49 AM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > > > On 07/19/2018 06:55 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> While trying to get a new validation¹ in the undercloud preflight >>> checks, I hit an (not so) unexpected i

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:20 AM Giulio Fidente wrote: > [...] >> >> I have started experimenting with edge deployments to help out on the >> split-controplane spec [1], which Steven started addressing >> >> I was able to deploy multiple

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:09 AM Emilien Macchi wrote: > Yeah I thought about this one too but I didn't have this challenge since I > just wanted nova-compute & neutron-ovs-agent running on the edge. > Actually I just faced it: Error: Failed to perform requested operation on instance "my-vm", the

Re: [openstack-dev] [edge][glance]: Image handling in edge environment

Hi, We figured out with Jokke two timeslots what would be okay for both of us for this common meeting. Please, other interested parties give your votes to here: https://doodle.com/poll/9rfcb8aavsmybzfu I will evaluate the results and fix the time on 25.07.2018 12h CET. Br, Gerg0 From: Csatar

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Proper behavior for os-force_detach

Nice, good to know. Thanks all for the feedback. We will fix that in our drivers. @Walter, so, in this case, if Cinder has the connector, it should not need to call the driver passing a None object right? Erlon Em qua, 18 de jul de 2018 às 12:56, Walter Boring escreveu: > The whole purpose of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:20 AM Giulio Fidente wrote: [...] > I have started experimenting with edge deployments to help out on the > split-controplane spec [1], which Steven started addressing > > I was able to deploy multiple stacks and isolated Ceph clusters, there > are some bits missing to p

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:09 AM Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote: > Hi!!! > > I'll like to propose Jose Luis Franco [1][2] for core reviewer in all the > TripleO upgrades bits. He shows a constant and active involvement in > improving and fixing our updates/upgrades workflows, he helps also trying >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][meta] Proposing Retiring the Stable Branch project

Tony Breeds wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:05:26PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: Hello folks, So really the subject says it all. I fell like at the time we created the Stable branch project team that was the only option. Since then we have crated the SIG structure and in my opinion that's

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 10:07 +0200, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote: > Hi!!! > > I'll like to propose Jose Luis Franco [1][2] for core reviewer in all > the TripleO upgrades bits. He shows a constant and active involvement > in improving and fixing our updates/upgrades workflows, he helps also > tryi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] prototype with standalone mode and remote edge compute nodes

On 07/19/2018 10:37 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Today I played a little bit with Standalone deployment [1] to deploy a > single OpenStack cloud without the need of an undercloud and overcloud. > The use-case I am testing is the following: > "As an operator, I want to deploy a single node OpenStack,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez < ccama...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi!!! > > I'll like to propose Jose Luis Franco [1][2] for core reviewer in all the > TripleO upgrades bits. He shows a constant and active involvement in > improving and fixing our updates/upgrades workflows

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

On 7/20/18 11:07 AM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote: Hi!!! I'll like to propose Jose Luis Franco [1][2] for core reviewer in all the TripleO upgrades bits. He shows a constant and active involvement in improving and fixing our updates/upgrades workflows, he helps also trying to develop/improve

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Jose Luis Franco for TripleO core reviewer on Upgrade bits

Hi!!! I'll like to propose Jose Luis Franco [1][2] for core reviewer in all the TripleO upgrades bits. He shows a constant and active involvement in improving and fixing our updates/upgrades workflows, he helps also trying to develop/improve/fix our upstream support for testing the updates/upgrade

Re: [openstack-dev] Disk space requirement - any way to lower it a little?

On 07/19/2018 06:55 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: >> Hello, >> >> While trying to get a new validation¹ in the undercloud preflight >> checks, I hit an (not so) unexpected issue with the CI: >> it doesn't provide flavors with the mini