+1
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Matthew Mosesohn
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Alexey Shtokolov
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Stanislaw made a great contribution!
> > I would like to mention SSL-support, YAQL expressions for data-driven
> > orchestration
> > and his awesome li
+1
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Andrey Sledzinskiy <
asledzins...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa [0] and fuel-devops [1]
> core.
>
> Alexey is doing great job improving fuel-qa and fuel-devops projects.
> He's become an expert in code base in ver
Vova,
please don't forget merge #fuel-qa into a #fuel
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Nice. #fuel-infra is to merged as well.
>
> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova <
> afedor...@mirantis.com> wrot
+1
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Ivan Berezovskiy wrote:
> Thank you all for the trust! I'll do my best :)
>
> 2016-05-19 18:57 GMT+03:00 Alex Schultz :
>
>> +1 great job Ivan
>>
>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Matt Fischer
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me!
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 8:1
fuel/+spec/remove-logs-from-nailgun
>> 2. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/remove-logs-from_Nailgun
>>
>> - romcheg
>>
>> > 14 бер. 2016 р. о 09:53 Bogdan Dobrelya
>> написав(ла):
>> >
>> > On 03/14/2016 09:38 AM, Anastasia Urlapova wrote:
>>
+1 to Vitaliy, it would be nice find somewhere a details for migration.
And one more concern I should highlight - for some users logless UI may be
challenging thing.
The logs removing shouldn't affect the UX.
Nastya.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Andrew Woodward wrote:
> I think we can add
Igor,
I agree with folks, that we have to fix plugin. You didn't mention any real
reasons, why we should change workflow with example-plugin right now in the
middle of release. If we are keeping support of the example plugin in 9.0
it should work from box w/o any black magic in other places.
Nast
+1
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Denis Egorenko
wrote:
> I'm not a fuel core member, but i also would like to vote +1 for Matthew.
> He's doing great job!
>
> 2016-02-24 16:02 GMT+03:00 Aleksandr Didenko :
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Vladimir Kuklin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Fellow
Aleksey, great news!
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Alexey Shtokolov
wrote:
> Fuelers,
>
> Task based deployment engine has been enabled in master (Fuel 9.0) by
> default [0]
>
> [0] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273693/
>
> WBR, Alexey Shtokolov
>
> 2016-02-09 21:57 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ku
+1
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Evgeniy L wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
> vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 to enable it ASAP.
>>
>> It will also affect our deployment tests (~1 hour vs. ~2.5 hours).
>>
>> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8
+1
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Roman Vyalov wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin
> wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>>
>> Aleksey Kasatkin
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Vladimir Sharshov <
>> vshars...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> +1 from me to Bulat.
+1 to extend FFE by 1 day
Nastya.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Dmitry Klenov wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I would like to ask for FFE extension by 1 day. Reason: we didn't have
> green BVT today due to BUD network connectivity issue.
>
> Commits to merge:
>
>- https://review.openstack.org/#/c
Artur, Shura and Dima,
I want close the action item which I've got on the Fuel IRC meeting Nov
26th.
BP for investigation how we can(not) run HA tests on nodepool was created:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/qa-rnd-ha-on-nodepool
Milestone target is "next" cause we are close to FF for
@Vova,
thanks for bringing this up.
The new approach without docker containers on master node really has many
advantages.
@Igor,
regarding your question, I would say that we have many dependencies from
containers in CI/CD systems and test's codebase. The test alignment to the
new implementation wo
.
>>>
>>> IRC:...
>>> e.g. you'd just refer to the current folder, which should be root of the
>>> repo by default.
>>> Simon is asking a valid request: if you add his folder in the file, he
>>> will be always added to the review request
Simon,
structure of fuel-web repo is much more complex than fuel-qa, ~ 50 active
contributors work with fuel-web.
There is the functionality of the different Fuel domains and each requires
its own expertise, so maintenance is divided by folders.
