see nova-docker maintained at least until Zun is not in beta
status.
Cheers,
--
Álvaro López García al...@ifca.unican.es
Instituto de Física de Cantabria http://alvarolopez.github.io
Ed. Juan Jordá, Campus UC tel: (+34) 942 200 969
Avda
ker? Will it support the same features in the (near) future?
Does it make sense to maintain nova-docker until Zun fills the gap?
Regards,
--
Álvaro López García al...@ifca.unican.es
Instituto de Física de Cantabria http://alvarolopez.github.io
Ed. J
ews. We tried to invest some effort on libvirt + Xen,
but unfortunately we didn't have enough resources to commit for this by
ourselves. Who is taking care of this?
Regards,
--
Álvaro López García al...@ifca.unican.es
Instituto de Física de Cantabria htt
libvirt+xen on Ubuntu, using theblktap2-dkms package and a
3.5 kernel (we couldn't use it with t a 3.8 due to this bug that seems
resolved now [1]).
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blktap-dkms/+bug/1078843
Regards,
--
Álvaro López García al...@ifca.uni
e know if this is a code bug or rather a WSGI configuration
> setting that I missed?
Just for the record, we have a similar problem in Havana, so a bug has
been filled for this [1].
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1298462
Regards,
--
Álvaro López García
On Sat 16 Nov 2013 (17:43), Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 11:18 AM, Álvaro López García wrote:
> > On Fri 15 Nov 2013 (07:28), Dan Smith wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >
> > Hi Dan.
> >
> >> As you know, Nova adopted a plan to require CI testin
nstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-October/016661.html
> Thanks!
>
> --Dan
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Álva
50362/
[2]
https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/auth/controllers.py#L335
[3]
https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/auth/controllers.py#L342
--
Álvaro López García al...@ifca.unican.es
Instituto de Física de Cantabria h
tion as part
> of a review, they also submit the replacement text rather than just -1.
> - The submitter incorporates that change into a patch
I totally agree on this. A -1 without a proposed change is totally
useless (I've never found such a review though).
Regards,
--
Álvaro Ló
Hi Adam.
On Wed 30 Oct 2013 (11:08), Adam Young wrote:
> On 10/30/2013 05:38 AM, Álvaro López García wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> >Please take
> >into account that external authentication and the REMOTE_USER stuff
> >can be used without any federation at all. For example i
hentication and the REMOTE_USER stuff
can be used without any federation at all. For example if an org
is providing their users with X509 certificates and they want to
use that for authentication instead of username/password. In this case
there would be no authz, no mapping, etc., just a
3/
[4] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+spec/auth-plugins
Regards,
--
Álvaro López García al...@ifca.unican.es
Instituto de Física de Cantabria http://alvarolopez.github.io
Ed. Juan Jordá, Campus UC tel: (+34) 942 200 969
Avda. de
ps://review.openstack.org/#/c/50362/
[3] http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_ssl.html#sslusername
--
Álvaro López García al...@ifca.unican.es
Instituto de Física de Cantabria http://alvarolopez.github.io
Ed. Juan Jordá, Campus UC tel: (
-July/011260.html
Regards,
--
Álvaro López García al...@ifca.unican.es
Instituto de Física de Cantabria http://alvarolopez.github.io
Ed. Juan Jordá, Campus UC tel: (+34) 942 200 969
Avda. de los Castros s/n
39005 Santander (
Hi again.
Thank you for your reply, Sandy. Some more comments inline.
On Thu 01 Aug 2013 (10:04), Sandy Walsh wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 09:51 AM, Álvaro López García wrote:
> > On Thu 01 Aug 2013 (09:07), Sandy Walsh wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2013 04:24 AM, Álvaro López García w
On Thu 08 Aug 2013 (17:45), Joe Gordon wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Álvaro López García <
> alvaro.lopez.gar...@cern.ch> wrote:
>
> > Hi John.
> >
> > On Wed 07 Aug 2013 (15:56), Joe Gordon wrote:
> > > Can you provide more detail in the B
ers
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Álvaro López García <
> alvaro.lopez.gar...@cern.ch> wrote:
>
> > Dear all.
> >
> > I've registered a blueprint [1] to improve and extend the current
> > image cache handler on the compute nodes, so that we can ha
maybe get an approval or not)?
Cheers,
--
Álvaro López García al...@ifca.unican.es
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On Thu 01 Aug 2013 (09:07), Sandy Walsh wrote:
>
>
> On 08/01/2013 04:24 AM, Álvaro López García wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > TL;DR: I've created a blueprint [1] regarding weight normalization.
> > I would be very glad if somebody could examine and commen
usting the multiplier. This is explained in [1], and
implemented in [2] (with some suggestions by the reviewers).
[1]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=normalize-scheduler-weights
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27160/
Thanks for your feedback,
--
Álvaro Ló
;cloudy' an architecture that *requires* instances and
> volumes be on the same node. If we treat instances as ephemeral and
> volumes as persistent having them live on the same node is a contradiction.
I do fully agree with this. In the worst case, a machine requiring
affinity with a
n
failing. Moreover, the filter implies that the user has some knowledge
on the infrastructure (i.e. that volumes and instances can be
coallocated) and it is only available for LVM drivers, whereas the
weigher should work transparently in all situations.
Cheers,
--
Álvaro López García
; [2] and IMO this goes against a one true open cloud.
Why do you think [2] goes in that direction?
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Á
ut unfortunately I couldn't. I am working
in the following implementation, so probably it is worth to be added to
the BP items so as to be discussed in the next meeting:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/normalize-scheduler-weights
Cheers,
--
Álvaro López García
24 matches
Mail list logo
