with baby steps.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 07/22/2014 11:58 AM, David Kranz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
Honestly, I'm really not sure I see this as a different program, but is
really something
test coverage and making Rally absolutely
safe to run against any production cloud)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
.
* 950 commits over last 10 months
* Large, diverse contributor community
*
http://stackalytics.com/?release=junometric=commitsproject_type=Allmodule=rally
* http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/rally/180
* Non official lead of project is Boris Pavlovic
* Official election In progress
that we will get soon OSprofiler (
https://github.com/stackforge/osprofiler) in upstream: it will answer on
such questions like where is the bottleneck.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 9:07 AM, fdsafdsafd jaze...@163.com wrote:
Did someone test the concurrency of nova's resize
: 1,
users_per_tenant: 1
},
quotas: {
nova: {
cores: -1,
. here other values from
https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/rally/benchmark/context/quotas.py#L32-L80
}
}
}
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014
Joe,
What about running benchmarks (with small load), for all major functions
(like snaphshoting, booting/deleting, ..) on every patch in nova. It can
catch a lot of related stuff.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote
/osprofiler
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote:
Hello all,
I was looking for audit logs in nova. I found [1] but could not find the
launchpad entry audit-logging as mentioned in the wiki page.
Is this yet
Ben,
As I know the API of oslo.db and oslo-incubator/db are almost the same.
So why it should be complicated?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
+27, -2401
Wow, that's pretty painless. Were there earlier patches
when
changes (features) are small, don't affect too much, and they are optional.
It really kills OpenStack. And will drastically slow down process of
contribution and reduce amount of contributors.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
OpenStack-dev
Victor, Roman, Doug
Great work! kudos!
Ready to be first adopter=)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 6/19/14, 3:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Victor Sergeyev vserge...@mirantis.com
running benchmark.
Thoughts?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
+1 =)
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:57 PM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org
wrote:
The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure:
contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2
Hi Nachi,
Sorry for question, but did you try stackalytics?
E.g. this page http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/neutron/30
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi folks
As per neutron discussion, we agreed
Bruno,
Btw great idea add benchmark scenarios for quotas as well!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Bruno Semperlotti
bruno.semperlo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joshua,
Quotas will not be expanded during the scenario, they will be updated
*prior* the scenario
Bruno,
Well done. Finally we have this feature in Rally!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Bruno Semperlotti
bruno.semperlo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rally users,
I would like to inform you that the feature allowing to update tenant's
quotas during a benchmark
Oleg,
Seems like very interesting topic.
Especially I am interested in how could be this integrated with production
clouds (could it be run on controllers?). What API it present and is there
integration with horizon?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Oleg Gelbukh
+2 =)
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
Hi.
I would like to run for the OpenStack Compute PTL position as well.
I have been an active nova developer since late 2011, and have been a
core reviewer for quite a while. I am currently serving on the
/30
Thoughts?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Kun,
Welcome to Rally core team! =)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Gareth academicgar...@gmail.com wrote:
nice to join you guys ; )
On Monday, March 24, 2014, Hugh Saunders h...@wherenow.org wrote:
+1
Kun has been very active on gerrit, and contributed
are using are bad
2) Architecture solutions that we are using are bad
And start thinking about how to improve them.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/43151/
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buran_(spacecraft)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Sean Dague s
to that framework
c) replace API stuff using ceilometer (for logs) or this framework (for
restorable stuff)
To put in a nutshell: Restoring Delete resources / Delayed Deletion != Soft
deletion.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Mike Wilson geekinu...@gmail.com wrote:
For some
of OpenStack Resource in common way
without these hacks with soft deletion in DB. It is actually very
simple, take a look at this document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WGrIgMtWJqPDyT6PkPeZhNpej2Q9Mwimula8S8lYGV4/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
Joshua,
Fully agree, seems like Mistral duplicates a lot of efforts of TaskFlow.
I just don't see any reason why Mistral is reimplementing TaskFlow and not
just adding new features to...
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.comwrote
couldn't be
implemented in TaskFlow (or Joshua will be totally disagree).
Otherwise seems like Mistral team didn't spend time to investigate already
existing OpenStack solutions..
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Stan Lagun sla...@mirantis.com wrote:
Joshua, Boris
Joe,
Fully agree. We should just make a blueprint Get rid of soft deletion. So
we will get much better performance of DB + cleaner code, and avoid such
things like shadow tables and DB purge scripts.
