On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:30:57PM -0500, Miguel Lavalle wrote:
> It is easy to get there by subway from the Summit venue:
> https://goo.gl/maps/HjaTEcBbDUR2. I made a reservation for 25 people under
> 'Neutron' or "Miguel Lavalle". Please confirm your attendance so we can get
> a final count.
I'm
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 03:17:21PM +, Xiao Ma (xima2) wrote:
> Hi , Ben
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I configured the bond0 using linux bond then the result is not good for
> minimum guaranteed bandwidth.
> But if I use ovs-vsctl add-bond to configure the bond0 interface, the result
> is
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 03:40:30AM +, Xiao Ma (xima2) wrote:
> I want to use the QoS feature of OpenvSwitch to control the bandwidth based
> on the vlan id(Scene 1) or port id(Scene 2).
> So I deployed it as showed bellow,and configured the qos rules,the flows,and
> used iperf tool to test it
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 10:28:31AM -0700, rezroo wrote:
> I'm trying to reconcile differences and similarities between OVN and
> OpenDayLight in my head. Can someone help me compare these two technologies
> and explain if they solve the same problem, or if there are fundamental
> differences betwee
gt; approach to avoid the challenges and potentially misaligned advise we got
> (per Yi Yang's mail)?
>
> Thx
>
> Uri ("Oo-Ree")
> C: 949-378-7568
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org]
> Sent: Tuesday
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:08:23AM +, Yang, Yi Y wrote:
> Ben, yes, we submitted nsh support patch set last year, but ovs
> community told me we have to push kernel part into Linux kernel tree,
> we're struggling to do this, but something blocked us from doing this.
It's quite difficult to get
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:12:34PM -0400, Paul Carver wrote:
> I don't know the details of why OvS hasn't added NSH support so I can't
> judge the validity of the concerns, but one way or another there has to be a
> production-quality dataplane for networking-sfc to front-end.
It looks like the la
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 09:27:31AM -0500, Ryan Moats wrote:
> As I understand it, Table 0 identifies the logical port and logical
> flow. I'm worried that this means we'll end up with separate bucket
> rules for each ingress port of the port pairs that make up a port
> group, leading to a cardinali
Sign me up, too.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 01:07:02PM -0500, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> OK, there is enough interest, I'll find a place on 6th Street for us
> and get a reservation for Thursday around 7 or so.
>
> Thanks folks!
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Zhou, Han wrote:
> > +1 :)
> >
> > H
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:45:39PM -0800, Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016, at 01:32 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:30:03PM +, Sean M. Collins wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:13:16PM CST, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > > > Forgi
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:30:03PM +, Sean M. Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:13:16PM CST, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > Forgive my ignorance, but if we are gating on OVS 2.0 that is because it
> > is what is shipped with the distros that we test on. Are we saying that
> > no one uses the
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 05:58:14PM +, Frances, Margaret wrote:
> 2. OpenFlow¹s Goto instruction directs a frame from one table to the next.
> A redirection in this sense must be to a higher-numbered table, which is
> to say that OF pipeline processing can only go forward (see p.18, para.2
> of
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 07:05:44PM -0700, Chandra Sekhar Vejendla wrote:
> The reason for the failure of these tests has got to do with the way
> OVN handles router interface. In openstack multiple subnets can be
> added to a network and for each of these subnets the router interface
> has to be ex
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:07:32PM +0300, Gal Sagie wrote:
> If you are not familiar with Kuryr you can read my blog post about it here
> [1].
> Basically we already have a working demo integrating with Neutron and we
> are going to show
> it in OpenStack Tokyo (probably in the keynotes and in a sp
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:19:47AM +0300, Gal Sagie wrote:
> *OVN*
>
>1) OVN integration with Kuryr
Can you say anything more about what that entails?
Thanks,
Ben.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage q
Are you planning to remain involved with OpenStack?
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> I'm writing to let everyone know that I do not plan to run for Neutron PTL
> for a fourth cycle. Being a PTL is a rewarding but difficult job, as Morgan
> recently put it in his non-candidac
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 03:00:17PM -0500, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> I know we're not even at the Liberty Design Summit in Vancouver yet, but I
> wanted to take this time to announce the Neutron mid-cycle coding sprint
> for Liberty. HP has been gracious enough to offer to host at it's Fort
> Collins, C
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 09:53:23AM +0100, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159840/1/doc/source/testing/openflow-firewall.rst
>
>
> I may need some help from the OVS experts to answer the questions from
> henry.hly.
>
> Ben, Thomas, could you please? (let me know if
OVS bridge corresponding to the
> physical network. The bridge usually then has a physical interface added to
> it for the tagged traffic to use to reach the rest of the network.
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > What kind of VLAN support would y
witching openflow rules,
> > which is going to be severely affectedby the way we use to handle OF rules
> > in the bridge:
> >* via OpenFlow, making the agent a ???real" OF controller, with the
> > current effort to use the ryu framework plugin to do that. * via
> &
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 07:48:51AM +0100, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
> Also, ipset groups can be moved into conjunctive groups in OF (thanks Ben
> Pfaff for the
> explanation, if you’re reading this ;-))
You&#
[branching off a discussion on ovs-dev at this point:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-February/051609.html]
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> One thing to keep in mind, this ties somewhat into my response to Russell
> earlier on the decision around ML2 vs. core plug
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:45:46PM +0100, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
> On Thursday, 19 de February de 2015 at 23:15, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Ben Pfaff > (mailto:b...@nicira.com)> wrote:
> > > My initial reaction is that we can impl
t; [Adding neutron tag to subject, comments below.]
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> >> [moving this conversation to openstack-dev because it's more
> >> interesting there and that avoids crossposting to a subscribers-only
>
hu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:38:03AM +0100, Miguel ??ngel Ajo wrote:
> Thank you Ben!,
>
> Cross posting [1] to openstack list /neutron.
>
>
> [1] http://benpfaff.org/~blp/dist-docs.
>
> On Thursday, 19 de February de 2015 at 09:13, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Thu,
[moving this conversation to openstack-dev because it's more
interesting there and that avoids crossposting to a subscribers-only
list]
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:57:02AM +0100, Miguel ??ngel Ajo wrote:
>I specially liked the VIF port lifecycle, looks good to me, Ionly miss
> some
> ???port
26 matches
Mail list logo