In case of fuel-qa maintainers are doing review for w
t;>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> 2015-09-14 22:37 GMT+02:00 Ivan Kliuk :
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Anastasia Urlapova <
>>>> aurlap...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
Folks,
I would like to nominate Denis Dmitriev[1] for fuel-qa/fuel-devops core.
Dennis spent three months in Fuel BugFix team, his velocity was between
150-200% per week. Thanks to his efforts we have won these old issues with
time sync and ceph's clock skew. Dennis's ideas constantly help us to
i
riy Shulyak
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Anastasia Urlapova <
>>> aurlap...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Tatyana Leontovi
+1
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Tatyana Leontovich wrote:
> Fuelers,
>
> I'd like to nominate Andrey Sledzinskiy for the fuel-ostf core team.
> He’s been doing a great job in writing patches(support for detached
> services ).
> Also his review comments always have a lot of detailed informatio
+1
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko
wrote:
> +1, Evgeny has been a #1 committer in fuel-docs for a while, it's great to
> see him pick up on the reviews, too.
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:24 PM Irina Povolotskaya <
> ipovolotsk...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Fuelers,
>>
>> I'd lik
+1
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Aleksandr Didenko
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Vladimir Kuklin
> wrote:
>
>> +1 and also he is in US timezone, which should help us cover the globe
>> with Continuous Review process.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2,
Timur,
some numbers and devs recommendations you can find by link[0], it is our HA
Guid, feel free to contribute.
Nastya.
[0]
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HAGuideImprovements/TOC#HA_Intro_and_Concepts
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Timur Nurlygayanov <
tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> L
Yes, finally it happened!
First review was https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175366/
Nastya.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin
wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Aleksey Kasatkin
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Anastasia Urlapova <
> aurlap...@miran
;)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Best regards,
>>>> > Sergii Golovatiuk,
>>>> > Skype #golserge
>>>> > IRC #holser
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Vladimir K
Guys,
I would like to nominate Andrey Skedzinskiy[1] for
fuel-qa[2]/fuel-devops[3] core team.
Andrey is one of the strongest reviewers, under his watchful eye are such
features as:
- updrade/rollback master node
- collect usage information
- OS patching
- UI tests
and others
Please vote for Andre
+ 10
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:28 AM, Igor Zinovik wrote:
> +1
>
> On 26 March 2015 at 19:26, Fabrizio Soppelsa
> wrote:
> > +1 definitely
> >
> >
> > On 03/25/2015 10:10 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> >>
> >> Fuelers,
> >>
> >> I'd like to nominate Irina Povolotskaya for the fuel-docs-core tea
Mike, Dmitry, team,
let me add 5 cents - tests per feature have to run on CI before SCF, it is
mean that jobs configuration also should be implemented.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Mike Scherbakov
wrote:
> I fully support the idea.
>
> Feature Lead has to know, that his feature is under thre
Dmitry,
thank you that you raised this important discussion and added section @Test
and report bug.
>From my side I want notice, that we have many unclear bugs and sometimes is
very hard to verify such bugs.
The awesome example: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1357298
there are many questions
+1 for both
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh
wrote:
> +1
>
> 2014-10-10 16:35 GMT+07:00 Vladimir Kuklin :
>
>> Hi, Fuelers
>>
>> As you may have noticed our project is growing continuously. And this
>> imposes a requirement of increasing amount of core reviewers. I would like
>>
tal" tag to issues around Zabbix & Patching of
> OpenStack.
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Anastasia Urlapova <
> aurlap...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Mike, i've just want to say, if feature isn't ready for production use
>> and we have no other ch
Mike, i've just want to say, if feature isn't ready for production use and
we have no other choice, we should provide detailed limitations and
examples of proper use.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Tomasz Napierala
wrote:
>
> On 11 Sep 2014, at 09:19, Mike Scherbakov
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
>
> I think we should not count bugs for HCF criteria if they affect only
> experimental feature(s).
+1, absolutely agree, but we should determine count of allowed bugs for
experimental features against severity.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Nikolay Markov
wrote:
> Probably, even "experimenta
33 matches
Mail list logo