Probably we should some other thread to cover this topic?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
) On .delete() store info about records in (ceilometer, or somewhere
else)
3.4-6) similar to 1.1, 1.2, 1.3
This is not ready RoadMap, just base thoughts to start the constructive
discussion in the mailing list, so %stacker% your opinion is very
important!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
://review.openstack.org/#/c/76718/
So Doug could you please merge our revert to revert:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76836/
And we will sync it to nova:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76880/
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
://review.openstack.org/#/c/76718/
So Doug could you please merge our revert to revert:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76836/
And we will sync it to nova:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76880/
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Mike,
What version of tox do you use?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I am trying to figure out how I should be doing unit testing, and
documenting it in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow
Oddly
of cong params)
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally
[2]
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57240/27/doc/samples/deployments/multihost.rst
[3] https://github.com/pboris/osprofiler
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:38 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
I
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-incubator/tree/master/openstack/common/apiclient
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Jesse Noller
jesse.nol...@rackspace.comwrote:
As I said last week; we're ready to kickoff and have regular meetings for
the unified python SDK project. The initial meeting is scheduled
you Alexei for all work that you have
done.
Thoughts?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hugh,
welcome to Rally core team!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Ilya Kharin ikha...@mirantis.com wrote:
+1 for Hugh
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Sergey Skripnick
sskripn...@mirantis.comwrote:
+1 for Hugh, but IMO no need to rush with Alexei's
Monty,
One of the bugs that can produce random issues=)
https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/blob/master/oslo/messaging/_drivers/impl_rabbit.py#L548
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.comwrote:
On 02/04/14 at 10:39am
schema we should add tests that will check that model
migrations are synced.
(we are working on this)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Andrew Lazarev alaza...@mirantis.comwrote:
Trevor,
Such check could be useful on alembic side too. Good opportunity
Hi,
Nice work Oleg!
Soon we should also have tempest verification of cloud.
So we should add to API it as well.
Something like deployements/{id}/verify?{type}
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Oleg Gelbukh ogelb...@mirantis.com wrote:
I've finished the v0.1
around Web UI)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:32 PM, LELOUP Julien julien.lel...@3ds.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
I’m forwarding my own email previously posted on the QA list.
I would like to discuss about the cleanup() process used right after a
stress test run
retry logic in python clients?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Frittoli, Andrea (Cloud Services)
fritt...@hp.com wrote:
Hi all,
I’ve been working on a patch to ensure that all
models, that it is
useless for every other project.
So I don't think that forkit in such state of Nova Scheduler is useful for
any other project.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Jay
.
Not sure that nova history is right history for scheduler (Why not Cinder
for example? why exactly Nova?).
Imho Scheduler aaS for all projects and Nova Scheduler
are different things.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote
, that is actually just Nova copy paste is under
openstack?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
Here come a question related to AvailabilityZoneFilter.
A new project Gantt which is a common scheduler for OpenStack
installation pass SLA
4) Ensure that OpenStack VMs have their resources and work as expected
(already started discussion)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
I think there also needs to be a scalability best practise
will get it..
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
Thanks.. can you advise where the accumulated experience from Rally will
be assembled ?
Rally gives me the method to test my cloud but we also need to have a set
Hi all,
We made a etherpad about memcached based scheduler:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/scheduler-design-proposal
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com
wrote:
1) Scheduler as a Service (review BP
https
as a log collector.
And we already made patch for this in Ceilometer:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60262/
So it will be nice to get it reviewed/merged.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10 2013, Nadya
...
I hope that this email will help everybody to be more involved in Rally.
Btw any ideas about how to improve current project organization will be
really super useful. Thanks.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack
, and thank you for understanding.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Russell,
Actually what I said is not only related to Solumn or any other project.
Main idea of it was that, well structured etherpads are much better
instrument for such discussions.
Do you disagree with this also?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Russell Bryant
All,
Thank you guys for your opinion.
As a conclusion of this thread, I think that I shouldn't hesitate to raise
all discussion about Rally in mailing list also.. Right?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
On 5
scheduler as a big lib, then implement RPC methods + bit of
business logic in each project
2) Move all RPC calls from nova,cinder,ironic,... and business logic in 1
scheduler as a service
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Khanh-Toan Tran
khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.com
, that could be ported from
zipkin.
So, it will be nice if you will be able to join our efforts. And help with
testing ceilometer build OpenStack profiling system.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.comwrote:
On 11/29/2013 11:32 AM
integrated projects that use the code are using the library instead of the
incubator, we can delete the module(s) from the incubator.
Sounds good and right.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Eric Windisch e...@cloudscaling.comwrote:
Based on that, I would like
Robert,
Btw, I would like to be a volunteer too=)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
On 22 November 2013 23:55, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
I'm looking for 4-5 folk who have:
- modest Nova
malina scheduler rpc method to scheduler service
5) Remove Malina Scheduler
I don't think that it is step backward as it was mentioned in etherpad..
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
https://etherpad.openstack.org
persons) that will track all changes in project and prepare such updates
each week.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
--
Mirantis Inc.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
please?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
as well.
In case of memcached I just say one of arch, that you could run on each
server with scheduler service memcahced instance. But it is not required,
you can have even just one memcached instance for all scheulers (but it is
not HA).
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
On Sun, Nov 17
is nothing for memcached. So what kind of instances?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Alex Glikson glik...@il.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Boris,
This is a very interesting approach.
How do you envision the life cycle of such a scheduler in terms of code
repository, build
of object, and wait until it becomes ready.
openstack-rally command raised such exception because all calls of
snapshot_server method failed.
So we try to aggregate empty list of results. Could you file a bug in
launchpad?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
--
Mirantis Inc.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5
Jay,
yep Dolph is right #openstack-meeting
Dolph,
Thanks
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/28/2013 08:34 AM, Boris
and shouldn't be -2.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
Hi.
Because I am a grumpy old man I have just -2'ed
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39685/ and I wanted to explain my
rationale. Mostly I am hoping for a consensus to form
Johannes,
+1, purging should help here a lot.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Johannes Erdfelt johan...@erdfelt.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Johannes Erdfelt johan...@erdfelt.com
regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote:
Johannes,
+1, purging should help here a lot.
Sure, but my point is more:
- pruning isn't done by the system
development workflow:
6.a) project is on stackforge and we use stock jenkins
6.b) launchpad with BPs, Bugs and Questions
6.c) wiki on http://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally,
What the rest of OpenStack are you speaking?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 2:38 AM
David,
Yes, that is the goal.
We should be able to get information about how it works, not only that it
works.
And get such interesting results:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally#How_influence_amqp_rpc_single_reply_queue_on_performance
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc
form. (Tomograph, Zipking, matplotlib...)
So I am not sure that we should put inside Tempest Rally, because Rally use
tempest. It is something like putting Nova into Cinder =)
Also putting Tempest into Rally is not a good idea. (same as putting Cinder
back to Nova).
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
know the name.
Might just be a good idea to check the trademarks and such beforehand,
to avoid a change at a later stage.
Or, alternately, just have Rally as part of Tempest.
-jay
From: Boris Pavlovic bpavlo...@mirantis.com
mailto:bpavlo...@mirantis.com**
Reply-To: OpenStack Development
://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/RoadMap
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:boris-42+status:merged,n,z 5. My
Contribution statistics:
http://stackalytics.com/?release=allmetric=commitsproject_type=Alluser_id=boris-42
Best regards, Boris Pavlovic --- Mirantis Inc.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
+1
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Shake Chen shake.c...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Ravi Chunduru ravi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.comwrote:
Greetings,
I would like to run for the OpenStack
Hi Joshua,
+1 to discuss it on oslo.db session!=)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
--
Mirantis Inc.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Roman Podolyaka
rpodoly...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi Joshua,
This looks great!
We definitely should consider this to become the base of oslo.db, as
currently
Nikola,
The main problem in this case that we use DB in wrong way.
If you need in online request to return 100k rows then you are doing
something wrong IMHO. And this fix is better then nothing (and it is the
best thing that we could do).
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013
You should add also corresponding migration in:
Nova/db/sqlalchemy/migrate_repo/...
Send from my phone
02.09.2013, в 12:41, Peeyush Gupta gpeey...@ymail.com написал(а):
Hi,
I have been trying to add a new column to compute_nodes table.
I understand the table is defined at
in the same time)
2) Sync Models and Migrations (fix DB schemas also)
3) Add from oslo generic test that checks all this stuff
4) Use BASE.create_all() for Schema creation instead of migrations.
But in OpenStack is not so simple to implement such huge changes, so it
take some time=)
Best regards,
Boris
projects, IIRC... (Glance used to be this way,
at least)
And it is totally unsafe (because result of models and migrations are
different)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/27/2013 04:32 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Jay,
I should probably share to you
won't need to provide sqlite in migrations and will use Alembic
without any problems.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote:
Jay,
We are not able to use in this approach in moment because we don't have
any
-sync is good?=)
Where is so big difference, and could somebody explain me? (I mean real use
cases from life where oslo sync is good and submodules are bad)
Thanks.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Mac
that second variant is much cleaner then first.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
*sigh* I wish I'd been aware of these conversations and been in the
Grizzly summit session on soft delete...
What specific unique
and it will take a
lot of time to implement it. E.g. I started working around unique keys at
begin of the Grizzly and we still didn't finish this work in OpenStack
projects (except Nova where we have last the patch on review
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36880/).
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
--
Mirantis
Flavio,
Agreed. I'd also like to see other project migrated before pulling
oslo.db out from oslo-incubator
as I wrote before oslo.db code is used by: Nova, Neutron, Cinder, Ironic,
Ceilometer use oslo.db. And we have already patches to switch in Glance to
id. And we are woking in Keystone and
Flavio,
So could you review please patches in Glance? =)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
--
Mirantis Inc.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 19/08/13 04:33 -0700, Gary Kotton wrote:
So are you agree with next points?
1) In Havana focus on migrating
).
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Mark Washenberger
mark.washenber...@markwash.net wrote:
Thanks for refocusing the discussion on your original questions!
Also thanks for this additional summary. I consider the patches you have
up for review
Hi All,
Could somebody answer me, why we are merging oslo code in other projects
and don't use
git submodules (http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Submodules)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
--
Mirantis Inc.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
be happy to look at a demo of a submodule based system for projects
to use code from oslo-incubator.
Probably we should just try, and analyze what approach is better?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
--
Mirantis Inc.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
What do
Hi Mark,
Sounds good. Just needs someone willing to implement it.
This is very interesting for us.
What do you think if we create a fake project that use submodules as an
example, and then just discuss it?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
--
Mirantis Inc.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Mark
+1
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 07/31/2013 03:10 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
Greetings,
I propose that we add Nikola Đipanov to the nova-core team [1].
Nikola has been actively contributing to nova for a while now, both in
code and reviews. He
agreed that it would be discussed on the coming summit.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
--
Mirantis Inc.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Wang, Shane shane.w...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
** **
I have a patchset ready for your review
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38802
Gary,
+1 for groups
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible that we also discuss the instance groups. This was
blocked because the new API did not support objects. The relevant patches
for objects have
much more:
1) network load
2) latency
3) one more service (memcached)
So I am not sure that it is better then just send directly to scheduler
information.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 23, 2013
Joe,
Sure we will.
Mike,
Thanks for sharing information about scalability problems, presentation was
great.
Also could you say what do you think is 150 req/sec is it big load for qpid
or rabbit? I think it is just nothing..
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013
to schedulers.
I think that patch-set that change this thing will be pretty small
(~100-150 lines of code) and doesn't requirers big changes in current
scheduler implementation.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
Mirantis Inc.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote
cores would like to implement current PCI passthrough
approach anyway.
I won't block anything and tomorrow at evening will be finished DB layer
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
Per the last summit
Hi one more time.
I will refactor DB layer tomorrow. As I said I don't want to be a block.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote:
Ian,
I don't like to write anything personally.
But I have to write some
this all could be really simple implement in current
Nova, without big changes
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_DRv7it_mwalEZzLy5WO92TJcummpmWL4NWsWf0UWiQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
Mirantis Inc.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
IIUC
to run rpc call to schedulers immediately (not after 60sec).
So there is almost no races.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
Mirantis Inc.
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.comwrote:
On 07/19/2013 05:01 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Sandy,
Hm I don't know
which
produce the same count of RPC calls).
So I don't see any explosion here.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
Mirantis Inc.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.comwrote:
On 07/19/2013 04:25 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
I think Soren suggested this way back in Cactus
constraint with correct name.
Probably we should rethink this rule?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
Mirantis Inc.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
are not able to use models created DB for unit tests.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Roman Podolyaka
migration to one Really huge migration in
alembic (it is also more complex then our 1 step)
So instead on doing 1 long but simple step we are doing 2 complex. Could
you explain me why?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:16 PM, David Ripton drip...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/16
201 - 300 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
